Tari
Tari wrote:
[Expert][Insane]
- 01:41:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - You could be more creative here. At least try to rotate 90 degrees to prevent the copy and paste of 00:17:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - // I'll make an adjustment here when I get the inspiration. Until then, well I need to think more..
- 00:34:929 (6) - I suggest you reposition this. The movement between this note and the previous one feels unnatural and very sharp. // Since I wanted a similar movement with 00:24:363 (2,3), I'd like to keep the flow. Instead made the stream less spaced so the flow to be less sharp.
- 00:42:508 (1,2,1) - The placement here is inconsistent from 00:37:456 (1,2,1) - . I assume it's intentional? // Unlike the previous sections, the following rhythm appears after 1/1, so adding a jump wouldn't be appropriate.
- 01:21:508 (2,3) - I prefer you make these align because they look more aesthetically pleasing that way. // Not really sure what you exactly mean here, but I wanted (2,3) interact along (1).
[Easy]
- 00:40:614 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - It would better you center this pattern and make it more symmetrical; It would make it look more visually appealing. // Guess it is actually centered if you look at (3). The combo colors might've distracted you.
- 00:52:614 (1,2) - I see this pattern quite frequently. I would prefer you change it up to make the map as a whole less boring. Try making it blanket slider start of 00:51:982 (1) - // This pattern is to be consistent with expert, and I don't think I've used such rotation sliders too frequently?
Mapset looks good so far. You need to add a normal to complete the spread. Also, the slider-slide sounds horrible with this song; please replace it with a silent soft-slide file. // That might work. Will add it later.
- Consider using HP 1.5. Recovery of HP is much less than the regain of HP due to the huge pauses in-between notes. // Valid point. Fixed.
- 01:05:877 (3) - Perfect this slider. The curve is a bit off and it's probably better centered. // Maybe it's because this contains a red control point. Those normally happen even they are symmetric, and guess this was the case.
- 01:39:982 (3) - Slider end could be better blanketed as well. // Tried.
- 01:45:035 - Any reason you skipped this beat? There is enough recovery time after the spinner to add a note here. // I normally do not prefer giving edgy recovery times on lower difficulties.
Call me back when you are ready.
HelloSCV
Thanks for the moddings~HelloSCV wrote:
[Easy][Normal]
이지를 만들면 벌에 쏘이지~~
ㅋㅋㅅㄱ[Insane]
음 노말하군
ㅋㅋㅅㄱ[Expert]
- 01:14:416 (1) -, 01:24:521 (1) - 등, 익스퍼트가 점프가 많은걸 고려하면 이런부분 같은경우엔 점프가 들어갔으면하는 아쉬움이 있네요, 제가 할 소린 아니지만 노트가 너무 다닥다닥 붙어있는 느낌이라 // 점프도 효과적이긴 합니다만 앞서서 이미 점프를 사용해버렸기 때문에 여기서는 조금 다른 강조포인트를 사용하기 위해서 흐름을 꺾었습니다.
힛사는 익퍼랑 동일좀 대충했긴한데 버블이 코앞이시니 괜찮을거라 믿음 ㅎ
- 00:18:995 (1) - 음자체도 그다지 강조되는 부분도 아니고 차라리 스피너로 시작됐으면 더 좋겠지만 노트도 나쁘지 않다고 생각은 해요 대신에 강한 느낌이드는 노말휘슬 대신 소프트 휘슬이 더 appropriate한거 같네요 // 음 고민스럽네요. 사실 이게 직전 음이랑 차이가 보이긴 했는데,
- 00:34:390 (2) - 여기 클랩보다 00:34:626 (5) - 여기 대신해서 넣으시는건 어떨까요 // ?
- 00:41:732 (1,2,3,4) - // 00:36:679 - 와 같은 느낌 가져가고 싶었습니다.
- 01:09:521 (3,4) - rhythm을 reverse하시는게 보컬?소리하고 좀 더 알맞게 들어가는거같아요 // 가사의 의미 단위를 생각해보면 현재 박자를 채택하고 싶습니다.
- 01:12:837 (1) - 뉴콤보 넣으신 special reason 이라도? // 지그재그 패턴 리딩 목적이었습니다만 굳이 필요는 없으려나요?
- 01:24:521 (1) - 이전노트와 점프가 들어가있지 않은상태에서 반복슬라이더를 넣는것은 playable하지 못하다고 think합니다. what about 반복빼고 뒤에 점프로 a note를 추가하시는게 더 great하겠네요 // 바꾸면 조금 패턴 디자인적으로 통일성이 깨질듯 하네요.