Oh hey! 1/3 sections <3
[Deramok]
00:01:535 (1,2,3) - Your initial blanket here feels a bit off. I think the sliderend of (2) isn't properly blanketing (1).
00:03:791 (1,2,3) - [nazi] The ends here aren't overlapped properly
00:19:279 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - A couple of things here:
1) The flow between (1,2,3) and (4) is a bit off. I suggest
moving it down a bit so that the circular flow from (3) allows you to loop to 4 properly.
2) (5) is spaced a bit inconsistently between (4) and (6). Move it a bit up.
00:23:490 (9) - I don't think this is the best positioning of this note patternwise. Your formed a triangle with 00:22:588 (2,3,8) so perhaps take advantage of that? Adjust the combo to form a good triangle then perhaps you can place 00:23:490 (9) at where (2) is? A suggestion:
http://puu.sh/rRiA4/f82bfff898.jpg00:24:242 (3,4) - [nazi] Move a little to the left perhaps to avoid that slight overlap with the slider.
00:25:144 (3,4) - Same here ^
00:26:648 (6,7,8) - You might as well make (5) and (6,7,8) look like mirrored sliders for neatness.
http://puu.sh/rRiRV/f8295ad9ca.jpg 00:34:016 (8,9,1,2) - Really, really inconsistent spacing here. (8,9,1) should be spaced similarly. The jump to (2) is fine given the music, but I think a reordering of combos would be necessary to signal that jump well. If you want to keep the jump RNC (1) and NC on (2) instead.
00:34:467 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - [nazi] Sliderends aren't overlapped properly (sorry for nazi xD)
00:38:377 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - An overall flow recommendation: First, reverse[Ctrl+G] (2) and (3), then make (5) be on the left instead of the right side of (4). Reverse (6) and (7) then make (6) on the right instead of the left side.
It plays better IMO.02:06:622 (4,5,6) - This would play better as mirrored sliders with (5) placed in the center between the two IMO.
02:08:180 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Your stream spacing here is inconsistent. Is this intentional?
02:10:031 (5) - Place this at 69,203 instead. The flow variety is much better compared to the current placement which is just a blanket.
02:14:609 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Flow wise, it's ok, but the design aspect is kind of :<
02:16:264 (7,8,9,10) - Same as above. Those overlaps looks ugly IMO :<
02:17:531 (6,7,8,9) - Two things here:
1) I think (8) would look better at 286,204, since you get to form a pseudo-pattern with it.
2) The jump to (9) has no flow to it whatsoever. There is no indication flow-wise as to how it jumps from (8) to (9). Note that in (8), the direction is from topright to downleft.
02:18:602 (4,5,6) - The sudden angled stream bit here is a bit jarring.
02:19:479 (11,12) - (9) and (10) were basically V-flipped sliders, so I think you should keep it consistent with (11) and (12) and also use V-flipped sliders.
02:23:570 (4) - Try placing this at 289,370 the flow and patterning become much better.
02:32:725 (2,3) - Please space your anti-jumps consistently. That's the only visual indication people have for them, so it's better to not ruin that too.
03:18:115 (2,3,4) - Again, design wise the overlaps aren't really good :<
03:19:089 (1) - I kind of was expected a 1/4 slider, 1/4 slider pattern here given how other parts similar to this was mapped that way. It just feels odd that you change the patterning now.
03:19:674 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - Can I recommend a pattern here for neatness?
http://puu.sh/rRl3W/9c24c4aaa0.jpg03:26:687 (10,11,1,2) - Actually, I'm going to keep quiet regarding these at this point, but yeah do note that I said earlier about overlaps :<
03:28:635 (2,3,4) - The slight curvature is kind of ugly IMO. Normally, you compress a stream like that in order to make it seem like a note, so you make it a straight line. By curving it, it looks really awkward and generally, you only curve them when you are transitioning between sliders and need to fill the space between the two with a small curve. [Same with the rest of the notes in the next part]
03:35:648 (6,7,8) - Inconsistent spacing here, and I think you could do well using a pattern here.
05:25:907 (4) - Weird flow here. Try placing it at 159,49?
[HalfSlashed]
Oh boy... spaced streams with jumps in between. Note that I actiively modded in a time of distance snap requirements, so excuse me if I sound a bit too harsh regarding your inconsistent spacing. Actually, maybe I'll just ignore some of the more minor things, but I'll bring up the big ones.
00:55:128 (3,4,5,6) - The stream structure and movement (during play) here is awkward.
01:01:362 (3,4,5,6) - Same goes here.
01:03:894 (1,2,3) - Regarding this inconsistent spacing, you don't have your usually music cue (the low bass) to justify a jump here. All your other similar jumps have that bass sound, so I think for consistency's sake you need to space this normally. [See 00:54:154 (1,2) - , 01:03:505 (1,2,3) - , etc]
01:10:128 (2,3,4) - Your blanketing here is too tight. Move (3) and bit to the left and up, I think.
01:12:855 (1,2) - Flow's a bit off here. (2) should be lowered a bit more to let's say 226,378? It doesn't go offscreen in play, don't worry.
01:13:440 (2,3,4,5,6) - After that, your pattern here also feels awkward. Flow wise, you start with a right -> left -> right, but in the middle, you swap it with a clockwise one. The change is a bit jarring.
01:15:193 (3,4,5,6,1) - Your curve here feels a bit more sharp towards the end. Soften it a bit by moving (5,6) a bit down?
http://puu.sh/rRjHb/480411fc6d.jpg01:17:141 (5,6,1) - [nazi] Inconsistent spacing here for no musical reason.
01:43:635 (4,5,6,7,1) - The curve here also gets more sharp towards the end. Suggestion:
http://puu.sh/rRjSz/60170091d2.jpg01:45:388 (9,10,1) - The slight curve looks a bit off IMO. Just make it straight.
01:46:946 (9,10,1) - I think it would look better if you just
lined them up straight here. The curve back is a bit jarring.
01:53:180 (9,10,1) - Same comment here, but it looks passable here.
01:55:614 (6,1,2,3,4,1) - Flow-wise, there's no problem, but design-wise it looks ugly IMO.
02:46:362 (1,2,3) - Blanketing is off here
04:05:063 (4,5,1) - Please don't confuse players like this. That anti-jump from (5) to (1) is unintuitive and will piss off so many players.
04:10:031 (5,1,2,3) - Inconsistent spacing :< Accelerated spacing doesn't work on narrowed streams, you need to clearly see the spacing increase slowly like in 04:32:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6)!
04:20:842 (6,7,8) - I think you're better of doing that triangle pattern at 04:22:401 (6,7,8) - first before you try a more confusing pattern like this, so that players know how this pattern is played before tackling it. So if possible, I recommend you swap the two patterns.
04:45:193 (6,7,8) - The flow between these notes are awkward.
The map needs more polishing IMO. Good luck!