Q
[1]
00:28:114 (6) - why don't you make better flow
like this?
00:46:981 - Add a beat? I think This part has a piano sound.
00:48:505 (5,1) - I think people could be confused about reading because 00:48:036 (3,4,5) - this looks triangle, So DS looks similar.
01:05:849 (1,2,1) - If I were you, I mapped
like this.
01:09:130 (3,4) - make sure 01:08:895 (2,3) - is jump.
01:41:239 - This should be clickable because It have strong piano.
01:50:380 (7,8) - Could be hard to read.
02:03:791 (1,2) - ctrl G fore flow with 02:03:927 (2,3) - .
03:32:700 (1,3) - How about make symmetry like 00:20:849 (1,2,3) - ?
03:34:245 - 03:35:336 - 03:36:427 - add a beat, It has strong sound.
03:47:154 (4,5) - Do you have any reason for stacking? I think Unstack could be better, 03:46:609 (2,3,4) - You didn't stack and you stacked 4,5 suddenly, It feels awkward for playing.
03:57:791 (1,2,3,4) - because of this antijumps, 03:58:882 (1,2,3) - this stream pattern could be hard to read.
04:34:882 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just copy&paste pattern? ISn't It boring to play? I think you just copied 04:33:791 (1,2,3,4) - 04:34:882 (1,2,3,4) - 04:37:063 (1,2,3,4) - 04:39:245 (1,2,3,4) - .
05:02:154 (1) - This circle could be hard to read Because of DS and It's In 04:57:791 (1) - this slider's body, make Easier reading.
Good luck!