and i would appreciate it if i did too0_o wrote:
I would appreciate it if iMuffin made more contributions to the game than prod responses and random/bandwagon votes.
and i would appreciate it if i did too0_o wrote:
I would appreciate it if iMuffin made more contributions to the game than prod responses and random/bandwagon votes.
Well... that's interesting... :< But yeah, you probably should've went for someone who could be of more risk.pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
this roleclaim only made me more suspicious :<pieguy1372 wrote:
roleclaim: Cop
Unfortunately, I haven't found any mafia yet. First night I checked Mashley and I couldn't complete my action, so perhaps we have a roleblocker in this game. Second night I checked E-Hooker and he's innocent.
Seeing as I'm almost dead, I practically have to do this.
Or you're providing a logical reason for pieguy to have checked you instead of pie himself, and he's not a cop.E-Hooker wrote:
I was probably investigated because at least two people believed/do believe/think that I am Mafia. I already said that's not the case, but pieguy seems to have checked up on me last night. Curiosity, perhaps?
Either way, i'm a townie, sorry Wojjie.
I'm not participating? k maybe instead i should throw together poorly worded excuses that make me seem more suspicious than the other way around. inb4 people claim this makes me suspicious.Mashley wrote:
Upon further consideration I'm going to Vote iMuffin... he's just refusing to participate in the game at all.
I'll participate hardMashley wrote:
Are you going to participate now?
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
if we lynched for inactivities i shouldn't really be the only one on the chopping block.0_o wrote:
You'll have all night for that.Wojjan wrote:
I really just want to kill him.
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
At this point I'm more in favor of a no-lynch since there's an even number of players. An extra round of night actions may be useful.
It's not inactivity I'm voting on, it's the complete vagueness of his posts and his determination not to get into any discussion. If you go through the thread more or less all his posts are bandwagon votes or, most recently, vague responses to me.0_o wrote:
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
I agree exactly.Mashley wrote:
It's not inactivity I'm voting on, it's the complete vagueness of his posts and his determination not to get into any discussion. If you go through the thread more or less all his posts are bandwagon votes or, most recently, vague responses to me.0_o wrote:
Thing is I'm not sure how wise lynching someone based on inactivity is in a potential lylo situation..
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :<0_o wrote:
Nonetheless, I still say no-lynch is the way to go. If there are 4 mafioso then we can't afford a mislynch today as that would leave us tied 4:4 tomorrow, thus we would lose. On the other hand, if we no-lynch today then the auxes would get another round of night actions, as well as increase the odds of lynching a mafioso. (Chance that a random lynchee is a mafia today = 4/10; chance tomorrow after a no-lynch = 4/9) We really have nothing to lose by postponing the lynch.
Vote no lynch
It's a game of "Do I chicken out or do I keep on?"Kitsunemimi wrote:
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :<0_o wrote:
Nonetheless, I still say no-lynch is the way to go. If there are 4 mafioso then we can't afford a mislynch today as that would leave us tied 4:4 tomorrow, thus we would lose. On the other hand, if we no-lynch today then the auxes would get another round of night actions, as well as increase the odds of lynching a mafioso. (Chance that a random lynchee is a mafia today = 4/10; chance tomorrow after a no-lynch = 4/9) We really have nothing to lose by postponing the lynch.
Vote no lynch
If you're wrong, we'll certainly lose an innocent overnight, while there was originally still room for error. In my opinion, it's not too hard to nail the Mafia by taking educated votes, we can't just sit around and let some people get killed until the odds are greater.
I'm actually leaning towards there being 3 mafia, but I'm preparing for the worst case scenario. The townies need an odd number of players, so even if there are 3 mafia a no-lynch would still be beneficial since we would have to do it at SOME point.Kitsunemimi wrote:
How are you so certain that there's 4 mafia? :< If you're wrong, we'll certainly lose an innocent overnight, while there was originally still room for error.
In my opinion, it's not too hard to nail the Mafia by taking educated votesYou mean like our last two lynches? Sure there is skill in spotting the mafia, but there definitely IS luck involved and no matter how you look at it we have a better chance picking a mafia member out of 9 people than 10
we can't just sit around and let some people get killed until the odds are greater.An innocent is going be killed tomorrow whether we lynch someone or not. If there are 4 mafia then we only have one shot - a no lynch would only move us closer to the target before shooting.