1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted

Raiden wrote:

follow up

general
use the volumes that Chromoxx uses on kantan and futsuu, hitsounds are currently practically inaudible Increased volume to 90
bring the bg up on Chromoxx's diffs with the same value you did on kantan and futsuu (-100) Done

futsuu
00:11:631 (13,14,15,16,17,18,19) - why the sudden rhythm change from 00:03:006 (1,2,3,4,5) - i recommend making the entire intro slightly more dense to bridge the gap with muzu Replaced most of the section with the usual 3/2 pattern.

i feel like overall futsuu needs more 1/2 specially at the intro when the muzu is going 1/4 (like 00:07:881 - ) Added a couple 1/2s in the intro on 00:13:506 (24,25,26) -
01:07:506 - 01:24:006 - has the same problem but on a lower scale since muzu only uses one 1/4 Added a few notes

01:13:881 (158) - move to 01:14:068 - and delete 01:14:256 (159) - the sudden 1/1 rhythm kinda throws off the 3/2 feeling you've been gathering up during this section Replaced with the usual pattern
01:30:006 (198) - missing finisher Added
01:41:068 (234) - could have finisher for the jarring sound Added
01:41:631 (235,236) - both have potent sounds to warrant a finisher Added
Waiting for Chromoxx now
posted
chromoxx is quite busy IRL, so he asked me to fix it for him.

Raiden wrote:

chromoxx's muzukashii
01:01:881 (215) - could move this to 01:01:131 - to have the kick represented and instead have 01:01:881 - as a break signifying that the kiai is over and that a calm part is coming and and and and fixed
01:47:631 - you can map this potent kick, you have a 2/1 rest moment immediately after fixed for consistency with the similar one

chromoxx's oni
00:22:787 (93,95) - you could ctrlg these two so that the vocalist going up can be more represented i think he prefer to keep the kkk d instead of kdk k for the flow. It seems more consistent with pattern in general
01:01:131 - can map thisfdafd ye
01:55:318 (600,601,602) - could be a kdd i dont think the 3 notes share the exact same tone ye
01:56:818 (607,608,609) - samae but ddk? might be better to just let it as ddd. seems consistent with 01:50:818 (579,580,581) - 01:47:818 (565,566,567) -

chromoxx's inner
00:39:943 - i know there is a note here, but i feel having a doublet dk dk pattern would fit so much better with the vocalist
00:51:943 - saem (for both) understandable, tho, i think chromoxx wanna get emphasis on this d 00:52:037 (307) - by using k here 00:51:943 (306) -
01:11:256 - this note can be confused as a separate note, consider doing the buildup progressive? I don't feel like building up progressively the speed up does really fit the music. (however, i do not really like how it overlap in 16:9 ; but I still find it ok)
01:29:068 - could be 1/6 kkkd i hear 4 notes on the melody considering the fact the 1/6 is quite low, I think 1/4 is ok
01:41:443 (665,666) - finisher on both for extra emphasis? considering how its mapped I think it might be better to keep it as simple note. He used finisher on this part for strong vocal like 01:46:506 (711,712,713,715) -
01:58:506 - and 01:59:256 - similar as in 01:11:256 -

call me back!
posted
Updated!
posted
2

Kantan at the beginning could use simple 3/2, it currently is way too away from Futsuu which is filled with 3/2 + 1/1

add notes at spots like 00:03:568 - 00:05:068 - 00:06:568 - 00:09:568 - 00:11:068 - 00:12:568 -

and i think that should be all
posted
Added notes on all those points
posted


since ctb diffs remain unchanged, it's time to bring it back
posted
Placeholder. I will check the map as well as soon as possible.
posted
ok we're just gonna go ahead with this and if Nardo wants to finish things up in the next 7 days he has the chance to

foresight bundled when

fuaieqlid!!
posted
another deadline given to Nardo
posted
i'm somewhat not sure if the hitsounds are somewhat "sunk" over the music, as i play the map, i couldn't hear the hitsounds very well (yes i put effect volume 100% and music volume 100%, as well as the master volume 100%, play with SPEAKER instead of HEADPHONE)
posted
Could you guys stop skipping the checking procedure?
posted

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Could you guys stop skipping the checking procedure?
i got a bad feeling about this ._.
posted
No need to feel bad. I was extremely busy last week due to the unexpected work schedule of mine. Absolute Zero contacted me once through pm but I did not even have time to read the message until today. Therefore I will do a routine check instead as it falls into qualified category.
posted

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Could you guys stop skipping the checking procedure?
Don't try to make it look like something obscure happened here. The nomination of this beatmap follows all the rules: two different people, AZ is a full BN, both are qualified for one of the modes contained in the set, way more than 24 hours between bubble and qualification passed due to your placeholder (which don't actually mean anything).
posted

ZiRoX wrote:

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Could you guys stop skipping the checking procedure?
Don't try to make it look like something obscure happened here. The nomination of this beatmap follows all the rules: two different people, AZ is a full BN, both are qualified for one of the modes contained in the set, way more than 24 hours between bubble and qualification passed due to your placeholder (which don't actually mean anything).
I don't think nardo intends anything malicious lol

Being that Nardo was the one to DQ the map in the beginning, it was probably better that nardo confirmed his issues that he brought up were fixed and ready to be pushed again, rather than AZ lol

this is why we delete taiko diffs btw :^)))))
posted
The issues were checked and confirmed with another qat and the original qualifying members, nothing was skipped here.
There is no rule that every taiko set that gets DQed for spread issues must be checked by Nardoxyribonucleic.
If other members feel like it is ready, there is no reason to hold the set back over a week because of a placeholder.
If you are very busy it would be best to focus on maps that need focusing on instead of placeholdering many different threads and halting the ranking procedures on all of them...
posted
I apologize for the confusion. In the future I will be more considerate about what I do when.
posted
placeholder
Please sign in to reply.