can confirm it's rankeable
Lol well this is interestingWafu wrote:
If lopkyy really did make a collab with you, sure, add lopkyy in tags. But he didn't post anything here (and has played 12 minutes of taiko overall)
regardless your abilities everyone know how to put circles in the editor, and i repeat it's a collab not a rankeable diff made by a "irrelevant" player with 12 minutes of taiko. no one posted anything here for a long time as you can see here and lopkyy stopped playing this game, because this i only called he again when i qualified this song, a thing that we dreamed 1 year ago.Kisses wrote:
Lol well this is interestingWafu wrote:
If lopkyy really did make a collab with you, sure, add lopkyy in tags. But he didn't post anything here (and has played 12 minutes of taiko overall)
i already understood the context, i read wafu's replySinnoh wrote:
Stop twisting what Wafu said about irrelevant. The context he used it in was that the tag was not related to the set because Wafu assumed lopkyy did not map anything, not because lopkyy is irrelevant as a person.
agree with wafu's statement, if he only put 1 or 2 notes in your diff, its not a collab dude, at least tell me which part that he made ?Wafu wrote:
If lopkyy really did make a collab with you, sure, add lopkyy in tags. But he didn't post anything here (and has played 12 minutes of taiko overall), can we get some clarification from lopkyy? We need to know if he really participated to know if he truly can be in tags.
-Sh1n1- wrote:
dunno why this guy makes the map more complicated
@Igor: Lopkyy in description is more than enough if you really want to show gratitude, do you really want to rank the map? just remove and everything should be ready to go.
I just want to proceed with the requalification of the map and avoid the useless drama about BGs and tags, I hope this post will start a new discussion about the map itself and not irrelevant things.General
- 01:15:424 - there are some things I wanna point out here:
Click me~~My suggestion here is map this part with notes:kantan and Futsuu: Spinner until 01:16:608 -
Muzukashii: Slider until 01:16:510 -
Oni: stream until 01:16:510 -Click me~~Kantan: 01:15:424 - 01:15:819 - 01:16:213 - everything as k
Futsuu: 01:15:424 - 01:15:621 - 01:15:819 - 01:16:213 - everything as k and then 01:16:608 - as d
Muzukashii: 01:15:424 - 01:15:621 - 01:15:720 - 01:15:819 - as k, 01:16:016 - as d, 01:16:213 - 01:16:411 - as k and 01:16:608 - as d
Oni: 01:16:608 - add a note here, it's true that drums are not prominent until here but voice is strong enough to deserve a note imo, also to match with my previous suggestions of additions on the other diffs. you are only saying to remap- Same thing with 01:28:746 (34) - Futsuu and 01:28:845 (285) - Muzukashii, they should be mapped imo, also why they start in a different place? @-@
Kantan
- 01:13:056 - add k here, this part feels too empty, current gap with higuer diffs is too long. ok
- 01:14:635 - I'll suggest you to add a note here too, d could be the best possible. yeah
- 01:43:845 (42) - to avoid a repetitive pattern cause you have triplets in 1/1 at the next section I wanna recommend you to remove such object and add 01:43:845 - d and k at 01:44:635 - no
Futsuu
- 00:12:069 - you miss a finish note here. yeah
- 01:05:161 (151,152,153,154) - this part doesn't match with 01:08:319 (159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166) -, dunno what are you following tbh, a possible solution to fix the current inconsistent between both sections also between all difficulties is moving 01:05:358 (152) - to 01:05:753 -, then 01:09:306 - to 01:08:911 - and 01:09:503 (162) - to 01:09:108 - i don't want change the structure here
- 01:11:871 (168,169) - this is kinda unconfortable for a newcommer imo and also for the sake of spread, I'll recommend you to move 01:11:871 (168) - to 01:11:674 - okay
- 01:23:121 - remove this note, you have more notes at this section than Muzukashii that is weird, also gap with katan is huge. again this (i'm looking Oni --> Kantan) see what i wrote in muzukashii
- 01:35:753 - remove pls, same as above ^
