Hi Ayyri,
M4M Requested via PM Discord.
Even if it's a american/french collab, i'll all speak in english coz' i'm lazy :V
[AyyAyyRi &
KUROKOTEI
]
[Ayyri]
00:25:362 (57) - just from my point of view, i'm not able to pass this stream because it is way too long and too complex that i could read haha, so i just cut every 4/1 to play it properly and what's going on, the 3 are ok for me, the 3 last ones less. The first fun fact is you start the 3 first time with a k 00:25:362 (57,72,87) - and after with a d 00:29:254 (102,117,132) - . The first thing that choke me a bit is the 4 d at 00:29:254 (102,103,104,105) - which i find is a lot and i would change to k 00:29:416 (104) - this one, the last one is at 00:32:660 (142,143,144,145,146) - which i would completly swap the k to d and d to k, it sound better and more accurate since 00:32:822 (144) - would be natturaly on a clap place and the high sound is present here.
And with all the changes and cut, i was able to pass it with no break. I mean you maybe not want to cut all of these since you may want some challenge but w/e.
00:43:362 - why a break here? That makes the whole parts not equaly longer. ddddk? like the previous quint
01:06:876 (452) - aaaaaaaa i don't know if it's allowed on the RC, generally we can accept if it's a xxxxO pattern, but it's a oxxxO, however it's 1/3. aaaaaa
01:12:065 (472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495) - hmmmm tbh use the same base as 00:18:876 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - this one sounds sounds akward.
01:30:065 (579,580,581) - Welp, why this triplet? There's nothing interesting here for, however the idea is interesting but if you want to keep it, use it more oftenly and regulary.
01:36:714 - Sound odd to not have even a d here.
02:05:254 (931,932,933,934,935,936,937,938,939,940,941,942,943,944,945) - Ifeel it is quite messy because no patterns are equaly in this stream, i'd rather see someting simple as kkddkkddkkdd etc... or complex but visible as kkddkdddkkddkdd(d) which contrast on the different sounds but keep the main base as k on the key points 02:05:254 (931,935,939,943) -
02:06:633 (947,951) - Delete to keep it clean and get the same base starter as 02:03:957 (917,918,919,920) -
02:10:444 (977) - the same goes above.
02:16:768 (1034,1035,1036,1037,1038,1039,1040,1041,1042,1043,1044,1045) - 02:37:524 (1207,1208,1209,1210,1211,1212,1213,1214,1215,1216,1217,1218,1219) - yep even if it's different ppl, i'm okay for different patterns, but keep the same way about 1/3 1/6 stuff.
02:50:660 (30,31,32) - why not basically ddddK? (same for all others ofc) (because lel 03:02:983 (93,94,95,96,97) - ).
03:08:741 (149) - Delete for a constant pattern stream length.
04:03:470 (368) - Dunno why but i like these triplets.
04:07:119 (402,408) - Rather k no? If we look on the previous triplets.
04:31:768 (676) - Delete for a constant pattetn stream length and keeping the sections distinct.
[Sayaka]
00:00:714 - Actually you should start your 0.50 here, because the first 4/1 is 1.00 and it visible by the fast white bar and it's kinda odd.
00:12:065 (14) - 00:17:254 (21) - I think it's more accurate to syncronize these patterns with the second of the section (like 00:05:903 (5,6,7,8) - ) because the impair patterns of the section are k --- k --- d
00:22:768 - Maybe spinner with low volume but as you want (but also not finishing too close to the stream because it's a complex one haha).
00:46:281 (272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284) - I love this kind of patterns where you start from a same base pattern, you can do w/e you want with a long stream after.
00:51:308 (323) - Not fan of a slider moreover when it is a very short one and finishes before the end of the sound you're targeting.
00:50:497 (314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322) - 00:53:416 (341,342,343,344) - what? xd Why is it so different but musically the same?
01:38:173 (623) - Oboi... not again :'^( But what i see here is you kept the stream with only 1 or 2 d / k in a row which is good for alternating and i guess it's the best choice to do for a stream. Just a few comments. 01:41:903 (669,673) - at these points we can here a up in the sounds and i feel like it should be better to get a similar pattern which start at the same place but that would make such changes which would be kdkkddk at 01:41:741 (667,668,669,670,671,672,673) - and on the same way ddkkddkdk at 01:42:551 (677,678,679,680,681,682,683,684,685) - .
Oboi this is 2 streams 4 me.
02:20:984 (1073,1074,1075,1076,1077,1078,1079,1080,1081,1082,1083,1084) - lol sayaka you remind me on my black or white part on top kac 2013 even tho i do this starting on the white lines, not the red ones
(Which is why i prefer my version and is more accurate imo)
02:32:497 (1163) - :japanese gobelin: i even prefer 1/6 than this kind of slider.
02:39:470 (1228,1229,1230) - ddk instead in order to go on the same base as 02:39:146 (1225,1226,1227) - .
02:48:065 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29) - why different from 00:18:876 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56) - .
The rest is ok for me. Generaly the structure is ok, i think this is the kind of map i need for endurance and stream haha.
(Hope i split well)
Gl hf for rank