ur not hanser
[General]
I'd prefer if you made the image 1920 x 1080 but 1440x810 is still 16:9 aspect ratio so zz
01:12:113 - 01:14:489 - snap these green lines
get metadata confirmed by someone like kwan pls
[Easy]
00:23:281 (4) - I'm not really like the fact that the repeat slider ends up hitting a high pitched piano note here lol, try to make it clickable maybe?
[Hard]
00:33:974 (4,5) - 4 should have more emphasis than 5 imo, the like "shatter" sound seems more significant thatn what's on 5 (plus u emphasized it for 00:37:538 (3) - )
00:45:855 (6,7,1) - It would be nice if this slightly like built up in spacing to reflect the increasing intensity of the music here
00:47:340 (3,4) - tbh you might as well just increase spacing slightly so it doesn't overlap since the sound is pretty strong anyways
00:52:390 (2,3,4) - might be confusing tbh since you had 00:50:013 (1,2,3,4) - stacked, maybe change the way 00:50:013 (1,2,3,4) - is or just stack 00:53:132 (3,4) - under 2
[Special]
00:07:241 (1,2,3) - tbh I expected it to be more in like with the spacing with 00:03:677 (1,2,3) - since they're relatively same in music intensity
00:35:459 (5) - spacing is a bit much imo for a drum that isn't extremely loud lol
00:54:172 (3) - is a louder version of the sound on 00:52:983 (4) - but it's spaced less so zz
I have to say I kinda agree with bouncebabe here, some of the jumps in special feel pretty big, I feel like the jumps should be only from 00:46:449 - to 01:00:706 - since it's the most intense part but they appear from 00:32:192 - to 00:46:449 - which, while the music does pick up here, doesn't pick up nearly as much as 46 sec to 1 min. The part from 32 sec to 46 sec kinda "dulls" the emphasis that you coulda had on 46 onward since it's so much more intense imo
o yeah and fix ur banner to fit the thing when ur not on the forum lol