hei!!!!!
just a prank bro
take contlorsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
just a prank bro
take contlorsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
- 00:05:489 (1) - when you do a slider like this the player expects it to emphasize a certain sound cause it looks so different compared to the others. i would change it to look more like the other 3/4 sliders you have
- 00:13:126 (3) - this white tick seems to be the powerful sound in the song here so why did you stack it under 00:12:944 (2) - . Stacking 00:12:944 (2) - under 00:12:762 (1) - would make more sense imo
- 00:15:671 (1) - kinda lame that you only decided to overlap this under 00:15:307 (4) - when the sound on that is so powerful that it could be a jump
- 00:15:853 (2) - don't really agree with the rhythm choices made here but w/e. For example 00:16:035 (4) - here, the 1/4 sounds continue which you mapped as a 1/2 slider. 00:20:398 (2,3) - and here you skipped a triple sound. Just pointing a few examples i'm too lazy to point out more
- 00:28:398 (6) - if you are a nice person you NC all of these lol. Reading stuff and emphasising cool sounds!!!
- 00:33:853 (1,2) - would swap NC's cause reasons above
- 00:36:762 (5) - all of these have been 3/4 sliders before pls
- 00:41:853 (1) - ending this slider on the red tick would make more sense as the red tick has a more prominent sound
- 00:49:125 (1) - if you wanna emphasize things like this at least make it noticeable like this
- 00:50:035 (2,3,4) - i would've expected more emphasis on these snares
- 00:59:307 (1) - you use this slidershape so rarely it just seems random
- 01:25:307 (2) - lol why does this have so much spacing when there is pretty much nothing in the song
- 01:35:671 (1) - where the 1-2's at? lol
- 01:49:853 (3) - could've emphasized the snares with sharp movement or spacing or something
- 01:59:671 (5) - nc for consistency. (refer to 00:44:035 (1) - )
- 03:09:398 (3) - pls remove this. There is literally no triple here and doesn't even fit imo. BUT if you really want a triple somewhere add it between 03:09:853 (2,1) - cause powerful downbeat
- 03:12:762 (5) - kinda sad that you started to break the 1/2 slider thing so early when the song didn't change at all and then here you just do a 1/2 slider so it doesn't really emphasize the change in the song. also 03:13:853 (4) - same
- 03:45:853 (1) - slow this slider down so 03:46:216 (1) - gets more emphasis
- 03:52:398 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i feel like this rhythm would work better as pretty much the whole thing is 1/4
- rest is just same stuff repeated or i just suck or something idk good luck