1. Easy (1,48 stars, 262 notes)
2. Hard (3,6 stars, 639 notes)
3. Insane (4,82 stars, 770 notes)
4. Normal (2,24 stars, 377 notes)

Shmiklak wrote:

на самом деле 0 пп

vanucik5656 wrote:

Shmiklak wrote:

на самом деле 0 пп

ты её просто пройти не можешь xd

Shmiklak wrote:

vanucik5656 wrote:

ты её просто пройти не можешь xd

скорее ты ранкнуть

pishifat wrote:

insane
00:36:785 (1) - ритм похожий на 00:49:585 (1) - подошел бы лучше. нет смысла выделять ту штуку на 3/4, вокалы звучат иначе
01:09:585 (5) - хвост снапнут не туда
01:45:585 (1,2) - 02:03:185 (1,2) - 02:04:785 (1,2) - комбоинг противоречит/несогласован комбоингу на 01:03:985 (1,1) - 01:05:585 (1,1) - и т.д. - нк на двойки надо ставить
02:07:385 (3,4,5) - 04:02:585 (3,4,5) - звуки здесь не похожи на те, что в начале стрима, поэтому странно их соединять/связывать вместе 01:28:785 (6,7,8,9) - какой=то такой ритм пойдет лучше
03:11:185 (1,2) - антиджамп бы игрался круче, если бы ты сделал что-то такое
aaa. эта часть в песне звучит необычно, и выделить ее нужно еще сильнее используя паттерны отличные от основных
03:45:385 (6,1) - 1/2 слайдер вписался бы лучше. 1 сейчас дает слишкком много внимания чему-то не очень важному

hard
00:36:785 (1) - то же, что и в инсе
01:54:985 (6,1) - не стоит использовать спейсинг путающий игроков 03:50:185 (6,1) - а вот так стакать это окей, или заспейсить как на нормале примерно
03:10:385 (1,2,1) - лучше не начинать использовать 1/4 со спейсингом так много времени спустя с начала карты. небольшие оверлапы как и везде в других местах = лучше подходят

ez (easy)
03:45:185 (2,3) - ритм типа zassdsfdf подходит больше. на большом белом тике ничего особенного нет лул
01:54:385 (4) - 03:49:585 (6) - наверно ты захочешь сбить звук на хвостах до 20%. они передают принцип удержал/отпустил, а не какой-то отдельный бит на хвосте и хитсаунды там звучат странно.

позови на речек!!

pishifat wrote:

insane
00:36:785 (1) - rhythm similar to 00:49:585 (1) - would be better. there's no reason to prioritize the 3/4 thing here, since vocals do something different
01:09:585 (5) - tail snapping is wrong
01:45:585 (1,2) - 02:03:185 (1,2) - 02:04:785 (1,2) - comboing inconsistent with 01:03:985 (1,1) - 01:05:585 (1,1) - etc. should add new combos to the 2s
02:07:385 (3,4,5) - 04:02:585 (3,4,5) - sounds here are different from the beginning of the stream, so it's weird to have them connected. 01:28:785 (6,7,8,9) - rhythm like this seems more fitting
03:11:185 (1,2) - would get more of the antijump effect if you did something like aaa. it's mapped in a way that doesn't make it seem as special as the song calls for
03:45:385 (6,1) - 1/2 slider like hard would be more fitting tbh. currently 1 is giving a lot of importance to something not very important

hard
00:36:785 (1) - same as insane
01:54:985 (6,1) - shouldn't really use visually misleading spacing on a diff like this 03:50:185 (6,1) - stacking like this is okay, or spacing more like on normal
03:10:385 (1,2,1) - better to not introduce spaced 1/4 so late into the map. the slight overlaps like everywhere else =more appropriate

ez
03:45:185 (2,3) - a rhythm like zassdsfdf seems a lot more fitting. that big white tick is so unimportant lul
01:54:385 (4) - 03:49:585 (6) - might want to lower volume of tails to like 20%. they're representing the hold/release and not any specific sound on the tail, so having hitsound impact there is odd

call me back!!

direday wrote:

Здаров. Заеду с модом из ниоткуда.

Insane

• 
  Я бы сделал погромче всю карту на 5-7%
  Докопаюсь до геометрии:

1. 00:06:385 (1,2) - подвинуть их чуть правее и крутануть 00:07:985 (2) - по часовой чтоб лучше смотрелось?
2. 00:14:985 (2) - чуть выше, чтоб продолжал 00:14:385 (1) - по дуге
3. 00:20:785 (1) - чутка бланкет съехал (далее просто бланкет)
4. 00:26:985 (3) - а этот чуть ниже по той же причине (дуга итп)
5. 00:35:185 (1) - крутануть против часовой чтоб смотрел на 00:34:985 (3) - ? Ну и подвинуть левее тогда придется
6. 00:36:785 (1,2) - дуга
7. 00:43:985 (6) - яб крутанул по часовой на пару градусов
8. 00:47:585 (4,1) - бланкет
9. 00:48:785 (3,1) - бланкет
10. 00:51:185 (1,2) - фигово, что они в край упираются, но выглядит некрасиво так
11. 01:03:985 (1,1) - дуга
12. 01:07:185 (1) - чуть чуть бланкет съехал. Как нибудь так лучше выглядит
13. 01:10:385 (1) - немного неаккуратно в начале получилось. Чередуй красные с белыми нодами на протяжении всего слайдера и будет норм.
14. 01:15:185 (1,4) - блакет - 01:15:985 (4) - крутани на пару градусов по часовой
15. 01:22:785 (1) - тоже неаккуратно. Опять не чередуешь ноды (я хз как это по-русски).
16. 01:25:985 (6,2) - бланкет. 01:26:585 (2) - против часовой
17. 01:49:985 (4,4) - вторая четверка съехала чуть чуть
18. 02:01:585 (1,1) - бланкет. Уменьшь кривизну
19. 02:03:385 (1,6) - не знаю это специально или нет. Скорее всего специально
20. 02:04:385 (6,1) - блакет
21. 03:04:585 (4,1) - тоже может кривизну чуть уменьшить?
22. 03:23:185 (1,4) - яб все оверлапы (перекрытия?) делал как тут - ровно на половину другого круга. Так выглядит стильнее
    Вроде всё. Пишифат как раз сказал то, что хотел когда позавчера карту скачал.

pishifat wrote:

easy
01:55:985 (1) - 03:51:185 (1) - need to go back to 70% volume after these lol D: fixed

vanucik wrote:

пасибо за мод, исправил большинство визуальных недочетов, только я тебе рекомендую поменьше писать про кривые бланкеты, которые при игре трудно заметить, они же в себе особого смысла не несут xd (имеется в виду о слайдер + нота = бланкет, недочеты таких бланкетов можно писать в моде, их прекрасно видно во время игры, но это не касается обьектов по типу "слайдер , пару обьектов и нота" , которая создает бланкет, во время игры эту структуру нереально сопоставить в единое целое, что можно легко сделать в эдиторе) , надеюсь я донёс до тебя мысль : ) я просто сам еле понял свои мысли

• 
  [General]

1. 00:12:785 - This line, in all difficulties, is not necessary because the previous inherited timing point already does everything this would. Basically remove it.
2. I am a bit concerned about the consistency and usage of hitsounds in the mapset. See Easy for more details. This probably applies to all difficulties, though.
3. According to Snail's soundcloud, this genre is also known as "Vomitstep", so could add that to the tags.
4. Consider increasing the HP setting in normal to 4, I see no reason to have Easy and Normal be the same in this regard.
   
   [Easy]
5. 00:46:385 (3,4,1,2) - Having this whole thing as a pattern and reoccurring rhythm may make 00:47:985 - rather faint as a result. By turning 00:47:985 - into a 1/1 slider and placing a circle at 00:49:185 - , it will stand out more, and the low rhythm density will bring additional contrast to the upcoming phase, 00:51:185 - .
6. 00:47:985 - Missing finish, refer to 00:44:785 - .
7. 00:57:585 - 00:59:185 - Personally I'd have added whistles on these. Same goes for 01:35:985 - , etc.
8. 01:09:985 (5) - In this case 01:10:385 - is much more prominent in the song, so placing the same hitsound on a sound, that doesn't even suggest anything instrumental, right before it, seems a bit odd. Consider removing the hitsound.
9. 01:10:385 (1) - 01:48:785 (1,2) - I'd suggest you emphasize these similarly. Currently the first one is ignoring the pause whilst the other is trying to accent it.
10. 02:02:785 (2,3,4) - There's some other sections where song and the map don't really line up. In this example 02:03:185 - is clearly stronger in the song, but in the map it's just like any note before and after it. I would suggest you simply turn 02:03:185 (3,4) - into a 1/2 slider. Additionally if you would like to keep rhythm density high, you could turn 02:03:985 (5) - into two circles instead, as lead-in to 02:04:785 - , for instance. Same applies later at 03:38:785 (2,3,4) - etc.
11. 02:20:785 - 02:33:585 - Consider adding a whistle to places like these. The downbeats have loud drum-kicks in the song, so might as well use it for feedback accordingly.
12. 02:36:785 - I don't really see why 02:43:185 - would be the same hitsound as this, but not the same as 02:39:985 - . I'd have just removed this whistle to be honest. It doesn't seem to reflect anything at the moment, unless I'm mistaken.
13. 02:39:985 - I also find it rather strange that 00:31:985 - has claps but these do not.
14. 02:46:385 (1,2,3,4,5) - Mind enlightening me as to what these whistles are reflecting? They look and sound very random as it is. Anyway, I think you get the idea, hitsound usage and consistency could be polished a bit more. I would recommend you apply the hitsounds to the insane difficulty and then copy down to the rest of the set, for consistency. If you'll be using a hitsound copier, remember to recheck lower diffs to confirm that the hitsounds have been copied correctly.
    
    [Hard]
15. 01:11:985 (1,2,3,4) - These look quite random at the moment. Might look neater if this and 01:04:785 (2,3,4,5) - were the same shape, bringing in some aesthetic consistency to the section.
16. 01:27:985 (1,2,3,4,5) - (4) isn't very audible in this case, so instead of a 5-note stream like this, which is discouraged in Hard difficulties either way, I would have simply have used a triple instead.
17. 01:00:785 (1,2,1,2) - This is not consistent with the way 01:39:185 (1,2,3,4) - 02:55:985 (1,2,3,4) - 03:34:385 (1,2,3,4) - were NCed. Consider removing the NC at 01:01:585 (1) - .
18. 02:00:785 (5,6,7) - 02:03:185 (1,2,3) - Is there any reason why the later part of this kiai are using triangles, but the earlier part is avoiding them? 01:44:785 (4,5,6) - 01:46:385 (2,3,4) - Otherwise you could make them consistent for a more apparent structure.
19. 01:43:785 (5,1,2) - Similarly to how emphasis was lacking on parts like these in easy, they're also rather weak rhythmically here. In the song 01:43:785 (5,2) - are similar, whilst 01:43:985 (1) - is different, so making it a 1/2 slider in the same way that 01:47:185 (1) - is, would probably be a good idea. If anything, 01:47:185 (1) - would be two circles, but it may end up getting rather dense for a hard, so keeping it as a 1/2 slider might be better. Same goes for 03:58:185 (4,1,2) - and the way (1) is different. An alternate way to deal with these is by ending a slider on the unique beat as a way to show that the map is not following that specific instrumental layer.
20. 02:48:785 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Patterns like these are very dense. Generally you'd want to avoid 5 note streams either way, so it may get a bit difficult if a circle is placed right after it, as is with the patterns in the Insane difficulty.
21. 03:16:785 (1,2,3,4,5) - Not going to have the stream the same way that 01:21:585 (1,2,3,4,5) - was arranged? As far as I can tell things are getting more difficult, so it would only make sense if it was either the same or harder.
    
    [Insane]
22. 01:01:485 (8,1) - 02:56:685 (8,1) - Entering a different section of a stream through different prominence like this does not really make sense. Consider instead placing emphasis in the same way throughout these. So either the first one would be entering into the prominent beat from the previous pattern, or the second would be leaving into the prominent beat.
23. 01:09:985 - This line is currently not necessary and can be removed. Perhaps this was meant to change velocity?
24. 01:28:285 (4) - No direct impact here, so consider removing it and moving 01:27:985 (1,2,3) - accordingly for spacing.

• [Insane]

1. 00:41:185 - remove hitsound
2. 00:51:485 - 00:51:785 - 00:52:085 - claps
   00:51:585 - only whistle
   And then do this for the others too, same for 02:46:685 - etc.
3. 01:03:785 - 01:42:185 - 02:58:985 - 03:37:385 - whistle
4. 01:21:585 - add finish, refer to 03:16:785 -
5. 01:28:285 - Still keeping this? Sounds odd to me at least.
6. 02:04:785 - remove line
7. 02:46:385 - 02:47:185 - 02:49:585 - etc. add whistle
8. 02:49:185 - clap, refer to 00:52:385 - 00:53:985 -
9. 02:57:585 - 03:35:985 - whistle, refer to 01:02:385 - 01:40:785 -
10. 02:59:185 - 03:03:985 - 03:11:985 - 03:24:785 - 03:37:585 - add whistle
11. 03:19:985 - whistle
12. 03:51:785 - remove finish, refer to 01:56:585 -
13. 03:52:785 - clap
14. 04:03:185 - whistle, refer to 02:07:985 -

Naxess wrote:

• [Insane]

1. 00:41:185 - remove hitsound
2. 00:51:485 - 00:51:785 - 00:52:085 - claps
   00:51:585 - only whistle
   And then do this for the others too, same for 02:46:685 - etc.
3. 01:03:785 - 01:42:185 - 02:58:985 - 03:37:385 - whistle not a good idea
4. 01:21:585 - add finish, refer to 03:16:785 -
5. 01:28:285 - Still keeping this? Sounds odd to me at least. It is a quiet sound, but clickable
6. 02:04:785 - remove line
7. 02:46:385 - 02:47:185 - 02:49:585 - etc. add whistle
8. 02:49:185 - clap, refer to 00:52:385 - 00:53:985 - it is not needed on 00:52:385 - 00:53:985
9. 02:57:585 - 03:35:985 - whistle, refer to 01:02:385 - 01:40:785 -
10. 02:59:185 - 03:03:985 - 03:11:985 - 03:24:785 - 03:37:585 - add whistle
11. 03:19:985 - whistle
12. 03:51:785 - remove finish, refer to 01:56:585 -
13. 03:52:785 - clap
14. 04:03:185 - whistle, refer to 02:07:985 -

Sonnyc wrote:

Insane.
00:27:185 (1) - 00:33:585 (1) - Can you use some ordinary looking sliders for here? The shape felt a bit abnormal while the music wasn't really different from other parts. These forms do not look so boring, but I will make them a little smoother
01:03:485 (2,3) - 01:41:885 (2,3,4) - Can you have a consistent expression here? The music doesn't really feel much different to create such inconsistency. This is the second and most difficult kiai, why not put a note?
02:06:985 (6,1) - 04:02:185 (6,1) - Can you start the combo from (6)? The current design doesn't look nice to indicate the rhythms nicely. ok
02:49:585 - Finish felt quite random here. It is the only part with two powerful claps, so I want to emphasize them with finish

Not bad, actually pretty fine enough. Not going to nominate this since the random placements of the kiai didn't felt organized for me. Best of luck~

Fanteer wrote:

+60 к чсв
Если че у меня 642

vanucik wrote:

Fanteer wrote:

+60 к чсв
Если че у меня 642

неправда, я не чсв

Namki wrote:

ура, поздравляю с первым

Sieg wrote:

Namki wrote:

ура, поздравляю с первым