Morgar wrote:

Panty's Hard

01:35:122 (3,4) - They overlap a small bit. Please fix for aesthetics. - ok
02:00:247 - This spinner is already super long so my first suggestion is to map this bit with lowering volume where is also does in the song.
If you choose to keep this spinner then make it last half a note longer (up to 02:16:122 - that is), this is exactly where the music ends. - already fixed

Dron4ik_G wrote:

Привет! Я из мод очереди.

• 
  [Panty's Hard]

1. 00:11:122 (4,5) - Также желательно направить 4 на 5. - fixed
2. 00:44:622 (2,3) - Тут нужно немного выровнять концы. Это почти незаметно, но все же. - fixed
3. 01:35:122 (3,4) - Это наложение 3 на 4 мне не очень нравится. 3 стоит сдвинуть немного вниз. - already fixed, check prev mod
4. 01:48:122 (1,2,3) - 3 стоит немного криво, поэтому из 1, 2 и 3 не получается прямой линии. Конец 3 нужно сдвинуть на одну клетку вправо по линии сетки. - это паттерн такой. После 3 идет такой же, но отраженный слайдер.
   
   В остальном все хорошо. Удачи!

Quadrocake wrote:

Мой сверхнужный мод(нет)

Panty's Hard

00:09:872 (4) - по музыке комбо нужно начать с этой ноты - угу
00:37:122 (3,4) - слайдер можно изогнуть, к тому же тут 00:33:122 (3) - тот же звук сделан одним слайдером - не реверсный слайдер ради разнообразия паттернов, да и к тому же изогнутый сюда не впишется, смотри предыдущие слайдеры - один, ровный, чуть влево направлен, другой, ровный, чуть вправо, и наконец длинный тоже ровный и отраженный.
01:30:497 - 01:31:497 - отчётливо слышно слово "to", но там ничего нет, и хочется нажать на ноту заранее. прости, но не слышу там слога "to".
00:49:497 (7) - можно сдвинуть немного вверх и вправо шоб красиво- ok

[ Space ] wrote:

hello! from my queue
[easy]
good map, only 2 complaints:

CS 2? Nah, 3 is good
02:00:122 (1,1,1) - you have all of that space to map but you instead place spinners for more than 15% of the song? I'll leave it like that for now.

[ Space ] wrote:

hello! from my queue


[kj's normal]

AIMod

01:36:997 - too far fixed
01:37:497 - too far fixed
01:38:747 - too far fixed
02:15:622 - too close fixed

these points are not DSed correctly according to AIMod.

01:38:872 (6) - this is too fast for the player to react to. map should have some moments that are slightly harder than the rest of the map

Deivedux wrote:

kj's Normal
00:25:622 (4) - Place that note somewhere closer to the next beat. ok, i think it is better now
00:59:122 - Either place this part more to the left, or reform this slider 00:59:122 - so that it would go more to the right after the reverse arrow. changed shape of the slider

Quadrocake wrote:

привет.
Feezly's Hard

00:12:622 (2,3,4) - Этот паттерн не очень подходит музыке, я бы немного изменил форму согласен
00:41:122 (3,4) - 00:45:122 (3,4) - 00:49:122 (3) - один и тот же звук ты делаешь совсем разными паттернами. Можно в 3 случае поменять слайдер на слайдер и ноту, как ты делал до этого, или первые два поменять на сплошные слайдеры. 00:53:122 (3) - этот вроде в тему стоит . знаешь , этот я изменил - 00:49:122 (3), ибо плохо выглядит , давно собирался , а остальные оставлю как есть . Ибо в этом и была задумка . Чтоб карта была интересной и разнообразить как-то, ведь дальше идет сплошной повтор . тройка - слайдер , тройка - сладйер .
01:31:122 (7) - 01:33:122 (3) - Вторую часть слайдера можно сделать паралельно нижней кромке nope . так играется намного легче , считаю нужным оставить как есть
01:40:622 (2) - Можно выгнуть как и предыдущий слайдер и снова нет . тут же задумка такая . верхний слайдер идет вверх , центральный по середине , нижни идет снизу .
02:00:122 (1,1,1) - ну... криво бесите . исправил расположение

[ Space ] wrote:

hello!



