forum

TQ - Revive

posted
Total Posts
3
Topic Starter
Skellen
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on onsdag 14. september 2016 at 21.52.21

Artist: TQ
Title: Revive
Source: VOEZ
BPM: 136
Filesize: 2857kb
Play Time: 02:31
Difficulties Available:
  1. Revived (4,45 stars, 553 notes)
Download: TQ - Revive
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
V O E Z is luv :p
skaytan
Overall not a bad map, there is good rhythmic choice and overall placement is ok however I think there could be improvements in the following areas.

00:06:088 (1,2,3) - Spacing could be changed slightly to compliment the maps star rating and cause its right at the start of the map??
00:09:615 (4,5,6) - Just something about the placement of these circles makes the map feel old and not fun/easy to play.
00:29:247 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing emphasis in this section could be improved by moving the circles with less ticks in between closer together on the playfield to improve sightreading. (An overall suggestion as this appears frequently).
00:39:615 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Weird spacing for jumps that are the same amount of ticks apart but are spaced differently in a way that is quite difficult to read
01:16:894 (1) - Could add more variety to this section of the map and possibly make the streams more aesthetically pleasing
01:54:173 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The spacing at the end of the stream is too difficult for the star rating of the map, feels like a 6 star pattern in a 4 star map.

Hope this is helpful
Topic Starter
Skellen

skayweed wrote:

Overall not a bad map, there is good rhythmic choice and overall placement is ok however I think there could be improvements in the following areas.

00:06:088 (1,2,3) - Spacing could be changed slightly to compliment the maps star rating and cause its right at the start of the map?? It fits in even if it's only the start.

00:09:615 (4,5,6) - Just something about the placement of these circles makes the map feel old and not fun/easy to play. why are these circles making the map not fun/easy to play?

00:29:247 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing emphasis in this section could be improved by moving the circles with less ticks in between closer together on the playfield to improve sightreading. (An overall suggestion as this appears frequently). The circles With less ticks in between are strong sounds so a little jump fits in my opinon

00:39:615 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Weird spacing for jumps that are the same amount of ticks apart but are spaced differently in a way that is quite difficult to read The ending jump 1-2 is louder than the rest so as above a little jump fits in

01:16:894 (1) - Could add more variety to this section of the map and possibly make the streams more aesthetically pleasing there is variety in the streams and any reason to why they aren't pleasing?

01:54:173 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The spacing at the end of the stream is too difficult for the star rating of the map, feels like a 6 star pattern in a 4 star map. The map is 4* since the song is slow and notes are a great deal of ticks apart, however this is the hardets diff which should have some difficult moments.

Hope this is helpful
Please sign in to reply.

New reply