forum

Hinkik - Time Leaper

posted
Total Posts
3
Topic Starter
TrueTails
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on domingo, 13 de noviembre de 2016 at 10:20:47 p. m.

Artist: Hinkik
Title: Time Leaper
BPM: 87,5
Filesize: 3405kb
Play Time: 01:50
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1,44 stars, 97 notes)
  2. Hard (2,54 stars, 103 notes)
  3. Normal (1,86 stars, 103 notes)
  4. Time Leaper (4,69 stars, 117 notes)
Download: Hinkik - Time Leaper
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
New map bois!

Hope this get ranked :D

If you want to make another diff, message me :)

Special thanks to SoULLex for supporting me in the creation of the map :3
EnderDJBoy
Amigo el mapa que hiciste de Time Leaper... FUE EPICO!!! Sigue trabajando en el para que sea uno Ranked & Verified!!! Muchisima Suerte! Con gusto lo descargare cada vez que saques una nueva parte!
Steffen
Hi!
You wanted a mod so I will try to do one.
Modding easy normal and hard only this time.
I'm a bad modder
Some of the input might be prefrence, but I'll say it anyway.
General

  1. How come you didn't map the rest of the song? I highly recommend doing so.
  2. Kiai time needs an endpoint. Put one at 02:12:146. You also need to set a preview point!
  3. The spread seems pretty fine, but Time Leaper is considerably harder than Hard. Just so you are aware of that.
  4. I recommend finishing Hard before asking for more mods
Easy

SV seems pretty high for an easy map. Consider nerfing it a little?

  1. 00:11:463 (1,2,3) - Maybe move this so it become a blanket? Nice spacing.
  2. 01:19:348 (3) - Overlap seems risky. Consider doing something about it.

Normal

Overall:
Pretty solid~

Opinions:
00:00:492 (1,2) - I think it'd look nicer like this

00:07:349 (3) - I feel that this part could be done better. Maybe shorten it and add a circle?

Hard

  1. 00:18:149 (3) - This circle is way to hidden. Try spacing it out a little.
  2. 00:34:263 (3) - ^
  3. 00:35:120 (5,6,7,8,9,1) - This part seems pretty hard (cause...it's a hard diff. haha...kms Consider nerfing maybe, or changing pattern.
  4. 00:41:292 (5) - why not have this one as long as 00:40:606 (3) - ?
  5. 00:46:091 (3,4,5,6,7) - Pattern is confusing. Consider redoing this one.
  6. 00:51:577 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Consider doing a straight or curved line instead here.
  7. 00:57:919 (3) - there's no significant sound here. I'd suggest removing it.
And that's it! I don't think I was of much help, but I'm glad if you found some use of it!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply