Stefan wrote:

Aloha~

[Inner Oni]
00:07:410 (9,12) - Wouldn't you make them as k? since the sound is slightly higher than usual I'd make them as k.
fixed
00:19:117 (28,31) - ^
fixed
03:08:325 (1115,1116) - swap them, it kinda sounds weird and I don't really understand the intention of the rhythm.
Map by the sound effect pitch here,I think it may play weird but it's good for me as least
03:09:239 (1125,1126,1127,1128,1129,1130,1131,1132) - instead of the current dkkddkkk rhythm, kkdkkdkk sounds better and plays more interesting. This also relates to 02:57:532 (1008,1009,1010,1011,1012,1013,1014,1015) - .
Consistency is quite important here,so yes as you said,it relates to the part at 02:57:532 -
I want them to be consistent with each other,so no change
03:51:495 (1394) - k note? I think it gives a nice addition to the previous ddk triplet. It is similar to 03:52:044 (1398,1399) - , and since you used k k here already you can do this here as well.
fixed
03:58:995 (1444) - k for the same reason as above.
fixed
04:14:361 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - I think some k notes aren't really properly used for the piano. ddkddkddk.. would be totally enough to emphasize them, it's more logical to play and emphasize the piano sounds better.
I change to ddkddkddkddkddkddkdkkdkk to emphasis the high pitch piano at the end

Honestly, I find that most of the things in the map works well at its own way. The non-kiai parts feels.. dull to play but that's the song's nature. The actual cool parts are the kiai sections.
Emm yes,it's quite dull in non-kiai section,I also don't want that xD .But adding some extra notes may result in messy mapping channel and overmapping.

iceOC wrote:

hi~ from game in chat

very noob modding

00:33:751 (74) - k?
00:33:934 (75) - d?
I think k d d d k is better than k d d k d because of the piano pitch
00:45:459 (116) - k?
00:45:642 (117) - d?
^
01:20:123 (292) - ^
but the 3 notes at 01:19:940 to 01:20:123 are remain the same pitch,so I don't want to change the pattern of the notes here
02:41:892 (866) - k?
fixed,and I change the whole pattern to ddkdkkddk
03:33:934 (1280) - d?
I use k is because the high pitch of the vocal,it better emphasis the vocal
03:34:026 - d?
ok
03:34:117 (1281) - delete?
the sound effect is here so no change
03:50:581 (1388) - d?
because of the high pitch of the vocal again
03:58:995 (1444) - d?
I think it gives a nice addition to the previous ddk triplet(reason given in previous mod)
04:21:495 (49) - k?
fixed
04:39:239 (77) - k?
low pitch
04:50:947 (96) - k?
^

sorry

very fun map :3

[R] wrote:

yo

RIP 2 kudos
[Inner Oni]
00:11:434 - change don ? for flow
00:11:434 - 00:12:898 - these three place are high-low-high pitch,so I use k d k
00:23:142 - ^
^
01:10:611 - or 01:10:703 - change kat, so player know when rythm change
01:13:447 - or 01:13:538 - change don, ^
I think it's not necessary to emphasis the rhythm change and this will lead to incomsistent of the patterns
01:55:977 - change kat ? for variety
doesn't fit the pitch lwl
01:56:251 - change kat, this sounds weird for me
^
01:57:440 - add kat ?
no high pitch music here
01:59:544 (618,619) - invert this, to emphasize vocal 01:59:727 -
01:59:727 - change this note to d instead
02:00:733 - maybe add note here
no change
02:03:569 (642,643) - invert ?
ok
02:11:800 - add note maybe
Good
02:14:178 - change kat ? for flow 02:16:190 -
doesn't fit the vocal pitch
03:01:099 - change kat ?
ok
03:53:690 (1409,1410) - change k D, snare for 03:54:239 -
I want 03:53:873 - to be consistent with 03:42:166 -
04:05:032 (1490,2) - change kat maybe
I'll think about it


that's all from me
Good Luck~

1. Add Source "jubeat saucer".

1. 00:01:191 - to 00:23:873 - I think these notes section is not necessary because the sounds are too soft and there is no sound strong imo
2. 00:25:154 (3,7) - change kat?
3. 00:36:312 (44) - add don big? consistency as 00:24:605 (1) -
4. 00:48:020 (86) - ^
5. 00:57:898 (108,109) - control + g?
6. 01:00:276 (117,118) - change don? only 01:01:739 (126,127) - increases to piano and is better kat in this section imo
7. 01:06:130 (153) - change don?
8. 01:28:721 (330) - ^
9. 01:31:739 (358) - ^
10. 01:45:459 (486) - change kat? considering for rhythm 01:49:849 (514) - imo
11. 01:52:776 (535) - ^
12. 01:54:605 - missing note?
13. 01:55:520 (553) - change kat?
14. 01:56:800 (564) - change kat big for the cymbal?
15. 02:07:776 (633) - change kat and 02:07:959 (634,635) - control + g? is better to voice imo
16. 02:08:873 - to 02:19:849 - imo is better break (with these notes does not fit well to the voices without rhythm... so fine better for 04:17:928 - )
17. 02:28:172 (748,751,754) - change kat? (much don in this section)
18. 02:31:190 (770,771,772,773,774,775,776) - change kat? It is better for voice increases imo
19. 02:37:776 (828) - change kat?
20. 02:40:428 (853) - ^
21. 03:01:190 (1043) - ^
22. 03:18:386 (1182,1183,1184) - change don and 03:18:751 (1185) - change kat big? the cymbal is strong imo
23. 03:31:008 (1262,1263) - change don?
24. 03:37:776 (1306) - change kat to piano?
25. 03:45:916 (1356) - change kat?
26. 04:13:995 (16) - ^
27. 04:52:410 (1) - I feel that this spin is not necessary when the music is decreasing (little bit weird)... replace a note?

Etsu wrote:

Hello!

Taiko mod request from my Queue. (long time sorry )

[General]

1. Add Source "jubeat saucer".
   fixed

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:01:191 - to 00:23:873 - I think these notes section is not necessary because the sounds are too soft and there is no sound strong imo
   the drain time will be too short for approval then,and I think that's the intro of the song and I think it couldn't be empty
2. 00:25:154 (3,7) - change kat?
   pitch doesn't change
3. 00:36:312 (44) - add don big? consistency as 00:24:605 (1) -
   I remove the D at 00:24:605 (1) because of main beat there
4. 00:48:020 (86) - ^
   ^
5. 00:57:898 (108,109) - control + g?
   Increase in vocal pitch,so no change
6. 01:00:276 (117,118) - change don? only 01:01:739 (126,127) - increases to piano and is better kat in this section imo
   ok
7. 01:06:130 (153) - change don?
   I try to keep consistent within whole this music part with the sound effect,which is kkd kkd kkd...and I think kat is more suitable here
8. 01:28:721 (330) - ^
   01:27:532 - 01:28:995 - I want to do kdddk kkddk kkkdk here(idk how to explain it...)
9. 01:31:739 (358) - ^
   fixed
10. 01:45:459 (486) - change kat? considering for rhythm 01:49:849 (514) - imo
    01:45:459 - no pitch change here
11. 01:52:776 (535) - ^
    ^
12. 01:54:605 - missing note?
    I don't want to map too dense here,to give a break for player and seperate the vocal
13. 01:55:520 (553) - change kat?
    fixed
14. 01:56:800 (564) - change kat big for the cymbal?
    low pitch here
15. 02:07:776 (633) - change kat and 02:07:959 (634,635) - control + g? is better to voice imo
    ok
16. 02:08:873 - to 02:19:849 - imo is better break (with these notes does not fit well to the voices without rhythm... so fine better for 04:17:928 - )
    Why there's vocal and I don't map it?I think vocal is necessary to be mapped
17. 02:28:172 (748,751,754) - change kat? (much don in this section)
    but drum sound are remain same pitch,change k here will be weird
18. 02:31:190 (770,771,772,773,774,775,776) - change kat? It is better for voice increases imo
    ^
19. 02:37:776 (828) - change kat?
    I think ddddkdk fits the pitch better
20. 02:40:428 (853) - ^
    no obvious pitch change
21. 03:01:190 (1043) - ^
    ti be consistent with 02:40:428
22. 03:18:386 (1182,1183,1184) - change don and 03:18:751 (1185) - change kat big? the cymbal is strong imo
    03:18:751 - I want this D to be consistent with all D in the same part,it'd be weird if I change to K
23. 03:31:008 (1262,1263) - change don?
    ok
24. 03:37:776 (1306) - change kat to piano?
    map according to vocal here
25. 03:45:916 (1356) - change kat?
    sorry rejected
26. 04:13:995 (16) - ^
    ok
27. 04:52:410 (1) - I feel that this spin is not necessary when the music is decreasing (little bit weird)... replace a note?
    not enough drain time then :<

Good luck with your map~

bbj0920 wrote:

00:08:508 (12) - mind making this k? because violin's pitch feels seperate at 00:05:581 (4,7,10,12) - , of which you've made the change in color for the first 3 notes.
I think this note has a lower pitch compare to next note,so no change
00:11:069 (17) - just a suggestion to make it d, i don't really feel enough strength to make it kat but there's ~kind of minor~ violin so idk
BG music(idk what is that instrument...is high pitch)
00:20:215 (31,36) - you know
^
00:27:532 (50,51,52,53) - idk this imo makes the whole intention of patterns in this part kind of ambiguous, i think you mapped to the strength of piano but here 4 notes don't have it, so d d d d? (or d d d k because d d d d might seem a bit monotonous.)
ok
00:31:556 (65,66) - wouldn't d k make sense here? thinking about pitch and strength of piano.
fixed
00:39:239 (92,93,94,95) - youuu know
^
00:43:264 (107,108) - yehaj
^
00:54:788 (135,136,137,138) - doesn't really follow the music i think. following the vocal i think d d d k or d k d k (considering strength)
change to d k d k
01:13:812 (245,246,247) - i'd love to make it 1/6 kkkk or kddk or whatever starts and ends with k lol
ok change to kddk
01:36:312 (437,438,439,440,441) - making it not end with k feels very, very weird. every synth?-quintuplet ends with k and this doesn't??
I choose the kdkkd because I think it has a better flow and consistent with 01:37:227 -
02:00:459 (622,623,624,625,626) - could've added more triplets like ddk k ddd, anything else could be here
add ddk
02:03:386 (639,640,641,642,643,644) - this is against the structure, d k d-ish structure everywhere else and k d k here? try something else i think, current one feels unnatural
nice spot,I change to k d k
02:25:337 (737,738,739,740,741) - it's alright because of vocal but following synth would be more appropriate imo, d k kkk d maybe? would work as good transition too
I want here to be consistent with 01:07:776 -
03:01:922 (1050,1051,1052,1053,1054,1055,1056,1057) - you're following synth right? kkddkddk would fit much better
change to kkddkddd
03:09:880 (1131) - would make it d, because making 03:09:239 (1124,1125,1126,1127,1128,1129,1130,1131,1132) - dkkddkkdd would be appropriate because 03:09:605 (1128,1129,1130,1131) - has lower pitch than 03:09:239 (1124,1125,1126,1127) -
okay
03:55:886 (1421,1422) - piano is so mappable
map according to sound effect not piano here
04:36:312 (71,76) - yehaj
^
04:39:239 (77) - not a k? keep consistency with 00:11:434 (18) -
fixed
04:48:020 (90,95) - yheja
^
04:50:947 (96) - same as 2 lines above. if you are making it d because it's outro, you could've just lowered the volume or something idk
fixed

good map gl

Smallwu wrote:

Hi, mod from my queue
[Inner Oni]
01:45:916 - Add k
聽不到有音樂;w;
01:46:831 (534,535) - Ctrl+G
玩起來有點奇怪...
01:51:770 - Add k 然後 01:51:953 - Add d
OK
02:00:825 (630,631) - Ctrl+G 按照人聲音高
好的
02:03:477 - Add k
整個轉做kdddk
02:11:434 (687) - k
好的
02:16:922 (698,699) - Ctrl+G 按照人聲音高
轉做d k
02:17:654 (700,701) - Ctrl+G ^
I think it's fine
03:19:575 - Add k
沒音樂
03:26:160 - ^
^
03:26:892 (1243) - k
OK
03:37:776 (1309) - k 因鋼琴聲
我是跟sound effect map的,所以不跟piano pitch噢
------
我個人感覺, 這次你是來讓我增添譜的趣味度的, 所以主要就加了一些Note
增加的部分我都沒附上原因, 是因為那些Note本身就可有可無 (我覺得>_>)
挑你也聽得順耳的就行

這次摸得爛爛的 見諒;w;
祝Rank!

Ulqui wrote:

Hi
Short mod

Inner Oni

01:26:160 - d
01:26:892 - d (make that stream longer)
I don't want the first kiai time have long streams here,because the climax of the song is the third kiai time
which I think it's better to put long stream there,and the density of notes is increasing progressively
01:37:867 - add a d
01:38:599 - d (same)
^
01:42:075 - put a k
I want the first beat of the each four bars be seperated from the 4-bars music part,so that's why I leave a space at 01:42:075 -
02:35:855 - k
no obvious music here
02:42:989 - d
ok
03:50:215 (1395) - change to d
vocal high pitch here
04:27:715 (59) - this note is a bit weird, change to spinner(? (if you do that, 04:26:069 - delete and put a spinner too)Emm,I have though about it,but adding a spinner is not a good way I think.I will try to ask for the ideas from other modders

1. 00:48:020: ~
   Lowering density here is unnatural and hard to do hit, so you shoud to add piano rithm. Like this ->
   
   
   
2. 01:45:093: ~ 01:56:800:
   Here's color schme will be more good if you match 1/1 d___d___d___d___ rythm.
   Also you can clear up difference between 01:56:800: ~'s 1/1 d___k___d___k___ rythm.
   I present example first three mesures so I want you to try after it.
   
3. 01:56:800: ~
   I feel that color sheme is biased in don. So few changes.
   
   1. 01:57:349 (622) - k
   2. 01:58:812 (630,631) - kk
   3. 02:02:471 (653) - k
   4. 02:06:221 (681) - k
   5. 02:04:666 (669,670) - kk
4. 02:31:922: ~
   Even here, it will be good if you pick up drum's rythm partly not only synthesizer's rythm.
   * Drum's rythm : 1/1 d___d___d___d___ .
   So few changes.
   
   1. 02:33:386 (811) - d
   2. 02:34:392 (819) - k. To hilight 02:34:483 (820):.
   3. 02:36:495 (838,839,840) - dkd
   4. 02:35:215 (827) - d
   5. 02:35:398 (828,829,830,831,832) - kkddk
   6. 02:37:593 (847,848) - kk
   7. 02:39:148 (862,863) - kd
   8. 02:46:739 (932,933,934) - kkd
   9. 02:47:928 (944,945) - kd
   10. 02:48:203 (946,947,948) - kkd
   11. 02:50:215 (965) - d
   12. 02:58:172 (1037) - d
   13. 02:59:636 (1052,1053) - kd
   14. 02:59:910 (1054,1055,1056) - dkd
   15. 03:11:343 (1169,1170) - kd
   16. 03:11:617 (1171,1172,1173) - dkd
5. 03:18:751: ~ 03:42:166 - Same as 01:45:093: ~ 01:56:800:.
6. 03:42:166: ~ :Same as 01:56:800: ~

maziari1105 wrote:

Hi. I'm sorry to be late ;_;

[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:48:020: ~
   Lowering density here is unnatural and hard to do hit, so you shoud to add piano rithm. Like this ->
   
   
   change in another way,nice suggestion
2. 01:45:093: ~ 01:56:800:
   Here's color schme will be more good if you match 1/1 d___d___d___d___ rythm.
   Also you can clear up difference between 01:56:800: ~'s 1/1 d___k___d___k___ rythm.
   I present example first three mesures so I want you to try after it.
   
   ok,change in my way
3. 01:56:800: ~
   I feel that color sheme is biased in don. So few changes.
   
   1. 01:57:349 (622) - k
   2. 01:58:812 (630,631) - kk
   3. 02:02:471 (653) - k
   4. 02:06:221 (681) - k
   5. 02:04:666 (669,670) - kk
   I want to highlight every second and forth beat(drum tick)in each bar,putting a lot of k can't do this effect
4. 02:31:922: ~
   Even here, it will be good if you pick up drum's rythm partly not only synthesizer's rythm.
   * Drum's rythm : 1/1 d___d___d___d___ .
   So few changes.
   
   1. 02:33:386 (811) - d
   2. 02:34:392 (819) - k. To hilight 02:34:483 (820):.
   3. 02:36:495 (838,839,840) - dkd
   4. 02:35:215 (827) - d
   5. 02:35:398 (828,829,830,831,832) - kkddk
   6. 02:37:593 (847,848) - kk
   7. 02:39:148 (862,863) - kd
   8. 02:46:739 (932,933,934) - kkd
   9. 02:47:928 (944,945) - kd
   10. 02:48:203 (946,947,948) - kkd
   11. 02:50:215 (965) - d
   12. 02:58:172 (1037) - d
   13. 02:59:636 (1052,1053) - kd
   14. 02:59:910 (1054,1055,1056) - dkd
   15. 03:11:343 (1169,1170) - kd
   16. 03:11:617 (1171,1172,1173) - dkd
   Accept most of them
5. 03:18:751: ~ 03:42:166 - Same as 01:45:093: ~ 01:56:800:.
6. 03:42:166: ~ :Same as 01:56:800: ~

ok
I didn't write mod too much.
Good luck!

iloveyou4ever wrote:

Etsu wrote:

Hello!

Taiko mod request from my Queue. (long time sorry )

[Inner Oni]

• 
  
  16. 02:08:873 - to 02:19:849 - imo is better break (with these notes does not fit well to the voices without rhythm... so fine better for 04:17:928 - )
  Why there's vocal and I don't map it?I think vocal is necessary to be mapped /*i was trying to make a break for the above notes played but i agree with you

Good luck with your map~

Thanks for modding

1. 00:24:605 (39) - It should be k for consistency with 00:30:459. the melody on both notes is very similar feeling.
2. 00:25:154 (41) - 00:26:617 (46) - 00:36:312 (82) - 00:36:861 (84) - 00:37:776 (86) - 00:38:325 (88) - Also, change to k. I think it's definitely strong melody enough.
3. 00:27:532 - How about changing like this? I think It would be more natural to play.
4. 00:39:239 - It's also a bit weird feeling. try other rhythm like as above suggestion.
5. 00:46:556 (120,121,122,123) - d k d k for consistency with 00:34:849 (78,79,80,81).
6. 00:56:251 (151) - It would be better to move to right by 1/2 divisor to emphasize vocal. actually vocal sound is more strong than other sound.
7. 01:06:312 - Add note?
8. 01:13:812 (258,259,260,261) - It's definitely 1/4 rhythm.
9. 02:28:630 (768,769,770,771) - It's really awkward. I think it would be better to simplify more.
10. 02:33:751 - Add note to follow strong sound.
11. 03:27:715 - triplet for consistency? i think dkd or ddd would be not bad.
12. 04:08:020 (6) - It's still high melody. how about changing to k?
13. 04:28:995 (60) - Move to 04:29:178. Start of new melody is on there.

Sylphi wrote:

Sorry for being late.

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:24:605 (39) - It should be k for consistency with 00:30:459. the melody on both notes is very similar feeling.
2. 00:25:154 (41) - 00:26:617 (46) - 00:36:312 (82) - 00:36:861 (84) - 00:37:776 (86) - 00:38:325 (88) - Also, change to k. I think it's definitely strong melody enough.
3. 00:27:532 - How about changing like this? I think It would be more natural to play.]
4. 00:39:239 - It's also a bit weird feeling. try other rhythm like as above suggestion.
5. 00:46:556 (120,121,122,123) - d k d k for consistency with 00:34:849 (78,79,80,81).
6. 00:56:251 (151) - It would be better to move to right by 1/2 divisor to emphasize vocal. actually vocal sound is more strong than other sound.
   change to another way
7. 01:06:312 - Add note?
   nope sry
8. 01:13:812 (258,259,260,261) - It's definitely 1/4 rhythm.
9. 02:28:630 (768,769,770,771) - It's really awkward. I think it would be better to simplify more.
10. 02:33:751 - Add note to follow strong sound.
11. 03:27:715 - triplet for consistency? i think dkd or ddd would be not bad.
    add dkd
12. 04:08:020 (6) - It's still high melody. how about changing to k?
13. 04:28:995 (60) - Move to 04:29:178. Start of new melody is on there.

S a n d wrote:

Taiko mod request from: iloveyou4ever
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: -
Modding Content: Inner Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*


- 00:35:764 - 加 d, 因為如果你是要跟鋼琴的話, 這邊有鋼琴聲.
-- 00:47:471 - 同上 ^
我帶上耳機還有較25%還是聽不到...
- 00:59:727 ~ 01:08:508 - 在IRC提過了, 這段感覺頗亂. 要用2連來跟音是可以, 但是要用就要用到底, 不然一直切換vocal到音樂這樣子整體感覺很亂.
-- 注意03:30:459 - 這段跟剛剛上面一樣的問題
ok,改過了,都改做triplet,跟回背景sound effect
- 01:26:343 - 改 k 還有 01:26:526 - 改 d? 這樣跟音比較好
01:26:434 - 01:26:800 - 應該是高高低高高音,所以我放kkdkk,維持現狀
- 01:29:087 - 加 d? 因為跟 01:27:623 一樣啊 缺乏連貫性.
-- 01:40:794 - 同上 ^
ok
- 01:36:678 - 改 k? 很明顯的高音, 不太可能是d.
ok
- 02:41:251 - 改 k? 接續著上一個note的高音.
02:41:251 - 我轉k還有02:41:343 - 這裡都加了k
- 03:18:751 - kiai在這邊結束好像比較合理?
對
雖然沒有指出特別多問題 但是主要的問題都是大區大區的, 所以只能跟你說大方向該怎麼走, 就算細節一個一個挑出來也沒有太大的幫助. 多注意連貫性的問題, 缺乏連貫性或是一次想要跟太多音會讓譜面變得太亂. 加油喔:3!

Ceryuia wrote:

Hihi~ From my Queue

[Inner Oni]
00:25:523 - Add a don as there is a low piano sound here
00:37:230 - ^
ok
00:47:657 (124,125) - Ctrl+G, there is a higher note on 00:48:023
I think d k d k d is more natural and easy to play
02:26:437 (759,760,761,762,763) - Change these to kats as this fits the music much better
These notes have the same pitch at all,and I think d suits the music,so I put all of them d
no change sry...
Since this was a short mod, I'll shoot some kudosu stars as this song is so nice to listen to :3
This is my favourite song <3

Good Luck ~!!

Raediaufar wrote:

I can't really play this map well, so maybe my mod is not really good

[Inner Oni]

Open

Inner Oni:
01:17:474 - i think this part should be kdk, so add d here 01:17:565 - and change 01:17:657 (281) - to k
I will consider your opinion...but I think just 1/2 here can highlight and emphasis the stream at 01:18:754 -
01:18:206 (285,286) - kdk too here
^
01:36:041 (447) - k here? seems the pitch is still same as 01:35:950 (446) -
nice
01:36:864 - I think of http://puu.sh/s0wsW/c9f9f2c717.jpg
ok changed
02:35:401 (825,826,827,828,829) - dkdkd
I think the original is better in playing.
03:04:669 - kinda have different idea on this part, I like to put more k when the pitch is increasing and less k when the pitch is decreasing, btw my idea:
03:05:035 (1102) - I think this should be k

03:06:041 (1113,1115) - k

03:06:315 (1116) - d
all of the above changed and I also changed some notes

1. Barline position seems suspicious from 04:05:584 - onwards. There are things that concerning me, like:
   
   1. at 04:29:181 - i think there should be a barline there since it is the first beat, like the intro (00:01:194 - ).
   2. different snapping position between 04:06:315 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - and 04:17:931 (41,42,43,44,45,46) - ?
   3. 04:27:718 - vocal seems goes slower here. i think barline also should be here as well
   i think it would need discussion or some opinion about this. there might be variable BPM for the vocal there.
   

1. 00:09:974 (14,15,16,17,18) - how about change to k-d-d-k-d to reflect the higher pitch at (17) better?
   00:21:681 (33,34,35,36,37) - same as ^
2. 00:25:523 - and 00:25:889 - consider to delete these notes, since the section is not too intense here, and for consistency with 00:31:376 - and 00:31:742 -
   after that you might want to change 00:25:706 - to d
3. 00:37:230 - and 00:37:596 - same as above point.
4. 00:27:718 - you can try to delete this to have less density here to reflect the calmness of this section better.
   00:39:425 - same as above if applied
5. 00:35:218 (1,2) - try to swap this to represent the increase in piano pitch?
   00:36:315 - and change to d. this is more natural imo.
6. 00:46:925 (1,2) - same as above point
7. 00:52:413 - maybe add d to stabilize the rhythm?
8. 00:54:791 (1,2,3,4) - try dkkd instead? it would fits the vocal in a way better
9. 01:03:297 - consider to delete, and
   01:03:389 - move to 01:03:754 - , feels much better since the break will be at similar moment with 01:00:462 - and 01:06:315 -
10. 01:14:181 - possibly you forgot to put finisher? refer to 01:11:254 - and 01:17:108 -
11. 01:14:822 (1,2,3) - try k-dk instead? fits the electronic sound better imo
    01:16:285 (1,2,3) - same as ^
12. 01:56:803 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - break pattern is not unified with 01:45:096 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - , and flow is quite odd because of that. try to make same break spot for those two sequence? maybe:
    
    1. 01:56:803 - make D---d-k-d-kkd-k-d like the first session?
    2. 01:56:803 - or if want to have variation, try D---k-ddd-d-k-d-d?
13. 01:55:157 - maybe change to d to follow the rhythm provided by throbbing sound more accurately?
14. 02:03:480 - try to add k,
    02:04:029 - delete
    02:04:395 - add d
    02:04:669 (1,2,3) - change to kkd
    02:05:126 - - and delete
    this way will flows much better and interesting imo. currently it feels...too repetitve of ddk..
15. 02:14:364 - consider to delete to focus on vocal? i think this session deserve to be more calm.
    02:16:193 - same as ^
16. 02:25:523 (1,2) - swap to make more consistent rhythm? (d-k-d-k-d-k and so on)
17. 02:28:358 - delete and 02:28:450 - change to d? a bit overworked imo.
18. 02:34:395 - you might want to change to d, or change 02:34:395 - to k for consistency
19. 02:57:809 - change to k, and
    02:58:175 - change to d? i think this would fits the song better since pitch is higher at first.
20. 03:05:950 - i'd change this or 03:06:224 -this to k since pitch goes really high there and might be good for climaxing,
    03:06:498 - and then place d here for smoother flow. try?
21. 03:37:047 - consider to add d here, it feels strange because you ignore the low beat in this one.
22. 03:49:212 - try to add d? feels too low density for kiai
    03:50:218 - and change to d to make variaton rather than repetitive
23. 03:53:053 - add d,
    03:53:145 - and change to d to make ddd? it could fits the drum very well
24. 04:38:876 (1,2) - swap? same as the intro
    04:50:584 (1,2) - ^

Volta wrote:

Hi!

[General]

1. Barline position seems suspicious from 04:05:584 - onwards. There are things that concerning me, like:
   
   1. at 04:29:181 - i think there should be a barline there since it is the first beat, like the intro (00:01:194 - ).
      refer to Monstrata one(approved) https://osu.ppy.sh/s/418922,it doesn't have an additional barline here,so I didn't add this xDD
   2. different snapping position between 04:06:315 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - and 04:17:931 (41,42,43,44,45,46) - ?
      Because of the vocal delay,the vocal starts on 04:07:474 - but no 04:07:413 - ,I think that's the song nature :<
   3. 04:27:718 - vocal seems goes slower here. i think barline also should be here as well
      yep the vocal is going down but the song itself overall didn't slow down,again I think just the delay of the vocal
      #BLAMETAKA xDD
   i think it would need discussion or some opinion about this. there might be variable BPM for the vocal there.
   

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:09:974 (14,15,16,17,18) - how about change to k-d-d-k-d to reflect the higher pitch at (17) better?
   00:21:681 (33,34,35,36,37) - same as ^
   That sounds better
2. 00:25:523 - and 00:25:889 - consider to delete these notes, since the section is not too intense here, and for consistency with 00:31:376 - and 00:31:742 -
   I also cancel the notes on 00:29:181 - and 00:40:889 - too!!
   after that you might want to change 00:25:706 - to d
   Yes xD
3. 00:37:230 - and 00:37:596 - same as above point.
   Ok
4. 00:27:718 - you can try to delete this to have less density here to reflect the calmness of this section better.
   Good point too!!I don't realize to decrease the density of the calmness section in the song and it plays better!
   00:39:425 - same as above if applied
   Sure
5. 00:35:218 (1,2) - try to swap this to represent the increase in piano pitch?
   Ok
   00:36:315 - and change to d. this is more natural imo.
   00:24:608 - I want to keep the consistency as 00:24:608 - here and also it highlights the sound effect pitch difference between 00:35:950 - and here.
6. 00:46:925 (1,2) - same as above point
   Ok
7. 00:52:413 - maybe add d to stabilize the rhythm?
   I want to leave a space here as to vocal at 00:52:230 - last for two beat until 00:52:962 - ,leaving here empty can emphasis the long lasting vocal here
8. 00:54:791 (1,2,3,4) - try dkkd instead? it would fits the vocal in a way better
   Ofc!
9. 01:03:297 - consider to delete, and
   01:03:389 - move to 01:03:754 - , feels much better since the break will be at similar moment with 01:00:462 - and 01:06:315 -
   Nice point!!
10. 01:14:181 - possibly you forgot to put finisher? refer to 01:11:254 - and 01:17:108 -
    Yes I forget to add that xDD
11. 01:14:822 (1,2,3) - try k-dk instead? fits the electronic sound better imo
    01:16:285 (1,2,3) - same as ^
    Nice point and it plays better
12. 01:56:803 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - break pattern is not unified with 01:45:096 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - , and flow is quite odd because of that. try to make same break spot for those two sequence? maybe:
    
    1. 01:56:803 - make D---d-k-d-kkd-k-d like the first session?
    2. 01:56:803 - or if want to have variation, try D---k-ddd-d-k-d-d?
    I will choose B as I want to keep emphasis the k on every 2/4th beat of each bar
13. 01:55:157 - maybe change to d to follow the rhythm provided by throbbing sound more accurately?
    I think the original one suits more :<
14. 02:03:480 - try to add k,
    02:04:029 - delete
    02:04:395 - add d
    02:04:669 (1,2,3) - change to kkd
    02:05:126 - - and delete
    this way will flows much better and interesting imo. currently it feels...too repetitve of ddk..
    Ok I think it's good to put some variations here,and I apply all of the above suggestion also change 02:06:133 - to kkd to
15. 02:14:364 - consider to delete to focus on vocal? i think this session deserve to be more calm.
    the vocal seems starts at 02:14:181 - and keep on at 02:14:364 - ,and I think delete either one of them will play strange,so I keep dd here
    02:16:193 - same as ^
    Ok and also delete 02:16:742 - this note
16. 02:25:523 (1,2) - swap to make more consistent rhythm? (d-k-d-k-d-k and so on)
    Ok
17. 02:28:358 - delete and 02:28:450 - change to d? a bit overworked imo.
    emm but what I hear of the sound effect(electronic sound) is kkdkk,seems like the music is repeating kk kk kk...in the background
18. 02:34:395 - you might want to change to d, or change 02:34:395 - to k for consistency
    Isn't it a 'k' o.o,I will keep it as k anyways
19. 02:57:809 - change to k, and
    02:58:175 - change to d? i think this would fits the song better since pitch is higher at first.
    Nice point!
20. 03:05:950 - i'd change this or 03:06:224 -this to k since pitch goes really high there and might be good for climaxing,
    the hitsound suits the music more when playing it and the pitch here is a bit lower compare to the previous two notes,that's why I want to put d here as to emphasis the pitch change
    03:06:498 - and then place d here for smoother flow. try?
    nope as to keep consistency at 02:42:901 - :<
21. 03:37:047 - consider to add d here, it feels strange because you ignore the low beat in this one.
    sounds better but it will lead to high density of notes here with no 1/2 break :< I will think about it
22. 03:49:212 - try to add d? feels too low density for kiai
    Nice
    03:50:218 - and change to d to make variaton rather than repetitive
23. 03:53:053 - add d,
    Sounds good!!
    03:53:145 - and change to d to make ddd? it could fits the drum very well
    to keep consistency here sorry
24. 04:38:876 (1,2) - swap? same as the intro
    04:50:584 (1,2) - ^
    Ok

i think that's it for now.. i'm not sure about the ending. Maybe chromoxx can give opinion or suggestion
I will ask for Chromoxx for more opinions
Thanks for modding

1. 03:42:168 - 04:05:582 - You used too much ddd/ddk patterns in this part so kiai became too simple. Try to use some more patterns like dkd, kdk, and 5-plets. Make sure difficulty curve is appropriate to the song.
   
   
   1. 04:04:668 (1504,1505,1506,1507,1508,1509,1) - can be harder like kkdkddk

tasuke912 wrote:

Hello.

[ Inner Oni]

1. 03:42:168 - 04:05:582 - You used too much ddd/ddk patterns in this part so kiai became too simple. Try to use some more patterns like dkd, kdk, and 5-plets. Make sure difficulty curve is appropriate to the song.
   add more notes to create variation,you may check that out
   and I want to highlight those 2/4th beat on every bars(mapped as k),so I think putting a lot of k there will let the effect disappear :c
   
   
   1. 04:04:668 (1504,1505,1506,1507,1508,1509,1) - can be harder like kkdkddk
   ok
   
   

Call me back

Skylish wrote:

PRO ily4, me eat dust behind