- kinda unfair that you have something to hit at 01:44:733 -01:44:832 - 01:44:931 - while Muzu is empty, I strongly recommend you to remove 01:44:437 - and then change 01:44:635 (75) - into d d k at 1/2. what it's the problem with my sliders? you only said remove all and change to... why i can't keep all change nothing ;-;
Muzukashii
- 00:48:977 (149,150,151,152,153) - dunno why your rhythm choice is different than Futsuu, I recommend you to move 00:49:569 - to 00:49:174 - to keep consistency with your futsuu and to add more vocal enphasis to 00:49:766 (152,153) - i want keep the enphasis here 00:48:977 -
- 00:50:950 (157) - this is kinda controversial for me, less enphasis to 00:51:740 - that deserve to be finisher (D), there should be a triplet at 00:50:950 -, also if you wanna add a slider here, why didn't you do the same at lower diffs?, remove slider and put notes imo. doesn't have triplets in my muzukashii @-@, and i put a slider because i want a transition less "agressive" to this calm part 00:52:135 -
- 00:53:911 (165) - move to 00:54:503 - to keep the same rhythm base as lower diffulties, kinda weird that the same mapper is following another sounds on the same song. it's a bit weird you say "the same mapper" when i call this a collab '^'
- 01:23:121 - add a note here to fix spread. i did the same thing here 01:35:753 -
- 01:26:477 - missing finisher here. yeah
- 01:35:753 - a note here will add more balance to the spread, dunno why futsuu has more notes here. as you can see, in futsuu doesn't have these notes 01:36:345 (309,311,313,315) - and in muzukashii doesn't have this note 01:35:753 (308) - so it's really to balance
- 01:41:477 (325) - it will be better as notes, trust me, what do you think about 01:41:477 - k, 01:41:674 - 01:41:773 - 01:41:871 - 01:42:069 - d and 01:42:266 - K i want keep my sliders
- 01:44:437 - remove cause adding more enphasis to drums it's important at this part, changing from 5-plet (Oni) into 1/2 transition (Muzukashii is too much imo), that's why I also wanna suggest you to add d at 01:44:733 - and 01:44:832 - i don't want triplets and i did the same thing here 00:12:463 -
Oni
- 01:28:056 - what hapenned here? are you skipping this sound on purpose? cause other diffs are following this sound with notes. yes,
maybe only my imagination,but i think a note here it's weird- 01:54:898 - you miss a finish here to keep consistency with your previous patterns. i think the sound here is a bit low, because this i didn't put note here 01:55:983 - too
That's all from my side, I hope it could be re-qualified soon, it's a great map!, good luck and remove Lopkyy from tags, don't be stubborn or you won't receive more help.
Kisses wrote:
@Sh1n1 I think the finish at 01:54:898 was intentionally skipped in the oni diff because of the fact the mp3 fades out good good xd
Oni[]I just wanted to test my modding skills ~
- 00:26:181 (127) - add don here? It flows well imo and would still keep the melody you were following from earlier wait... here
- 00:28:056 (131,135,137,141,143,147) - The finishes on these notes feel unnecessary. There doesn't feel a need to create so much emphasis when the song doesn't give it any. I'm not sure if it's your style but it does feel incredibly forced and plays a lot smoother when deleting the finishes again talking about change the structure of certain session
- 00:38:121 (152) - Listening to the drums surely a don would fit here better right? It would also give more emphasis to the final kat 00:38:319 (153) - my intention here is low to high, a don here break this
- 00:51:740 - For this section how about deleting notes like 00:53:319 (235) - 00:56:477 (250) - ? The long sequences doesn't really make me feel like I'm playing to a calmer part of the song and the long sequences don't work well with low SV it's a bit hard keep the 1/2 rhythm with slow SV
when you starts play oni. it's intentional, don't worry- 01:16:312 (342) - Personally I think this plays much better as a kat too hard
- 01:23:121 (377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401) - Looking at the spread between Futsuu > Muzu > Oni , the pattern you used here makes the spread really skewed it's your opinion, a problem or something else? .-.
