1. 00:25:138 - For an unexplained reason in some difficulties you've used a manual break, when in others they're not changed at all, would you mind checking them to keep the consistency. AND YOU SHOULD ADD "SASSY" TO TAGS NOW!

1. 00:32:443 (6,1,2,3) - Looks great actually, but don't you think the strong sound start at 00:32:443 - instead of the white tick? the pattern feels a bit forced due that the next 3 circles has exactly the same kind of sound, so I'd like to make them as one straight line from here 00:32:443 - to 00:32:736 - here.
2. 00:37:897 (2) - I'd like to add a Normal Sampleset here, just as the previous patterns that are basically the same.
3. 00:48:710 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - This is really creative to be honest, I liked it so much.

1. This is difficult.

1. 00:39:749 (2,2) - Nazi* Could you stack them properly to improve the Quality itself?
2. 00:53:190 (1,1,1,1) - I love this.
3. 00:58:255 (5) - How about to add a NC at this section? it's very difficult already due the Stream Stack/Jump, but probably a NC might help just a bit.

1. 00:59:619 (2,2) - I just have one thing to point out in this difficulty, due that the density at the kiai time is really difficult to notice that there's a overlapped slider here, so I'd like to unstack them manually, like this maybe?

• Looks good.

1. 00:04:878 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Ooh la la, Fancy~

1. 00:12:963 - I think feels a bit empty without any custom sound at this part, how about to use a Normal Sampleset here?
2. 00:37:800 (1,1) - As far as I know the minimum recovery time after a spinner are 2 ticks, so a quick fix for this would be move the next slider more to the center of the grid.

1. 00:12:671 (3) - Nazi* What do you think about to make the wave a bit more softer? just like this? it probably will help to improve the aesthetics in this part at the least a little bit.
2. 00:29:813 (1) - I think you've forgot to add the Normal Sampleset at the head of this slider.
3. 00:48:515 (1,2,1,2,1) - Seems like the Distance here changed a lot from the previous patterns, could you consider to use 1.20 instead 1.70/1.50?
4. 00:58:255 - Whistle?
5. 01:02:541 (1,2) - Same for these two.

Cryptic wrote:

I'm glad you fixed that ghost triplet we talked about but don't you think your solution creates too weird of a start-stop motion for this CS and BPM? The movement here: 00:47:346 (4,5,6,7,1) - seems really awkward because it opposes the slider direction (which you don't do unless you're emphasizing something, and 7 is the same intensity as 6). Can you elaborate what exactly is wrong with this movement? It's about as simple as it can be.. the vocals are equally emphasized, which explains the equal spacing. There really isn't anything awkward with this movement. If I went for some uber crazy spacing here with tons of directions changes then yeah, it might have got awkward, but here? I highly doubt this.

Also, what happened to making this circles 01:01:372 (1) - due to vocal emphasis? I know you said that her vocals weren't "as spammy" but they're about as spammy as 01:03:320 (1,2,3) - that or the entirety of 00:54:749 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - that. I decided against it, because I reconsidered how the structure of her vocals appeared to me. It less sounds like 123456 12, but more like 1234 1234, that's why I went for this pattern. I've used circles for the first four to cover up the huge stress on the vocals - they seemed slightly less stressed after, hence why I went for this kind of slider.

Those are really my only concerns on the top diff at this point since I think they don't quite fit what you've been doing. (I still personally disagree with this 00:57:865 (1,2,3,4) - as a pattern due to the fact that it's really the only place in the map where something like this occurs and it doesn't have much of a "tell" at all that it's coming. You basically do a huge obtuse jump into that square and it's appears kind of awkward if I look at the individual movements required to do it.) I think we happen to agree to disagree here. To me, this pairing of vocals is pretty much unique, hence why I went for this pattern. Why would I put it somewhere else with that mindset? You agreed with me that I followed some kind of staccato of her vocals (not quite fluent with musical terms, in all honesty) here 01:00:982 (1,2,3,4) - , hence why the pattern looks slightly different and more close together.

HallidayASR wrote:

Hello! A storyboard mod (?)

Just a thought about the SB

I know there was a little discussion on the SB already. The storyboard itself doesn't bothers me at all; I think it's pretty funny & clever, and that there's no need to put a limit to creativity in a case like this, so all that is fine to me c:

But I do have a problem with it: I don't think some elements of the storyboard should be on every diff.

Here are the elements that I think should be (partially) removed from the mapset:
-The lyrics: In lower diffs, they just don't match with what's being played. A (new) player playing one of the lower diffs and reading the storyboard will not understand the joke OR be able to relate it to the map, and will probably get confused by it; I think this should be avoided.
A person that can play & pass Kawabunga (Or some of the other higher diffs) is already familiarized enough with osu! (In general) to understand the concepts and references, that just isn't the case with newer players.

-The last 4 Miku gifs: On Kawabunga the 4 Mikus drop and fall in a place where they get inside of some sliders, and that's cool, but that doesn't happen anywhere else on the mapset. That makes those gifs unnecesary on the other diffs. Note that I know these don't actually do any harm (Because they can't cause any confussion), so this one is optional.

So, my suggestion is:
-Delete the lyrics on the diffs Easy, Normal, Hard, Kyversible's Insane and Another. I guess the lyrics can be kept on the rest of the diffs, since they use a small cs, and again, I think anyone that can play the 3 diffs above Another is experienced enough to understand the storyboard xD
-Delete the last 4 Miku gifs on every diff but Kawabunga (Optional).

This shouldn't be so hard, if the storyboard was made with scripting, Damnae will only have to delete the textlines on the diff's .osb files that correspond with the things I mentioned (I don't know if it's actually that easy, I'm just guessing here o_o)


Well, that's all I wanted to say, not much, but it's definitely something that should be given some thought before this map goes ranked

Victoire wrote:

My reading might be shit but has the average reading really gone up so much that ar9.5 on a 8* alternate map is reasonable? I wish I could play this without having to make an edited ar10 version or memorizing it for EZ. That said, if I make it playable for myself I really enjoy it!

fieryrage wrote:

can we at least make the od 10 so notelocks arent a thing ty

literally no reason an 8 star map shouldnt be od 10