[feezly's hard]
00:09:122 (4) - like the last diff (and even more relevant in this one), sliders like these could end on a white tick and place a circle at the sliderend. Nope
00:37:372 (4) - try to have a more circular flow here. I purposely made a triangle and not going to make it more circular.
Thank you

Gokateigo wrote:

kj's normal

00:30:622 (5) - This angle isn't visible (or hard to see) I do not think so
00:39:622 (8) - ^ - ^
00:41:122 (3) - This slider looks bad, do a better curve Fixed

Gokateigo wrote:

Hi
Feezly's hard
00:13:122 (4) - Use a slider here Fixed
Same mistakes than kj's N Curves aren't good for clap sounds fixed

Gokateigo wrote:

Easy

1. The map is very good in genral but :
2. 01:36:122 (1) to 01:59:622 (5) : All these objects don't represent any sound Listen carefully to the song.
3. The kiai time and the normal parts are the same, you should map another sound or remove sliders to add circles to keep the map interesting to play I'll think about adding some sircles.

1. Не проще было разбить пнг файл с пузырьками на несколько аккуратно обрезанных файлов и анимировать отдельно. Это бы избавило нас от лишней сб нагрузки.

1. Что-то ОД и ХП высоковаты. Я бы на тройку поставил, все-таки ритм простой да и глядя на другие сложности ясно становится, что 4 это высоковато.
2. Паттерны. Проблема в том, что у тебя нет какой-то идеи или структуры и даже похожие моменты замапаны по-разному. Например, 01:44:123 (1,2,3) - три слдайдера идущих друг за другом и каждый изогнут и поставлен как-то по своему, дальше 01:48:123 (1,2,3) - тоже не наблюдается никакой связи или структуры. Начинается это все примерно 00:12:122 (1,2,3) - отсюда.
   
   Если ты строишь карту на таких слайдерах, то логично ограничить их разнообразие до двух трех определенных углов и фигур и применять их через всю карту, тогда у тебя появится четко прослеживаемая структура и карта в целом будет ощущаться более логичной и аккуратной. Это особенно важно в этом треке, который сам по себе весьма монотонный.
   
   И все бы было неплохо, но из-за общего ощущения неаккуратности и нерегулярности паттернов все кажется очень неаккуратным, даже принимая во внимание вполне неплохой ритм.

1. 01:12:122 - не стоит оставлять сильные биты некликабельными попробуй заменить 01:11:872 (7) - на два серкла? Как вариант можно так
   Note: 01:20:122 - аналогично. Может еще где-то что-то упустили.
2. 01:42:122 (5) - совсем уж он внезапно тут возникает, я бы не стал так резуо гнуть слайдер без особого повода. У тебя такое больше нигде в карте не встречается.
   
   Ну, оно такое. Местами видны неаккуратности и нехватка опыта, 01:33:122 (4) - например вот тут слайдер касается хп бара, а 02:08:622 (3,4) - вот тут переход немного резковат, но вообще неплохо.

1. Через весь интро спейсинг плавает от х1.0 до х1.7, хотя особой причины для этого я не вижу. Это очень заметно и выглядит сокрее неаккуратно, чем интересно.
   
   Попробуй спейсинг привести в порядок, попутно можно попробовать поработать над структурой паттернов, хотя мне кажется, что многие из них выглядят кривовато именно из-за спейсинга. В детали я не вникаю, советую с основным сначало разобраться.

1. 00:08:122 (1,2) - не имеет смысла ставить тут джамп, если дальше в музыке он нигде не повторяется.
2. 00:44:622 (2,3) - реверс у тройки не читается, это неранкабильно. Попробуй перестроить паттерн.
3. 00:52:497 (4,5,6,7) - попробуй на четверку поставить новое комбо, чтоб предупредить игроков о смене спейсинга?
   Note: 01:09:122 (5,6) - 01:10:372 (3,4) - вот такие вещи могут путать игроков, не стоит так делать. Лучше каких-то примерно одинаковых значений спейсинга придерживаться. // 01:26:122 (1,2) - 01:29:622 (5,6) - вот такие паттерны вызывают трудности при чтении
   
   Cо спейсингом что-то странное.

Bakari wrote:

[kj's Normal]

1. 01:12:122 - не стоит оставлять сильные биты некликабельными попробуй заменить 01:11:872 (7) - на два серкла? Как вариант можно так
   Note: 01:20:122 - аналогично. Может еще где-то что-то упустили. Исправил
2. 01:42:122 (5) - совсем уж он внезапно тут возникает, я бы не стал так резуо гнуть слайдер без особого повода. У тебя такое больше нигде в карте не встречается. Постарался сделать слайдер чуть более плавным, но резкий угол все равно оставил
   
   Ну, оно такое. Местами видны неаккуратности и нехватка опыта, 01:33:122 (4) - например вот тут слайдер касается хп бара Мне кажется, это зависит от размера хп-бара, например, у меня он достаточно тонкий, так что слайдер никак не задевает

Мне кажется, это зависит от размера хп-бара, например, у меня он достаточно тонкий, так что слайдер никак не задевает

Bakari wrote:

Мне кажется, это зависит от размера хп-бара, например, у меня он достаточно тонкий, так что слайдер никак не задевает

Попробуй со стандартным, все, что касается редактора всегда берет в расчет стандартный скин (ну или тот, который идет с мапсетом).

Bakari wrote:

[Easy]

1. Что-то ОД и ХП высоковаты. Я бы на тройку поставил, все-таки ритм простой да и глядя на другие сложности ясно становится, что 4 это высоковато. Понизил до 3.
2. Паттерны. Проблема в том, что у тебя нет какой-то идеи или структуры и даже похожие моменты замапаны по-разному. Например, 01:44:123 (1,2,3) - три слдайдера идущих друг за другом и каждый изогнут и поставлен как-то по своему, дальше 01:48:123 (1,2,3) - тоже не наблюдается никакой связи или структуры. Начинается это все примерно 00:12:122 (1,2,3) - отсюда.
   
   Если ты строишь карту на таких слайдерах, то логично ограничить их разнообразие до двух трех определенных углов и фигур и применять их через всю карту, тогда у тебя появится четко прослеживаемая структура и карта в целом будет ощущаться более логичной и аккуратной. Это особенно важно в этом треке, который сам по себе весьма монотонный.
   
   И все бы было неплохо, но из-за общего ощущения неаккуратности и нерегулярности паттернов все кажется очень неаккуратным, даже принимая во внимание вполне неплохой ритм. Окей, ремапну.

1. 00:21:622 (3,4) - 00:36:622 (2,3) - 00:41:122 (3,4) - 00:52:622 (2,3) -
   00:54:622 (4) - The circle's approach rate comes from outside the playfield or anyhow the monitor and it may overlap with some skins' HP bar. It should be placed lower to ensure it's easily readable for new players
2. 01:02:622 (6) - 01:09:622 (2) - 01:30:622 (4) - ^

1. 00:08:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's not clear what rhythm you are following here.1 and 2 clearly follow the guitarish sound, and so does 3. Then 4 is on the drums and 5/6 follow the guitar again. What I don't understand is why you'd prioritize drums on 4 when 3 completely ignores the drum on the white tick.
   All objects but 3 could be seen as "following the drums" (since they hit white ticks aswell), but 3 misleads into thinking the guitar is the main focus, so 4 is just confusing. A solution to this pattern could be something like this. That pattern makes more sense because all clicks are on white ticks up to 3, which introduces clicks on the offbeat with a passive rhythm, and 4 makes sense here because no white ticks were ignored. Consider making 6 a reverse, since ignoring the guitar sound @ 00:11:872 is not justifiable at that point
2. 00:12:122 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern has a similiar issue. Here I think this rhythm would be the best solution, because it's consistent with the previous pattern. The clickable on 7 can be justified because in the previous pattern a reverse 6 had an object there. It's about properly introducing rhythms and patterns with passive rhythms first.
3. 00:16:122 (1,2) - 1, 2, and 2's sliderend all represent the same sound. Plus, 1's sliderend follows the bass line, while 2 ignores it. To solve both of these issues I suggest you shorten 2 and add a clickable object, like so
4. 00:18:122 (6,7) - ^