- 01:46:115 (509) - 01:47:694 (519) - 01:49:273 (529) - I'm surprised you didn't have these notes as dons to play more closely to your patterns at the beginning of the map ^
back to stdyeah, it's really nice when we are trying to improve
already said by Shini lol okay and so Lopkyy still on tags?-Sh1n1- wrote:
Lopkyy in description is more than enough if you really want to show gratitude, do you really want to rank the map? just remove and everything should be ready to go.
right you can tell it now but it seems no clarity about this, I dont see lopkky involved with ranking process in here and from first time you made this set, theres no information about part which both of youve mapped, so the way out is remove lopkyy from tags. please reconsider about this if you really want this set get requalifiedPoii wrote:
if he only put 1 or 2 notes in your diff, its not a collab dude, at least tell me which part that he made ?
okaySurono wrote:
already said by Shini lol okay and so Lopkyy still on tags?-Sh1n1- wrote:
Lopkyy in description is more than enough if you really want to show gratitude, do you really want to rank the map? just remove and everything should be ready to go.right, you can tell it now. please reconsider about this if you really want this set get requalifiedPoii wrote:
if he only put 1 or 2 notes in your diff, its not a collab dude, at least tell me which part that he made ?
Surono wrote:
I saw Kisses point from 01:22:727 - here and its about spread
* delete 01:23:121 - this on futsuu and add notes on muzukashii, I dont know why 4plet 1/2 on futsuu ok
* 01:23:713 - 01:24:898 - 01:25:490 - add don around here, its similar with Kantan density ok
* 01:25:292 - just add don in here for futsuu, since oni has 3plet + finishers
I think the spread of this set would be fine and neat if you fix these
no i don't want your mp3, better now?Wafu wrote:
I also mentioned the mp3 quality in the older post, nobody still gave a response to it. I said I can give you a better one without changing offset. Yes, it is a suggestion, but you need to respond to everything with a reason. For the time being, I'll leave the sample-exact mp3 here. You are not forced to use it, but at minimum give your response to it.
vai ter voltaAtaraxia wrote:
saudades lopkyy foda . . .
qualifica ae nrml xddd
Lanturn wrote:
SILENT SIREN / Silent Siren / サイレント サイレン / サイレントサイレン
Regarding the artist field. When Silent Siren was published by Brand-New Music (http://www.brand-newmusic.co.jp/artist_ ... _siren.php) and dreamusic (http://dreamusic.co.jp/artist/silent-siren/profile/), they officially went by "Silent Siren" with "サイレント サイレン" (Brand-New Music) and "サイレントサイレン" (dreamusic) on the side for reading assistance. SILENT SIREN is now the bands current name under the label by EMI-RECORDS. (http://www.universal-music.co.jp/silent-siren/)
This song was published under Brand-New Music so the most appropriate Artist to use would be the first one
Artist: Silent Siren
The Katakana is just to assist the reader as shown on the official publisher site so it shouldn't be used (throw in tags). You can see the romanization only being used in the official music video as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4i1xbKCK7Y
Your current artist field uses dreamusic's artist choice.
tl;dr, remove the unicode artist and use Silent Siren.
That's not a proper answer. I agree with Lanturn's reasoning, if you do not have anything else to say, I will proceed with the disqualification in order for you to fix the issues mentioned above. Thank you!Igor Sprite wrote:
Naotoshi wrote:
Kurai tbm ta morrendoKurai wrote:
Naotoshi wrote:
ta tudo dando errado xdNet0 wrote:
@Igor Sprite Para com os meme velho, fodendo Valdomiro velho kkkk, só ajeita o artist pra Silent Siren nos dois campos e vai estar pronto pra qualificar novamente.
i don't know what is happening hereGabe wrote:
:weary: