ooooh another map for this
Lasse wrote:
9 months ago
add "recall" to tags so website search can find the map easier?
http://i.imgur.com/Tas1wCl.jpg
(it doesn't support ":" so you can't search the map there by using "Re:call")
ar9 is totally fine imo, currrent feels a bit too high
soft-hitfinish is very quiet and often really hard to even notice, should increase volume of the file or something
your intro (until 00:27:544 - ) just feels a bit too intense in contrast to other parts. how about just toning it down a bit?
for example 00:11:093 (2,3) - 00:12:383 (2,3) - could be stacks
00:14:480 (3,1) - really is too much though
01:28:190 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - how about adding some green lines here to follow the strong volume increase of piano?
02:08:835 (1,2) - so underwhelming, can you at least space them more? even though I think some clickable 1/6 would be great
02:10:448 (3,4) - shouldnt these be the same shape, just like you did on 02:09:480 (1,2) - ?
03:15:609 (2,3) - whyyyyyyy no clickable 1/6
(((((((((((
03:52:060 (1,2) - etc.
you could easily use the first occurance to introduce some recognizable way to map 1/3 and then utilize that
04:20:448 (3,4,1) - autostacking breaks this
https://i.imgur.com/r2fZMBy.jpg04:49:964 (2,4,5,1) - ^
04:24:964 - can you not storyboard hitsounds on clickable objects, that's just going to throw people off..
also volume seems too high
the others you used seemed acceptable, but here it's just weird and would be nicer to use as proper hitsound
05:04:319 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - isn't this 1/6
05:20:770 (1) - would start 1/4 earlier, cause the 1/2 gap after slider seems a bit too big as it's a halfbpm map
[]
I'm fine with some of the more improvised rhythms and some of your spacing/movement choices as they reflect the overall intensity fine, but the intro could really be toned down a little
also some clickable 1/6 would be great
feel free to call me back if you think you properly addressed these points!