forum

BlackYooh vs. siromaru - BLACK or WHITE? [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
116
show more
Topic Starter
komasy

JUDYDANNY wrote:

今度こそfinal?
[komasy]

  • :!: 00:08:413 - ~~ 以前の1/4のdkdkにした方が断然プレイ感+音の聞こえ共にベターです 1/8を無理に混ぜてるように見える...
    元々ここには1/8を入れていましたが、色々あって消しました。しかしやはり個人的にはこの箇所では1/8が良いと思っており、dkdkでは自分の中では正直イマイチじゃないかという風に思っており、自分の置きたい1/8を設置し直しました。音をよく聞いてみると若干ズレているようにも聞こえる気がしますし(25%で聞いてみるとピアノ+シンバルの音がキック音より先に聞こえる)、何しろ1/2で力強くなっているのに1/4で繋げてしまうのはかなり勿体なく、曲の特性を生かしきれないと思います。このような音はここの箇所以外では無く、ほかの部分と似たような配置にするよりか敢えて周りと違う配置にしたほうが面白いと思います。
Topic Starter
komasy
代理です

JUDYDANNY wrote:

今度こそfinal?
[nyanmi]
  1. 00:56:251 - , 01:01:440 - kの方が前後の繋ぎの展開としてより適切かと思います fix
  2. 01:10:684 - remove finish, 01:10:765 - add d? 直前のfinish-5pletの流れとは全く別物なのでfinishを用いるよりもストリームを配置した方がプレイ感としてよさそうです なるほど、確かにそうですね。追加で、01:11:089 - をスピンまでのビルドアップ感がここで途切れる感じがしたので削除しました。
  3. 01:32:981 - , 01:33:143 - remove? 小さな抑揚、またドラムも鳴ってないので至極自然な流れになりますfix やばかった
  4. 01:37:035 - add k ? 繋げた方がよさそうな..^
  5. 01:40:116 - same.^
  6. 01:41:251 - change to k, 01:41:575 - change to d ,, ピッチがどんどん下がっているのでおしりdkkkdに違和感がかなりきますうーん、色々悩みましたが、01:40:521 - からkkddkdkkkdddkdkddという配置に行きつきました。ピッチがだんだん下がっていくということで後ろdメインに、01:41:170 - からkddd...と続いていくような感じがした…とか、色々考慮した結果このような配置になりました。
  7. 01:46:927 - add k, drum不足fix
  8. 01:48:062 - same reason, add k.この先にも続いている様に聞こえたので01:48:224 - にも追加、配色が続いてしまうので01:48:386 (249,250) - をCtrl+Gとしました。
  9. 01:48:873 - remove? ドラム音が聞こえない..fix
全てfixしちゃいましたw(*‘ω‘ *)
自分なりのマッピングというか、あまり音を聞いてないのもあるのでしょうね…微妙に音に合ってない気もしますw
Topic Starter
komasy
updated
Topic Starter
komasy
I made some improvements.

all diff
00:00:630 - +5%
00:41:981 - +5%
00:51:224 - +10%
00:52:116 - +5%
01:05:494 - kiai off 01:05:819 - kiai on
01:13:278 - to 01:23:575 - +10%
01:23:575 - +5%
01:34:035 - +5%

agoni
Deleted over mapping by 1/6 and changed to kdkdkd from 1/8.
01:12:954 (14,15,16,17) - changed to kddk k d. Since the sound is small compared to other finish notes, I deleted D. It also fits the interval of the sound effect of the back.
01:26:251 (1,2) - 01:26:900 (6,7) - added finish. The same sound continues here : 01:23:657 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) -
JUDYDANNY
[Futsuu]
  1. 01:03:873 - k? 次のdddとの統一としても音のなりように変化はあるので変化は後者のddd側だけで良いと思います...
[ag]
  1. 01:42:792 - change k, 01:43:846 - remove?
    前者は高音パーカッションリズム一貫性
    後者はいつぞやも言ったような気がしますが、盛り上がりとしては本来は一度落ち着くべきなので物量緩和です。オーバーに感じる。
Topic Starter
komasy

JUDYDANNY wrote:

[Futsuu]
  1. 01:03:873 - k? 次のdddとの統一としても音のなりように変化はあるので変化は後者のddd側だけで良いと思います...
[ag]
  1. 01:42:792 - change k, 01:43:846 - remove?
    前者は高音パーカッションリズム一貫性
    後者はいつぞやも言ったような気がしますが、盛り上がりとしては本来は一度落ち着くべきなので物量緩和です。オーバーに感じる。
All fixed
JUDYDANNY
随分と長期間になりました、お疲れ様でした!

komasy wrote:

コれ
Topic Starter
komasy

JUDYDANNY wrote:

随分と長期間になりました、お疲れ様でした!

komasy wrote:

コれ
ありがとうございました!!!
初めて本格的にRankedを狙った譜面で、かなり譜面づくりが下手だというのがあって、かなりご迷惑をおかけしてしまいました。
Aisha
o/

i'm slightly confused with 00:52:157 - 01:33:994 - greenline usage, there's not a real problem if you move first one to 00:52:197 - and the second one is like senseless for me D:, maybe if you use 90% idk could have a little more sense like you did on the first one

also kantan could still use 1.4 SV or 1.3, is not that complex so if you don't want to change you could use 1.3 on futsuu so makes a better spread :p


[Futsuu]
00:38:251 (2,3,4) - d k k / d d k / k d k sounds better imo, triple kat is like they're having the same pitch so D:
01:31:765 (29) - maybe delete? is a little dense for a section before kiai
personal: 01:34:359 (1) - :arrow: 01:34:521 - ? could be good for a futsuu diff!

[Muzu]
00:39:224 (5) - don?
00:57:711 (75) - remove big note maybe, this section is a little strange since you use 00:52:521 (53) - big note on here (i agree with this since it's a kiai start) but you don't here 00:55:116 (64) - (both have the same sound)
01:02:900 (97) - ^

[Oni]
00:40:846 (1) - d?
same question about finishers on kiai :c
01:12:629 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - may I suggest a kkkkddk here?

[Inner]
00:25:927 (232,233,234,235,236,237,238) - dkddkdk fits better imo according to pitches
00:36:954 (301) - 00:39:548 (2) - may I suggest using kat on them? for variation basically and difference from 00:38:251 (307) -
01:13:278 (1) - it isn't that important but is a little strange to see this diff with spinner, I can agree with you if you don't want to delete it, but is like unnecesary imo

call me back ~
Topic Starter
komasy

xfraczynho wrote:

o/

i'm slightly confused with 00:52:157 - 01:33:994 - greenline usage, there's not a real problem if you move first one to 00:52:197 - and the second one is like senseless for me D:, maybe if you use 90% idk could have a little more sense like you did on the first one

also kantan could still use 1.4 SV or 1.3, is not that complex so if you don't want to change you could use 1.3 on futsuu so makes a better spread :p


SV of all diff are fixed. And since BPM 185 is not fast, I changed Kantan's SV to 1.4.

[Futsuu]
00:38:251 (2,3,4) - d k k / d d k / k d k sounds better imo, triple kat is like they're having the same pitch so D:
It is a quiet part so I do not want to put d.

01:31:765 (29) - maybe delete? is a little dense for a section before kiai
I think that it is acceptable, so keep

personal: 01:34:359 (1) - :arrow: 01:34:521 - ? could be good for a futsuu diff!
Since the drum starts from there, keep

[Muzu]
00:39:224 (5) - don?
same as futsuu

00:57:711 (75) - remove big note maybe, this section is a little strange since you use 00:52:521 (53) - big note on here (i agree with this since it's a kiai start) but you don't here 00:55:116 (64) - (both have the same sound)
01:02:900 (97) - ^
I think that they are not the same sound. I am putting Finish according to the sound of the cymbal. But 01:02:900 - is not cymbal, so I deleted finish here!

[Oni]
00:40:846 (1) - d?
same

same question about finishers on kiai :c
01:02:900 - deleted finish!

01:12:629 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - may I suggest a kkkkddk here?
now better imo

call me back ~
thanks for mod! :)
Topic Starter
komasy

xfraczynho wrote:

[Inner]
00:25:927 (232,233,234,235,236,237,238) - dkddkdk fits better imo according to pitches keep
00:36:954 (301) - 00:39:548 (2) - may I suggest using kat on them? for variation basically and difference from 00:38:251 (307) - um.. I agree to add difference to those. but 00:39:548 - and 00:36:954 - seem like to similar. so I only changed k 00:38:251 - .
01:13:278 (1) - it isn't that important but is a little strange to see this diff with spinner, I can agree with you if you don't want to delete it, but is like unnecesary imokeep. I think it is important to expressing calm.
thanks for mod!
JUDYDANNY
restart.
Topic Starter
komasy

JUDYDANNY wrote:

restart.
ありがとうございます!
Aisha
Everything looks nice! ~
HomieLove
congratz! :)
Topic Starter
komasy
thanks everyone :) :)
Ozu
F.I.N.A.L.L.Y
Topic Starter
komasy

404 AccNotFound wrote:

F.I.N.A.L.L.Y
I DID IT.
yuzu__rinrin
長かったね……おめでとう(っ´ω`c)
Topic Starter
komasy

yuzu__rinrin wrote:

長かったね……おめでとう(っ´ω`c)
ありがとうございます…! :)
Please sign in to reply.

New reply