because trying to have a constructive argument is the same as yelling. Of course people that never bother to have one would see it that way. Just go back where you came from.
Zains point was that camellias songs (and the adjacent maps) lack diversity because his songs follow a formula where he uses slow and fast part in alternating order. Never mind the fact that all anime openings so far are literally in
Verse-Chorus form, which is as generic as it gets. And don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with using a formula that worked super well for decades. If you complain that the overarching structure of a song is boring, you can either go listen to experimental music or to
songs that are so
short, that they only consist of one or two parts.
The thing is, none of this matters. There is plenty of leeway for interesting stuff within the standard "
intro - verse - chorus - verse - b-section - chorus - outro"-formula that is so commonly used. Especially when there are thousands of things going on at the same time and there are lots of rhythmic irregularities, as it happens to be the case with camellia songs. Saying that the formula itself makes for generic maps is really stupid, as most songs nowadays use it, anime songs included. I don't think anyone would claim that every map that has a song using this overarching structure, is boring. The relevant difference between most anime songs and camellia is: Anime songs tend to have nothing going on within the formula, it's just 4-4 all the way through. As a result, you get copycat jumpmap #15682.
Zain is one level of abstraction too high, complaining that there are slow and fast parts which makes his maps boring. In my comment, I go even higher by saying that all maps are just circles and sliders, which makes them lack variety, making it very clear how bad arguments can get when you choose to argue on the wrong level.