nice to see this actually improved quite a bit from when you had me testplay it some weeks ago!
just a few small things:
s00:03:229 (2) -doubt finish on tail is intended as it sounds pretty weird
00:04:309 (5,1) - removing one of these finishes might also sound better cause it sounds a bit too noisy
00:21:583 - this is really minor, but if you could make the bump fit with the strong sound here it would be awesome!
http://i.imgur.com/lLtwvj9.jpg00:59:184 - yes it follows the vocals fine, but having the transition into a new part suddenly not clickable seems a bit unfitting considering how you mapped other things
01:02:672 (4,7,8,1) - 01:04:068 (4,7,8,1) - 01:08:254 (5,8,9) - might want to adjust things like these for autostacking cause
http://i.imgur.com/0adDNQZ.jpg is eww // 04:54:823 (5,2) - for this part too
02:22:905 (1) - don't think finish really fits here o: same for the whole part until 02:33:980 - actually, they sound a bit too forced with the song being so calm and only having some high pitched sounds on these
03:03:719 (3,4) - sudden drop in rhythm intensity kills this a bit too much I think, why not replace 4 with a triple or kickslider+circle?
03:43:835 - hoyl can you reduce the finish usage after this a bit, seems a bit too overused. maybe go wuth 2/1 finishes?
05:07:033 (1) - sounds a bit "slow" for what you mapped it to, 1/8 should be nicer
05:29:533 - would increase volume in 5% steps instead so this can be higher volume cause starting the stream witha barely audible hitsound is really irritating
05:46:800 - sad to see the cymbal ignored here cause that is one of the things making this chorus different from before :c
06:17:797 (1) - why not mute sliderticks instead of slide here and have the slide barely audible? cause all the ticks on nothing sound weird
h00:33:893 (5,6) - since you spaced all other triples that follow similar sounds, having this spaced would be nice too
01:36:335 (2) - would be great to have the spacing here a bit more progressive, even if 01:36:684 (2) - stands out much in the song, the differnce with 01:36:161 (1,2) - feels rather jarring to play when you could do sth like
http://i.imgur.com/VVmnFky.jpg which would still work with your visuals
01:36:858 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - 9+3 comboing seems a bit weird when music goes 3+3+3+3. think either
http://i.imgur.com/ARjeLHx.jpg or
http://i.imgur.com/PFoEtrU.jpg would be great
01:54:562 (4) - think removing the repeat from these things would be great cause there isn't really anything worth mapping on 01:54:736 - and that puts more emphasis on the sound on the white tick // 05:53:166 (2) -
02:35:463 (1) - 02:36:858 (1) - so here you use finishes, but then for the second half of the part you don't use the, despite the music being so similar?
03:07:556 (1) - how about moving the nc to the next object cause that is where the part actually starts a
03:10:347 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - so much 1/2 clicking here feels a bit too forced with the white ticks being so much stronger in the song and you mapping all sliders around this-. 03:12:440 (3,4,5,6) - is nice cause it matches the transition though
03:23:602 (1) - why not 3/4 when 03:23:951 (1) - is so similar and 3/4? would match the vocals and that fading in stuff much better // 05:36:161 (1) -
04:33:719 (9) - shouldnt this go on until the blue tick? one repeat buffer is enough for playability anways
05:11:219 (6,7,8) - even compared to your other similar things, the spacing of this passive 1/4 jump seems a bit too much considering it's so similar musically to others
05:18:370 (5) - could nc cause change in music and it looks nicer on such stream spacing changes
05:36:509 (1) - 03:23:951 (1) - have such different sounds on them, would be great if they were mapped differently and since the high pitched 1/4s on 05:36:509 (1) - are so strong, I think a a repeat or even 4 circles would be great
05:48:021 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - would be great if this was a bit less focused on the center of the screen, if you do it for so long it actually becomes a bit noticeable while playing
05:52:382 (2) - cymbal is on this, not on 1, so hitsounding could reflect that
06:00:579 (1,1,1,1) - finish seems a bit too overused already, especially with nothing really supporting it
sb06:03:694 - could have this fade out a bit slower so it ends with the slider
06:17:031 (1) - did you forget the effect on this one? cause all other clicks in this part have it
things are mostly rather minor so I think it should be fine for pentori to qualify without having karen/chaoslitz check it again