it's not a little set, but thank you!
Arrival wrote:Hello Senritsu <3 Hi Arrival ♥
Currently, the SV for Muzukashii and Oni is 1.97, I believe this is not intended and due to the current taiko edit bug, so be careful when you update the map ! omg kill me
00:15:560 (18) - Consider adding a note here, not only it fits and goes well with the music but it also breaks the monotony of a 2/1 rhythm. (04:05:170 - same here) but there IS a note? o3o
00:27:414 (34) - There is a lack of consistency here that is needed for a kantan imo. I'd put ddk just as you did here 00:49:588 (63,64,65) - . i dont see why consistency is needed on a song which has different kind of music lols
00:06:737 - Add a d here ? Feels weird without it imo. i want to make it different from Muzukashii, but i will think about this again later.
00:33:501 (69) - Try moving this note to 00:33:936 - , the current version makes a weird rythm imo, and moving this note here will fit better. 00:38:719 (82) - , same thing for this note if you follow this suggestion. agree. might have been a little tired when i mapped this
00:43:936 (95) - Delete this note ? Doesn't sounds well and if you remove it you'll have a nice build up towards the next part of the song. okay
01:20:893 (171,172,173,174,175) - This seems to be a difficuly spike a bit too high, you're going from a 1/1 and 2/1 rhythm to suddenly 5 1/2 notes. Consider deleting one of them. (I think of this note for exemple 01:21:328 (173) - ) i dont think that's a problem, because (1) it's a slow song and (2) the kiai part at the beginning can't be mapped any harder for this diff. but i will consider it also, thanks!
03:52:127 - To be consistent in this part, either add a k here OR delete this one 03:45:170 (37) - my fault
04:11:040 (1) - End this spinner here 04:19:953 - ?? Thats what you did in the Kantan. since i made muzu and oni also ends at the same spot at futsuu so i will change the kantan.
00:15:649 (31,32,33) - Well you should have a note on the red tick (00:15:913 - ), so I suggest moving the triplet by one 1/4 tick later. It plays better too imo. idk current one sounds fine for me, so lets see what other modders think about this
00:33:284 (94) - Move this note here 00:32:849 - , this note 00:35:023 (100) - here 00:34:588 - , and this 00:36:762 (106) - here 00:36:328 - Definitely sounds and plays better than the current version. uhhh dunno if i want this but.... this suits my style sooo...
00:38:067 - What about adding a note here ? (Same with 01:38:936 - etc) i purposely making them different because the second part is way merrier than the first one
00:46:545 (141,142,143) - Change them to k ? 1 -> To contrast with all the dons 2-> It will fit better with the high pitch of the music here 3-> To be consistent with 01:47:414 (342,343,344) - yeah agree
01:10:567 - Why don't you put a note here as you did there 01:08:828 (211) - ? for break, and also to make it not weird. if i add a note there, then the consequence is i have to follow the vocal on this part, meaning it same with Oni which i dont want to make
01:18:501 (239) - Since you're mainly following the vocals, consider moving this note here 01:18:936 - . changed. idk why i did that
02:12:414 (431,432,433,434,435,436) - Well all dons looks weird imo... But as you want. because you mention it, im changing to ddkdkd
02:33:719 (508) - This note shouldn't appear all of a sudden in this section, or if you want to keep it put doublets here 02:30:567 - and 02:32:306 - . i have my reasons here, but if more modders are complaining about this i will change this.
03:17:127 (40) - Same as 01:18:501 (239) - if you applied my suggestion
03:51:475 - Add a kat here and make 03:51:257 (164) - a don ? no absolute reason to do so, also im giving break here lols
01:16:545 (303) - Consider changing it to k to break the don chain here and marking the melody change. but the rest of my diff are don ((
01:38:610 - Add a not here ? To emphasize the little melody ? (Same for the other corresponding parts in the song if you do it ofc) i dont hear anything lols and i think it's better this way to emphasize the not-little one but emphasize what's audible for us
01:56:545 (496) - Change this to d to be consistent with 01:49:589 (470) - im emphasizing the vocal pitch's difference so
03:15:436 - This note is weird imo, I had trouble playing it in my first try. I would simply remove it. thanks for the suggestion i was also confused with this lol
Nice little set ! Good luck for quick ranking