forum

Muzzy - Endgame [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
57
show more
Aloda
Hi.

Continue?
How about removing 00:37:720 (6) and 00:39:092 (17), then adding a note at 00:38:406. I feel like it has the strongest sound here of the three and it also makes sense to have the more dense pattern at the (slightly) louder part of the song. Compare it to 00:37:720.

You could remove 01:04:463 (145) , then change the spinner (01:04:635 (1)) so it starts here instead. The sound you're mapping it to seems to start here, and using a spinner at the end of a 1/4 stream like this is fine.

What is 02:44:577 (1) mapped to? Remove it?

A number of the notes between 03:29:835 and 03:32:577 feel a little off. Maybe you could try changing some colours around here to match the song a little more closely.

04:09:606 - 04:50:749 feels quite strange to me. I think you've used a little too much 1/4 throughout the section. I think the gradually increasing density is really nice, but yeah, I think it's a bit too much. Maybe try starting from like 1 triplet per bar then gradually increasing up to something like what you have at 04:31:549.

Your map is pretty good already, so my mod ended up being pretty short ahaha :) gl
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Aloda wrote:

Hi.

Continue?
How about removing 00:37:720 (6) and 00:39:092 (17), then adding a note at 00:38:406. I feel like it has the strongest sound here of the three and it also makes sense to have the more dense pattern at the (slightly) louder part of the song. Compare it to 00:37:720. Changed

You could remove 01:04:463 (145) , then change the spinner (01:04:635 (1)) so it starts here instead. The sound you're mapping it to seems to start here, and using a spinner at the end of a 1/4 stream like this is fine. Applied

What is 02:44:577 (1) mapped to? Remove it? I listen a low sound

A number of the notes between 03:29:835 and 03:32:577 feel a little off. Maybe you could try changing some colours around here to match the song a little more closely. Changed some notes

04:09:606 - 04:50:749 feels quite strange to me. I think you've used a little too much 1/4 throughout the section. I think the gradually increasing density is really nice, but yeah, I think it's a bit too much. Maybe try starting from like 1 triplet per bar then gradually increasing up to something like what you have at 04:31:549. I think that remap this maybe

Your map is pretty good already, so my mod ended up being pretty short ahaha :) gl No matter, all count :D
Thanks for mod Aloda :)
Beatmap update~
Ladies Night
For M4M queue.

[General]

HP5.5 can be bumped up to HP6, I believe with how the song is very consistent with its rhythm, making the HP drain harder is sufficient for more challenge.

For tags, add "016 - expedition" to the end of Monstercat in tags for the album origins.

For tags, add electronic for genre.


[Continue?]

00:39:692 (21) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the drums using kats for similar sounds like earlier on for 00:39:435 (19) and 00:38:749 (14).

01:13:463 (60) - Change to k, the growl sound starting at 01:13:377 still continues and plus it would be consistent if it was the same like this earlier pattern at 01:10:635 (38,39,40,41,42) for the same sound.

01:16:635 (74) - Change to k, you emphasized the same sound using kats earlier for this note at 01:16:463 (73) and it would play well and rhythmically wise leading up to the loud don for the drums at 01:16:806 (75).

01:25:463 - Add a d, the drums and the synthetic sound starting at 01:25:377 still continues and plus it makes this section of kats more fun to play leading up to the streamy section compared to just 1/4th kats leading up to the streamy section.

01:25:977 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to add this in.

01:33:349 (206) - Change to k, the drums and the growling sound still continues starting from 01:33:263 - and it would be emphasized better as a kat like you did previously for the same sound at 01:30:520 (182,183,184).

01:44:320 (282) - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this.

02:00:520 (48) - Change to k, the same sound starting at 02:00:349 still continues and would play rhythmically well leading up to the triple (d,d,d) pattern that's mapped to the drum.

02:09:349 - Add a d, the synthetic sound and drums starting at 02:09:263 still continues and would make the string of 1/4th kats more rhythmically fun to play leading up to the streamy part.

02:09:863 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this.

04:14:835 (43) - Change to d, I hear nothing of significance that can be emphasized using a kat here and it would be better to keep this section consistent like earlier for the same sound at 04:13:377 (31,32,33).

05:17:835 (63) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the higher vocals like you did earlier on at 05:06:520 and 05:12:349.


Best of endeavors with going for Approval for this marathon.
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Voyage wrote:

For M4M queue.

[General]

HP5.5 can be bumped up to HP6, I believe with how the song is very consistent with its rhythm, making the HP drain harder is sufficient for more challenge. Fixed

For tags, add "016 - expedition" to the end of Monstercat in tags for the album origins. Added

For tags, add electronic for genre. Added


[Continue?]

00:39:692 (21) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the drums using kats for similar sounds like earlier on for 00:39:435 (19) and 00:38:749 (14). Changed

01:13:463 (60) - Change to k, the growl sound starting at 01:13:377 still continues and plus it would be consistent if it was the same like this earlier pattern at 01:10:635 (38,39,40,41,42) for the same sound.

01:16:635 (74) - Change to k, you emphasized the same sound using kats earlier for this note at 01:16:463 (73) and it would play well and rhythmically wise leading up to the loud don for the drums at 01:16:806 (75). Changed

01:25:463 - Add a d, the drums and the synthetic sound starting at 01:25:377 still continues and plus it makes this section of kats more fun to play leading up to the streamy section compared to just 1/4th kats leading up to the streamy section. The sv's don't fit well. I changed some notes to d for follow your suggestion.

01:25:977 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to add this in. ^

01:33:349 (206) - Change to k, the drums and the growling sound still continues starting from 01:33:263 - and it would be emphasized better as a kat like you did previously for the same sound at 01:30:520 (182,183,184). Changed

01:44:320 (282) - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this. Ok

02:00:520 (48) - Change to k, the same sound starting at 02:00:349 still continues and would play rhythmically well leading up to the triple (d,d,d) pattern that's mapped to the drum. Changed

02:09:349 - Add a d, the synthetic sound and drums starting at 02:09:263 still continues and would make the string of 1/4th kats more rhythmically fun to play leading up to the streamy part. Same reason of 01:25:463 -

02:09:863 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this. ^

04:14:835 (43) - Change to d, I hear nothing of significance that can be emphasized using a kat here and it would be better to keep this section consistent like earlier for the same sound at 04:13:377 (31,32,33). Changed

05:17:835 (63) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the higher vocals like you did earlier on at 05:06:520 and 05:12:349. I don't follow the vocal. I follow just the drum


Best of endeavors with going for Approval for this marathon.
Thanks for mod :D
I'll mod your map in a moment
Beatmap update~
NlHIL
[Continue?]
01:36:692 (230,231) - 03:08:063 (14,15) - 03:19:206 (22,23) - swap
03:01:206 - add d?
03:12:177 - add k?
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

NlHIL wrote:

[Continue?]
01:36:692 (230,231) - 03:08:063 (14,15) - 03:19:206 (22,23) - swap Changed
03:01:206 - add d? I don't listen a loud sound
03:12:177 - add k? ^
Thanks for mod!
Beatmap update~
Jaye
[General]
  1. d = don & k = kat, Caps on either for a Finisher (standard layout really).
  2. This was really hard to mod tbh.

[ Continue?]
  1. 01:27:606 (162) - Change to d, the different in tone between this note and that of (160) is something that should be highlighted (red ticks are important).
  2. A lot of this is pretty good tbh.
  3. 03:09:435 (16) - Change to k as sound is almost identical to 03:08:064 (14).
  4. 04:02:749 (217) - Change to k, high toned noise. Although there is a deep held noise (that sounds like a noisy beehive) I wouldn't recommend mapping to it (mapping to held notes is weird).
  5. 04:53:492 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Invert the colours of this whole section, the higher vocal parts you have mapped as d and surrounded with k, though it should be the other way around to emphasise "hah". Also you mostly do this in the later patterns so I'm not sure why this one is completely different.
  6. I really like this stream at 05:23:663.

Apologies for the extremely short mod, but it's already looking pretty good. Best of luck getting this approved!
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Jaye wrote:

[General]
  1. d = don & k = kat, Caps on either for a Finisher (standard layout really).
  2. This was really hard to mod tbh.

[ Continue?]
  1. 01:27:606 (162) - Change to d, the different in tone between this note and that of (160) is something that should be highlighted (red ticks are important).
  2. A lot of this is pretty good tbh. Changed
  3. 03:09:435 (16) - Change to k as sound is almost identical to 03:08:064 (14). Changed
  4. 04:02:749 (217) - Change to k, high toned noise. Although there is a deep held noise (that sounds like a noisy beehive) I wouldn't recommend mapping to it (mapping to held notes is weird). Changed
  5. 04:53:492 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Invert the colours of this whole section, the higher vocal parts you have mapped as d and surrounded with k, though it should be the other way around to emphasise "hah". Also you mostly do this in the later patterns so I'm not sure why this one is completely different. I try to vary in patterns. But i changed some notes
  6. I really like this stream at 05:23:663. Thanks :)
8-)
Apologies for the extremely short mod, but it's already looking pretty good. Best of luck getting this approved! All mod count, thanks!
Thanks very much for mod :D
I'll mod your map soon
Beatmap update~
snowball112
Heya, follow up mod on irc suggestions.

  1. Move down bg further, looks better. Change to 0,0,"2d97d91603.jpg",0,120 or so.
  2. It's a bit annoying that you don't keep 00:45:263 (25,26) - these sounds consistent as k later in this section when the sound is similar, at least until 00:51:949. For 00:52:120 (58,59) - you can use kd, because the sound is lower, but before that I think it's better if you keep it as k. Try something like this, cursor on 00:49:377. I don't think it fits well if you switch the note colour for that sound.
  3. 01:08:320 - move to 01:08:149 for better fit. Similar at 01:18:863 - etc.
  4. 01:14:063 - this part could use a few more notes, density is too low otherwise I think. Try something like this, cursor on 01:15:435.
  5. 01:10:635 - this should not be kkddk. The sound is similar to 01:07:892 - , not to 01:13:377. Maybe try 01:10:720 - d and 01:13:635 - k, just make these two different.
  6. 01:15:435 - add a note here for consistency
  7. Similar to what we discussed in IRC for the previous section: I am not convinced that it is good to start a triple from sounds like 01:29:492 - when sounds like 01:30:520 - are better for that. Also, you have clearer sounds that can be used for 1/4 between 01:29:149 - and 01:29:492 - (low background sound). And 01:29:063 - should be removed. And 01:31:120 - does not fit well I think. Try something like this,cursor on 01:30:177. Also applies to later sections until 01:46:806.
  8. 01:49:206 - section from here until 02:08:920 - could use a few more notes. Example, cursor on 01:51:949.
  9. 03:50:577 - this should be k according to the other patterns you have used here.
  10. 04:53:835 - kdkd? and 05:12:692 (48,49,50,51) - ddkd for more consistent structure in this part.
  11. The section from 04:09:606 - is a bit questionable, I don't think the song is not so intense. Maybe try patterns like this, cursor on 04:10:463. Or something like this, cursor on 04:11:835 - . Or add some breaks to what you currently have, because I think these patterns are questionable, especially the 5-note 1/4 in this part. The song does not really do a build up here.
I still have a few concerns about the final kiai, but we can discuss that in IRC.

Edit: some more things you may want to consider:
  1. 01:15:435 - try this, so that the spacing follows the high instrument sounds in the background, feels more natural to play.
  2. 01:24:435 - missing note for consistency.
  3. 01:53:149 - add d, better for following background sounds here.
  4. 01:54:777 - add d for consistency
  5. 01:55:035 - kkd? The instrument is strong here.
  6. 01:57:263 - ddkkk? Similar reason to ^
  7. Try 02:00:692 - D and remove 02:00:863 (66,67) - for similar structure to 01:49:720 (3,4,5). You can also signal the beginning of the increasing song intensity like this.
  8. 02:01:806 and 02:04:549 - should be k I think.
  9. 02:06:863 - maybe add d here for the background instruments.
  10. 02:08:235 - ^
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

snowball112 wrote:

Heya, follow up mod on irc suggestions.

  1. Move down bg further, looks better. Change to 0,0,"2d97d91603.jpg",0,120 or so. Fixed
  2. It's a bit annoying that you don't keep 00:45:263 (25,26) - these sounds consistent as k later in this section when the sound is similar, at least until 00:51:949. For 00:52:120 (58,59) - you can use kd, because the sound is lower, but before that I think it's better if you keep it as k. Try something like this, cursor on 00:49:377. I don't think it fits well if you switch the note colour for that sound. I applied your suggestion with a similar pattern
  3. 01:08:320 - move to 01:08:149 for better fit. Similar at 01:18:863 - etc.Notes moved
  4. 01:14:063 - this part could use a few more notes, density is too low otherwise I think. Try something like this, cursor on 01:15:435.)I added more notes, but i delete note in 01:16:120 -
  5. 01:10:635 - this should not be kkddk. The sound is similar to 01:07:892 - , not to 01:13:377. Maybe try 01:10:720 - d and 01:13:635 - k, just make these two different. Changed only kdddk, kddkk i don't like the sound
  6. 01:15:435 - add a note here for consistency Ok
  7. Similar to what we discussed in IRC for the previous section: I am not convinced that it is good to start a triple from sounds like 01:29:492 - when sounds like 01:30:520 - are better for that. Also, you have clearer sounds that can be used for 1/4 between 01:29:149 - and 01:29:492 - (low background sound). And 01:29:063 - should be removed. And 01:31:120 - does not fit well I think. Try something like this,cursor on 01:30:177. Also applies to later sections until 01:46:806. I don't follow your suggestion. I try to follow the electro background sound that is added in this section 01:28:120 - . But i changed some kkd for kkk
  8. 01:49:206 - section from here until 02:08:920 - could use a few more notes. Example, cursor on 01:51:949. Added notes and suggestion followed
  9. 03:50:577 - this should be k according to the other patterns you have used here.
  10. 04:53:835 - kdkd? and 05:12:692 (48,49,50,51) - ddkd for more consistent structure in this part. Changed
  11. The section from 04:09:606 - is a bit questionable, I don't think the song is not so intense. Maybe try patterns like this, cursor on 04:10:463. Or something like this, cursor on 04:11:835 - . Or add some breaks to what you currently have, because I think these patterns are questionable, especially the 5-note 1/4 in this part. The song does not really do a build up here. I followed your suggestion, nice idea!
I still have a few concerns about the final kiai, but we can discuss that in IRC.

Edit: some more things you may want to consider:
  1. 01:15:435 - try this, so that the spacing follows the high instrument sounds in the background, feels more natural to play.
  2. 01:24:435 - missing note for consistency.
  3. 01:53:149 - add d, better for following background sounds here.
  4. 01:54:777 - add d for consistency
  5. 01:55:035 - kkd? The instrument is strong here.
  6. 01:57:263 - ddkkk? Similar reason to ^
  7. Try 02:00:692 - D and remove 02:00:863 (66,67) - for similar structure to 01:49:720 (3,4,5). You can also signal the beginning of the increasing song intensity like this.
  8. 02:01:806 and 02:04:549 - should be k I think.
  9. 02:06:863 - maybe add d here for the background instruments.
  10. 02:08:235 - ^
Applied all and discussed on irc
Thanks for check the map
We discussed the rest in irc
Beatmap update~
snowball112
Recheck, no kd.

  1. 01:01:549 (110,112) - ctrl+g? If you're following the same base kdkkd structure as before you should swap these to have kd here.
  2. I think there should be a k on 01:03:177 - , because if you compare 01:01:720 (112,113,114,115,116) - and 01:03:092 (128,129,130,131,132) - , these should be similar from base structure, but the second one is more intense. Since the first is dkddk after the change ^, you could make the second one kkddk as the intensity increases.
  3. 01:11:235 - I think you can add a k for the instrument sound here.
  4. Some k in the 5-note at 01:13:377 - would be nice, maybe try dkkdk. And 01:21:606 - can be k for a similar reason, so you have your 5-note patterns for this kind of sound start with d-k-d in the first two kiai sections.
  5. 01:16:806 - finish? Similar to 01:05:835 - , would make a nice accent here.
  6. You can try filling out 01:35:406 - and 01:35:577 - with notes for emphasis of the sound here, maybe try making a kdddkkd pattern here.
  7. 02:00:692 - finish, would be nice for emphasis and marking the new part.
  8. I think you can add a d on 02:04:120 - .
  9. 04:19:549 - try this, better for consistent structure.
  10. 04:20:920 - try this, and repeat at 04:22:292 - as well.
  11. 04:23:663 - you can try something like this if you want for more consistency.
  12. I think 04:26:406 - can be d kkd as well. Similar at 04:27:777 - , I think it sounds nicer for the instrument sounds, and also not bad for variety.
  13. 04:46:635 - I think this should look like this for better overall structure with 04:49:377 - imo, to get a 1-2-1-2 pattern.
  14. I think 06:10:635 - could be D, just because the pitch decreases very slightly here.
  15. I think it might play out better if you ctrl+g notes like 05:30:349 (156,158) - to make dkddk patterns instead of kdddk, but this is up to you. I just find that the kdddk don't flow as nicely. Applies to the rest of the final kiai.
You may call me back~
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

snowball112 wrote:

Recheck, no kd.

  1. 01:01:549 (110,112) - ctrl+g? If you're following the same base kdkkd structure as before you should swap these to have kd here. Ok, fixed
  2. I think there should be a k on 01:03:177 - , because if you compare 01:01:720 (112,113,114,115,116) - and 01:03:092 (128,129,130,131,132) - , these should be similar from base structure, but the second one is more intense. Since the first is dkddk after the change ^, you could make the second one kkddk as the intensity increases. Changed
  3. 01:11:235 - I think you can add a k for the instrument sound here. Added
  4. Some k in the 5-note at 01:13:377 - would be nice, maybe try dkkdk. And 01:21:606 - can be k for a similar reason, so you have your 5-note patterns for this kind of sound start with d-k-d in the first two kiai sections. I left it as it was, but in the last 5 notes of each kiai I changed it to kkdkk
  5. 01:16:806 - finish? Similar to 01:05:835 - , would make a nice accent here. I want to highlight the beginning of kiai
  6. You can try filling out 01:35:406 - and 01:35:577 - with notes for emphasis of the sound here, maybe try making a kdddkkd pattern here. I did not add a note on 01:35:406 - I think the pace is better. Added note in 01:35:577 -
  7. 02:00:692 - finish, would be nice for emphasis and marking the new part. Finish added
  8. I think you can add a d on 02:04:120 - . I don't hear something that stands out
  9. 04:19:549 - try this, better for consistent structure. Applied
  10. 04:20:920 - try this, and repeat at 04:22:292 - as well.
  11. 04:23:663 - you can try something like this if you want for more consistency.
  12. I think 04:26:406 - can be d kkd as well. Similar at 04:27:777 - , I think it sounds nicer for the instrument sounds, and also not bad for variety. I did not apply the changes you suggested, but it gave me an idea to tweak current patterns
  13. 04:46:635 - I think this should look like this for better overall structure with 04:49:377 - imo, to get a 1-2-1-2 pattern. Ok, changed
  14. I think 06:10:635 - could be D, just because the pitch decreases very slightly here. Oh well, changed
  15. I think it might play out better if you ctrl+g notes like 05:30:349 (156,158) - to make dkddk patterns instead of kdddk, but this is up to you. I just find that the kdddk don't flow as nicely. Applies to the rest of the final kiai. I applied your suggestion with dkddk
You may call me back~
Thanks!
Beatmap updated~
snowball112
Bubbled~
#1

Final IRC check
22:26 gaston_2199: Hey! I applied the changes you sent me on the forum. When you can check it
22:28 snowball112: i'll check now I think
22:34 snowball112: alright, 02:44:577 - this could be a k
22:34 snowball112: mono is fine for the piano I think
22:35 gaston_2199: 02:45:949 (2) - d?
22:35 snowball112: no, just leave as k
22:35 snowball112: it's better if you just mono k for piano
22:36 snowball112: and then start using d and k for long instruments later
22:36 gaston_2199: Ok
22:36 snowball112: just make 02:44:577 - k, rest is fine here
22:36 gaston_2199: Well, fixed
22:40 snowball112: ok, 04:42:520 - the part starting here
22:41 snowball112: I think 04:48:006 - this one should be the same as 04:45:263 (232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239) -
22:42 snowball112: 04:48:006 - http://puu.sh/sFsdR/5bd99b3154.jpg
22:42 snowball112: just looks neater that way
22:46 snowball112: i'm still a bit unhappy about 04:20:920 (74,75) - 04:22:292 (82,83) - 04:23:663 (90,91) - that these are not dk :< because the pitch is different to 04:25:035 (98,99) - for example
22:48 snowball112: 04:26:406 (107,108) - dk and 04:27:777 (115,116) - dk too, so you transition better
22:48 snowball112: it would make dk_dk_dk_kd and dk_dk_kd_kd, could be nice for transition in this part
22:50 gaston_2199: Mmm, sounds good
22:51 snowball112: 04:37:377 (175,176) - and 04:38:749 (184,185) - would be dk too, indicator to transition
22:51 snowball112: so there you would have dk_dk_kk_kk
22:54 gaston_2199: I try to follow on the drums throughout the song and i think that d is not sound good
22:55 gaston_2199: Since here 04:32:235 (141) - for example, is k
22:55 gaston_2199: And I want to constantly follow that
22:55 snowball112: then you can leave these
22:55 snowball112: the ones I mentioned first are the more important ones
22:58 snowball112: can you update? that should be everything
22:59 gaston_2199: Ok
23:00 gaston_2199: done
23:00 snowball112: alright, last recheck
23:02 gaston_2199: I thins change this 04:37:892 (176,185) - for k
23:02 gaston_2199: think*
23:04 snowball112: you also forgot a finish on 01:05:835 -
23:04 snowball112: 01:16:806 - maybe too, but that one is optional
23:05 snowball112: and 03:50:577 - should be a d
23:05 gaston_2199: I forgot lol
23:05 gaston_2199: Ok
23:06 snowball112: maybe 03:57:435 - d as well, for better structure
23:06 gaston_2199: 03:57:263 (193) - Remove finish?
23:07 snowball112: probably, other sounds like this don't have finish either
23:08 gaston_2199: Ok, it's better to remove it
23:10 snowball112: I'm thinking that you could maybe change 04:40:292 - to d
23:10 snowball112: maybe 04:41:663 - as well
23:10 snowball112: to buildup more closely to the ddk_d_kdk from previous parts
23:12 gaston_2199: r Ok
23:12 gaston_2199: Ok*
23:13 snowball112: how about 04:44:149 - and 04:45:092 - d as well? very optional, but so much k is a bit loud
23:14 gaston_2199: You're right, it sounds better as you said it
23:15 snowball112: ok, last thing
23:15 snowball112: maybe 05:30:520 - and 05:36:006 - k
23:17 snowball112: because you used ddkkd before at 05:29:663 - for example, and 05:30:349 (156,157,158) - is stronger, so maybe dkk here
23:17 gaston_2199: I had thought about it
23:18 snowball112: i think it would work well :P
23:18 gaston_2199: The same in 05:41:492 - and 05:46:977 (54) - ¿
23:18 gaston_2199: ?*
23:19 snowball112: yes
23:19 gaston_2199: Beatmap updated
RuinedChicken
Took me a while, huh?

The issues I saw at a first glace are no longer there. I've played your map a gooooood amount of times. No inconsistencies within your own style that I can see. Even the one part I didn't like is still mapped consistently.

To sum up, it's pretty good. I'm shooting a star here and wish you good luck. Hope to see it ranked : D
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

RuinedChicken wrote:

Took me a while, huh?

The issues I saw at a first glace are no longer there. I've played your map a gooooood amount of times. No inconsistencies within your own style that I can see. Even the one part I didn't like is still mapped consistently.

To sum up, it's pretty good. I'm shooting a star here and wish you good luck. Hope to see it ranked : D
Me alegro de que le haya gustado.
Muchas gracias por la estrella :)
Saludos!
Secretpipe
Awesome!
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Secretpipe wrote:

Awesome!
:) :D
Vulkin
wtf am i doing modding a bubbled map
also im sorry for modding at the last minute :( , been busy with so many exams and stuffs.

-Continue?-
im not sure if the HP is ok, since its a marathon and they tend to have a much lower HP for their length, might need to recheck this

01:37:206 (233,234) - Ctrl+G?
02:07:292 (108) - k for consistency?
02:12:777 (150) - dont feel like this is needed

im really sorry for modding this thing at the last minute of being ranked ;A;
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Vulkin wrote:

wtf am i doing modding a bubbled map
also im sorry for modding at the last minute :( , been busy with so many exams and stuffs.

-Continue?-
im not sure if the HP is ok, since its a marathon and they tend to have a much lower HP for their length, might need to recheck this Para mi está bien ya que no tiene patrones complicados, se puede reponer rápido el HP en algunos momentos. De igual manera lo pensaré

01:37:206 (233,234) - Ctrl+G? Cambiado, es el mismo sonido nada más que con volumen más fuerte.
02:07:292 (108) - k for consistency? Me gusta, cambiado.
02:12:777 (150) - dont feel like this is needed Sigo el electro sound

im really sorry for modding this thing at the last minute of being ranked ;A; No importa, todo cuenta aunque sea en el último momento :D
Gracias por tu mod!
Beatmap updated~ (bubble popped)
Vulkin

gaston_2199 wrote:

Beatmap updated~ (bubble popped)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
snowball112
Rebubbled.
#1
Vulkin
ok that was fast o-o
DakeDekaane
Hola, vi tu mapa por pura curiosidad y me gustó bastante a pesar de que este tipo de música casi no es de mi agrado.

Solo unos pequeños comentarios:
El kiai de 01:28:806 - debería comenzar en 01:29:149 -, que es donde realmente empieza el "climax".

01:29:149 - 01:46:977 - Esta parte la sentí un poco inconsistente, al parecer te enfocas más en el sintetizador, con los dons acorde al ritmo de las percusiones, pero hay unas cuantas notas que rompen esto.
Por ejemplo, empiezas con un kat en 01:29:149 (177) - pero tienes dons en 01:31:892 (198) - y 01:34:635 (218) - , podrías hacer 01:29:149 (177) - un don para mantener la consistencia.
De igual manera para 01:38:749 (240) - (don) y 01:41:492 (258) - 01:44:235 (279) - (kats), volver los kats, dons.

02:49:035 - Te sugeriría subir el volumen al menos a 25% aquí, esta sección no es tan calmada como parece ser, y las notas se escuchan muy bajo (en mi opinión).
03:29:835 (33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - Esta sección sonaría mejor como ddkkkddkkkddkkkd, reflejaría mejor el cambio en el ritmo.
03:54:520 - Esta sección teniendo 100% de volumen es un poco raro considerando que donde reduces a 80% es relativamente más intenso, te sugeriría que tu cambio de volumen fuera algo así.

Sería todo de mi parte, puedes llamarme para dar la 2da burbuja.
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

DakeDekaane wrote:

Hola, vi tu mapa por pura curiosidad y me gustó bastante a pesar de que este tipo de música casi no es de mi agrado.

Solo unos pequeños comentarios:
El kiai de 01:28:806 - debería comenzar en 01:29:149 -, que es donde realmente empieza el "climax".

01:29:149 - 01:46:977 - Esta parte la sentí un poco inconsistente, al parecer te enfocas más en el sintetizador, con los dons acorde al ritmo de las percusiones, pero hay unas cuantas notas que rompen esto.
Por ejemplo, empiezas con un kat en 01:29:149 (177) - pero tienes dons en 01:31:892 (198) - y 01:34:635 (218) - , podrías hacer 01:29:149 (177) - un don para mantener la consistencia.
De igual manera para 01:38:749 (240) - (don) y 01:41:492 (258) - 01:44:235 (279) - (kats), volver los kats, dons.

02:49:035 - Te sugeriría subir el volumen al menos a 25% aquí, esta sección no es tan calmada como parece ser, y las notas se escuchan muy bajo (en mi opinión).
03:29:835 (33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - Esta sección sonaría mejor como ddkkkddkkkddkkkd, reflejaría mejor el cambio en el ritmo.
03:54:520 - Esta sección teniendo 100% de volumen es un poco raro considerando que donde reduces a 80% es relativamente más intenso, te sugeriría que tu cambio de volumen fuera algo así.

Sería todo de mi parte, puedes llamarme para dar la 2da burbuja.
Apliqué todo lo que me has marcado. Aquí 01:29:149 - y aquí 01:39:092 - tuve que cambiar algunos patrones para modificar lo que me marcaste, no me había percatado de esos dons. Creo que ahora está mucho más consistente que antes.

Muchas gracias por ver mi mapa!
Beatmap updated~
DakeDekaane
Me gustaron las modificaciones que realizaste.

¡Buena suerte!

#2
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

DakeDekaane wrote:

Me gustaron las modificaciones que realizaste.

¡Buena suerte!

#2
Muchas gracias!! :)
Nwolf
weff

From 02:40:463 - til 04:09:606 - I'd suggest having 0.75x SV, with possible increasing SV on the already existing green lines (03:24:349 - maybe have slow SV increase similar to 05:15:435 - ). This should make it more distinguishable from more intense parts!

04:23:663 - Don't wanna have two 1/4 triplets again in the 1/2 7-plets, like 04:12:692 (18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - ?

05:42:349 (17) - Inconsistent with previous versions of this in the kiai, should be a don (05:28:635 (143) - )

call me back~
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Ntiger wrote:

weff weff

From 02:40:463 - til 04:09:606 - I'd suggest having 0.75x SV, with possible increasing SV on the already existing green lines (03:24:349 - maybe have slow SV increase similar to 05:15:435 - ). This should make it more distinguishable from more intense parts! I applied this from here 03:24:349 - until 04:09:606 -. Here 02:40:463 - I think it does not go here because there is not much intensity, but I changed the SV for 0.85/0x

04:23:663 - Don't wanna have two 1/4 triplets again in the 1/2 7-plets, like 04:12:692 (18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) - ? Sure!I think it got better

05:42:349 (17) - Inconsistent with previous versions of this in the kiai, should be a don (05:28:635 (143) - ) I have not noticed, fixed

call me back~ HYPE
I thought you were not going to see him, thank you very much! :D
Beatmap updated~
Nwolf
Since this SHOULD be ranked on the 25th:

Merry Christmas!

Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Ntiger wrote:

Since this SHOULD be ranked on the 25th:

Merry Christmas!

Finally!!
Ooh yeah, thanks to all! I really happy :)

¡Merry christmas and happy new year!
SYAHME
Congrats >L_<
Kyouren

SYAHME wrote:

Congrats >L_<
Raediaufar
Woow gratz man!!! Really love this :3
Topic Starter
gaston_2199
Thanks all for support. I hope I can continue making more maps to qualified :)
toara_fict
GJ
Mercurial
Why Taiko? :c
Topic Starter
gaston_2199

Mercurial wrote:

Why Taiko? :c
Porque es más fácil mapearlo :c
Secretpipe
2hard4me ;_;

gratz!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply