Going for ranked
Good luck
Good luck
Not going to change this unless it is a rankable issue and BN's feel it has to happen, but thanks for trying to help out more. sorry404 AccNotFound wrote:
love this map, so one little suggestion.
In Oni diff, 00:00:280 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - little unmatched with sound to me.
since you followed the drum sound like 00:00:280 (1,2) - kd, 00:00:663 (3,4,5) - must be d kk cause of sound pitch imo.
this is my suggestion.
really sorry for suggest after bubble ;w;
see ya~
Surono wrote:
up to the mapper, but I felt thats enough to emphasized since the loud drums are just 00:00:280 - 00:00:664 - these, 00:00:921 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - these sounds are just kick drums but if to follow the flow is not bad tho, kinda overemphasized imo
@Wolrd Fraction 00:01:818 - just kat this to emphasized the contrast of 00:01:305 (6,7,8,9) - these
if you want, you can apply that suggestion without update because its minor/little suggestion. doesnt need to rebubble
OK i made the necessary changes. Let's see what happensthzz wrote:
i think 00:01:818 - is clearly low sound, so it's better to change 00:01:690 - to k than Surono's tbh.Surono wrote:
up to the mapper, but I felt thats enough to emphasized since the loud drums are just 00:00:280 - 00:00:664 - these, 00:00:921 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - these sounds are just kick drums but if to follow the flow is not bad tho, kinda overemphasized imo
@Wolrd Fraction 00:01:818 - just kat this to emphasized the contrast of 00:01:305 (6,7,8,9) - these
if you want, you can apply that suggestion without update because its minor/little suggestion. doesnt need to rebubble
up to you.
others seem fine. call me again and let's go for qf
wwwwwwwwww wats this XD ggthzz wrote:
i think 00:01:818 - is clearly low sound, so it's better to change 00:01:690 - to k than Surono's tbh.i was fool lol
up to you. yeah up to mapper, lul madness subjective intensifies
I'm sorry but i have to disagree, I believe the spread between the 2 is fine and further removal of any of those notes would make the spread between futsuu and muzu too great. Thanks for trying to help though.qoot8123 wrote:
Hi o/
I have some concerns about spread in futsuu:
From 00:51:562 - to 01:27:972 - there is only 3/2 rest moment on futsuu and muzu while kantan has much larger one like 3/1, I think you need to add some 2/1 break on futsuu to make the spread more balance with muzu and kantan like remove 00:56:177 (105) - ,01:04:383 (125) - ,01:12:588 (146) - and 01:20:792 (166) - .
EDIT: Everything suggested was changed, i took a deeper look into the map and found what qoot said to be accurate. Thanks for the help.Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
The concerns raised by qoot are valid. Additional modding as follows:
- [Kantan]
- 00:40:280 (42) - this note could be removed for a 4/1 rest considering the current note density from 00:35:151 to 00:51:562 - is relatively higher than that in the kiai. By doing so, kiai's intensity could be emphasized more properly.
- [Futsuu]
- 00:40:792 (71) - similar to Kantan, you may delete this note for a better transition to higher difficulties.
- From 00:51:562 to 01:27:972 - there are no 2/1 breaks within this 36-second session, which is in fact rather demanding for beginners. The deletions qoot mentioned do not affect overall spread with Muzukashii at all as Muzukashii has similar note density at those specific spots. Therefore, please reconsider his suggestions again.
- [Muzukashii]
- From 00:00:280 to 00:50:536 - similar to Futsuu but in different part of the map, there are no 2/1 breaks within this 50-second session, which is also deemed consecutive at this level of difficulty. I would recommend removing 00:35:664 (91,92) - for a more balanced spread with Futsuu at that spot.
- 00:41:049 (107) - similar to Futsuu, you may remove this note as well.
- [Oni]
- 00:36:433 (138) - you may delete this note with respect to the suggestion in Muzukashii for spread refinement.