1. 00:09:122 (4) - There is no reason to skip the drum @ 00:09:622 , especially when 00:08:122 (1,2,3) - starts off so dense. You should shorten the slider and add a clickable object, like you did for 00:13:122 (4) -
2. 00:10:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Rhythm is all over the place with this one. While there are sounds an all objects, the emphasizing is way off imo. This is an example on how it should be done, and I'll explain thoroughly why to ensure you get an idea of how to fix similiar patterns:
   4 was shortened to land on the drum. Consequently, 5 and 6 were placed on offbeats since 1, 2 and 4 also follow the guitar. 7 was placed as a circle rather than a slider so that 8 can be a slider instead. This is because 8,9,10 emulate 00:08:122 (1,2,3) - same clicking
3. 00:13:872 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I can hear the continous 1/2 noise in the bg, but the guitar and drums are more prominent and not prioritizing them plays poorly. I suggest the same changes as above
4. 00:16:122 (1,2,3,4) - 1,2,3 are perfect. 1 follows the guitar, bass and drums, 2 makes sense because of the bass addition and the slight guitar sound, and 3 is emphasized by having it be a slider. 4, on the other hand, emphasizes the same sounds differently for no reason. I advise you restructure the rhythm starting from 4 onwards by repeating 1,2 and 3

Gokateigo wrote:

Hi from my queue o/ (You asked a long time ago but I forgot sorry ^^)

Panty's hard

1. 00:12:622 (2) - bad flow - fixed
2. Same thing about curves/angles

Good luck o/

Bakari wrote:

[Panty's Hard]

1. 00:08:122 (1,2) - не имеет смысла ставить тут джамп, если дальше в музыке он нигде не повторяется. - fixed
2. 00:44:622 (2,3) - реверс у тройки не читается, это неранкабильно. Попробуй перестроить паттерн. - fixed
3. 00:52:497 (4,5,6,7) - попробуй на четверку поставить новое комбо, чтоб предупредить игроков о смене спейсинга? - fixed
   Note: 01:09:122 (5,6) - 01:10:372 (3,4) - вот такие вещи могут путать игроков, не стоит так делать. Лучше каких-то примерно одинаковых значений спейсинга придерживаться.- fixed // 01:26:122 (1,2) - 01:29:622 (5,6) - вот такие паттерны вызывают трудности при чтении
   
   Cо спейсингом что-то странное.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Удачи!

1. Fine.

1. 00:13:872 (3,4) - I'm a bit confused why you make here a circle on red tick and slider on white, when on pattern before you made a slider on red tick and you followed a guitar. Now it can be a bit complicated, cause when you are changing a sound which you follow that fast when it's not new part here. So i prefer to Ctrl + G both objects and then try to make this objects nice look and make good DS. Also you can make 00:09:872 (3,4) here Ctrl + G and then it will follow drums so this way is good too.
2. 00:29:622 (3,5) - This two are a bit too close in my opinion, so better thing which you can make here is move 00:30:622 (5) a bit to up and then DS 00:31:622 (6,7) objects (i prefer by rotating and will be fine).
3. 00:58:122 (6) - I prefer NC here, cause I think a 00:59:622 (9) combo in Normal is kinda weird.
4. 01:06:122 (6) - The same as above.
5. 01:11:622 (6) - Is start of this slider you should add a normal addition, cause better consistency in hitsounding.
6. 01:19:622 (5,6) - I think you should make here a normal addition on start of slider and auto addition on circle, cause then it sounds much better in my opinion.

1. 00:13:122 (4) - Why there isn't clap on a head of slider like before? You should to add it for better sounds.
2. Ok, that's all form hitsounds. To be hosent with you this is not the best diff i've seen ever. The Distance Snap is really randomely and aesthetics is kinda bad. You need to still improve your mapping, of course everyone must started. I prefer to you watch a pishifat videos on YouTube, because he is learning newbies and experienced mappers how to making our maps better.

1. Maybe add a custom diff name?
2. Nothing.

Mombei wrote:

[kj's normal]

00:08:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think it's not clear what rhythm you are following here.1 and 2 clearly follow the guitarish sound, and so does 3. Then 4 is on the drums and 5/6 follow the guitar again. What I don't understand is why you'd prioritize drums on 4 when 3 completely ignores the drum on the white tick.
All objects but 3 could be seen as "following the drums" (since they hit white ticks aswell), but 3 misleads into thinking the guitar is the main focus, so 4 is just confusing. A solution to this pattern could be something like this. That pattern makes more sense because all clicks are on white ticks up to 3, which introduces clicks on the offbeat with a passive rhythm, and 4 makes sense here because no white ticks were ignored. Consider making 6 a reverse, since ignoring the guitar sound @ 00:11:872 is not justifiable at that point -- Some notes are really out of rhythm so I deleted them

00:12:122 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern has a similiar issue. Here I think this rhythm would be the best solution, because it's consistent with the previous pattern. The clickable on 7 can be justified because in the previous pattern a reverse 6 had an object there. It's about properly introducing rhythms and patterns with passive rhythms first. I did a slider 00:14:122 (4) - shorter so now the pattern should have a clear guitar rhythm

00:16:122 (1,2) - 1, 2, and 2's sliderend all represent the same sound. Plus, 1's sliderend follows the bass line, while 2 ignores it. To solve both of these issues I suggest you shorten 2 and add a clickable object, like so I think my version is better

Chalwa wrote:

[kj's Normal]

1. 00:58:122 (6) - I prefer NC here, cause I think a 00:59:622 (9) combo in Normal is kinda weird. I see no reason for NC
2. 01:11:622 (6) - Is start of this slider you should add a normal addition, cause better consistency in hitsounding. Done
3. 01:19:622 (5,6) - I think you should make here a normal addition on start of slider and auto addition on circle, cause then it sounds much better in my opinion. Done

[- Mizki -] wrote:

kj's Normal

-00:18:622 (6) - slider curve moved to left for flow? No
-01:52:122 (1) - slider curve moved to left for flow? No
-02:02:872 (6) - could be the other way around No

Mombei wrote:

yo
[Feezly's Hard]

1. 00:09:122 (4) - There is no reason to skip the drum @ 00:09:622 , especially when 00:08:122 (1,2,3) - starts off so dense. You should shorten the slider and add a clickable object, like you did for 00:13:122 (4) - Fixed
2. 00:10:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Rhythm is all over the place with this one. While there are sounds an all objects, the emphasizing is way off imo. This is an example on how it should be done, and I'll explain thoroughly why to ensure you get an idea of how to fix similiar patterns:
   4 was shortened to land on the drum. Consequently, 5 and 6 were placed on offbeats since 1, 2 and 4 also follow the guitar. 7 was placed as a circle rather than a slider so that 8 can be a slider instead. This is because 8,9,10 emulate 00:08:122 (1,2,3) - same clicking Fixed
3. 00:13:872 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I can hear the continous 1/2 noise in the bg, but the guitar and drums are more prominent and not prioritizing them plays poorly. I suggest the same changes as above Fixed
4. 00:16:122 (1,2,3,4) - 1,2,3 are perfect. 1 follows the guitar, bass and drums, 2 makes sense because of the bass addition and the slight guitar sound, and 3 is emphasized by having it be a slider. 4, on the other hand, emphasizes the same sounds differently for no reason. I advise you restructure the rhythm starting from 4 onwards by repeating 1,2 and 3 Fixed

In general this diff could use some better rhythm.

[- Mizki -] wrote:

o/

Feezly's Hard

-00:31:622 (4) - looks better if stacked at the same place as circle 2 Fixed
-01:40:622 (2) - curve this the same as slider 1? My idea

Chalwa wrote:

o/
[Feezly's Hard]

1. 00:13:122 (4) - Why there isn't clap on a head of slider like before? You should to add it for better sounds.
2. Ok, that's all form hitsounds. To be hosent with you this is not the best diff i've seen ever. The Distance Snap is really randomely and aesthetics is kinda bad. You need to still improve your mapping, of course everyone must started. I prefer to you watch a pishifat videos on YouTube, because he is learning newbies and experienced mappers how to making our maps better. nice mod

Bakari wrote:

здарова
[Feezly's Hard]

1. Через весь интро спейсинг плавает от х1.0 до х1.7, хотя особой причины для этого я не вижу. Это очень заметно и выглядит сокрее неаккуратно, чем интересно. пофиксил
   
   Попробуй спейсинг привести в порядок, попутно можно попробовать поработать над структурой паттернов, хотя мне кажется, что многие из них выглядят кривовато именно из-за спейсинга. В детали я не вникаю, советую с основным сначало разобраться. ^

Pennek wrote:

[Eiji's Normal]
01:03:872 (1) - Sliders should start on strong sounds and end on sounds of equal or relatively less strength. not necessary

01:38:872 (6) - follow the concept you establish here 01:34:872 (6) - and shorten your slider by 1 red tick to end on a strong sound. note: i see you do this through most of the map from then on. The easiest fix would be to lengthen the first slider by 1 red tick, but I don't feel that reflects the music accurately because of the strong beat/vocal on the white ticks, so instead I suggest to rework all of those other sliders. sorry, I know it's a pain. Similar sounds do not have to be mapped the same way

Misery wrote:

-00:27:122 (4,5) - ctrl+g? (flip the two circles?) no
-00:52:622 (2,3) - removing the reverse arrow and moving the slider 3 to the white tick sounds better to my ears - sounds identically, but yea now it's looks better
-01:34:872 (2) - move this to the northwest very slightly just so that it lines straightly tohttps://puu.sh/vRR4E/f352556e88.txt the next slider - ok
-02:09:122 (3) - I like this slider if the red dots are white - ok

Juiceys wrote:

01:41:122 (4) - Looks weird could change it to look nice like this - ok

SPOILER

https://puu.sh/vQa18/a01e436610.jpg

01:53:122 (4,5) - All of the other patterns with similar rythmn have much smaller DS like at 01:44:872 (2,3) - or 01:18:122 (1,2) -
Why is the DS larger here? - idk. fixed
01:29:622 (5,6) - Same here, no prominent sound on 6 to justify such a large jump - fixed
01:40:122 (1,2,3) - The sounds here are really similar and I feel should be mapped the same ( 2 sliders or 4 circles ) - hm... I don't think so

Pennek wrote:

[Panty's Hard]
00:08:872 (3,4) - these are angled differently from these 00:08:122 (1,2) - . It's an easy fix with copy paste. - fixed
00:36:122 (1) - suggestion - Can add emphasis onto 1 by ctrl g'ing 1. - yes, now it's looks better
01:01:122 (3) - Sliders should start on strong sounds and end on sounds of equal or relatively less strength. This ends on a very strong sound. - fixed
01:05:372 (5) - ^ - fixed
01:07:372 (4) - ^there are more than just these, probably also before as I just started focusing on it. I'll let you find them yourself as you'll learn more that way. - fixed

Pennek wrote:

hi from modqueue o/
this seems like a wellmodded map already, I'll do my best to find what others may have missed

[General]
00:33:122 (3) - counting these sections as kiai time is weird as the rhythm itself doesn't change intensity. It'd be like seeing a wub map adding kiai every time a fast slider came. The same applies for all of the other onesound-sections. Deleted.

[Easy]
02:00:122 (1,1,1) - shortening these 3 spinners by 1 redtick will make them follow the music and give more time for new players to react to the spinners. Fixed.

Dyl-Byl wrote:

hi from my queue~
i read all the manga but haven't seen the movie yet- well.. into the mod You should watch this movie! It's a masterpiece :^)

[General]
song setup

1. https://puu.sh/vW4hS.jpg this site say that the correct name for this dude is the same but with lower case Fixed.
2. i would add tags like silent and voice since the manga is called that and someone might search it by that Added.

