Meouxe- wrote:

General

BG - откровенное ✔

Отключи Widescreen Support ✔

hollow

Скорость слайдеров в нормале изменять нельзя Печально, потом ремапну. Может быть
У тебя очень непонятное расставление NC 00:17:726 (1,2,1,2,1) - вот тут к примеру, звук не меняется а комбо меняется ( Слайдер нота и сразу же новое комбо ) и таких моментов много Вроде поправил
02:11:410 (1,2) - Может сделаешь 1-ый как 2-ой ✔
Первый киай очень долгий, предлагаю сделать его вот от сюда 02:21:831 (1) Музыка одинаковая в обоих частях, так что оставлю как есть

blank

все таже проблема с NC ✔

void

01:06:357 (4,5,1) - Попробуй их сделать дальше от друг друга ✔
01:29:726 (1) - оверлап ✔
01:35:410 (1,1,1) - ^^ ✔
01:53:410 (2) - бланкет норм
02:30:357 (1,2,3,4) - чуть чуть дальше от друг друга ✔
Диффа однако очень классная хех, спасибо

gap

Такое я хз как модить

От себя
Карта очень динамичная и не однообразная что и есть хорошо. Удачи тебе с ней Спасибос

Hailie wrote:

M4M From Queue - Mod this map https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/675527/discussion (couple of suggestions would do just fine)

Ok for 1 - is that a naked women? ya need to find a more appropriate bg for this game and I HIGHLY advised ya change that before you end up being force to change it and you don't want that to happen since it have been cases like this Removed for now

(came straight from Ranking Criteria)A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to a username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming.

It fine having the last difficulty a custom name but it be better to just called the other difficulties Normal, Hard, and Insane since none of the names given indicate the difficulty at all and will just confuse people. Yeah, I know but there not just an usual diffs, so I named them. But ok, normal and hard get back

Another thing is the difficulty spread itself - You will need a difficulty below 2* if you wish to have this rank since your normal difficulty is above that I'll add ez later then

Now as I seen the hard and compared to the Normal - I am a bit bad at explaining this so maybe someone else would come along but I feel the need to say that u may need an advanced difficulty (basically just a harder normal) because your hard look difficult for hard players starting off
I could be wrong about that so just get some more opinions about that (it might just be fine ) Ok if someone else note that

• 
  void

1. 00:05:726 (5) - since this is a SV change - this is too similar to how these look 00:05:568 (4) - and a player would mess up on this
   Add a NC on it too make it look more obvious ✔
   this occurs quite a bit but I think some of them is not that bad but I feel ya still should check them just in case
2. 00:45:515 (1,2,3,4) - I understand what you trying to do but these jumps is too high and I just believe the music doesn't support that much since the song isn't that jumpy to begin with - plus ya don't have these type of jumps in the actual kiai so please just lower them
   kind of the same 00:46:778 (1,2,3,4) - but not as bad as those above - the other jump in this section isn't that spacy like these so I won't point them out ✔
3. 01:24:041 (1,2) - hmm they basically following the same similar sound so I think having (2) look like 1 would be better ✔

kind of short mod I know ... I think the difficulties look quite interesting and I couldn't mod the highest difficulty sorry

gave a star Oh thanks

PeterEU wrote:

Hi from my queue

Change background pls its just gray,, ✔

NormalYour mapping style is pretty weird lol heh
I can't understand it really why don't for example make 00:06:357 (1) like that http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9294102 recurved
00:43:936 (1) - doesnt fit with curve of previous slider ✔
01:06:673 (1,2) - ehh make it look better ✔
02:45:831 (2) - why doesnt it have the same shape as previous ✔

Hard01:35:410 (1,2) - feels too close ✔
02:16:463 (1) - doesnt flow well with previous ✔

BlakeBestWaifu wrote:

From my queue

Easy
01:20:252 (6,1) - Changing the slider velocity by 0.5x isn't recommended. Maybe change it to 0.75x so that it isn't so much a change increased to 0.7
01:36:673 (1) - After the red anchor the slider should go up
01:37:936 (2) - Replace the a 1/2 repeating slider eh, here notable hs. But ok
01:45:515 (4) - It should be a 1/2 slider + a note
01:50:568 (4) - Same here ^
01:55:620 (4) - ^
02:00:673 (1) - Way too hard for an easy. New players are unable to read additional reverses because they are visible for such a short amount of time
03:20:884 (5,6,7) - They should be in a straight line. Move them up a bit
all fixed

Normal
01:12:357 (1,2,3,1) - I don't know if it is just me or the flow is off ✔
01:37:936 (1,2,3) - Don't stack notes under slider tails on a normal ✔

The difficulty gap between [hard] and [void] is huge. It's like there is a missing difficulty. uuhhh, so there will be another diff soon
Good luck with mapset! thanks

seselis1 wrote:

o/ m4m from my q
Easy
In general your sliders as in easy diff are too fast. Consider lowering slider velocity uhh, whole remaped
00:02:568 (3,4) - it'd look better if you would put them in one line and made this slider something like this but neater
✔
00:36:042 (1) - if this would face 00:34:778 (5) - this slider's middle, it'd look better
00:37:936 (4,5) - these repeated sliders follow different sounds, so both should be placed on white or red ticks, not differently. So I suggest you this:
✔
01:12:041 (2) - would also look neater if it faced slider middle
02:00:673 (1) - 1/4 beats can't be in easy diff important sound, but changed a bit

Normal
Slider velocity should also be reduced will do if someone else point this out
00:07:620 (1,2) - would look better if this was also a blanket
00:42:673 (4,1) - for new players it is an uncomfortable backward movement, they might click slider tail
00:54:042 (1,2) - would also look better if it was blanket
00:59:726 (2,3) - nothing is emphasized by these, so they should be separate
01:14:252 (6,1) - blanket
01:18:357 (1,1,1) - no need so many NCs
01:21:515 (1,2) - these emphasize something different; it's good thanks
01:30:989 (3) - even different sound, I'd place it somewhere near
01:36:041 (3) - ^ etc
02:02:252 (1,2) - blanket
02:14:884 (1,2) - blanket better
02:40:463 (3,4) - no need for stack
03:05:410 - it'd be good if this was clickable sound
almost all fixed

Hard
00:15:515 (2) - ok, so 00:15:594 - there is no sound, and 00:15:673 - there is sound. If you want this a slider then you should extend it to blue tick. ✔
00:16:147 (2) - ^ etc ✔
00:20:252 (4,1) - pls keep ds constant, this can be confusing ✔
00:22:463 (4,3) - almost overlap ✔
00:38:252 (1,2,3) - this stream's and 00:38:884 (4,5,6) - this' circles are placed in a little different spacing. you shoud make spacing the same ✔
00:39:515 (1,2,3) - there are no sounds on yellow ticks but here incite moment
00:44:252 (1,2) - overlap ✔
00:45:831 (2,3,4) - again different stream spacing not a kiai but more active part
01:41:094 (2,1) - spacing should change ✔
03:20:568 (1) - no sound on blue tick ✔

void
00:07:620 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:08:884 (1,2,3,4) - stream spacing should be the same 1 fixed 2 good
00:36:357 (1) - no sounds on repeated places high pitch here
00:54:041 (4) - can be hard to notice ye, changed a bit
00:56:252 (3,1) - spacing should change nc, so conceived
00:57:831 (1) - ^ same
01:25:936 (1) - should end on red tick ok
01:29:726 (1) - ^
01:42:989 (1) - No need for repeated high pitch again
02:06:357 (1,2,3) - since it's kiai, shouldn't it be jumpy? i guess it's fine
03:01:620 (1) - remove NC ✔

gap
00:01:305 (1,2) - again overmapped, no sounds on yellow ticks that triples fit good in rhytm
00:30:673 (1,2) - and 00:31:305 (1,2) - spacing shouldn't be so drastically different that diff about unusual spacing at all
00:34:778 (3) - different sound, you should place somewhere else ✔
00:37:936 (1,1) - between these 2 and 00:38:252 (1,2) - between these 2 same spacing? wrong i like that microjump ;_;
00:39:042 (2,3,1) - fix spacing same as 00:30:673 (1,2)
00:49:620 (1,1,1,1,1) - no needed for so many NCs ✔
01:20:252 (7) - NC ✔
01:20:884 (11) - NC ✔
01:21:199 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - too many NCs. Basically they should indicate new sound lul didnt notice that
02:03:515 (1) - even with nc, spacing is confusing
In the rest of the map similar problem fixed
what I pointed out you should apply to all your map, not just those places thanks for advice, i'll try

In general, you shouldn't overmap, you should pay more attention to spacing and use NCs sensibly true
GL thank you
my map for m4m https://osu.ppy.sh/s/673857

Gloria Guard wrote:

Hello, From my queue

I have something to say to you before I write a modding post.

1. Normal and hard difficulty you make is completely different from normal difficulty. and You lack basic distance use and ability to control difficulty. yea i understand You are a beginner mapper with some mapping experience. sure, I need some practice with this

2. You used a pattern that is not suitable for Hard. example 02:18:673 (4) - 02:29:094 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - 02:36:989 (2,3,1,2,3,4) etc. also These slider patterns are not organized and are inconsistent. ✔

ok That's all I have to say. i will post modding this map.

[normal]

Overall this difficulty is inconsistent in distance. You must use the correct distance and make sure you understand the correct distance. yes, I'm not get right distances sometimes, but at all here smooth range. Only in peak moments rise is.
I'll be glad if you give some additional explanations

00:28:463 (2) off screen slider body. 1~2 grid up this slider. 00:30:042 (1) this slider too ✔
00:39:515 (1,2,3) spacing error ? reduced, and on 03:00:989 (1,2,3,1) too
01:01:936 (1) off screen slider body too. ✔
01:17:726 (1,1,2,3) Can you try consistency curve slider shape? ✔


[Hard]

00:35:094 (4,5) This 1/4 slider rhythm can confuse the player and the same slider length as the usual 1/2 rhythm.
You should make a normal 1/2 slider rhythm here. slowed them



Good luck. here I need more than only it heh

UselessXD wrote:

Hi o/ From my queue #_#

gap
00:04:463 (5,6,7) - I would say that this jumps are too big - it's the beggining of the map and music ain't changed yet. ✔
00:06:357 (3) - please make smaller slider velocity ✔
00:07:936 (2) - maybe try to do here a repeated slider like 00:06:989 (2) hm, sure
00:08:252 (3) - how about changing the slider velocity to make this slider like 00:06:673 (1) ✔
00:11:726 (1,3) - this slider reminds me HW's Tsubaki, lower slider velocity again heh
00:14:568 (5) - make this slider longer (1/4, not 1/8) here strong beat, but ok
00:15:515 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - i think that this rhythm is unpleasant to play, you can change it or just mix pattern of this sequence mixed a bit
00:21:199 (1,2,3) - too big spacing (according to 00:20:568 (1,2,3) ) , when you'll make jumps like this think about making 1-2 jump smaller 2-3 a bit bigger 3-4 bigger etc.. swapped 00:21:199 (1,2,3) and 00:21:831 (1,2,3)
00:26:568 (3) - direction of this slider should't be contrary to direction of previous jump here should so recurved slider
00:30:831 (2,3) - you made here big jump in 1/4 and small spacing in 1/2 00:30:989 (3,1) - think about swaping this spacings strong beat at 00:30:989 (3) is reason for it, but reduced
00:42:989 (3,4,5) - too hard to not sliderbreak i guess, maybe some change here shortened by 1 repeat
00:46:463 (1,2,3) - it is going to surprise player while playing a map, try to keep the tempo like here: 00:47:726 (1,2,3) it's fun, so if someone else req
00:52:147 (1,2,3) - easier to sliderbreak then 2 tips upper ^^ ✔
00:57:831 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - small spacing, small spacing and BOOM 00:59:094 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - make this jumps smaller and the spacing from earlier sequance bigger please ✔
01:03:199 (3,4,5) - I'm not sure about this kick sliders... downrepeated
01:13:620 (1,2) - you can move away this from 01:13:305 (3) ✔
01:18:041 (1,2,3) - 90% chance of sliderbreak if you dont know the map circled
01:19:305 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,1) - very hard pattern, I would make it easier ✔
01:20:884 - there is a slower part, dont make slider velocity too big ✔
01:58:463 - i think that -> 01:57:199 (1,2,3) this pattern shall be putted also here (remember about changing slider velocity like in this kick sliders) nice
02:02:884 (1,2) - this is way too huge spacing remixed
02:03:041 (2,3,1,2) - misleading pattern I guess ^
02:03:673 (2,3) - too huge again color=#0080FF]✔[/color]
02:04:778 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I see that you like this pattern but it is really 'extreme' I play my maps and here it even easier to aim
than 00:59:410 (1,2,3,4,5,6)
02:12:357 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - this pattern is unfcable while playing first time x.x mixed
02:13:936 (3,4,5) - again I'm not sure about this kick sliders.. If you like them let them to be there. slowed
02:14:884 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - again this pattern - really difficult.. made it smaller
02:18:042 (1,2,3) - pattern is hard to play cuz slider velocity is too high mixed It was hardest pattern for me at first testplays
02:19:936 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this whole sequence is surely unrankable (if you aren't Hollow Wings) ;_; reduced
02:31:936 (1,2) - too big spacing ✔
02:35:094 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this pattern again - it's just uncomfortable to play sure, changed
02:51:199 (1,2,3,4,5) - pattern hard to read but also cool in some way nc added
03:02:884 - here at the reds new sound appear. I think that there should be slider instead of a circle. sure
03:05:568 (2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - too hard to read i guess
03:11:884 (6,7) - make some spacing between these

This diff is interesting and for sure isn't standard like most of the map nowadays. I would say that it's some type of Hollow Wings' mapping :p
I'm not HW, but her maps inspire me a lot, right
I think that it's cool map, but it might be hard to make it ranked :v

I hope I could help Good luck! thanks, it was very helpful

Gordon123 wrote:

привет,а билетик тут (и он сгорает)
[general]

• 
  во первых почекай аимод в нормале и изи(в изи явижу ты использовал спейсинг 0,9 - но у тебя проблемы с дс,пофикси это) ✔ аимод умер, пишет, что всё плохо, хотя всё на месте лол
  во всей карте отключи видскриин суппорт(так как это для СБ) хз почему он в езе включился, везде до этого убирал

[Easy]

• 
  00:26:568 (2,3) - двойные реверсы нежелательны на самых лёгких сложностях,так что попробуй что то другое ✔
  00:32:884 (5) - ^ так же,если далее будут идти такие де ноты,то если что я из не пишу,так как двух раз хватает для уточнения этого момента ✔
  02:00:673 (1) - такие ноты определённо нельзя использовать в изи ✔
  02:17:726 (3,4) - оу,так у тебя всё не по ДС ЛООООЛ,ты чо! до этого момента идёт 02:17:410 (2,3) - момент с норм дсом,а в этом моменте у тебя джамп очень резкий,юзай дс на все карте (я про изи-нормалы) так как именно там всё идёт под ДС. (исправь спейсинг на всей карте) проглядел этот момент
  02:27:199 (2,3) - ^ странный переход,хотя соединение между нотами есть,ФИКС ДС тоже упустил

[normal]

• 
  очень странно,сравня изи и нормал,на нормале с ДС всё в полядке,в аиМоде только один объект 01:20:568 (2,3) - фикс не знаю, чего возмущается, расстояние-то идентичное
  02:21:199 (1,2,1) - а не слишком ли это далеко? укоротил, и на 01:00:357 (1,2,1) заодно

[hard]

• 
  как всегда за гранью моего понимания D: хех

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
соре,но я больше из себя не могу выдавить,так что звиняй за такой короткий мод изик вон ковырять не так уж и мало

Good Luck

huntress wrote:

i like the song and your mapping is cool so i might as well

[void]

- the start of the song continually increases in intensity, but 00:02:568 (1) - 00:03:831 (1) - are more intense jumps than 00:06:357 (1) - 00:07:620 (1) - that follow afterwards. could switch these two maybe? would be a better buildup changed spacings to increasing
- 00:16:463 (1) - could lower this slightly? the 90 degree angle from 00:16:147 (4) - doesnt fit well with the other slider angles and having it in the far corner makes it awkward ✔
- 00:21:831 (3,4,5) - this wide angle jump and sudden change in momentum is really hard to play and doesnt feel natural at all. would be nicer if 00:22:147 (5) - was switched with 00:22:463 (1) - but theres other ways that would work too I want few obstacles in map for righty players. Jump from bottom-right to left-up is nice place for choke
- 00:40:463 (1) - this part starting here is really neat but it could be more interesting and less repetitive to play if you change the direction you move around the center? starting at 00:42:989 (1) - maybe? (halfway through) ✔
- 02:10:305 (2,3,4) - this angle is also awkward because it goes against the established flow same as above, but here also some clockwise flow is
- 02:43:305 (2,1) - the slider velocity change here is really unexpected because these two sliders look almost identical, makes it hard to tell the rythym is changing. could change it to be more like 02:42:042 (2,1) - where the first slider is obviously longer extended

theres not much else could add, nothing really sticks out to me

i cant play [gap] very well so i dont think i could be useful for that. i like the aesthetics of [void] more though

Thanks for mod, note for start part was really important even if that not really visible for others. I recommend you to point out such things further in your mods.

mindmaster107 wrote:

Here from my M4M queue!

My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/677022

I did mention I can only mod 5+, so Im modding the top diff

[gap]
There are no individual problems, rather overarching problems you should consider.

Your movement gimmick is beautiful, and it is fun to play in a hollow wings style of mapping which I wish people would try for songs which support it. heh, glad to know it

That is about as far as I am stepping however, as I am confused about spacing.
00:07:620 (1,2,3,4) - 00:05:094 (1,2,3,4,5) - 00:00:042 (1,1) - These patterns suggests drums are being emphasized through SV.
00:23:094 (1,2,3) - 00:25:620 (1,2,3) - 00:27:831 (1,2,3) - These patterns suggests drums are being emphasized through spacing.
If you wanna make a cohesive map, you need to stick with one and only one method of representing sounds. If I say used spacing, rhythm, and SV to represent the drums, unless there is a clear distinctive sound overpowering the drums, it would make no sense to the player, and they wouldn't be able to associate the song with the map's ideas. It's because of background tension in music, started from 00:20:252 (3), but I get you point i guess, so it will be helpful for me in future
00:45:831 (1,2,3) - 00:47:094 (1,2,3) - Pattern changes like this also make no sense. Here I cannot tell what spacing and flow is trying to match up with. You need to keep to your ideas strongly, and make sure they stay consistent. sure, these jumps must be similar
This happens throughout your map, with ideas not being cohesive enough both across patterns in a section, and the map as a whole. patterns here coupled with circle places, which overlap each other, so if I want change pattern - I need to remap huge part of section

TL;DR Make your ideas more clear by matching ideas to the song in clear and DISTINCT ways. now I know, what to do with my style, thanks

Some parts are done well, like intense and calm sections feel different, both to play and to see, visually and physically. You now need to focus on making repeated bits look and play about the same bar some variation. Keep your core ideas the same. For more info watch pishifat's video outlining how to do it.

One idea I really think you should expand on is having your objects form some overall pattern, like 01:09:199 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - of parallel lines, and 00:54:042 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - of concentric objects. If you can make your map visually connected, rather than a loose connection of objects that would be great. yeah, but here a lot of jums, so it possible only in few places. You can take a look on [void]

Apart from that glaring issue, I really think you can reach rank thats cool

newton- wrote:

from nm q

might wanna rename "void" to "insane" since only the topdiff of each mapset is allowed to have custom naming ye

[gap]

1. more general than specific problems - will mainly focus on aesthetics and flow because rhythm seems fine. apply these to the whole map. sure, i need some remap
2. 00:03:831 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - it feels like most of your objects are just placed there because they play at vaguely comfortable angles and don't follow any patterns - try arranging your objects in more geometric, symmetrical, or parallel patterns for visual appeal.
   it's a pattern, maybe i'll change it if someone else req
   
3. 02:07:620 (3,1) - looks just like the 1/2 spacing you just used on 02:07:305 (1,2,3) - even though this is 1/1. i suggest that you give each rhythm pattern its own distinct spacing so that it's more easily recognizable to players. ✔
4. 02:01:305 (1,2,3) - you switch between different kinds of flow without apparent reasons - for example, here, you switch between wide and sharp flow between these objects, but you don't follow up this pattern with 02:02:884 (1,2,3) - since you use wide flow to jump to 3 rather than using sharp flow like you did in the previous combo. keep it consistent and have a predictable pattern for the kind of flow you're using. ✔
5. 02:16:305 (2,3) - there's a bunch of spacing inconsistencies too - the sound on 3 was spaced multiple times before, yet here it isn't spaced - breaking player expectations. when mapping important sounds, space them consistently so theyre more easily recognizable. fixed i guess

watch pishifat if you haven't, he explains how to make your maps more consistent with the concepts they have I have a lot to work on

good luck! thanks

-Aerith- wrote:

NM FROM MY QUEUE ~

Easy-00:03:831 are you sure this is not offscreen ? for me it is lol i have a lot space above
-00:40:147 remove this circle pls , its too much for a noob player xd ✔
-01:00:357 might as well change this to circle rather than slider unsupport with sound

Normal-00:16:463 uhh blanket maybe ? it is part of pattern 00:15:199 (1,2,1,2,3)
-00:17:726 same ✔

Others are fine and fix distance snap pls ~ really dk why it warn, ds everywhere all the same

Hard-00:02:568 stack maybe ? fine so
-00:03:199 same ^
-00:44:252 this slider is not good , can you try to fix it maybe ? fixed i guess

Btw , you wanna change the BG to this one Instead XD ? https://wall.alphacoders.com/big.php?i=672578looks nice, but here I want smth inhuman ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Reynolduh wrote:

i don't like this song. why did i accept it hmm

general
i don't think the 2nd kiai is necessary i think it is

Easy
00:40:463 (1) - shift it up so that it aligns with 00:39:831 (7) ✔
01:38:568 (3) - not necessary. del it it is fine
01:46:147 (5) - ^ ^

NOarmal
DO NOT have BIG sv chnages all of a sudden in normal diff's boi.at 02:00:673 (1) - the slider is TOO fest. things like this should be used in insanes/extra's and hard ocaasianally. change it baxck to 1 ✔
02:21:199 - ^ ✔

haard
00:02:568 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - these patterns are different from 00:05:094 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - when they represent the same sounds. ples change them to same pattern ✔
00:10:147 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ it is same already lul
00:39:515 (1,2,3) - these reveres are not necessary. just make them as circles or 1/4 sliders they are good
00:59:410 (1,2) - ^ ✔
01:00:042 (3) - why 1/8? just put this as circle or 1/4 sldier ✔
01:03:199 (1,2,3,4) - ^ cause of range
02:26:568 (1) - ^ ✔
01:09:831 (1,2,3) - ^ ✔
02:03:199 (3,2) - ugly overlap. fix ples ✔
02:23:726 (4,3) - ^ ✔
02:32:568 (4,1) - ^ ✔

i'lll stop here. cause i really just can't take anymore of this song lmao

Yusomi wrote:

hii, m4m from my queue

you can't have 2 diffs with custom diff names, it's not allowed regardless of the techniques used. All diffs must indicate the increasing difficulty of the map with the exception of the highest diff. ✔

gap00:03:831 (1,2,3) - maybe just make perfect triangle if someone else req changes for this, i'll mix
00:09:515 (3) - this has such a strong sound on it you should make it stand out, like you do here 00:08:252 (3) - for example. reverse added
00:10:147 (1,2,3,4,5) - if you want to do this you have to do it here also 00:05:094 (1,2,3,4,5) - otherwise my map won't make sense ✔
00:22:463 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - spacing is really random here, try to have a justification or reason for every objects position
00:22:463 (1,2,3) - low space for easier aim from 00:22:147 (3). Next, 00:23:252 (2,3) - larger space cause of stronger sound on 00:23:410 (3). And low space at 00:23:726 (1,2) again for easier aim from 00:23:410 (3)
00:48:989 (1,2) - why such large spacing when you usally make 1-2 small spacing but 2-3 big spacing. here you did the opposite? really, reduced
01:03:199 (3) - this should be more spaced to match 01:02:410 (2,3) - ✔
01:19:936 (5,6,7) - suggest evenly spacing this, as currently it looks quite messy fixed i guess
01:49:936 (3) - this should be closer to 01:49:620 (2) - to follow your previous logic ✔
02:42:357 (3,1) - , 02:33:515 (3,1) - , 02:34:778 (3,1) - there's so much random spacing in this diff, like i said earlier find a reason in the music for why each object is in that position. changed a bit now it's increasing. About positions - that is for patterns, you can set lower AR and take a look
03:10:147 (3,1) - this should have low spacing to follow the same logic as 03:07:620 (3,1) - and 03:08:884 (3,1) - and 03:06:357 (3,1) - uggggh remapped for break-jump-break-jump

void00:00:042 (1,1) - suggest spacing it out more, having things so tightly packed looks messy ✔
00:05:094 (1,2,3,4,1) - these aren't evenly spaced i know lul
00:06:357 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,5) - why do these get more spaced when the music stays the same? not the same, that section has rising, but ok, reduced a bit
00:20:568 (2,3) - space it out a little more looks messy ✔
00:39:831 (1,2) - if you really want to do this then ctrl+g these two notes then 00:40:147 (3,4) - ctrl+g these two, it has better flow from the previous sliders ✔
00:48:989 (4,1) - why is spacing so low here cause of sound changing. yeah inversed, but i want so
00:50:252 (4,1) - same here, it's pretty weird since the (1) is a much stronger sound so it's being under-emphasised with this spacing ^
00:57:515 (3,1) - and 00:58:778 (3,1) - . like the top diff spacing seems very random, these should be consistently spaced. mixed
01:05:726 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - this is very cluttered, space things out more, try to maximise use of the playfield. changed a bit
01:09:199 (1) - i have no idea what's going on with the inherited points in this map. so many sv changes and mutes makes it look very unstructured just a different sound heh
01:18:357 (1) - i think there's a hitsound mistake here oh sure
01:39:515 (2,1) - random overlap looks messy ✔
02:07:936 (3,4) - this looks really out of place in this map i like it
in this whole kiai the music is really repetitive but your mapping has no consistency or structure. i think you should use some similarities in your patterns to follow the music better. I try to hark bgm, where may be (and there is) additional sounds which i can show by all that sliderhell. I dont like map just beats, it's boring so that is why this overmap hard to perceive

insane00:01:936 (5) - strong sound is on this note, so it should be emphasised ✔
00:06:989 (5) - same here, strong sounds should stand out ✔

there seems to be no reasoning for your choice of object. when you use circles or 1/2 sliders it's random, like the other diffs this one is lacking structure or consistency. Make sure you are always attempting to follow something in the music.

03:02:252 (2) - this reverse arrow is hidden. this is unrankable didnt know about it

good luck ! thanks

Arutsuki wrote:

hi m3m

expert

•ok so keep in mind those are all general issues and reapeat through the rest of the map, I'm leaving out specific little mistakes cuz they're better to take care of once you learn the basics properly

•First and most notable problem is your rhythm choice; you need something that represents what you follow in the music properly, and is consistent. I assume you're trying to give variety to the map to not have it repeat too much, since the song is really repetitive, but you can achieve that all while having consistent and accurate rhythm choices. Let's see an example:

• •00:02:568 - from here the intro is basically just 4 sounds repeating with a loud clap on every second white tick; you can map this for example with a
  rhythm like this, which covers all the sounds it needs and doesn't add any that aren't in the music. as you could see, I use different rhythm for each diff. I guess, most covered version is [another]. using of different rhythms is not good at all at least by new(bie) mapper like me, but i want so.
  Then 00:05:094 - here comes a change in the music, the pitch of the bass in the background goes down, which you can use to add in more variety,
  like this. There's a ton more of these you can use to vary the gameplay and keep the rhythm accurate
  at the same time, so listen to the song carefully and work on your rhythm choices before anything. yeah, I need to map few mapsets fully for sort out my ideas before going to rank. I got it after few mods. Anyway I want some else critique for this.
  Listening/mapping without hitsounds enabled would help with telling what's the right rhythm in the song. I always map without hs
  •Also in the kiai there's tons of 1/4 sounds different from the rest of the song that you just ignored which is a real shame.

•Next, the spacing and sv changes. Both of these should be done on sounds in the music that go out of the ordinary (a drum louder than the rest has a bigger jump into it, or a low pitch synth has a slower slider, etc)I know, but mostly dont like this concept, but not randomly only where it might look cool. It is not so random like looks, if someoone want, i can explain position 90% of objects. but my positioning logic too much overweighted comparing to other maps as I see There's some nice ideas going on there, 00:10:147 (1,2,3,4,5) - or 00:11:726 (1,2,3) - would be pretty cool if they weren't done randomly, that's why I think it's a shame you aren't mapping any more interesting songs, or songs that would support these kinda patterns. Yooh can fit for this, but cause of bpm my map of them will be literally hell heh Anyway, some examples of the spacing:

• •02:06:673 (1,2,3) - this kinda spacing would be nice if it was used more, 02:06:673 (1,2) - low spacing on less intense sounds and 02:06:989 (3) -
  higher on more intense one. It might be a bit overdone imo but the basic idea is there, so if you kept this up consistently where the music keeps it
  up, the map would have much better structure just from that alone. whole diff about this, isn't it? not same spacing everywhere, and not only of circles but this pattern comes often enough

•Overall it has nice ideas and I can see how you take inspiration from other mappers, but it needs proper execution. With anything you do, it should be consistent as long as the sounds it's mapped to are consistent, and different when the music is different. I don't think it's worth it with this song unless you remap from scratch, but take these advices for the next time you make something and put more thought into why and where you place objects. sure

Had a look at the other difficulties and it's basically the same as for expert, you have to get a hang of your rhythm and structure, and your maps will be better.
If you need me to clarify anything feel free to message me, good luck Mod mostly for mapping than for map, but thanks. I need to save it as guide for myself

Muya wrote:

hi, sorry for delay

[General]
this map is used 100% volume on some sections, but I think its too noisy. sure, reduced in mid-section
also, this costom hit sounds are doesnt fit at this song. just a imo idk where to get it, but anyway almost all players use skins with own hs
03:02:884 - why kiai here? I thought its strage, and doesnt fit. different mood here

[easy]
you should fix stack leniency to 7 (default), because you didnt use stack on this difficulty. ✔
00:32:884 (5,6,7,8) - miss grid? I concern this gap of grids as (5) and (6,7,8). yeah

[normal]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

If stacks are used, Stack Leniency must be set high enough for 1/1 hit objects to stack. Directly overlapping hit objects cause reading problems for new players.

^ you must do increase stack leniency on this difficulty if normal diff. I dont like stack as you could notice heh. fixed

[hard]
01:49:620 (2,3) - if not overlapping on this, I guess will be more good look ✔
02:00:673 (1,2,1) -

Ranking Criteria wrote:

If stacks are used, Stack Leniency must be set high enough for 1/2 hit objects to stack. Directly overlapping hit objects cause reading problems for players of this level.

you should set enough leniency for 1/2 snap stacked object. ✔
02:16:147 (4,3) - might be looks bad for this overlap. ✔
02:17:410 (4,1) - this stacking too, unrankable issue. ✔
02:31:305 (4,1) - ^ ✔
03:11:726 (1,5) - if not overlapping on this, I guess will be more good look ✔

[insane]
00:28:463 (3,5) - avoid this overlapping? I'd suggest these objecting instead. ✔
00:59:410 (5,9) - same ✔
01:10:463 (8,2) - same ✔
01:33:515 (8,9,10,11) - might be this spacings will make a confusion for players. yeah
03:20:252 (4,5) - make a mirror of them? just do copy (5) and put then ctrl+H. it also possible avoid overlap of with 03:19:620 (1) - not sure i get you right, but changed a bit. also overlap fixed

[another]
00:05:094 (1,2,3,4,1) - might be over mapped... use soft-hitnormal to these slider ends? soft is notable different from others but it may goes good

[expert]
01:03:199 (3,4) - unsnapped either one? looks (3) snapping on 1/16, but (4) snapping on 1/12 and (5) snapped on 1/8. here pitch changing so i decide to vary sliderlenghts
02:00:673 - if I mapping with this song, I think I'll follow the dnb sounds... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
^ this map is kept same rhythms, and hit sounds. I thought want more other patterns

[another]
00:19:936 (4) - I thought 1/4 slider does fit ✔

[expert]
00:07:305 (4) - make reverse? or snap with 1/4 might be better too slow for previous 00:06:673 (2,3)
01:49:936 (3) - hmm suddenly drum sound? might be strange UUUUGGGGHHHHH idk why it broken. here soft sample. same situation was on [another] at 00:58:147 (1) and i lost my mind in try to fix it
anyway right now i know that was damned sampleset addition

this stand over other samples huh, now i can hate it
02:01:305 - you were follow with the dnb sounds (to make some streams) i guess here really low bpm for streams this map has literary followed same rhythm, this is make boring for players. I have to agree

well, Im not good this song at mapping or modding, I couldnt good suggestions
at least you must fix the stack leniency issues, this is unrankable issue. yeah, fixed i guess
good luck thanks

1. 01:20:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) -
2. 02:00:673 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) -