Azure wrote:

Hello,M4M from #modreqs hey

[Insane]

1. 00:03:568 add a not and stack 00:03:458 (7,8,1) together? (it's insane diff so a little jump it's fine) but making a triple here doesn't make any sense, it's a really calm part (only sax) and Idk why would you make a triple here
   
2. 00:05:443 delete NC, 00:06:105 NC But it's a red tick and previous is a big white 1/1
3. 00:12:061 make this slider straight and stack 00:12:502 (1) with 00:11:399 (3), (keep the slider (1) blanket with 00:13:163 (3)) I rotated it down side
   
4. 00:15:921 add a note? sounds good Not really :/
5. 00:17:796 (1,2,3,4,5) make a beautiful star? like Naah I wanted a small spacing differences between 00:17:796 (1,2) - and 00:18:237 (3,4) - because there is a pretty strong tone on 00:18:237 (3,4) - :3
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:29:597 add a not? why not following this sound ? with current nicely looking and nice to play pattern I don't think it's that needed :3
7. 00:31:693 change this note to 1/4 slider and make it parallel with 00:31:913 to keep the flow like Hmm
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:52:649 try this (two 1/4 slider) Hmm, might be pretty unexpected but I'll consider this
   
   placement
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 00:55:737 the rhythm should be better with this?
   
   you can try this placement if you changed the rhythm
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:59:266 ^
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 01:02:796、01:06:325... etc. ^
12. 01:48:678 move it downer in x412 y304 oki
13. 01:51:656 add a note? Idk
14. 01:55:958 (5,1) stack it better? fixed
15. make more jump in this diff will be better? it's little easy for insane I guess.. I don't want it to be very jumpy and complicated
16. check some stack by yourself~~

that's all,it's a nice map for a new mapper! thanks :3
good luck~ thx

1. 02:18:237 (3) - I recommend you to unstack this circle since it can cause confusion~ Players may think this is 1/4 because you never stack 1/2 notes at the end of sliders so this results in a false indication of a faster note coming up when it's just the same rhythm. It happened to me.. I clicked before the right time because I thought it was gonna be 1/4. So yeah.. unstacking it is something I highly recommend ;w;

1. 01:17:796 (1,3) - Switch NC

1. 00:26:619 -
2. 00:33:678 -
3. 00:40:737 -
4. 00:47:796 -

1. 01:08:972 -
2. 01:16:031 -
3. 02:23:090 -
4. 02:30:149 -

ezek wrote:

Hi hi! Re-Re-Recheck :v Re-Re-Re-Re-Re ~~~~
Hard

1. 02:18:237 (3) - I recommend you to unstack this circle since it can cause confusion~ Players may think this is 1/4 because you never stack 1/2 notes at the end of sliders so this results in a false indication of a faster note coming up when it's just the same rhythm. It happened to me.. I clicked before the right time because I thought it was gonna be 1/4. So yeah.. unstacking it is something I highly recommend ;w; Done m8

Easy

1. 01:17:796 (1,3) - Switch NC oki

Okay, now a concern about this difficulty raised in my head. The thing is that you're using only 1/1 when it has the potential of using 1/2 and 3/2 repeat sliders to bring variety to the rhythm and make the diff more fun. Great idea, you know when I started to make this mapset I thought only 1/1 can be used in Easy, bakabaka >.<

Just to prevent any confusion, here are how they look:
3/2


1/2


Places where I suggest to add 1/2 repeat sliders:

1. 00:26:619 -
2. 00:33:678 -
3. 00:40:737 -
4. 00:47:796 -

And by now you should know where to put them in the next choruses (where there's kiai) since it's pretty simple Yup <3

Places where I suggest to add 3/2 repeat sliders:

1. 01:08:972 -
2. 01:16:031 -
3. 02:23:090 -
4. 02:30:149 -

I hope Easy is more fun to play next time I see the map \:3/ It's done ~~ :3
Btw Max Combo on that diff is 420 now \:3/

ezek wrote:

I'm not a fan of the aesthetics, but I believe this should be enough, nice progress you made~ Good luck with the next BN~
Metadata is taken from the official video published by the official channel of the artist, so it should be a valid metadata source~

~Bubbled~

XVoIR wrote:

Nie rzucim ziemi skąd nasz ród!
Nie damy pogrześć mowy.
Polski my naród, polski lud,
Królewski szczep Piastowy.

Nie damy, by nas gnębił wróg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Do krwi ostatniej kropli z żył
Bronić będziemy ducha,
Aż się rozpadnie w proch i w pył
Krzyżacka zawierucha.

Twierdzą nam będzie każdy próg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Nie będzie Niemiec pluł nam w twarz
Ni dzieci nam germanił,
Orężny wstanie hufiec nasz,
Duch będzie nam hetmanił.

Pójdziem, gdy zabrzmi złoty róg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Nie damy miana Polski zgnieść
Nie pójdziem żywo w trumnę
W Ojczyzny imię, na jej cześć
Podnosi czoła dumne.

Odzyska ziemi dziadów wnuk!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

M a r v o l l o wrote:

Was video provided by ezek? If so I don't think he can nominate this set because he is part of set.

M a r v o l l o wrote:

Was video provided by ezek? If so I don't think he can nominate this set because he is part of set.

Shinju wrote:

I don't know what kudosu is but give me ;-;

deadpon3 wrote:

Shinju wrote:

I don't know what kudosu is but give me ;-;

*gives kds*

Shinju wrote:

I don't know what kudosu is but give me ;-;

MkGuh wrote:

Shinju wrote:

I don't know what kudosu is but give me ;-;

You can get kudosus by helping someone's mapset making a mod to suggest things that will make the set better.

Gratz for the bubble btw!

1. The way you mapped this + CS2 makes aesthetics look really cramped, strongly recommended to use CS2.5 instead.
2. 01:07:208 (3,4) - Could've used the same slider shape here, current one looks aesthetically inconsistent.

1. 00:19:561 (1) - Why a spinner on this part when other diffs are mapped?
2. 00:24:855 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:38:972 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:46:031 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - etc I want you to pay more attention on rhythm density on these parts(also other kiais/choruses as well), I don't know why you used 1/1 rhythms randomly like 00:24:855 (1,2) - 00:40:737 (1,2,3) - 00:47:796 (1,2,3,4) - etc which makes the rhythm plays really inconsistent. This is clearly noticeable when you mapped all these parts without any 1/1 rhythms in the second chorus/kiai. Try balance the 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms usages on these parts to make them more consistent. If you want rhythm variations then try not to do it without making too much rhythm inconsistency.
3. 02:57:943 (3) - Not really necessary to map this imo since you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:56:178 anyways.
4. Overall I wish you could've used a higher DS throughout the map so things like 03:01:031 (3,4) - 03:16:913 (2,3,1) - etc won't look too cramped.

1. 00:13:163 (3,5) - Looks cramped lol not really aesthetically appealing compared to other blankets like 00:16:031 (1,3) - 00:20:443 (3,4) - etc. Similar thing also occurred at 01:45:149 (5,1) .
2. 00:25:296 (2,3,4,5) - 00:28:384 (1,2,3,4) - aaa I'm really curious what rhythm you're following here with these circle patterns.
3. 02:56:178 (4) - Same reasoning as what I mentioned in Normal as you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:57:943 to begin with, which have a similar rhythm.
4. 03:08:972 (1) - A 1/1 slider doesn't really fit here since there's vocal in the middle of the slider, you didn't do this anywhere else so might as well use a different rhythm here.
5. The patterning ideas seem random to me, like 01:19:561 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:33:678 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) for instance where the second one is a pattern while the first one doesn't really look like one, which is pretty inconsistent.

1. 00:05:443 (1) - I assume this follow the sax right? But I don't know what 00:01:914 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) are following since they didn't seem to follow anything in particular.
2. 00:09:855 (4) - What's the purpose of having a repeat slider here? It really stands out as it's the only repeat slider in the entire section.
3. 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4) - 01:46:693 (2,3,4,5,6) - You made a pattern with these two but not 03:14:266 (1,2,3,4) which has a pretty much similar rhythm?
4. 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6) - 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6,2,3,5,6) - 01:02:355 (2,3,5,6) - So this is how you followed the sax right? Then why 01:05:884 (3,5,6) - 02:20:002 (3,4) - 02:20:884 (6) - aren't the same rhythm then?
5. 01:30:149 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 02:44:266 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Do these patterns really reflect or express anything from the song? I really want to hear your explanation on this cuz it doesn't seem like it at all. Repeated patterns would play better if the song is gradually building up, which is not in this case.
6. 01:35:443 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - You're using the same pattern on these, but then you used different patterns on 02:49:561 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - which I don't know why tho
7. 01:50:222 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - The circle placements here should be improved, you need to pay more attention on balancing visual spacings like 01:50:663 (4,6,1) - 01:51:766 (3,4,6) - etc where you can balance these triangles.
8. Also the way you emphasis thing is really inconsistent, at least in terms of spacing. I don't understand your idea on having noticeably different spacings with 00:35:443 (1) - 00:42:502 (1) - 00:49:561 (1) - etc
9. Personally I don't really agree with the way you pulled off symmetry patterns cuz they are done inconsistently and didn't reflect/express anything much from the song.

Electoz wrote:

[Easy]

1. The way you mapped this + CS2 makes aesthetics look really cramped, strongly recommended to use CS2.5 instead.
2. 01:07:208 (3,4) - Could've used the same slider shape here, current one looks aesthetically inconsistent.

[Normal]

1. 00:19:561 (1) - Why a spinner on this part when other diffs are mapped?
2. 00:24:855 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:38:972 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:46:031 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - etc I want you to pay more attention on rhythm density on these parts(also other kiais/choruses as well), I don't know why you used 1/1 rhythms randomly like 00:24:855 (1,2) - 00:40:737 (1,2,3) - 00:47:796 (1,2,3,4) - etc which makes the rhythm plays really inconsistent. This is clearly noticeable when you mapped all these parts without any 1/1 rhythms in the second chorus/kiai. Try balance the 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms usages on these parts to make them more consistent. If you want rhythm variations then try not to do it without making too much rhythm inconsistency.
3. 02:57:943 (3) - Not really necessary to map this imo since you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:56:178 anyways.
4. Overall I wish you could've used a higher DS throughout the map so things like 03:01:031 (3,4) - 03:16:913 (2,3,1) - etc won't look too cramped.

[Hard]

1. 00:13:163 (3,5) - Looks cramped lol not really aesthetically appealing compared to other blankets like 00:16:031 (1,3) - 00:20:443 (3,4) - etc. Similar thing also occurred at 01:45:149 (5,1) .
2. 00:25:296 (2,3,4,5) - 00:28:384 (1,2,3,4) - aaa I'm really curious what rhythm you're following here with these circle patterns.
3. 02:56:178 (4) - Same reasoning as what I mentioned in Normal as you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:57:943 to begin with, which have a similar rhythm.
4. 03:08:972 (1) - A 1/1 slider doesn't really fit here since there's vocal in the middle of the slider, you didn't do this anywhere else so might as well use a different rhythm here.
5. The patterning ideas seem random to me, like 01:19:561 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:33:678 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) for instance where the second one is a pattern while the first one doesn't really look like one, which is pretty inconsistent.

[Wiejska Inba]

1. 00:05:443 (1) - I assume this follow the sax right? But I don't know what 00:01:914 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) are following since they didn't seem to follow anything in particular.
2. 00:09:855 (4) - What's the purpose of having a repeat slider here? It really stands out as it's the only repeat slider in the entire section.
3. 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4) - 01:46:693 (2,3,4,5,6) - You made a pattern with these two but not 03:14:266 (1,2,3,4) which has a pretty much similar rhythm?
4. 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6) - 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6,2,3,5,6) - 01:02:355 (2,3,5,6) - So this is how you followed the sax right? Then why 01:05:884 (3,5,6) - 02:20:002 (3,4) - 02:20:884 (6) - aren't the same rhythm then?
5. 01:30:149 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 02:44:266 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Do these patterns really reflect or express anything from the song? I really want to hear your explanation on this cuz it doesn't seem like it at all. Repeated patterns would play better if the song is gradually building up, which is not in this case.
6. 01:35:443 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - You're using the same pattern on these, but then you used different patterns on 02:49:561 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - which I don't know why tho
7. 01:50:222 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - The circle placements here should be improved, you need to pay more attention on balancing visual spacings like 01:50:663 (4,6,1) - 01:51:766 (3,4,6) - etc where you can balance these triangles.
8. Also the way you emphasis thing is really inconsistent, at least in terms of spacing. I don't understand your idea on having noticeably different spacings with 00:35:443 (1) - 00:42:502 (1) - 00:49:561 (1) - etc
9. Personally I don't really agree with the way you pulled off symmetry patterns cuz they are done inconsistently and didn't reflect/express anything much from the song.

These things I suggested above, some of them aren't really suggestions. More like they are things I don't really understand why and I want to hear your explanation/reasoning.
Also popping this because I don't think this set is ready yet, aesthetics, rhythms, and patterning ideas can still be improved more, I hope some of the problems which I brought up are enough for you to understand the general idea, good luck~

Shinju wrote:

ADAM NIE PODDAWAJ SIĘ ;______;

Electoz wrote:

[Easy]

1. The way you mapped this + CS2 makes aesthetics look really cramped, strongly recommended to use CS2.5 instead.
2. 01:07:208 (3,4) - Could've used the same slider shape here, current one looks aesthetically inconsistent.

Diff remapped with CS2,5

[Normal]

1. 00:19:561 (1) - Why a spinner on this part when other diffs are mapped?
2. 00:24:855 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:38:972 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 00:46:031 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - etc I want you to pay more attention on rhythm density on these parts(also other kiais/choruses as well), I don't know why you used 1/1 rhythms randomly like 00:24:855 (1,2) - 00:40:737 (1,2,3) - 00:47:796 (1,2,3,4) - etc which makes the rhythm plays really inconsistent. This is clearly noticeable when you mapped all these parts without any 1/1 rhythms in the second chorus/kiai. Try balance the 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms usages on these parts to make them more consistent. If you want rhythm variations then try not to do it without making too much rhythm inconsistency.
3. 02:57:943 (3) - Not really necessary to map this imo since you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:56:178 anyways.
4. Overall I wish you could've used a higher DS throughout the map so things like 03:01:031 (3,4) - 03:16:913 (2,3,1) - etc won't look too cramped.

The Kiais and rest of the song have been fixed

[Hard]

1. 00:13:163 (3,5) - Looks cramped lol not really aesthetically appealing compared to other blankets like 00:16:031 (1,3) - 00:20:443 (3,4) - etc. Similar thing also occurred at 01:45:149 (5,1) .
2. 00:25:296 (2,3,4,5) - 00:28:384 (1,2,3,4) - aaa I'm really curious what rhythm you're following here with these circle patterns.
3. 02:56:178 (4) - Same reasoning as what I mentioned in Normal as you didn't map 02:54:413 - 02:57:943 to begin with, which have a similar rhythm.
4. 03:08:972 (1) - A 1/1 slider doesn't really fit here since there's vocal in the middle of the slider, you didn't do this anywhere else so might as well use a different rhythm here.
5. The patterning ideas seem random to me, like 01:19:561 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:33:678 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) for instance where the second one is a pattern while the first one doesn't really look like one, which is pretty inconsistent.

Hmm, I remaked some sliders to make them fit to vocals/rhythm better, overall diff really improved ^^

[Wiejska Inba]

1. 00:05:443 (1) - I assume this follow the sax right? But I don't know what 00:01:914 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) are following since they didn't seem to follow anything in particular.
2. 00:09:855 (4) - What's the purpose of having a repeat slider here? It really stands out as it's the only repeat slider in the entire section.
3. 00:31:913 (1,2,3,4) - 01:46:693 (2,3,4,5,6) - You made a pattern with these two but not 03:14:266 (1,2,3,4) which has a pretty much similar rhythm?
4. 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6) - 00:55:296 (2,3,5,6,2,3,5,6) - 01:02:355 (2,3,5,6) - So this is how you followed the sax right? Then why 01:05:884 (3,5,6) - 02:20:002 (3,4) - 02:20:884 (6) - aren't the same rhythm then?
5. 01:30:149 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 02:44:266 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Do these patterns really reflect or express anything from the song? I really want to hear your explanation on this cuz it doesn't seem like it at all. Repeated patterns would play better if the song is gradually building up, which is not in this case.
6. 01:35:443 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - You're using the same pattern on these, but then you used different patterns on 02:49:561 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - which I don't know why tho
7. 01:50:222 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - The circle placements here should be improved, you need to pay more attention on balancing visual spacings like 01:50:663 (4,6,1) - 01:51:766 (3,4,6) - etc where you can balance these triangles.
8. Also the way you emphasis thing is really inconsistent, at least in terms of spacing. I don't understand your idea on having noticeably different spacings with 00:35:443 (1) - 00:42:502 (1) - 00:49:561 (1) - etc
9. Personally I don't really agree with the way you pulled off symmetry patterns cuz they are done inconsistently and didn't reflect/express anything much from the song.
   
   Fixed all

These things I suggested above, some of them aren't really suggestions. More like they are things I don't really understand why and I want to hear your explanation/reasoning.
Also popping this because I don't think this set is ready yet, aesthetics, rhythms, and patterning ideas can still be improved more, I hope some of the problems which I brought up are enough for you to understand the general idea, good luck~

HiPat wrote:

Nie rzucim ziemi skąd nasz ród!
Nie damy pogrześć mowy.
Polski my naród, polski lud,
Królewski szczep Piastowy.

Nie damy, by nas gnębił wróg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Do krwi ostatniej kropli z żył
Bronić będziemy ducha,
Aż się rozpadnie w proch i w pył
Krzyżacka zawierucha.

Twierdzą nam będzie każdy próg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Nie będzie Niemiec pluł nam w twarz
Ni dzieci nam germanił,
Orężny wstanie hufiec nasz,
Duch będzie nam hetmanił.

Pójdziem, gdy zabrzmi złoty róg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

Nie damy miana Polski zgnieść
Nie pójdziem żywo w trumnę
W Ojczyzny imię, na jej cześć
Podnosi czoła dumne.

Odzyska ziemi dziadów wnuk!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!
Tak nam dopomóż Bóg!

• Looks good.

• 00:21:325 (3) - Move up to improve flow.
  [list:1337]01:59:266 (4) - ^

• 00:05:443 (1,2) - I don't like head touching that tail. Perhaps you could move (2) away a bit?
  01:16:472 (2,3) - The flow here is a bit off. You could move (3) to the right or flip it upside down to improve this.
  02:47:795 (1,2) - Blanket could be better, like at 02:53:090 (1,2).
  03:19:561 (1) - This is too close to 03:17:796 (1). Normal players might skip 03:19:119 (2), so make the flow more obvious.

• This song is annoyingly catchy @- @;. Hope I helped!

PolkaMocha wrote:

Requested a "Nice NM" ou o; OwO

[General:]

• Looks good. <3

[Easy:]

• 00:21:325 (3) - Move up to improve flow. done
  [list:1337]01:59:266 (4) - ^

00:24:855 (1) - Why not bend this on the tick so it bends to the music? I did something
01:19:561 (4) - I think y96 x56 looks nicer. okay
01:35:443 (1) - I would place a note at the beginning of this spinner. noo :c
01:56:619 (1,2,3) - This might confuse beginners. It's pretty, but I would move the 1/1 slider away to clear up confusion. done
02:19:561 (1,2,3) - That triangle pattern will mess beginners up on what to play next, as they are both equal distance from the previous object. Map it like you did at 02:21:325 (3,4,1). fixed[Normal]

• 00:05:443 (1,2) - I don't like head touching that tail. Perhaps you could move (2) away a bit? Nah, it's fine ^^
  01:16:472 (2,3) - The flow here is a bit off. You could move (3) to the right or flip it upside down to improve this. done
  02:47:795 (1,2) - Blanket could be better, like at 02:53:090 (1,2). copied xd
  03:19:561 (1) - This is too close to 03:17:796 (1). Normal players might skip 03:19:119 (2), so make the flow more obvious. fixed

[Afterword:]

• This song is annoyingly catchy @- @;. Hope I helped!

Cydros wrote:

irc mode

20:32 Cydros: ar jest okej
20:32 deadpon3: nieee coś ty
20:32 Cydros: hp 6 - 6.5 7 nie wiem w sumie
20:32 Cydros: ale to tak dziwnie wyfglada przy takim ar i od
20:32 Cydros: takie hp xD
20:33 deadpon3: hmm, dobra może być 6.5
20:33 Cydros: obczajam mape
20:34 Cydros: 00:17:796 (1,2,3,4) -
20:34 Cydros: nikt ci sie tutaj nie przypierdolil
20:34 Cydros: o DS?
20:35 deadpon3: nie, jest spoko nie musi być na ds tutaj
20:35 Cydros: kk
20:36 Cydros: 00:42:502 (1,3) -
20:36 Cydros: ten blanket jest okej?
20:37 Cydros: http://puu.sh/sxuTS/f951ff49ed.jpg
20:38 deadpon3: chyba, nie wiem nie widze xd
20:38 deadpon3: czekaj sprawdze dokładnie
20:39 deadpon3: powinien być w porządku
20:39 Cydros: 01:14:708 (2,3) -
20:39 Cydros: tutaj tez moglbys blanket jebnac
20:39 Cydros: albo poprawic jesli jest
20:39 deadpon3: jest blanket
20:39 Cydros: w skrocie nawet przesunac troche kolka
20:39 deadpon3: okej git dzieki