[Easy]
the map
there are a lot of missing beats that should be there

1. 00:16:622 (2,4) - maybe make it so they don't overlap weirdly Fixed.
2. 00:20:622 (2,4) - ^ Fixed.
3. 00:24:622 (2,4) - ^ i know this is for a pattern but could at least try something different. Fixed.
4. 00:30:622 (4,1) - can you make it not overlap Why not? It is easy to read.
5. 00:33:622 - there is a strong sound there, maybe shorten the slider and add a beat next to it. Nah... These sliders follows the sound of the guitar (I'm not sure if it's guitar or something else). I will think about adding the hitsounds for the slider ticks.
6. 00:37:122 (2) - ^
7. 00:41:122 (2) - ^
8. 00:45:122 (2) - ^
9. 00:49:122 (2) - ^
10. 00:53:122 (2) - ^
11. 01:37:622 (2,4) - again with the overlaps Easy to read.
12. 01:46:122 (3,1) - move the one closer to the 3 Fixed
13. 01:57:122 (2,3) - no overlap Yes overlap
14. 02:00:122 (1,1,1,1) - 4 spinners in a row in an easy diff? maybe get rid of the first 3 add a break, then keep the last one 11 seconds break just for the spinner sounds like a bad idea. But I will think of something different.

Dyl-Byl wrote:

[Panty's Hard]
map
is this a hard or insane? i'm confused with all the stream so i won't mod this diff
if you want me to mod if, pm me what diff it is.
- lol this is hard diff. So... as you want.
combos

1. 00:08:622 (1) - get rid of the nc - yeh k
2. 00:09:872 (1) - ^- k
3. 00:14:622 (1) - ^- nope
4. 00:18:122 (1) - ^- no
5. 00:22:622 (1) - ^- nope
6. 00:26:122 (1) - ^- no
7. 00:30:622 (1) - ^- nope
8. 00:34:372 (1) - ^- no
9. 00:38:122 (1) - ^- nope
10. 00:42:372 (1) - ^- no
11. 00:46:372 (1) - ^- nope
    you get the idea - i think it's bad idea imo

1. Nice diff, pretty solid imo. I'll only point out minor stuff like nazi blankets and etc
2. 00:29:622 (3,4) - Polish blanket
3. 00:43:622 (4,1) -
4. 01:25:122 (2) - maybe ctrl j like what you did on 00:08:122 (1,2) - Because it flows more better
5. 01:27:122 (4,2) - This stack isn't perfect as osu auto stacks if you try to stack it and and you ctrl z you will notice it will move, so yea.
6. 01:37:622 (2,4) - Fix blanket

1. 00:14:122 (4) - I recommend stacking this on slidertail of 00:12:122 (1) - for the sake of aesthetics
2. 01:44:122 (1) - Maybe stack this on 01:41:872 (4) -
3. I think the diff feels empty and needs more objects Unlike Easy, this diff feels really less dense and it's like mapping only to 1 sound which is pretty 1 sided.

1. 00:16:622 (2) - Missed a clap?
2. 00:34:622 (2,3) - Fix blanket
3. 02:00:122 (1,1,1) - This feels too repetitive. Which is kinda boring. Is this aspire? xddd
4. The diff needs flow and aesthetics, I feel the notes are just randomly placed and it's just like you're eyeballing everything, like for example 01:28:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This section feels so random because the flow changes every time on each slider and it looks aesthetically bad. I believe you should do comfortable flow since the song is soft and slow and doesn't need such flowkillers even if it's a hard diff

1. If this is a hard then you're breaking the ranking criteria guideline that says

   Avoid streams made of more than 5 notes.

   Consider nerfing this
2. 00:52:872 (6,7,8) - I think this jump isn't necessary as there is no strong sound there. Also people might think that this is 1/2 spaced instead or w/e
3. There are too many streams, which is not appropriate for a hard diff, consider removing the streams or rework this as an Insane diff instead.

-Aqua wrote:

[Eiji's Normal]

1. 00:14:122 (4) - I recommend stacking this on slidertail of 00:12:122 (1) - for the sake of aesthetics It will not be noticeable, which means no aesthetics
2. 01:44:122 (1) - Maybe stack this on 01:41:872 (4) - ^
3. I think the diff feels empty and needs more objects Unlike Easy, this diff feels really less dense and it's like mapping only to 1 sound which is pretty 1 sided.

-Aqua wrote:

[Easy]

1. Nice diff, pretty solid imo. I'll only point out minor stuff like nazi blankets and etc
2. 00:29:622 (3,4) - Polish blanket Fixed.
3. 00:43:622 (4,1) - This is not a blanket.
4. 01:25:122 (2) - maybe ctrl j like what you did on 00:08:122 (1,2) - Because it flows more better Nah I will leave it like that.
5. 01:27:122 (4,2) - This stack isn't perfect as osu auto stacks if you try to stack it and and you ctrl z you will notice it will move, so yea. Fixed.
6. 01:37:622 (2,4) - Fix blanket Fixed.

1. Is the storyboard done? It looks like there's just a blue line in the middle of the screen going up and down

1. Whenever you have 1/2 sliders like 00:33:122 (2) - , you can still have a clap hitsound play in order to preserve the hitsound pattern. You just need to switch to a custom sampleset on the slider tick, and name the clap hitsound drum-slidertickXXX.wav, where XXX is the number of the custom sampleset. Ths way, the long sliders won't seem weird compared to the rest of the notes hitsound wise.

1. You need justification for the DS changes which currently occur multiple times in the map, seemingly at random. As a result it looks very disorganized as it is. For example, the map starts out 1.5x, but suddenly switches to 1.3x at 00:12:122 (1) - seemingly for no reason. It then goes back and forth betwwen 1.5 and 1.3 before moving to 1.2x? The intensity of the music remains pretty much constant until the chorus at the end so there should be DS changes like this unless you are implementing jumps (which there doesn't seem to be)
2. In general, I think the notes need more structure. A lot of the map feels a bit randomly placed, even ignoring the varying DS changes. For example, 00:51:122 (6,7,8,1) - these notes could have easily been in a perfect line, and most of the blanketed notes (eg, 00:08:872 (3,4) - 00:33:122 (3,4,1) - 00:34:622 (2,3) - ) are not blanketed precisely, and a lot of the notes which come directly before or after a slider (eg, 00:10:622 (2,3) - ) could be placed so that they are directly in line with the slider, and certain runs like 00:17:122 (3,4,5) - could easily be made into perfect triangles. There's a lot more examples of things that can be changed in order for the map to have more structure. Basically you should always try to ask yourself whether there's a reason a note was placed in a particular location.
3. 00:49:622 - You can still have a clap hitsound right here by changing to a custom sampleset with the clap sample as drum-slidertick.wav, same with 00:53:122 (3) - and a few other long sliders
4. 00:57:122 (1,2,3) - For 1/4 triples such as these, I would recommend using a much smaller DS than 1.6x. I think 1.0x would be an appropriate DS for the given difficulty of the map.
5. 01:08:122 (1,2) - I highly reccomend you switch this pattern either to 01:07:122 (1) - , 01:06:122 (1,2) - , or 01:04:122 (1,2,3) - . The slider tail is not a clickable element, which makes the tail weaker than the head. However, the 3rd pulse of the beat, which lands on the slider tail, is by convention stronger than the 2nd pulse. Thus, this pattern is rhythmically uncomfortable to play. Also, this is the only instance where the particular pattern is brought up, meaning it could easily be chtanged to one of the other options without affecting the map.
6. 01:17:122 (1,2,3) - Why do you start stacking triples here, only to stop stacking them at 01:25:122 (1,2,3) - ? You should probably be consistent with the rest of the map and space out the stacked notes. If you're going to have stacks, you should at least have some sort of reasoning on why one triple is stacked and another one isn't. You shouldn't just haphazardly switch between the two

30201102 wrote:

[General]

1. Is the storyboard done? It looks like there's just a blue line in the middle of the screen going up and down