Cut the first 5 seconds off of the audio track, it's needlessly taking up space and wasting time, since it's just silence. This isn't a rankability issue, it's just... ugh.
There are way too many flaws in this, despite being such a short map. How did it make it to qualified?
StaR's Insane
00:06:596 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - These notes aren't just weirdly spread, but it just plays quite badly.
00:14:979 (2,3) - Maybe stack sliderend with this note? There's a lot of that sort of stacking going on in the map, and it doesn't make sense to have that little inconsistency there.
00:38:361 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This is a really skewed octagon. It feels rather strange playing it, since all of the followpoints do not share any single point.
00:39:464 (2,4) - Again, stacking?
00:45:039 (2) - Maybe move this note over just a bit, so that the sharply turning slider at 00:44:578 (1) - directly leads into the followpoint.
00:14:979 (2,3) - Maybe stack sliderend with this note? There's a lot of that sort of stacking going on in the map, and it doesn't make sense to have that little inconsistency there.
00:38:361 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This is a really skewed octagon. It feels rather strange playing it, since all of the followpoints do not share any single point.
00:39:464 (2,4) - Again, stacking?
00:45:039 (2) - Maybe move this note over just a bit, so that the sharply turning slider at 00:44:578 (1) - directly leads into the followpoint.
Insane
00:16:082 (1) - This held sound ends at 00:16:523, why does the slider keep going to 00:16:744?
00:33:067 (1) - Maybe move this so the sliderend is blanketed with 00:32:185 (4) - because it looks weird as it is.
00:26:008 (1,4) - I would advocate moving these 2 notes over so that 00:26:008 (1,2,3,4) - becomes a triangle with at least close to 2 equal distances. As it stands, it looks like a bit of a mess.
00:31:964 (3) - There is 0 sound here. If 00:31:743 (2) - was a 2/4 slider, it would make sense to have the end here, but the note is a clear unnecessary overmap.
00:41:891 (1) - Maybe make this into a 180 degree rotation of 00:41:449 (5) - ?
00:45:424 (1) - I had to turn my audio up to normally ear-destroying levels to hear the sound behind this spinner after 00:48:953. Ending it on the big white tick seems more accurate to me.
00:33:067 (1) - Maybe move this so the sliderend is blanketed with 00:32:185 (4) - because it looks weird as it is.
00:26:008 (1,4) - I would advocate moving these 2 notes over so that 00:26:008 (1,2,3,4) - becomes a triangle with at least close to 2 equal distances. As it stands, it looks like a bit of a mess.
00:31:964 (3) - There is 0 sound here. If 00:31:743 (2) - was a 2/4 slider, it would make sense to have the end here, but the note is a clear unnecessary overmap.
00:41:891 (1) - Maybe make this into a 180 degree rotation of 00:41:449 (5) - ?
00:45:424 (1) - I had to turn my audio up to normally ear-destroying levels to hear the sound behind this spinner after 00:48:953. Ending it on the big white tick seems more accurate to me.
Light Insane
00:26:670 (3,4) - My slidey senses are tingling, I think this blanket is off just a bit.
00:27:773 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing emphasis in this pattern is REALLY bad. The highest spaced circle is on the least emphasized part of the 'song' behind this pattern.
00:33:949 (3) - Maybe this should be a 180 degree rotation of 00:33:067 (1) - for the sake of visual consistency.
00:43:214 (5) - This, perhaps one of the strongest sounds in the whole 'song,' has not only no hitsound, but is actually an extremely quiet soft tick? Why?!
00:27:773 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing emphasis in this pattern is REALLY bad. The highest spaced circle is on the least emphasized part of the 'song' behind this pattern.
00:33:949 (3) - Maybe this should be a 180 degree rotation of 00:33:067 (1) - for the sake of visual consistency.
00:43:214 (5) - This, perhaps one of the strongest sounds in the whole 'song,' has not only no hitsound, but is actually an extremely quiet soft tick? Why?!
General
Metadata:
Tags:
"jump" "funny" "lol" "short" are all irrelevant tags.
Remove "gidz" from the tags, as searching "gidz" will include search results with the tag "-gidz-" in them.
Change "takoyaki" to "-takoyaki-"
Why is "nnk" a tag?
Tags:
piko taro ppap pen pineapple japanese jump funny lol short takoyaki gidz -gidz- dailycare skylish nanako nnk starrstyx"piko" and "taro" should not be in the tags, as they are duplicates of the artist.
"jump" "funny" "lol" "short" are all irrelevant tags.
Remove "gidz" from the tags, as searching "gidz" will include search results with the tag "-gidz-" in them.
Change "takoyaki" to "-takoyaki-"
Why is "nnk" a tag?
There are way too many flaws in this, despite being such a short map. How did it make it to qualified?