Horie Yui - Coloring

posted
Total Posts
53
Topic Starter
Karen
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2017年1月5日 at 18:37:05

Artist: Horie Yui
Title: Coloring
Source: パパのいうことを聞きなさい!
Tags: Papa no Iukoto wo Kikinasai! papakiki ending Chaoslitz
BPM: 117
Filesize: 3565kb
Play Time: 01:30
Difficulties Available:
  1. Chaoz's Insane (3.6 stars, 395 notes)
  2. Easy (1.41 stars, 105 notes)
  3. Expert (4.4 stars, 439 notes)
  4. Hard (2.85 stars, 270 notes)
  5. Insane (3.31 stars, 338 notes)
  6. Normal (2.15 stars, 188 notes)


Download: Horie Yui - Coloring
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
play Platinum Disco
Meg
1st
nice map
Xinely
kuru kuru mawaru
VINXIS
D
Topic Starter
Karen
O
Kalibe

VINXIS wrote:

D
Maboyu
走過路過不要錯過~~早安人格
渣水摸~不要介意QAQ

[General]
Tags 不放點東西嗎?>.<

[Hard]
00:57:071 (5) - 這里是不是漏了OAO?
阿勒剛重覆聽一次是不是沒有放到音效?...還是我載不完全

感覺其他難度都很棒>.< 摸不出什麼QAQ
沒什麼幫到忙xD
Hanazawa Kana
人哥怎么能这么神
感觉主难度这里00:23:737 (1,1,1,1) -可以换成四个1/8折返滑条 单点感觉体现的不是很好(好不好打就不知道了)
别给kd了
Topic Starter
Karen

AliomLoung wrote:

走過路過不要錯過~~早安人格
渣水摸~不要介意QAQ

[General]
Tags 不放點東西嗎?>.< 放了

[Hard]
00:57:071 (5) - 這里是不是漏了OAO?
阿勒剛重覆聽一次是不是沒有放到音效?...還是我載不完全 没复制到o.o

感覺其他難度都很棒>.< 摸不出什麼QAQ
沒什麼幫到忙xD

Hanazawa Kana wrote:

人哥怎么能这么神
感觉主难度这里00:23:737 (1,1,1,1) -可以换成四个1/8折返滑条 单点感觉体现的不是很好(好不好打就不知道了) 做了这么多图我最讨厌的就是什么1/4折返1/8折返,打起来像吃香,fff :)
别给kd了
kanor
[Genal]
主难度的tag不一样
[Insane]
00:29:891 (7,1) - 1可以再往上移一点嘛?感觉这个lap应该不是很有必要......
00:50:404 (3) - 移到(348,136)厚不厚呀,既然lap了干脆就多lap一点嘛0w0要不往左放点也可以
01:21:686 (8,9,10,11,1) - 最后一个应该歪了?前面都是0.49最后变成了0.48
01:08:609 (4,5) - 这个会不会放的有点太远了呀.....前面的最多也就到1.94DS,这里是2.11,看起来快像1/2了
[Expert]
00:11:430 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 感觉这个遮挡和其他部分的不太一样,没有提示感觉坑了好多....00:15:532 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 跟这个相比的话后者更简单,感觉把后面这个梗提前怎么样?有个提示感觉稍微好点;w ;
00:22:455 (1,2,3) - 为什么这里的spacing突然降了呀,初见的时候还以为是1/6....拉大或者像00:14:250 (2,3,1) - 这样叠起来可以嘛?
00:38:609 (3,4,5,6,1) - 1突然跳一下会不会有点坑呀,毕竟3456都在降spacing....
00:41:430 (1,2,3,2,3,4,3,4,5) - 这里是故意不放一条直线的嘛......前面两天肉眼看起来没有第三条直;w;
00:55:532 (1,2) - 要不干脆包一下算了?
00:40:148 (6) - 这里在00:31:942 (1) - 这里都NC了,要不这里也NC了吧
00:41:173 (1) - 为什么这里要NC呀......是为了避免遮挡嘛?

很水的膜;w;随便看看就好啦
GL ~ :)
Chaoslitz
Mafumafu
[Easy]
00:45:276 (6) - 有点太高了都擦到了HP bar 看着有点难受的·
00:45:276 (6) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
00:47:327 (1) - 是不是这里不应该NC啊
00:49:378 (4) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
00:57:583 (5) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
01:09:891 (6) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
01:11:942 (1) - 是不是这里不应该NC啊
01:28:353 (1) - 折返有点弱,不如跟后面的: https://puu.sh/sVwRX/cb5ab8c512.png

[Normal]
NC感觉有点乱啊,不如都一个大白线NC一次要么就两个。

[Hard]
00:04:250 (1) - 有点太低了呀都和击打偏移那个东西重叠了,每次看到那个击打偏移我就心塞,还是不要把note摆在那里了
00:12:712 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:08:609 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 间距弄一样好了
01:21:686 (4,5,6,7) - 第四个1/4空了有点不好
01:28:609 (2,3) - 离远点好了,总按成1/2

[Insane]
00:48:353 (7) - 连打这么多,不如适当NC一下

[Chaoz's Insane]
00:30:660 (8,9,1) - 有点难受
00:56:558 (5,6,7,8,1) - 可以考虑适当NC提醒一下这个pattern
01:12:968 (4,5,6,7,1) - 这个也是 因为别的1/2摆的也不算太远怕弄混了
加个Kiai吧

[Expert]
那你不如用AR9.3好受点
00:49:122 (7) - ?
我还是觉得AR9.3好,后面有些摆的AR9太难读了,我有点怂 并且1/2摆的都很近 现在的AR很容易就把1/4 1/2弄混
Atrue
[General]
Combo colors are just a bit too similar, consider try some other colors that won't make it hard to distinguish.

Tags are not consistent through diffs.

[Easy]
  1. Structrual Issue
    01:23:224 - 01:27:327 - To be safer, you can even cover these places with a reverse, that will be a bit easier to follow as 1/1s.

[Normal]
  1. Structrual Issue
    How about AR 5.3 or something? Current AR is somehow a bit lower than expected though.

[Hard]
  1. Structrual Issue
    00:56:558 - 01:12:968 - Personally I would go for continue on the vocal track rather than suddenly change to drums, which will make some confusion here. Example:

[Insane]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Good to go

[Chaoz's Insane]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Good to go

[Expert]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Worth a try. Nice idea.

    00:00:660 - For your beat arrangement, I'd say here should be covered. Not sure how to do it, but I'll just give an example:
  2. Minor Picks
    00:57:071 (5) - May need to move downward a bit to make the pattern perfect.



Forum PM for any questions related.
Topic Starter
Karen

kanor wrote:

[Genal]
主难度的tag不一样
[Insane]
00:29:891 (7,1) - 1可以再往上移一点嘛?感觉这个lap应该不是很有必要......
00:50:404 (3) - 移到(348,136)厚不厚呀,既然lap了干脆就多lap一点嘛0w0要不往左放点也可以 没overlap啊
01:21:686 (8,9,10,11,1) - 最后一个应该歪了?前面都是0.49最后变成了0.48
01:08:609 (4,5) - 这个会不会放的有点太远了呀.....前面的最多也就到1.94DS,这里是2.11,看起来快像1/2了
[Expert]
00:11:430 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 感觉这个遮挡和其他部分的不太一样,没有提示感觉坑了好多....00:15:532 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 跟这个相比的话后者更简单,感觉把后面这个梗提前怎么样?有个提示感觉稍微好点;w ; 这两个三连间距递增,后面的提前了就不好咯
00:22:455 (1,2,3) - 为什么这里的spacing突然降了呀,初见的时候还以为是1/6....拉大或者像00:14:250 (2,3,1) - 这样叠起来可以嘛? 因为00:21:686 (2,3,4) - 这里听起来比较强烈啊,变间距能体现音乐
00:38:609 (3,4,5,6,1) - 1突然跳一下会不会有点坑呀,毕竟3456都在降spacing.... 降spacing是因为特殊音,这里也不算跳,很容易
00:41:430 (1,2,3,2,3,4,3,4,5) - 这里是故意不放一条直线的嘛......前面两天肉眼看起来没有第三条直;w;
00:55:532 (1,2) - 要不干脆包一下算了?
00:40:148 (6) - 这里在00:31:942 (1) - 这里都NC了,要不这里也NC了吧 后面是因为遮挡
00:41:173 (1) - 为什么这里要NC呀......是为了避免遮挡嘛?

很水的膜;w;随便看看就好啦
GL ~ :)

Atrue wrote:

[General]
Combo colors are just a bit too similar, consider try some other colors that won't make it hard to distinguish. made it easier to read

Tags are not consistent through diffs.

[Easy]
  1. Structrual Issue
    01:23:224 - 01:27:327 - To be safer, you can even cover these places with a reverse, that will be a bit easier to follow as 1/1s.

[Normal]
  1. Structrual Issue
    How about AR 5.3 or something? Current AR is somehow a bit lower than expected though. ar3->5->7 looks nice

[Hard]
  1. Structrual Issue
    00:56:558 - 01:12:968 - Personally I would go for continue on the vocal track rather than suddenly change to drums, which will make some confusion here. hmm your suggestion is good but it feels more like following drums here and i made a short break before it, so it should be fine Example:

[Insane]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Good to go

[Chaoz's Insane]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Good to go

[Expert]
  1. Structrual Issue
    Worth a try. Nice idea.

    00:00:660 - For your beat arrangement, I'd say here should be covered. Not sure how to do it, but I'll just give an example:
  2. Minor Picks
    00:57:071 (5) - May need to move downward a bit to make the pattern perfect.



Forum PM for any questions related.

Regraz wrote:

[Easy]
00:45:276 (6) - 有点太高了都擦到了HP bar 看着有点难受的·
00:45:276 (6) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
00:47:327 (1) - 是不是这里不应该NC啊
00:49:378 (4) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
00:57:583 (5) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
01:09:891 (6) - 是不是这里应该NC啊
01:11:942 (1) - 是不是这里不应该NC啊
01:28:353 (1) - 折返有点弱,不如跟后面的: https://puu.sh/sVwRX/cb5ab8c512.png 还是跟简单的音吧

[Normal]
NC感觉有点乱啊,不如都一个大白线NC一次要么就两个。 调整了下

[Hard]
00:04:250 (1) - 有点太低了呀都和击打偏移那个东西重叠了,每次看到那个击打偏移我就心塞,还是不要把note摆在那里了
00:12:712 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:08:609 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 间距弄一样好了
01:21:686 (4,5,6,7) - 第四个1/4空了有点不好
01:28:609 (2,3) - 离远点好了,总按成1/2

[Insane]
00:48:353 (7) - 连打这么多,不如适当NC一下

[Expert]
那你不如用AR9.3好受点 毕竟bpm很低,9.3还是太高了吧
未完待续
EncoreW
[Expert]

00:08:353 (1) - 不太喜欢这个finish,用默认的 soft finish很好,这个finish突然来一下有点吓人

00:12:199 (3,1) - 往左下靠一点,00:11:942 (1,2,3) - 这三个感觉不等边也要等腰,这样好看点

00:13:865 - 这地方听上去应该是多出来的,因为这里什么都没有

00:49:122 (7) - 这为什么要1/8啊

00:48:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这几个间距也不太好看1.0-1.3-1.8-2.0-2.0-2.1-5.1根本找不出规律

01:03:224 (7,8) - 01:19:635 (7,8) - 感觉拿圈塞满好一点

01:26:301 (1,2,3,4,5) - 45藏在12下面3放出来是不是更几把一点

[Chaoz's Insane]

为啥觉得前半段每个NC都好长gee

kiai呢gee

00:01:173 (7) - 感觉这地方要加个音效gee

00:02:327 - 00:22:840 - 这地方是不是漏音了gee

01:21:686 (1,2,3,4,1) - 感觉这个串的形状可以拉一个往下弯的弧线gee http://puu.sh/sXuc3/a13e42cab6.jpg

所以gee到底是什么

[Insane]

00:02:327 - 为啥你们都不太喜欢填上这个地方

00:55:148 (5,6,7) - 感觉这种地方可以用1/4折返滑条,否则感觉这个图也全是串,比hard多了太多了

[Hard]

01:04:891 - 这地方好几根没用的绿线

01:29:378 (4) - NC

Topic Starter
Karen

Speechless wrote:

[Expert]

00:08:353 (1) - 不太喜欢这个finish,用默认的 soft finish很好,这个finish突然来一下有点吓人 狗才用默认finish

00:12:199 (3,1) - 往左下靠一点,00:11:942 (1,2,3) - 这三个感觉不等边也要等腰,这样好看点

00:13:865 - 这地方听上去应该是多出来的,因为这里什么都没有 有na

00:49:122 (7) - 这为什么要1/8啊 几把

00:48:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这几个间距也不太好看1.0-1.3-1.8-2.0-2.0-2.1-5.1根本找不出规律

01:03:224 (7,8) - 01:19:635 (7,8) - 感觉拿圈塞满好一点 好像没啥区别

01:26:301 (1,2,3,4,5) - 45藏在12下面3放出来是不是更几把一点 其实这样更几把

[Insane]

00:02:327 - 为啥你们都不太喜欢填上这个地方 不是主旋律

00:55:148 (5,6,7) - 感觉这种地方可以用1/4折返滑条,否则感觉这个图也全是串,比hard多了太多了 本来都是折返,但是感觉太简单了

[Hard]

01:04:891 - 这地方好几根没用的绿线

01:29:378 (4) - NC

Kibbleru
sorry for delay

expert
00:11:942 (1,2,3) - would it be better to make this more triangle-like? to follow along with 00:11:430 (1,2,3) -
00:50:789 (6) - could u try something like 00:54:891 (6) - feels off to not map the drum there
00:58:994 (6) - ^
00:51:045 (7) - btw nc for consistency
01:02:968 (5) - i think nc will help here
01:21:686 (4) - ^

chaoz insane
00:30:404 (7,8,9,1) - i think the movement here is a bit hard to catch if u compare it with ur other places due to the flow breaking, it would help to reduce spacing from 9 to 1

insane
00:21:942 (7) - offscreen? i think?
00:50:404 (3,4) - space out a little for aesthetics :d
01:01:173 (7,8,9,10,1) - nazi but doesnt seem to be a straight line here

hard
01:21:686 (4,5,6,7,8) - might as well avoid 5 note streams considering this is the only one u use
01:28:609 (2,3) - i think you could use higher spacing for this to help distinguish its 1/2 gap

normal
00:25:532 (3) - hp bar



how bout rename normal -> advanced easy -> normal
Topic Starter
Karen

Kibbleru wrote:

sorry for delay

expert
00:11:942 (1,2,3) - would it be better to make this more triangle-like? to follow along with 00:11:430 (1,2,3) -
00:50:789 (6) - could u try something like 00:54:891 (6) - feels off to not map the drum there i think it's ok, repeating the same rhythm is pretty boring so i'd like to keep them different
00:58:994 (6) - ^
00:51:045 (7) - btw nc for consistency
01:02:968 (5) - i think nc will help here
01:21:686 (4) - ^

chaoz insane
00:30:404 (7,8,9,1) - i think the movement here is a bit hard to catch if u compare it with ur other places due to the flow breaking, it would help to reduce spacing from 9 to 1

insane
00:21:942 (7) - offscreen? i think?
00:50:404 (3,4) - space out a little for aesthetics :d
01:01:173 (7,8,9,10,1) - nazi but doesnt seem to be a straight line here

hard
01:21:686 (4,5,6,7,8) - might as well avoid 5 note streams considering this is the only one u use
01:28:609 (2,3) - i think you could use higher spacing for this to help distinguish its 1/2 gap

normal
00:25:532 (3) - hp bar



how bout rename normal -> advanced easy -> normal that would ruin the enh diffs' icons :c
other things are fixed

Regraz wrote:

[Expert]
那你不如用AR9.3好受点
00:49:122 (7) - ? 挺好玩的
我还是觉得AR9.3好,后面有些摆的AR9太难读了,我有点怂 并且1/2摆的都很近 现在的AR很容易就把1/4 1/2弄混 思考了一下还是觉得不改了吧,一是不喜欢小数ar,二是这图pm很低没有那么难读的感觉
Kencho

Speechless wrote:

[General]
  1. 太穩了
[Easy]
  1. 00:36:045 (4) - DS大了
  2. 01:28:353 (1) - 為了統一結束時間,滑條建議改成這樣 http://puu.sh/t4CcN/cef5cd01d9.jpg
[Normal]
  1. 01:29:891 (3) - 為了統一結束時間,換成1/2滑條比較好
[Hard]
  1. 01:22:199 (7,1) - Swap NC
[Insane]
  1. 00:49:378 (1,3) - 碰到了,把3移右一點
  2. 01:29:378 (4) - 看你Hard的放法,NC比較好
[Chaoz's Insane]
  1. 加上kiai time?
  2. 00:25:660 (5) - 刪掉會比較好,雖然有vocals但是這裡不停頓比較奇怪
  3. 00:35:660 (5) - 建議換成兩個圓圈,參考00:37:711 (5,6) - ,一個藍線起一個紅線起容易出梗
[Expert]
  1. Combo colors和別的難度不同 http://puu.sh/t4C2A/c8388a831d.png
  2. 00:48:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 這個超級難
  3. 01:02:327 - 這個空了怪難受的
  4. 01:07:455 (7) - 應該NC
Topic Starter
Karen

Kencho wrote:

Speechless wrote:

[General]
  1. 太穩了
[Easy]
  1. 00:36:045 (4) - DS大了
  2. 01:28:353 (1) - 為了統一結束時間,滑條建議改成這樣 http://puu.sh/t4CcN/cef5cd01d9.jpg
[Normal]
  1. 01:29:891 (3) - 為了統一結束時間,換成1/2滑條比較好
[Hard]
  1. 01:22:199 (7,1) - Swap NC
[Insane]
  1. 00:49:378 (1,3) - 碰到了,把3移右一點
  2. 01:29:378 (4) - 看你Hard的放法,NC比較好
[Chaoz's Insane]
  1. 加上kiai time?
  2. 00:25:660 (5) - 刪掉會比較好,雖然有vocals但是這裡不停頓比較奇怪
  3. 00:35:660 (5) - 建議換成兩個圓圈,參考00:37:711 (5,6) - ,一個藍線起一個紅線起容易出梗
[Expert]
  1. Combo colors和別的難度不同 http://puu.sh/t4C2A/c8388a831d.png
  2. 00:48:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 這個超級難 缩小了
  3. 01:02:327 - 這個空了怪難受的 后面的也改了
  4. 01:07:455 (7) - 應該NC
其他都改了
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply