forum

TRUSTRICK - Recall THE END (Anime ED Version)

posted
Total Posts
63
show more
Sonnyc
map looks great. gonna just leave it dead?
Topic Starter
Anxient

Sonnyc wrote:

map looks great. gonna just leave it dead?
FUCK I FORGOT ABOUT THIS MAP
Weber
good 1
Shiguma

Sonnyc wrote:

map looks great. gonna just leave it dead?
IKR

Anxient wrote:

Sonnyc wrote:

map looks great. gonna just leave it dead?
FUCK I FORGOT ABOUT THIS MAP
DUDE I FUCKING DIDN'T I'VE BEEN WAITING T_T
Miriko
Hiya~ Just small mods desu! Small mods! >< Because I'm that bad at modding...

[Advanced]
  1. 00:24:862 (4) - NC? Since it's separated from the rest of the combo, I thought a NC here would be appropriate. ><
  2. 01:25:972 (3) - This is just a small suggestion to extend the play time on this difficulty slightly. And move the spinner to 01:27:358 - . What ever you map to extend it to that point is up to you, but there are strong beats at 01:26:298 - , 01:26:787 - and 01:27:276 - just right before the suggested placement of the spinner~
I wish I could map lower difficulties that easily... ;-; I'm so bad at them...

[Hard]
  1. This is probably just me but I thought that the frequent use of hiding a note under slider ends feels really awkward on a hard difficulty. It's not bad to use it at times but it feels too frequent in my opinion. The reasons I'd lower the amount of notes hiding under sliders are (1) Readability where players may often misread the next slider to be the next note and get confused about the rhythm afterwards or it leads to the other reason which is (2) Flow, in which the notes that forces the players to pause for each hidden note would disrupt the flow of the map and make it feel awkwardly snappy.

    Parts that feels awkward in flow and readability-wise:
  2. 00:31:547 (1,2,3) - Instead of hiding it under 00:31:547 (1) - , maybe stack it on top of 00:32:199 (3) - instead. The flow won't feel as awkward because the (1) slider would flow right into (3) which you could stack (2) onto.
  3. 00:35:623 (2) - This is the same as the first suggestion~
  4. 00:42:765 (3,4,5) - Mmm...I'm on the fence about this one. I had no trouble reading this (sort of) when I first played it but I suggest if there's an alternative way to map these three notes, you should try it.
  5. 00:58:417 (3,4,1,2) - Players would probably mess up the readability here and lose rhythm. A much more readable pattern and pathing might be better.
  6. 01:04:613 (2,3,4) - This feels really stuttery...I'm not sure how to describe it. xD
  7. 01:13:580 (2,3,4,5) - This too~
  8. 01:16:189 (2,3) - ^ ><

    Mainly, it's the 1/2 sliders with notes hidden underneath them that disrupts the flow most.
That's the only thing I could suggest for Hard~ Overall it's good! ^^

[aliv's Insane]
  1. Please consider reducing the HP. x.x It's a bit too high.
Good difficulty!

[SHSL:Hope]
  1. 00:19:289 (1,2,3) - Strange spacing. o.o
  2. 00:35:623 (1,2,3) - ^
  3. 01:12:765 (2) - It's just an aethstetic thing, but the kick-slider is slightly too 'downward' and it messes up the appearance of a triangle slightly. xD
Straight sliders everywharrr~

That's all I could think of~ I hope I helped. ><
Topic Starter
Anxient

Victorica wrote:

Hiya~ Just small mods desu! Small mods! >< Because I'm that bad at modding... - "bad at modding huh..?"

[Advanced]
  1. 00:24:862 (4) - NC? Since it's separated from the rest of the combo, I thought a NC here would be appropriate. >< - naw not really. ya see im trying to keep the NC consistent xd
  2. 01:25:972 (3) - This is just a small suggestion to extend the play time on this difficulty slightly. And move the spinner to 01:27:358 - . What ever you map to extend it to that point is up to you, but there are strong beats at 01:26:298 - , 01:26:787 - and 01:27:276 - just right before the suggested placement of the spinner~ - umu... ill keep it as is ;p
I wish I could map lower difficulties that easily... ;-; I'm so bad at them...

[Hard]
  1. This is probably just me but I thought that the frequent use of hiding a note under slider ends feels really awkward on a hard difficulty. It's not bad to use it at times but it feels too frequent in my opinion. The reasons I'd lower the amount of notes hiding under sliders are (1) Readability where players may often misread the next slider to be the next note and get confused about the rhythm afterwards or it leads to the other reason which is (2) Flow, in which the notes that forces the players to pause for each hidden note would disrupt the flow of the map and make it feel awkwardly snappy. -

    Parts that feels awkward in flow and readability-wise:
  2. 00:31:547 (1,2,3) - Instead of hiding it under 00:31:547 (1) - , maybe stack it on top of 00:32:199 (3) - instead. The flow won't feel as awkward because the (1) slider would flow right into (3) which you could stack (2) onto. - mm i was actually stacking it on 1 because of emphasis reasons for 3. 3 is a main beat right? so i thought it would be better here o3o
  3. 00:35:623 (2) - This is the same as the first suggestion~ - applied~
  4. 00:42:765 (3,4,5) - Mmm...I'm on the fence about this one. I had no trouble reading this (sort of) when I first played it but I suggest if there's an alternative way to map these three notes, you should try it. - stacked some more, but it should be easier to read(?)
  5. 00:58:417 (3,4,1,2) - Players would probably mess up the readability here and lose rhythm. A much more readable pattern and pathing might be better. - i made the 2nd portion more readable, but im keeping the 1st part for emphasis reasons.
  6. 01:04:613 (2,3,4) - This feels really stuttery...I'm not sure how to describe it. xD - xd reaaally now? ;O
  7. 01:13:580 (2,3,4,5) - This too~ - ;a;
  8. 01:16:189 (2,3) - ^ >< - changed~

    Mainly, it's the 1/2 sliders with notes hidden underneath them that disrupts the flow most. - really? >.<
That's the only thing I could suggest for Hard~ Overall it's good! ^^

[aliv's Insane]
  1. Please consider reducing the HP. x.x It's a bit too high.
Good difficulty!

[SHSL:Hope]
  1. 00:19:289 (1,2,3) - Strange spacing. o.o - uwa!
  2. 00:35:623 (1,2,3) - ^ - uwa!!! (applied both)
  3. 01:12:765 (2) - It's just an aethstetic thing, but the kick-slider is slightly too 'downward' and it messes up the appearance of a triangle slightly. xD - changed~
Straight sliders everywharrr~

That's all I could think of~ I hope I helped. ><
uwaaaa thanks for modding (even tho i asked you for it AAAA)
Logic Agent
self reminder.
Osu Tatakae Ouendan
(OWO)
Recall for Recall

I hope this is ok (/w\)
[Normal]
00:11:789 (2,3,1) - Rhythmically, these feel weird. (1) follows vocals as seems as though instruments aren't notable enough and there's no established pattern following 1/1 instruments before this, so ok. 00:11:789 (2) - swallows up 3 1/1 vocals on red ticks, and then (3) follows vocals, but 00:13:256 (1) - shifts suddenly to 1/1 instruments, which is weird to me. I suggest this: http://puu.sh/tvsjm/de0421e583.jpg
00:24:862 (3,4) - Rhythmically weird for me as well. 00:23:721 (1,2) - follows vocals, and the transition to vocals is actually neat, but my problem is the sudden shift to instruments on 00:25:677 (4) - again, and then the awkward nothingness that follows. Suggesting http://puu.sh/tvsrb/9a07e40f4f.jpg : as the piano on 00:25:677 - is not significantly loud enough compared to vocal and there is not much of a way to transition back to instruments otherwise.
Alternative: http://puu.sh/tvsBQ/06928a862a.jpg
Other alternative in relation to next:
00:26:329 (1,2,3,4) - feels odd to be on 1/1 white ticks, since the stronger vocals are on red and the 1/1 white ticks feel out of place by comparison.
Here's a possible suggestion starting from 00:24:862 - : http://puu.sh/tvsLk/86757b7af9.jpg or some variation if you can think of one

01:18:472 (1) - suggesting moving this higher (keep ds ofc lol) because its a sharp movement drop in its current position which for me isn't entirely natural on a lower diff. May have to adjust everything else after
01:26:461 (1) - I really think this is too short and too sudden for a normal. Might have to try changing that

[Advanced]
My problem is that Normal uses largely 2/1's and 1/1's, but Advanced begins using 1/2 sliders and spaced 1/2 circles regularly. 1/2 sliders increase movement involved while at the same time the rhythm is also denser and the spacing is higher.
Just think about it first and map another diff like me
00:20:786 - put circle here?
01:01:841 (4) - i guess this can be moved a bit so its not too far to the left?

[Hard]
00:02:332 - circle here i guess? By this point (in the set) most of the map centers on more continuous rhythm, so it feels odd to have this unmapped
00:04:941 - circle?
00:13:256 (1) - weird rhythmic choice, considering even on the Advanced a denser rhythm is used. Probably this? http://puu.sh/tvvSp/ccd48f78e5.jpg
00:56:298 (1,2,3) - suggestion: These sliders oughtta be on vocal red ticks, with (1) starting at 00:56:135 -
01:17:167 (1,2,3,4) - maybe you can follow vocals here again? i mean, I'm not sure I'm hearing something that can be mapped to with 1/2 circles

Ok.
The difficulty spike from Hard to insane is really high.
Hard employs very few jumps and even then it's rarely hitcircles.
Insane begins to use jumps on a regular basis and its often on continuous hitcircles.
Your options would probably be either be like my Re:Call and a new diff or nerf Insane or slightly increase Hard's difficulty
Take also into consideration that nerfing Insane widens the gap from Insane to SHSLHope. Personally I have reservations about the gap from Insane to SHSLHope being large already but it isn't really bad and i'm not sure either
Further take into consideration the spread i mentioned regarding Normal to Advanced.

[ailv's insane]
00:24:210 (1) - should probably be further from 00:24:047 (4) -
00:35:541 (2) - there isn't a note to map to here. delete this?
01:07:222 (2) - should probably be moved elsewhere, either having the direction go to the left or having it above.
01:16:841 (1,2,3,4) - I think these sliders should be mapped to vocals on red tick, starting 01:17:004 -


Hope this helps (/w\)
I would've modded on movements a bit more but I can't be sure without testplaying and I can't testplay with lag and I don't wanna get yelled at if my mod on movement wouldn't be fitting for a modern map
Topic Starter
Anxient

Osu Tatakae Ouendan wrote:

(OWO)
Recall for Recall

I hope this is ok (/w\)
[Normal]
00:11:789 (2,3,1) - Rhythmically, these feel weird. (1) follows vocals as seems as though instruments aren't notable enough and there's no established pattern following 1/1 instruments before this, so ok. 00:11:789 (2) - swallows up 3 1/1 vocals on red ticks, and then (3) follows vocals, but 00:13:256 (1) - shifts suddenly to 1/1 instruments, which is weird to me. I suggest this: http://puu.sh/tvsjm/de0421e583.jpg - i tried?
00:24:862 (3,4) - Rhythmically weird for me as well. 00:23:721 (1,2) - follows vocals, and the transition to vocals is actually neat, but my problem is the sudden shift to instruments on 00:25:677 (4) - again, and then the awkward nothingness that follows. Suggesting http://puu.sh/tvsrb/9a07e40f4f.jpg : as the piano on 00:25:677 - is not significantly loud enough compared to vocal and there is not much of a way to transition back to instruments otherwise.
Alternative: http://puu.sh/tvsBQ/06928a862a.jpg - tried something else...
Other alternative in relation to next:
00:26:329 (1,2,3,4) - feels odd to be on 1/1 white ticks, since the stronger vocals are on red and the 1/1 white ticks feel out of place by comparison.
Here's a possible suggestion starting from 00:24:862 - : http://puu.sh/tvsLk/86757b7af9.jpg or some variation if you can think of one - ill keep it as is. i think its fine

01:18:472 (1) - suggesting moving this higher (keep ds ofc lol) because its a sharp movement drop in its current position which for me isn't entirely natural on a lower diff. May have to adjust everything else after - ill do something about it if it gets mentioned again.
01:26:461 (1) - I really think this is too short and too sudden for a normal. Might have to try changing that - well what do i do about it @_@

[Advanced]
My problem is that Normal uses largely 2/1's and 1/1's, but Advanced begins using 1/2 sliders and spaced 1/2 circles regularly. 1/2 sliders increase movement involved while at the same time the rhythm is also denser and the spacing is higher.
Just think about it first and map another diff like me - ill consider it. but i think its fine, really. i mean the only thing i changed was the rhythm usage. the DS is still consistent (sort of)
00:20:786 - put circle here? - o-ok
01:01:841 (4) - i guess this can be moved a bit so its not too far to the left? - o-o=ok

[Hard]
00:02:332 - circle here i guess? By this point (in the set) most of the map centers on more continuous rhythm, so it feels odd to have this unmapped - i would legit map this if the focus was the pianos. sadly, it isnt, so i feel like itd would be just plain weird if i mapped this but not the entire piano jingle during this section.
00:04:941 - circle? - ^
00:13:256 (1) - weird rhythmic choice, considering even on the Advanced a denser rhythm is used. Probably this? http://puu.sh/tvvSp/ccd48f78e5.jpg - fixed
00:56:298 (1,2,3) - suggestion: These sliders oughtta be on vocal red ticks, with (1) starting at 00:56:135 - b-but, muh emphasis...
01:17:167 (1,2,3,4) - maybe you can follow vocals here again? i mean, I'm not sure I'm hearing something that can be mapped to with 1/2 circles - ;c

Ok.
The difficulty spike from Hard to insane is really high.
Hard employs very few jumps and even then it's rarely hitcircles.
Insane begins to use jumps on a regular basis and its often on continuous hitcircles.
Your options would probably be either be like my Re:Call and a new diff or nerf Insane or slightly increase Hard's difficulty
Take also into consideration that nerfing Insane widens the gap from Insane to SHSLHope. Personally I have reservations about the gap from Insane to SHSLHope being large already but it isn't really bad and i'm not sure either
Further take into consideration the spread i mentioned regarding Normal to Advanced. - ill have to map another insane. i mean, 3.1 --> 4.77 stars isnt very helpful here.


Hope this helps (/w\) - mods always help!
I would've modded on movements a bit more but I can't be sure without testplaying and I can't testplay with lag and I don't wanna get yelled at if my mod on movement wouldn't be fitting for a modern map - it did fine. probably.
thanks for the mod, dad~
Shiguma
I have arrived

General
Turn off countdown in all of your diffs

Normal
00:41:461 - Add a circle here please D:

Advanced
00:30:894 - 1/2 slider here?
00:58:091 (2,3) - curved slider into a note under it seems weird

Hard
00:30:894 (1,2,3) - Not a stream or buzzslider? D:
00:40:564 (1) - Putting spinner here makes me sad because you can't map 00:41:461 (1) - that way, and you even did in the Advanced diff :(
00:53:689 (1) - This one curved but 00:54:341 (3) - this one straight? Sounds aren't that different imo
01:15:211 (3,1) - Slight blanket error I think https://puu.sh/tw1WQ/b9314ca827.png
01:18:146 (6,1) - ^

aliv's Insane
00:10:484 (5) - 1/2 slider instead?
00:18:962 (2,3,4) - Feel like the flow in this is kinda weird, it looks kinda weird too
00:23:068 (4) - This should be the note that breaks flow I think, I don't know how you could achieve it without moving around the notes previous, but the piano should be emphasized somehow I think
00:28:123 (3,1) - Why do you have the little thing jutting out of the slider but then you don't stack it on top of it ._. https://puu.sh/tw0Dx/088eb22030.png Look at how nice it looks like that :o
01:05:102 (3,4) - Stack?
01:18:146 (5) - Move this up higher and slightly to the left?

SHSL:Hope
00:39:994 (3,4,5) - What if these went down instead of to the right?
01:03:146 (2) - Shouldn't this one be curved too, or 01:03:472 (3) - be straight?
01:09:015 (4) - because I'm not sure if you did it intentionally, I feel like these stood out though so idk
01:26:461 (2,3) - increase spacing, because you have 01:26:787 (1,2,3) - equal spacing for these three 01:26:298 (1,2,3) - but in this one (1,2) is a good spacing and (3) is small
01:28:907 - What if you were mean and put a note here :o

Nothing much to say, I think it's pretty good
Rank it soon for me buddy :)
Topic Starter
Anxient

Shiguma wrote:

I have arrived - ;O

General
Turn off countdown in all of your diffs - i hate my life

Normal
00:41:461 - Add a circle here please D: - ok

Advanced
00:30:894 - 1/2 slider here? - why?
00:58:091 (2,3) - curved slider into a note under it seems weird - its fiiiine

Hard
00:30:894 (1,2,3) - Not a stream or buzzslider? D: - its my policy to not add any streams on hard diffs (which is why i ended up mapping another diff to compensate for the hugeass diff spike on the spread)
00:40:564 (1) - Putting spinner here makes me sad because you can't map 00:41:461 (1) - that way, and you even did in the Advanced diff :( - lets be real, theres not alot i could do here.
00:53:689 (1) - This one curved but 00:54:341 (3) - this one straight? Sounds aren't that different imo - i dont see the issue.
01:15:211 (3,1) - Slight blanket error I think https://puu.sh/tw1WQ/b9314ca827.png - nothing new. fixed
01:18:146 (6,1) - ^ - i tried.

SHSL:Hope
00:39:994 (3,4,5) - What if these went down instead of to the right? - if i did that it would play weird.
01:03:146 (2) - Shouldn't this one be curved too, or 01:03:472 (3) - be straight? - as much as i love straight sliders, it just doesnt feel right to put a straight slider here.
01:09:015 (4) - because I'm not sure if you did it intentionally, I feel like these stood out though so idk - well, it plays better than if i put a straight slider. plus i get blanket bonus.
01:26:461 (2,3) - increase spacing, because you have 01:26:787 (1,2,3) - equal spacing for these three 01:26:298 (1,2,3) - but in this one (1,2) is a good spacing and (3) is small - i feel like i placed it like this coz imo, 3 feels more silent than the jump pattern, thus this spacing. plus, contrast makes it even better!
01:28:907 - What if you were mean and put a note here :o - i will never forgive myself if i did this.

Nothing much to say, I think it's pretty good
Rank it soon for me buddy :) - mod my light insane diff.
big thank!
Shiguma

Anxient wrote:

mod my light insane diff.
Sure thing buddy, but I don't really have much to say xd

Light Insane
You know, I think calling it just "Insane" would be fine man
00:40:972 (1,2,1,2) - Equal spacing even though the second one sounds way stronger?
00:56:950 (1) - I feel like this should be rotated towards the left not the right

Also, on the Hard diff: 00:40:564 (1) - Putting spinner here makes me sad because you can't map 00:41:461 (1) - that way, and you even did in the Advanced diff :( - lets be real, theres not alot i could do here. You could if you didn't have a spinner there and maybe had like some sliderart instead. I feel like the two sounds should be mapped because it leads into the kiai and its pretty hype sound, y'know? (Just my opinion on it)
Topic Starter
Anxient

Shiguma wrote:

Anxient wrote:

mod my light insane diff.
Sure thing buddy, but I don't really have much to say xd

Light Insane
You know, I think calling it just "Insane" would be fine man - for the sake of my pride, im not calling a 3.8 star a insane. unless, i gotta.
00:40:972 (1,2,1,2) - Equal spacing even though the second one sounds way stronger? - bumped it.
00:56:950 (1) - I feel like this should be rotated towards the left not the right - 00:56:461 (2,1) - need contrast. or else itll be too weird imo lmao

Also, on the Hard diff: 00:40:564 (1) - Putting spinner here makes me sad because you can't map 00:41:461 (1) - that way, and you even did in the Advanced diff :( - lets be real, theres not alot i could do here. You could if you didn't have a spinner there and maybe had like some sliderart instead. I feel like the two sounds should be mapped because it leads into the kiai and its pretty hype sound, y'know? (Just my opinion on it) - ok. im doing it just for you okay? coz i love you.
lelthx
ailv

Osu Tatakae Ouendan wrote:

[ailv's insane]
00:24:210 (1) - should probably be further from 00:24:047 (4) -applied
00:35:541 (2) - there isn't a note to map to here. delete this? applied, also changed the patterning here a little
01:07:222 (2) - should probably be moved elsewhere, either having the direction go to the left or having it above. remapped this little portion here
01:16:841 (1,2,3,4) - I think these sliders should be mapped to vocals on red tick, starting 01:17:004 - applied

Shiguma wrote:

00:10:484 (5) - 1/2 slider instead? nope, i don't feel the sustain is important enough to map here
00:18:962 (2,3,4) - Feel like the flow in this is kinda weird, it looks kinda weird too ctrl-g'd the repeat slider here
00:23:068 (4) - This should be the note that breaks flow I think, I don't know how you could achieve it without moving around the notes previous, but the piano should be emphasized somehow I think increased spacing a little here,
00:28:123 (3,1) - Why do you have the little thing jutting out of the slider but then you don't stack it on top of it ._. https://puu.sh/tw0Dx/088eb22030.png Look at how nice it looks like that :o applied
01:05:102 (3,4) - Stack? applied
01:18:146 (5) - Move this up higher and slightly to the left? applied
Thanks for modding! o/
Cerulean Veyron
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH short mod

[- - General - -]
  • - Well, it's fine when a GD has different combo colors. But how did Light Insane's first combo color is the same as aliv's, and disparates the rest of your difficulties?
    - Well done~

[- - Normal - -]
  1. 00:25:677 (4) - I guess you've missed a Normal sampleset whistle hitsound on the slider tail over here. So... add it there~
  2. 00:47:167 (1) - Not close enough to off-screen object in gameplay monitoring or whatever, but it looks pretty much potential for one from that slider head touching down in my point of view. You might wanna try moving this slider, or maybe rotating if you want to keep the triangle pattern with the two sliders 00:46:515 (3,1) - just a few bit of grids higher.

[- - Advanced - -]
  1. 00:15:049 (6,1) - 00:31:547 (1,2) - The anti-spacing here is pretty inconsistent. Although the small 1.9x spaced jumps on some further parts are pretty suitable, but not on these two parts. So as usual, redo to the default 1.8x distance spacing that sets for the whole difficulty.
  2. 00:35:786 (3) - Not sure if this intends to be on purpose, but somehow AiMod says this slider's tail is not snapped correctly. In this section for other difficulties, however, were actually started of with circles or slider heads. So, this one's actually different. You may wanna reconsider~
  3. 01:03:635 (3,4,5) - The rhythm composition here doesn't really show a lot of melding with neither the song track nor the vocals. So I might suggest something a little to better the current rhythm, may be this should do for stressing the downbeat much greater.
  4. 01:19:939 (2,3) - Probably the same thing as above. With the 1/2 beat slider after the reversing, it would literally give the impact feeling over the emphasis.

two diffs cuz kds farming busy with schedule lul

hi anxient & ailv
Topic Starter
Anxient

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH short mod

[- - General - -]
  • - Well, it's fine when a GD has different combo colors. But how did Light Insane's first combo color is the same as aliv's, and disparates the rest of your difficulties? - WHAT.
    - Well done~

[- - Normal - -]
  1. 00:25:677 (4) - I guess you've missed a Normal sampleset whistle hitsound on the slider tail over here. So... add it there~ - alrighty
  2. 00:47:167 (1) - Not close enough to off-screen object in gameplay monitoring or whatever, but it looks pretty much potential for one from that slider head touching down in my point of view. You might wanna try moving this slider, or maybe rotating if you want to keep the triangle pattern with the two sliders 00:46:515 (3,1) - just a few bit of grids higher. - i think it'll be fine. probably.

[- - Advanced - -]
  1. 00:15:049 (6,1) - 00:31:547 (1,2) - The anti-spacing here is pretty inconsistent. Although the small 1.9x spaced jumps on some further parts are pretty suitable, but not on these two parts. So as usual, redo to the default 1.8x distance spacing that sets for the whole difficulty.
  2. 00:35:786 (3) - Not sure if this intends to be on purpose, but somehow AiMod says this slider's tail is not snapped correctly. In this section for other difficulties, however, were actually started of with circles or slider heads. So, this one's actually different. You may wanna reconsider~ - tried to fix.
  3. 01:03:635 (3,4,5) - The rhythm composition here doesn't really show a lot of melding with neither the song track nor the vocals. So I might suggest something a little to better the current rhythm, may be this should do for stressing the downbeat much greater. - nah. i like it as is. plus the piano is being emphasized by the slider.
  4. 01:19:939 (2,3) - Probably the same thing as above. With the 1/2 beat slider after the reversing, it would literally give the impact feeling over the emphasis. - oke

two diffs cuz kds farming busy with schedule lul - lul

hi anxient & ailv
thhnaks
Mismagius
[General]
  • timing feels really wrong, especially considering measure resets and offset at some points. youll probably need someone good at timing though
    also idk if having your map be 60% kiai time is fine
[Normal]
  • idk this feels a bit too hard to be the easiest difficulty
  1. 00:10:973 (1,2,3) - idk, not a big fan of mapping vocals in easier diffs. i would just do something like this to make it a bit more intuitive
  2. 00:19:808 (2,1) - you could improve the flow here by placing (1) and fixing the next note like this
  3. 00:23:721 (1,2,3,4) - again i dont really agree with mapping to vocals here but yeah
  4. 00:39:341 (1,2,3,4) - same here, the rhythm does feel a bit confusing. id say something like this feels much more intuitive
  5. 00:43:907 (3) - would consider doing something like this so you can click on the strong beat
  6. 00:58:907 (3) - slider goes a bit out of the playfield
  7. 01:03:472 (2,3) - rhythm feels a bit wrong here, shouldnt it be something like this?
  8. 01:26:461 (1) - spinner feels a bit too short for a normal/easiest diff of the mapset. wouldnt really consider it (also would make sense to finish this on 01:28:570 like the other diffs)
[Advanced]
  1. 00:09:017 (3) - considering the previous NCing pattern, either this or (5) should be NC'd
  2. 00:20:786 (1,1) - i dont really see the need for 2 NCs here
  3. 00:28:612 (4) - i feel like this sliderend is a beat that should be clicked, maybe replace the slider with 2 notes
  4. 00:31:221 (1,1) - same here, no need for 2 NCs imo
  5. 00:36:081 (1) - no need to NC
  6. 00:38:689 (6) - same as before, i feel like you could remove reverse arrow and place a beat at 00:39:341
  7. 00:44:885 (2,3) - i feel like this rhythm works better here
  8. 00:49:450 (3,2) - not too sure about this but eh looks fine on gameplay
  9. 00:53:526 (4,5,6) - flow could be kinda improved here, like this
  10. 00:59:885 (3) - same as before, could make this 2 notes so you click the strong beat
  11. 01:15:700 (1,2,3,1) - this rhythm would work much better here
  12. 01:22:059 (1,3) - same as before, not sure about this
  13. 01:25:972 (3) - could be 2 notes so you click the strong beat

    also would make sense to finish this on 01:28:570 like the other diffs
[Hard]
  • not a big fan of the notes stacked under sliders because they're kinda antiflow-ish but not much to be done at this point lol
  1. 00:18:147 (4) - would be nicer if the strong beat was clickable here
  2. 00:41:461 (3,1) - idk about this in a Hard, it does feel a bit confusing on the first try
[Light Insane]
  • the NCing around the chorus feels really inconsistent/overdone, might want to look deeper into it since idk if its intentional or not
  1. 00:28:612 (3) - pretty sure this is going out of the playfield
  2. 00:30:894 (3) - this is 1/8, not 1/4
  3. 00:42:276 (2,3) - spacing between these 2 feels a bit low considering the song intensity
  4. 00:46:515 (3,4,5,6,1) - why do the 1/4s here have different spacing
  5. 00:49:613 (5,1) - this could be a jump considering intensity
  6. 01:03:472 (1,2,1,2) - flow here is pretty bad tbh, could be made better like this or something idk
  7. 01:10:320 (3,1) - could be a larger jump
[Insane]
  • same thing about the NCs, i guess its intentional then
  1. 00:31:221 (1,1) - why 2 NCs
  2. 00:33:177 (1,2) - the antijump here feels weird idk, i guess you could do something like this
  3. 00:49:124 (1) - move 3rd point to 152;312 to make your wave slider prettier (then fix the stacking afterwards)
  4. 00:50:917 (4,5) - why the low spacing
  5. 00:58:417 (6,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ehhh, maybe making your mapping here more active and follow the strong notes to be clicked (this also applies to NCing)
  6. 01:05:265 (1,2) - spacing feels a bit too low here
  7. 01:06:244 (1,2,1,2) - avoid mapping sliderstarts at red ticks, but idk since you're following vocals so nvm i guess
  8. 01:09:667 (4,1) - spacing is a bit low
[Hope]
  1. 00:10:321 (1,2,3) - id probably place (3) around 456;268 since the current spacing is wayyyy too anti-flow tbh
  2. 00:20:786 (1,1) - not gonna comment on the NCing anymore i guess lol
  3. 00:38:689 (1,2) - ok this plays reeeeeeeally weird and i heavily consider changing it
  4. 00:49:776 (1) - why not silence this sliderend like you did with the previous one
  5. 01:04:450 (2) - i think this would work a bit better
  6. 01:23:037 (4,5) - spacing feels a bit too low
  7. 01:26:461 (2,3) - same as before, this just doesn't fit
sorry if i overlooked something or didn't explain well enough but im really sick and i strongly dislike anime songs so i couldnt stand hearing this anymore
Topic Starter
Anxient

Blue Dragon wrote:

[General]
  • timing feels really wrong, especially considering measure resets and offset at some points. youll probably need someone good at timing though
    also idk if having your map be 60% kiai time is fine
[Normal]
  • idk this feels a bit too hard to be the easiest difficulty - idk bout you, but this feels easy enough..
  1. 00:10:973 (1,2,3) - idk, not a big fan of mapping vocals in easier diffs. i would just do something like this to make it a bit more intuitive - normally, id agree. but in this particular section of the song, the vocals are the most noticeable part of the song, so id prioritize that over the instrumentals.
  2. 00:19:808 (2,1) - you could improve the flow here by placing (1) and fixing the next note like this - applied
  3. 00:23:721 (1,2,3,4) - again i dont really agree with mapping to vocals here but yeah - ;w
  4. 00:39:341 (1,2,3,4) - same here, the rhythm does feel a bit confusing. id say something like this feels much more intuitive - i agree!
  5. 00:43:907 (3) - would consider doing something like this so you can click on the strong beat - applied
  6. 00:58:907 (3) - slider goes a bit out of the playfield - straight sliders really are the best!
  7. 01:03:472 (2,3) - rhythm feels a bit wrong here, shouldnt it be something like this? - i changed it, but not like this lol. but its changed.
  8. 01:26:461 (1) - spinner feels a bit too short for a normal/easiest diff of the mapset. wouldnt really consider it (also would make sense to finish this on 01:28:570 like the other diffs) - same tbh
[Advanced]
  1. 00:09:017 (3) - considering the previous NCing pattern, either this or (5) should be NC'd - applied
  2. 00:20:786 (1,1) - i dont really see the need for 2 NCs here - me neither.
  3. 00:28:612 (4) - i feel like this sliderend is a beat that should be clicked, maybe replace the slider with 2 notes - ok
  4. 00:31:221 (1,1) - same here, no need for 2 NCs imo - alright then
  5. 00:36:081 (1) - no need to NC - a-alright
  6. 00:38:689 (6) - same as before, i feel like you could remove reverse arrow and place a beat at 00:39:341 - a-a-alright
  7. 00:44:885 (2,3) - i feel like this rhythm works better here - ill keep it as is. if i do it like that id end up ignoring alot of powerful beats
  8. 00:49:450 (3,2) - not too sure about this but eh looks fine on gameplay - it also plays fine
  9. 00:53:526 (4,5,6) - flow could be kinda improved here, like this - flow = improved
  10. 00:59:885 (3) - same as before, could make this 2 notes so you click the strong beat - ok
  11. 01:15:700 (1,2,3,1) - this rhythm would work much better here - density = INCREASED
  12. 01:22:059 (1,3) - same as before, not sure about this - itll be fine.
  13. 01:25:972 (3) - could be 2 notes so you click the strong beat

    also would make sense to finish this on 01:28:570 like the other diffs
[Hard]
  • not a big fan of the notes stacked under sliders because they're kinda antiflow-ish but not much to be done at this point lol - ;w;
  1. 00:18:147 (4) - would be nicer if the strong beat was clickable here
  2. 00:41:461 (3,1) - idk about this in a Hard, it does feel a bit confusing on the first try - if theres more mentions about this, ill do something else.
[Light Insane]
  • the NCing around the chorus feels really inconsistent/overdone, might want to look deeper into it since idk if its intentional or not
  1. 00:28:612 (3) - pretty sure this is going out of the playfield - meet my friend, stacked notes
  2. 00:30:894 (3) - this is 1/8, not 1/4 - i know.
  3. 00:42:276 (2,3) - spacing between these 2 feels a bit low considering the song intensity - well, 3 isnt a emphasized note so i dont see why there should be a jump in the first place?
  4. 00:46:515 (3,4,5,6,1) - why do the 1/4s here have different spacing - i wanted to try to make the player go slower. is that ng? probably is tho. fixed
  5. 00:49:613 (5,1) - this could be a jump considering intensity - nah. not enough emphasis. i seriously think that this is better tho.
  6. 01:03:472 (1,2,1,2) - flow here is pretty bad tbh, could be made better like this or something idk - did something similar.
  7. 01:10:320 (3,1) - could be a larger jump - i agree!

[Despair]
  1. 00:10:321 (1,2,3) - id probably place (3) around 456;268 since the current spacing is wayyyy too anti-flow tbh - did something more stylish
  2. 00:20:786 (1,1) - not gonna comment on the NCing anymore i guess lol - i-im sorry
  3. 00:38:689 (1,2) - ok this plays reeeeeeeally weird and i heavily consider changing it - changed.
  4. 00:49:776 (1) - why not silence this sliderend like you did with the previous one - wokey
  5. 01:04:450 (2) - i think this would work a bit better - same
  6. 01:23:037 (4,5) - spacing feels a bit too low - naaaah.
  7. 01:26:461 (2,3) - same as before, this just doesn't fit - ok fine.
sorry if i overlooked something or didn't explain well enough but im really sick and i strongly dislike anime songs so i couldnt stand hearing this anymore - sorry i had to put you through this >.<
Logic Agent
Late m4m.

[General]
  1. New bg size?
[SHSL:Hope]
  1. 00:00:702 (3) - Not a fan of this reverse tbh, the repeat is on nothing in the music and the slider ends where a click could be justified. I would just do 1/2 then a circle after it, but it's up to you. This goes for more than just this reverse slider.
  2. 00:01:191 (1) - Skipping over the sound on the red tick here, you don't think it should be mapped?
  3. 00:03:310 (1) - Again not sure about skipping the sound on the red tick here, but if you want to do this I guess it kinda works. Just seems odd to me.
  4. 00:06:245 (3,1) - Those wide angle jumps into this small spacing makes this part feel very underemphasized, I would give this more spacing somehow.
  5. 00:09:506 (1,2,3,4,5) - Ctrl + G this for no reason other than I think it'd be cool like that?
  6. 00:10:973 (1) - Again with the reverse thing, except this time it ends on a strong vocal.
  7. 00:43:091 - Not mapping vocals here huh.
  8. 01:22:385 (1) - Finish?

    Don't really like how you skipped out on a lot of vocals in the chorus of this diff, but other than that it's alright.
[ailv's insane]
  1. OD7.5? Having same OD as Light Insane is weird.
  2. No caps on Insane? I get your name is lowercase but it just seems weird to have this diff only.
  3. 00:05:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - These are not groups of 4, these are groups of 3. As such, your patterning is very weird, you should adjust the nc's as well. Also this stack 00:06:408 (3,4) - is pretty meh because it underemphasizes the strong drum sound.
  4. 00:08:528 (4,5) - Ctrl + G this rhythm for a click on the piano?
  5. 00:15:049 (5) - Remove NC
  6. 00:27:471 (1) - Don't like this reverse on the piano sound, I'd prefer if you mapped this out more.
  7. 00:28:286 (4) - A reverse on a strong vocal, again I would map this out more.
  8. 00:33:666 - Place a circle here to leadin to the increase density?
  9. 00:43:091 - Slider end on a strong vocal, would prefer if this were clickable.
  10. 00:45:211 (4,1) - Ctrl + G this rhythm for the vocal?
  11. 00:46:515 (1) - Starting here your nc's are kinda screwy. 00:47:004 (1) - Remove 00:47:167 (1) - Add 00:47:820 (3) - Remove 00:49:124 (3) - Add 00:49:776 (3,1) - Switch
  12. 00:51:570 - I suggest adding a circle here and making both of these reverses only go once, having a reverse on the white tick is pretty bleh.
  13. 01:06:896 - NC errors again, but I'm lazy.
  14. 01:12:439 (1,2) - Same as earlier
  15. 01:16:841 (6) - Missing a hitsound
  16. 01:17:004 (1,2) - Switch hitsounds

    Some hitsound and rhythm issues that I didn't point out, but should be fairly obvious given my suggestions. It's mostly okay though, nice aesthetics.
[Light Insane]
  1. 00:00:213 - This diff is more dense in the intro than your topdiff lol
  2. 00:17:006 (4,1) - Ctrl + G rhythm? I like vocals.
  3. 00:39:994 (3,4) - Ctrl + G here as well? Clickable vocal and drum sound are landing on a slider tail so yeah.
  4. 00:49:776 (1,2) - Add some claps here or something?
  5. 01:02:167 (1) - Claps here too?
  6. 01:03:798 (1,2,1) - Don't understand the comboing here, as well as why you're putting a 1/1 slider but not on the vocal.
  7. 01:06:407 (5,1) - Why did you stop mapping vocals suddenly?
  8. 01:09:830 (2) - Make this into a circle and a 1/2 slider so you click the white tick?
  9. 01:12:602 (3) - Hitsounds
  10. 01:22:385 (1) - ^
  11. 01:24:994 (1) - ^

    This diff is nice.
[Hard]
  1. 00:43:091 - Strong vocal played on a stack, not a fan.
  2. 00:53:526 - Ignoring vocals here.
  3. 01:06:244 (4) - Reverse on a drum hit and slider end on vocals, pls no.
  4. 01:13:907 (4,5) - Why stack?
  5. 01:16:678 (4) - Same as earlier, pls no.
I think your rhythm choices need work, but the rest is nice. This song is weird so maybe that has something to do with it, but ya. Just work on rhythm and this set should be fine.
ailv

Blue Dragon wrote:

[Insane]
[same thing about the NCs, i guess its intentional then

00:31:221 (1,1) - why 2 NCs - removed nc
00:33:177 (1,2) - the antijump here feels weird idk, i guess you could do something like this this part wasn't really sitting right with me, changed it a little bit
00:49:124 (1) - move 3rd point to 152;312 to make your wave slider prettier (then fix the stacking afterwards) applied
00:50:917 (4,5) - why the low spacing changed spacing
00:58:417 (6,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ehhh, maybe making your mapping here more active and follow the strong notes to be clicked (this also applies to NCing) remapped this section
01:05:265 (1,2) - spacing feels a bit too low here changed spacing
01:06:244 (1,2,1,2) - avoid mapping sliderstarts at red ticks, but idk since you're following vocals so nvm i guess
01:09:667 (4,1) - spacing is a bit low changed spacing

Logic Agent wrote:

[ailv's insane]
  1. OD7.5? Having same OD as Light Insane is weird. sure, works for me
  2. No caps on Insane? I get your name is lowercase but it just seems weird to have this diff only. i don't think this is a problem
  3. 00:05:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - These are not groups of 4, these are groups of 3. As such, your patterning is very weird, you should adjust the nc's as well. Also this stack 00:06:408 (3,4) - is pretty meh because it underemphasizes the strong drum sound. changed here, seems to work better now
  4. 00:08:528 (4,5) - Ctrl + G this rhythm for a click on the piano? applied
  5. 00:15:049 (5) - Remove NC removed nc
  6. 00:27:471 (1) - Don't like this reverse on the piano sound, I'd prefer if you mapped this out more. yeh, remapped this part a little
  7. 00:28:286 (4) - A reverse on a strong vocal, again I would map this out more. same as above
  8. 00:33:666 - Place a circle here to leadin to the increase density? i don't want to map a note here just for the sake of increasing density.
  9. 00:43:091 - Slider end on a strong vocal, would prefer if this were clickable. fixed
  10. 00:45:211 (4,1) - Ctrl + G this rhythm for the vocal? 4 comes on mi, and 1 comes on ru
  11. 00:46:515 (1) - Starting here your nc's are kinda screwy. 00:47:004 (1) - Remove 00:47:167 (1) - Add 00:47:820 (3) - Remove 00:49:124 (3) - Add 00:49:776 (3,1) - Switch
  12. 00:51:570 - I suggest adding a circle here and making both of these reverses only go once, having a reverse on the white tick is pretty bleh. applied
  13. 01:06:896 - NC errors again, but I'm lazy. applied these nc changes
  14. 01:12:439 (1,2) - Same as earlier applied
  15. 01:16:841 (6) - Missing a hitsound
  16. 01:17:004 (1,2) - Switch hitsounds
Thanks for modding friends <3
Topic Starter
Anxient

Logic Agent wrote:

Late m4m.

[General]
  1. New bg size? - working on it.
[SHSL:Hope]
  1. 00:00:702 (3) - Not a fan of this reverse tbh, the repeat is on nothing in the music and the slider ends where a click could be justified. I would just do 1/2 then a circle after it, but it's up to you. This goes for more than just this reverse slider. - i agree
  2. 00:01:191 (1) - Skipping over the sound on the red tick here, you don't think it should be mapped? - naaah. dont wanna overload the intro with too much shit
  3. 00:03:310 (1) - Again not sure about skipping the sound on the red tick here, but if you want to do this I guess it kinda works. Just seems odd to me. - ^
  4. 00:06:245 (3,1) - Those wide angle jumps into this small spacing makes this part feel very underemphasized, I would give this more spacing somehow. - clearly not the cleanest thing i have ever done, but it works i guess.
  5. 00:09:506 (1,2,3,4,5) - Ctrl + G this for no reason other than I think it'd be cool like that? - i agree!
  6. 00:10:973 (1) - Again with the reverse thing, except this time it ends on a strong vocal. - im keeping this one.
  7. 00:43:091 - Not mapping vocals here huh. - i cant just ignore the piano yo.
  8. 01:22:385 (1) - Finish? - this might sound weird but in the actual song there isnt a cymbal there, so im not putting it. actually considered putting a finish there tbh, didnt sound so pretty to me.

    Don't really like how you skipped out on a lot of vocals in the chorus of this diff, but other than that it's alright.

[Light Insane]
  1. 00:00:213 - This diff is more dense in the intro than your topdiff lol - this is why i keep mapping with cs 4.5.. ah well its not that bad.
  2. 00:17:006 (4,1) - Ctrl + G rhythm? I like vocals. - same
  3. 00:39:994 (3,4) - Ctrl + G here as well? Clickable vocal and drum sound are landing on a slider tail so yeah. - i disagree!
  4. 00:49:776 (1,2) - Add some claps here or something? - nope.
  5. 01:02:167 (1) - Claps here too? - drum claps!
  6. 01:03:798 (1,2,1) - Don't understand the comboing here, as well as why you're putting a 1/1 slider but not on the vocal. - this made me remap
  7. 01:06:407 (5,1) - Why did you stop mapping vocals suddenly? - if i did i would be ignoring a lot of strong beats. not a worth-it tradeoff tbh.
  8. 01:09:830 (2) - Make this into a circle and a 1/2 slider so you click the white tick? - ok
  9. 01:12:602 (3) - Hitsounds - dealt with
  10. 01:22:385 (1) - ^
  11. 01:24:994 (1) - ^

    This diff is nice. - :O
[Hard]
  1. 00:43:091 - Strong vocal played on a stack, not a fan. - ok
  2. 00:53:526 - Ignoring vocals here. - its fiine.
  3. 01:06:244 (4) - Reverse on a drum hit and slider end on vocals, pls no. - fixed
  4. 01:13:907 (4,5) - Why stack? - good question
  5. 01:16:678 (4) - Same as earlier, pls no. - ur face
I think your rhythm choices need work, but the rest is nice. This song is weird so maybe that has something to do with it, but ya. Just work on rhythm and this set should be fine.
big thank
Sonnyc
General.
You forgot to reset your metronome at 00:36:733. Add a new redline there please.

Normal.
Use ar4 please. 5 is way too fast to be in the lowest difficulty.
00:41:298 (4,5) - Two circles feel a bit too difficult to be in the lowest diff. Mind making this to a 1/2 slider or something?
Not bad, but next time when making a "lowest" difficulty, keep some real difficulty aspects in mind. In this case, several 1/1 spacings are quite large while the bpm was high. Yet I feel I can consider this as the lowest one in this set.

Advanced.
ar7 at a map with nearly no jumps feels a bit high. At least, you'll want to balance the value after you've changed the ar of normal.
01:05:754 (2,3) - Even it isn't intended, the formation is pretty much like a blanket. You can improve it more.
01:09:994 - I think expressing the beat and the vocal at here would fit the song better.
01:20:754 (4,1) - There is a jump here, and I'm not really sure if the only jump of the map really deserves here.

Hard.
00:24:862 (4,5) - 00:26:818 (2,3) - Use 1.7x spacing for consistency.
01:26:216 (7) - Remove this object please. The song wasn't really strong to demand some object here. The only 1/4 click in this difficulty doesn't really seem to fit the overall consistency.

Light Insane.
00:30:568 (2) - The spacing suddenly decreased. It feels inconsistent while there wasn't some major difference in the song. Keep the 1.4x.

Insane.
Why is the diff name "insane" with a lowercase? It doesn't really make much sense with other diff names. Please use an uppercase.
Any special reason for using a different combo color with other diffs? Personally, the red color here felt a bit unfitting.
00:10:973 ~ 00:20:786 - I'd ask you a small rework on this section to reflect the intensity of the song better. Currently, the overall spacings here are pretty large which creates not much difference with other sections. That wasn't a nice map design, considering the music of this section was quite showing a difference. This part is weaker than other parts, and I hope you could reflect such aspect of the song. Structure issue.
00:14:560 (4) - Consider nc since the music seems to be a bit seperated here.
01:03:798 (1,2) - Starting the combo from (2) will fit the music better.
01:06:244 (1,2) - ^ Besides, you'll want to remove nc of 01:06:896 (1).
01:07:874 (5,1) - Considering other patterns such as 00:57:439 (1) - 01:18:309 (1) is starting the combo from the stream, I expect this to be consistent.

Ex.
What does the diff name mean?
The circle size is 5 along some big jumps which can lead to several miss. With that in mind, hp7 feels way too harsh.
00:00:702 (1,2) - No need for a manual stack.
00:14:397 (1,2) - Other spacings for 1/2 was 1.2x which didn't display a follow point. I don't really think this needs a small jump. This only feels like an inconsistency.
00:28:449 (1,2) - Is this 1/4 jump really necessary? This was the only usage in this section, and I think reserving this concept for further part would work more effectively.
00:50:754 (3,1) - 01:00:048 (2,1) - 01:11:624 (3,4) - I'd like to see more consistent concept here. The first one has a massive jump out of nowhere, which felt really sudden to be just once. And the final one wasn't even consistent in combo.
01:05:673 (2) - Can you consider removing this object? I can hear a beat existing in this part of the song, but the mapping concept didn't felt to be consistent with the overall idea in the kiai section. Such 1/4 jumps nearly appears right before when the kiai starts, and never appears except here. It look weak in structures imo.

It was nice to see the GD having a similar mapping concept with the host mapper's work.
Topic Starter
Anxient

Sonnyc wrote:

General.
You forgot to reset your metronome at 00:36:733. Add a new redline there please. - roger

Normal.
Use ar4 please. 5 is way too fast to be in the lowest difficulty. - roger
00:41:298 (4,5) - Two circles feel a bit too difficult to be in the lowest diff. Mind making this to a 1/2 slider or something?
Not bad, but next time when making a "lowest" difficulty, keep some real difficulty aspects in mind. In this case, several 1/1 spacings are quite large while the bpm was high. Yet I feel I can consider this as the lowest one in this set. - ill keep that in mind.

Advanced.
ar7 at a map with nearly no jumps feels a bit high. At least, you'll want to balance the value after you've changed the ar of normal. - -1 ar
01:05:754 (2,3) - Even it isn't intended, the formation is pretty much like a blanket. You can improve it more. - fixed the blanket
01:09:994 - I think expressing the beat and the vocal at here would fit the song better. - yeah revised.
01:20:754 (4,1) - There is a jump here, and I'm not really sure if the only jump of the map really deserves here. - mfw remap

Hard.
00:24:862 (4,5) - 00:26:818 (2,3) - Use 1.7x spacing for consistency. - gotcha
01:26:216 (7) - Remove this object please. The song wasn't really strong to demand some object here. The only 1/4 click in this difficulty doesn't really seem to fit the overall consistency. - good point. applied.

Light Insane.
00:30:568 (2) - The spacing suddenly decreased. It feels inconsistent while there wasn't some major difference in the song. Keep the 1.4x. - applied.


Ex.
What does the diff name mean? - warning: spoilers for any who hasnt played the game http://danganronpa.wikia.com/wiki/Ultimate_Hope
The circle size is 5 along some big jumps which can lead to several miss. With that in mind, hp7 feels way too harsh. - cs 4.5/hp 6.5 then.
00:00:702 (1,2) - No need for a manual stack. - idek why it does this
00:14:397 (1,2) - Other spacings for 1/2 was 1.2x which didn't display a follow point. I don't really think this needs a small jump. This only feels like an inconsistency. - i almost read this as a duwang. applied.
00:28:449 (1,2) - Is this 1/4 jump really necessary? This was the only usage in this section, and I think reserving this concept for further part would work more effectively. - was trying to emphasize the bassline, but the more i look at it the more dumb it looks. fixed.
00:50:754 (3,1) - 01:00:048 (2,1) - 01:11:624 (3,4) - I'd like to see more consistent concept here. The first one has a massive jump out of nowhere, which felt really sudden to be just once. And the final one wasn't even consistent in combo. - all green
01:05:673 (2) - Can you consider removing this object? I can hear a beat existing in this part of the song, but the mapping concept didn't felt to be consistent with the overall idea in the kiai section. Such 1/4 jumps nearly appears right before when the kiai starts, and never appears except here. It look weak in structures imo. - ok

It was nice to see the GD having a similar mapping concept with the host mapper's work.
ailv

Sonnyc wrote:

Insane.
Why is the diff name "insane" with a lowercase? It doesn't really make much sense with other diff names. Please use an uppercase. Changed, I'd like to keep my name lowercase though.
Any special reason for using a different combo color with other diffs? Personally, the red color here felt a bit unfitting. dunno how this happened :o changed it to match the other diffs
00:10:973 ~ 00:20:786 - I'd ask you a small rework on this section to reflect the intensity of the song better. Currently, the overall spacings here are pretty large which creates not much difference with other sections. That wasn't a nice map design, considering the music of this section was quite showing a difference. This part is weaker than other parts, and I hope you could reflect such aspect of the song. Structure issue. True. I've adjusted the spacing here in this section for lower intensity.
00:14:560 (4) - Consider nc since the music seems to be a bit seperated here. in this section, i'm only starting nc on the piano sound, i'd like to keep it that way
01:03:798 (1,2) - Starting the combo from (2) will fit the music better. Fixed
01:06:244 (1,2) - ^ Besides, you'll want to remove nc of 01:06:896 (1). Fixed
01:07:874 (5,1) - Considering other patterns such as 00:57:439 (1) - 01:18:309 (1) is starting the combo from the stream, I expect this to be consistent. Fixed

It was nice to see the GD having a similar mapping concept with the host mapper's work.
Thank you for modding :D
Sonnyc
insane= 00:20:215 (2) - I think a 1/4 doesn't exist here, and even if it does, it didn't quite fit this part of the song.
ailv

Sonnyc wrote:

insane= 00:20:215 (2) - I think a 1/4 doesn't exist here, and even if it does, it didn't quite fit this part of the song. my bad, i could have sworn there was a note here :o thanks for catching it :D
Sonnyc
Nominated.
Topic Starter
Anxient
UOOOH
Cryptic
Where is your metadata from? When I look at the official website it just says TRUSTRICK - Recall THE END.

Apparently I can't see the metadata confirmation in my own source. I'll mod this today hopefully.
Topic Starter
Anxient

Cryptic wrote:

Where is your metadata from? When I look at the official website it just says TRUSTRICK - Recall THE END.
http://www.nbcuni.co.jp/anime/danganronpa3/music/index00400000.html

track no.8

Myxo
Are you sure about the spacing on Advanced? It is very huge compared to the SV and creates this 'slow sliders x big spacing' feeling that's often used on higher difficulties. This concept doesn't really work on lower diffs though, even for Advanced level it feels awkward to play imo. The speedup that's necessary after every object almost feels like performing actual jumps.
Topic Starter
Anxient

Desperate-kun wrote:

Are you sure about the spacing on Advanced? It is very huge compared to the SV and creates this 'slow sliders x big spacing' feeling that's often used on higher difficulties. This concept doesn't really work on lower diffs though, even for Advanced level it feels awkward to play imo. The speedup that's necessary after every object almost feels like performing actual jumps.
yes i am sure. If i lowered the DS any more than i have already, the diff would feel alot more cluttered than it already is. i want to avoid that at all costs. as for the SV, i think it's not as slow as you imagined.

thank you for the concern, but if this still causes issues, maybe we should open up a discussion?
Cryptic
hi, ok, lets start I'm SHSL:Slow
popped for timing btw

[General]
  1. Your timing is off, especially in the intro part, take Chaoslitz's timing which is much closer to accurate. Just subtract like 747ms from his timing points and they should line up with yours. That, or fix the timing from like 00:10:973 - to 00:19:859 - and in the kiai. Really only that 9 second part is noticeable but we're supposed to get the timing as accurate as reasonable and thats on the Chaoslitz set so theres no reason to not have it here too.
[Normal]
  1. 01:01:189 (2,3) - This is the only pattern in the map with a single circle into slider, and it plays pretty awkwardly for a 1/2 in a Normal. I'd definitely like to see this changed.
[Advanced]
  1. 00:47:167 (1,2,3,1) - I'm not too sure about a movement this linear on an advanced...
  2. 01:00:211 (4) - NC this instead of 01:00:537 (1) - ? It doesn't follows your NC pattern otherwise.
  3. 01:26:298 (4) - NC this or un-NC 00:28:938 (1) - 00:39:341 (1) -
[Light Insane]
  1. 00:02:169 (5,1,2) - Seems like a large jump compared to the rest in this bit, nerf it a tiny bit please?
Call me back
Topic Starter
Anxient

Cryptic wrote:

hi, ok, lets start I'm SHSL:Slow
popped for timing btw - it was a pain to fix thanks

[General]
  1. Your timing is off, especially in the intro part, take Chaoslitz's timing which is much closer to accurate. Just subtract like 747ms from his timing points and they should line up with yours. That, or fix the timing from like 00:10:973 - to 00:19:859 - and in the kiai. Really only that 9 second part is noticeable but we're supposed to get the timing as accurate as reasonable and thats on the Chaoslitz set so theres no reason to not have it here too.
[Normal]
  1. 01:01:189 (2,3) - This is the only pattern in the map with a single circle into slider, and it plays pretty awkwardly for a 1/2 in a Normal. I'd definitely like to see this changed. - got rid of the circle and made it a suspended note(?) also moved a few things to make it look more bearable
[Advanced]
  1. 00:47:167 (1,2,3,1) - I'm not too sure about a movement this linear on an advanced... - 200% more rougher
  2. 01:00:211 (4) - NC this instead of 01:00:537 (1) - ? It doesn't follows your NC pattern otherwise. - NC'd both of them
  3. 01:26:298 (4) - NC this or un-NC 00:28:938 (1) - 00:39:341 (1) -
[Light Insane]
  1. 00:02:169 (5,1,2) - Seems like a large jump compared to the rest in this bit, nerf it a tiny bit please? - nerfd
Call me back
Cryptic
Timing is still super off (but consistently), did you change the mp3 but not your timing points or?
Topic Starter
Anxient
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFixed
Kyouren
Try ask Chaoslitz to used a MP3 and timing from his mapset!
Topic Starter
Anxient

KittyAdventure wrote:

Try ask Chaoslitz to used a MP3 and timing from his mapset!
i used his timing, but i kept my mp3 coz i got said mp3 straight from the album
Cryptic
Offset is 18 ms too late, select all points, move -18, and resnap notes.
Topic Starter
Anxient
heavy screeching

fixed
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply