nuvasek wrote:

M4M
personaly the half of the map is quite ResidentSleeper but ik its not ur fault
map is pretty nice to play when the crazy sliders come in and stuff but there are 2 pretty bullshit patterns there that arent really fcable(maybe)

00:12:399 (2) - no beat nothing at all yes beat clarinet
00:21:864 (2) - a bit late but idk this part is mapped to trumpet / clarinet thing but hitsounded to keep the uniformity of percussion hitsounds
00:23:042 (3) - no beat no beat but im going to keep it there because without it there's a pretty empty space and leaves me lonely and since it follows the same structure and pattern as the previous 2, its easily read
00:30:756 - ^ voice resumes on "tune"
01:50:368 (2,3) - very late yeah snover said he was going to redo the first timing later because he thinks it's around +7 off
01:56:368 - i would fill up the space throughout first kiai, this pattern is uniform. it is mapped to the claps and doesn't change its rhythm.
02:01:918 (1) - this slider doesnt fit to my ears covers both of the snares on 02:01:918 - and 02:02:368 - , delete the note if it helps listen
02:05:968 - would put a beat here again but thats just my style ^
02:26:143 - too many circle-sliders - playing it was very exhausting - try to shift/alternate between the circle-slider and slider without circle so i dont sleep while playing it changed to this because i noticed that anyone i asked to play this would get 100's on the circles, and not the sliders
03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - idk cant do it even with alternating or just spamming it but if u were able to fc it the damn son melloe smashed that bitch on his first try (tbh i made the map and it took me 2, but the song warrants these 1/4 jump streams because the emphasis is so heavy with the claps, percussion, and violin sounding thing (i cant do instruments rn like idk what that instrument is called because im so braindead rn)
03:23:660 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - listen at 25% - doesnt sound good ???? mapped to claps and snares
03:46:589 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - top players could probably do this? idk its just REALLY hard to read(unless thats what u wanted) unless u are god - i suggest nerf yeah mostly everyone has eaten shit on this combo pattern, I'll definitely be nerfing this somewhere along the road but I need to figure out first if its a reading issue or spacing issue
03:51:089 - my ears are 95% focused on the vocal part of this so i suggest changing that part to fit the voice will keep this in mind, it hasn't been read improperly by anyone i've asked to play it yet tho
04:15:303 (2) - replacing it with 1/4 slider(the short thingy slider) would be nice same musical chunk as 00:34:828 - and mapped the same way

Pikastar wrote:

ok first of all I'm literally from 2012 where this kind of mapping style didn't exist. so I don't think I can properly mod :s
just feel free to ignore w/o any reason, I won't be offended at all Croatian Rhapsody <3

it was a little confusing for me, of course that's because i'm bad. but :

03:15:839 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
03:22:696 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
03:39:732 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2) -
(and copa pastas of those patterns)

are extra confusing. most of these come from not being able to know where 03:22:803 (4,5) - will be headed because they're 100% stacked to eachother. yeah those vertical stacking slider patterns are what people have struggled on the most and for good reason, I'm still looking for a fitting alternative atm, although i plan on keeping 03:39:732 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - just about the same since it's just a faster 02:08:218 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) -


01:34:168 (2,3,4) - also instead of current pattern, i'd prefer something like 01:50:968 (2,3,4) - . Like they'll basically play the same but would be much less confusing. 01:34:018 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - uniform through the lower frequency wubs and is not the same musical chunk as 01:50:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - which is higher frequency wubs

although i have 0 idea on how this kind of mapping style works, I'm pretty sure if they play almost the same it's better to be placed in less confusing way? since the way i stack notes over slider tracks is introduced way earlier in the map, it's not too bad to read during the kiai, but yes less confusing is good lol ill look into it with more testplayers

thats me though, likely i'm wrong haha nah u good c:


I tried lol sorry for being a bad modder xD <3 thanks very much regardless

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

any no mod FC = 3 months of supporter OR 12$ to any charity so long as they accept credit card or paypal and are credible (known not to launder money etc etc.)

1. 01:13:619 (2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 100% copy a bit stupid, change direction/order will more fun. such as ctrl+g slider , exchange 01:14:295 (2,3) - 01:15:629 (2,3) - or like 01:19:198 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - different part with same feeling
   
2. 01:48:718 (1) - 01:58:318 (1) - it's 1/3, other part same, but 01:41:518 (1) - not 1/3 …… if the timing by yourself i think you can check there by yourself too
   
3. 02:12:418 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1) - as above, 100% copy is stupid …… it's more obvious in long map, let's imagine a 10 mins map, with 1min ctrl+v * 10 …… the key is same feeling
   

William K wrote:

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

any no mod FC = 3 months of supporter OR 12$ to any charity so long as they accept credit card or paypal and are credible (known not to launder money etc etc.)

XD seriously? sure why not

[S o l i t u d e]

Are you overmapping this? If yes... okay lol welp not really sure lets ask mods

1. 00:12:399 (2,3) - Since you did a vertical one here, how about making 00:12:971 (4,1) - the same to make it look better and flow better? 00:12:399 (2,3) - The one you did here was 2-3 was a straight down line. But if you was aiming for a diagonal line like the one you did with 00:12:542 (3,4) - , how about making it more far since I think it's not emphasized properly, the clap there seemed to be so strong. (And it's extra though.) o good idea lemme do that instead
2. 00:15:756 (2) - How about a CTRL+G here? sure and did same here 00:19:185 (2) -
3. 00:32:149 (3,4) - Actually this is pretty hard to read, players will think that 3-4 is a 1/2 jump, not a triplet since you spaced 00:32:042 (2,3) - the same with 00:31:828 (1,2) - spacing is the same yes but the arrangement is different. 00:30:971 (1,2) - in comparison to directly across the square 00:31:828 (1,2) - inherently makes this a different read. it is not the fault of spacing, and i haven't nor have i seen anyone else misread this
4. 00:34:721 - You missed a note here? since it seemed like that you still follow the same instrument here. there's a record scratch here, but no this is not what's being mapped. 00:35:899 (4) - is higher pitch and hence more audible in contrast to the heavy low frequency drums, and it also lines up well with vocals
5. 01:29:518 (3,4,5) - Players might misread this like... the first that plays is 3, and the second is number 5. Because they expect to have a zig zag pattern here, and it would be more matching here. the AR is high enough to prevent that (atleast i havent seen a misread on this yet) also there is heavy kick emphasis on 01:29:818 - which warrants the jump in the first place
6. Good slider arts XD but the SV changes made them touching an impossible level for human orz myself, various friends, and testplayers have all FC'd this first kiai (second kiai completely different tho that shit's monstrous LOOOL)
7. 02:24:118 (3,1) - How about switching the NCs here to make people understand that 02:23:968 (2,3,4) - is only for designs, since the one you did here is 2-3 = 1/2 gap, and 3-4 = 1/1 gap. It would make players misread these all with 1/2 gaps unlike the one you did with 02:24:418 (4,1) -. Players will directly notice the one here since they have a bigger spacing than the one 02:24:118 (3,4) - . mapped consistently throughout first kiai
8. 02:45:387 (3,4) - How about making the SV here lower since I heard sort of sound that is slower? sure
9. 03:33:249 (2,3,4,5,6) - Actually this is a bit unhumanly, but whatever XD melloe landed it, so we'll see about that
10. 04:52:303 (2) - wrong snapped? I think an ordinary 1/2 slider to follow vocals is more suiting here. o shit fix

That's all from me, I think. GL~ thank c:

Narcissu wrote:

skin need “a set”, you add “scorebar-ki” so you have to add “score-comma“,”score-percent” etc. i suggest you give up add skin, it's a bit trouble aw man, ok will fix this. ill upload later without skin elements

color5 resemble color6, same color is unrankable so change one better ok, made 5 lighter to be unmistakably less saturated

your map without Storyboard …… so close all “√” about “F4 → Design” i dont understand sorry :c

i guess some Hitsound delay, because you use many Hitsound and you without ranked map ... ok i mean ill definitely try and fix my hitsounds but why is that at all relevant lol

you should delete useless red line such as 00:54:971 - k

[look like all diff same]

1. 01:13:619 (2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 100% copy a bit stupid, change direction/order will more fun. such as ctrl+g slider , exchange 01:14:295 (2,3) - 01:15:629 (2,3) - or like 01:19:198 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - different part with same feeling google "broken record"
   
2. 01:48:718 (1) - 01:58:318 (1) - it's 1/3, other part same, but 01:41:518 (1) - not 1/3 …… if the timing by yourself i think you can check there by yourself too all of these instances are mapepd to "I've got that" and therefore follow the same 1/3 structure..... but timing is done by snover, and he said he was going to probably redo the first set of timing points because he believes they are around +7 off... which in retrospect might be why it feels like hitsounds are off, because the map is actually off lol
   
3. 02:12:418 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1) - as above, 100% copy is stupid …… it's more obvious in long map, let's imagine a 10 mins map, with 1min ctrl+v * 10 …… the key is same feeling not ctrl c +ctrl v, just exact same format. since this song is so crazy stupidly complex, i felt that the patterns should be as uniform as possible to make reading such a crazy map easier. and seriously, 02:12:568 (2) - 0.24 01:34:168 (2) - 0.26 01:44:068 (5) - 0.25 (and different arrangement

try practice more style,

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

1. 00:23:685 (3) - strange, make shape like you did before? 00:18:542 (2) -
2. 02:03:718 (1) - I think the end of slider is close with itself, increase the space? just like 02:03:718 (1,1) - the space of circle and the slider and 02:11:518 (1) -
3. 02:19:318 (2,3) - too close, move 02:19:618 (3) - to right a little ?
4. 02:53:456 (1,2,3) - make a triangle?
5. 03:25:696 (2) - how about
   img

   
   , then 03:25:696 (2,1) - the slider's end circle and bule one will same space with red slider itself
6. 03:26:553 (2,1) - make a blanket?
   img

   
7. 04:02:874 (3,2) - not overlap completely, check it
8. 04:54:517 (1) - hitsounds volume 60% is a little loud, dont you think?
9. 04:45:089 (2,3,4) - actually, not completely triangle

_Stan wrote:

hey from my queue

[S o l i t u d e]

1. 00:23:685 (3) - strange, make shape like you did before? 00:18:542 (2) - the object is just about the same shape, just functions in reverse order (which is weird saying that because it performs to accomplish the same flow lol... huh english is stupid c:) if more people are estranged to it's aesthetic i suppose ill change but idk i like it.
2. 02:03:718 (1) - I think the end of slider is close with itself, increase the space? just like 02:03:718 (1,1) - the space of circle and the slider and 02:11:518 (1) - oh tru that, looked a bit sloppy so i fixed. should no longer give the impression of clipping itself
3. 02:19:318 (2,3) - too close, move 02:19:618 (3) - to right a little ? when i look at it from 02:19:318 - i dont see an issue with spacing
4. 02:53:456 (1,2,3) - make a triangle? i cant tell if should agree or disagree because that is a triangle... right?? Edit: yes that is already a triangle 02:52:692 (1,2,1,2,3) -
5. 03:25:696 (2) - how about
   img

   
   , then 03:25:696 (2,1) - the slider's end circle and bule one will same space with red slider itself I LOVE THINKING ON THE SAME WAVELENGTH AS PEOPLE. HOLY SHIT YOU JUST CORRECTED MY AESTHETIC I LOVE YOU
6. 03:26:553 (2,1) - make a blanket? 03:26:553 (2,3) - blanketed as it is, i think this level of complexity is just enough to not restrict where i need to map
   img

   
7. 04:02:874 (3,2) - not overlap completely, check it fixed blanket
8. 04:54:517 (1) - hitsounds volume 60% is a little loud, dont you think? 45%
9. 04:45:089 (2,3,4) - actually, not completely triangle is for me? i just take 04:45:089 (2,3) - and rotate 120 but it is triangle for me idk

so great map and I like this song~ yeah~ / short mod cuz I can note find any problems more... sorry most manageable mod yet

GOOD LUCK THAAANK

HighTec wrote:

>no testplayer

>>>>>played the map even while it was wip

- _

Wivaiien wrote:

[Solitude]
■ I guess it's obvious, but remove the spaces from the diffname if this goes for rank FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK

■ 00:00:542 (2,3) - Personally, I'd space each of these a little less to highlight the stop/go effect more. This isnt necessary though. i think any less would be underwhelming and any more would be OP. in any case, the notes like 00:00:828 (3,5) - just continue in the same direction they came from so it should still highlight that stop/go effect (which you're right its like the only thing im trying to highlight here lol)
■ 00:02:685 (1,2,3,4) - Another subjective thing - I think these combos would look more appealing like this. yessir, i didnt change the angle of the slider to note but moved 00:02:971 (2) - to be the left side of square with 00:02:114 (2,4) - and moved 00:03:399 (4) - to follow the line created by 00:03:972 (3,4) - . this comes out to be pretty much the same aesthetic and follows nice formula too so h e h e
■ 00:09:828 (6) - should probably keep the basic idea of these combos (space less). ok
■ 00:20:685 (1,2,3) - Would probably be a good idea to make these somehow 'different' to the others (more spacing, generally different shape) so that it's possible to read the timing difference to 00:20:256 (2,3) - without having to rely on the approach circle too much. haven't seen anyone misread this yet, but if it happens ill take what you said into consideration
■ 00:21:328 (3,1) - 00:22:185 (3,1) - kind of the same thing, but it works as 'reverse spacing' ... maybe it's fine after all. Keep these things watched though. ok c:
■ 00:25:292 (1,2,3) - space a bit further away because timing = spacing and to avoid the overlap with 00:24:971 (3) - ok, a square spaces nicely
■ 00:28:399 (1,2,3,4,5) - Yea, this is where it gets more dangerous with the spacing. There is no way to find out whether this section has a normal timing (1/2) or has a faster timing (1/4) without completely relying on the approach circle. Ive been out of the loop on these for a while, so I cant really tell if this is unrankable or not. They would be, if this was 2015, that's all I can say. Try to avoid that. i've been keeping this in mind, idk if artistically it was a bad idea to have this sort of "broken record" theme recurring throughout the map to emphasize skip backs in musical chunks but idk... no one has misread these yet but for sure im keeping these in mind. just for now i ctrl G 00:28:721 (3) - ... that might've been worse lol idk fucc... if it is an unrankable issue ill change it all but for right now its just an artistic gimmick (and again i havent yet seen misreads)
-> 00:30:114 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - on the other hand are good to go and easy to read since every Jump has a Kickslider. Try to do something with this instead
■ 00:32:685 (1,2,3,1) - But then again, try to use Kicksliders consistently. All of these are Kicksliders with about the same distance between each object - however, 3->1 is a 1/4 jump while the others are not. Readability wise, not good aaah i see, i think this maybe resolves issue? i basically switched 00:33:328 (3,1) - the placement of these and molded it to the square a in a way that there is clearly more emphasis on 00:33:542 (1) - than say 00:32:685 (1,2) - . also, moved 00:33:756 (2) - in reverse flow to 00:33:542 (1) - to capture record scratch in a way that doesn't use so much spacing to confuse reading
■ 00:35:685 (3,4) - Similar thing. A few combos ago, this couldve been a 1/4 jump. i think this combo does a much better job of clarifying emphasis, also i think i fixed up previous pattern idk :pray: :pray: :pray:

There's alot about consistency in the first few seconds of the map. Sometimes a small visual gap is indeed a small timing gap too, but the next time it's a longer timing gap. These things should be made more clear somehow. Timing inbetween objects should be visualized by how far these objects are spaced apart from each other, just like there's a bigger gap in the timeline on top of the editor.
I can see why youve mapped things like this, but right now it's just really messy and very inconsistent. seems that way XD this helps tho thank

(I like the speedup part though. It's clearly visible where the strong beats are (since these are supported by jumps) and it seems generally more polished. Maybe take that as an example)

■ 01:48:718 (1) - This seems to be the only object in this pattern that's almost touching the previous Slider. Move a bit further away to fit in with the others? (like 01:58:018 (3,1) - ) oops yeah i was using 01:48:718 (1) - to bridge 01:47:518 (1,1) - , so i moved 01:48:418 (3) - down and fix the blanket on 01:49:318 (1) - to adjust
■ 03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - If you feel fancy, you could have the first 8 objects have less spacing than the last 8 objects have (bit more of a buildup thing) i think if i started in a way that its stacked just enough for the first 2 and then jumps for the last couple than it would be easier to read (more predict really) and prevent combo breaks (or just add to the amount of clusterfuck)... lemme try that
■ 03:33:089 (1) - The rhythm on this is extremely weird, but it's not 1/8th. The wub's are on some weird 1/12th triplet basis and I dont even fucking know, but this is what it sounds like to me. Do what you feel like doing, since 1/12th triplets would be overkill lol yeah trust me i spent like 3 hours alone just staring at the audio file to make sure i wasnt crazy... mapping it in 1/8 really is the only solution that is at all acceptable to the human range of perception when playing this part because otherwise i'd have to go like 1/24 or something retarded in the editor and i cant do that unfortunately xD... sry (i do think your timing is maybe a bit more true to the music but really tho like how do i map that rhythm in a readable way LOL trickaz went stupid with the rhythm so ill just leave it how it is) also lmao 1/12 no thank

03:33:089 (1) - ends on 03:33:232 - (at least this is where I feel like the wub sound stops it's main thing)

03:33:303 (1) - Triplet 1 Circle 1 Pitch A
03:33:339 (2) - Triplet 1 Circle 2 Pitch B
03:33:374 (3) - Triplet 1 Circle 3 Pitch A

03:33:410 No sound, only continuous noise from before

03:33:446 (1) - Triplet 2 Circle 1 Pitch A
03:33:482 (2) - Triplet 2 Circle 2 Pitch B
03:33:517 (3) - Triplet 2 Circle 3 Pitch A + Bass

■ 03:36:517 (1,2,3,4) - probably the same thing, but Im not gonna doublecheck yeah lets just put that behind us
■ 04:32:232 (1) - ends on 04:33:517 o i wasnt mapping it to the really quiet trumpet noise thing but i guess this works why not
■ 04:53:089 (4) - sits on the 1/4th blue tick after where it is right now oh what i had that there to begin with why did that move lol

idk really. I personally feel like the spacing thingies I pointed out at the top might not even be 'such big of a problem' since the meta evolved quite alot and therefore many people just ignore any spacing rules. The rest seems to be somewhat fine though(?) I dont know too much about extreme wubby maps, so I cant give any good input on that. idk felt pretty helpful to me

o yeah mods from here and this section 00:24:756 - were also applied to the later section (why mod it twice i mean... u rite)

-Harpuia- wrote:

I haven't modded in a long while, but I'll try my best ( •w•)/

[Solitude]

1. 00:04:685 (6) - (from 00:04:399 (5,6) - ) - I find this a bit weird. This opposes to the trend on the map here wherein two circles that are two beats away are slightly stacked 00:01:828 (1,2) - . 00:01:399 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - other instances of piano vocal slider circle mix, even if the orientation of which comes first adjusts to the song
2. 00:09:542 (5,6) - Kinda a continuation for the one above, if you would like to keep the one above as is, perhaps do the same thing here too. For consistency. they're different musical chunks tho
3. 00:10:399 (3) - For consistency, put the NC here instead on 00:09:971 (1) - . OK OK CHU IS RITE
4. 00:16:185 (4) - If there is a soft-strong-soft pattern in parts like 00:15:756 (2,3,4) - , I think this needs emphasis, just like 00:19:614 (4) - . If there isn't, I recommend doing what you did here 00:17:471 (2,3,4) - to that and 00:19:614 (4) - as well. OK U MIHGT HA VBEEN RITE OK I MIGTHVE FIXED THSOE
5. 00:47:685 (1) - I don't think the NC here is needed? transition in what element i mapped (percussion -> vocal)
6. 00:59:554 (2) - I suggest stretching this slider (even a bit lol), just for it to not cover much 01:00:167 (2) - . BRO IT CANT EVEN STRETCH ANYMORE LIK WTF THAT IS ACTUALLY THE LAST PIXEL POSSIBLE ARE YOU EVEN MODDING BRO
7. 01:25:768 (4) - I suggest putting it closer to 01:25:618 (3) - . This will put more emphasis on 01:25:918 (1) - imo, which is quite a strong beat. im going to remap 01:23:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - im pretty positive because i feel like it looks ugly as fuck... i think the emphasis and flow is down properly i just think it looks dumb as hell and same could be said for 03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ... i think the idea is on fleek but the execution is mad shit tbh (me_irl)
8. 01:28:318 - to 02:23:518 - YAS. YAAASS OH MY GOAUUWSHHH GAGA YOU LUUK SOOOH GUUDD WAOOOOW
9. 01:36:418 (4) - I think putting a DS difference between 01:35:968 (2,3) - (1/2) and 01:36:118 (3,4) - (1/1) is better (Refer to 01:55:168 (2,3,4) - ). NC-ing is a choice too. (May apply to 01:46:018 (4) - and some more others like 03:37:910 (4) - .) subjective, and according to narcissu, doing it all the same is boring
10. 02:34:318 (4) - NC here. lo ok da d
11. 03:11:660 - to 04:02:446 - YAS. YAAAS GAGA SLAAAAAY MAMAAA

That is all. Awesome map! :3 THANK FRO MOIDDNG Xd

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

o btw thi sis tha t layd gaga meme lo hahaha they sound like ducks

-Harpuia- wrote:

OH MY GAHWD YAAAAAAAAASS
ogm, taek dis stra

P A N irc mod

I had a really brief IRC with P A N that I couldn't save the log to because my dumb ass bumped the power button and lost the chat :C... as a P A N memorabilia tho I have one picture (omg it looks like im boosting my ego nooo someone tell me im shit plz) which is the only thing i have left at this point sorry xD (ok maybe it made me feel pretty good... <3 P A N)

anyway basically no functionality fixes, he just suggested i add some more hitsounds to the slower parts, so i added starting 00:41:256 - to 00:54:971 - and also added a decrescendo effect 02:25:918 - and a crescendo effect 02:37:967 -

Neoskylove wrote:

Q m4m

[solitude]
00:20:685 (1,2,3) - could be hard to read because of 00:20:256 (2,3) - .increased spacing for more obvious emphasis and easier ability to discern difference in timing
00:26:042 - 00:26:149 - where's beat...? 00:24:114 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - mapped to horns (i've been braindead on instruments for this song for last like 2 weeks)
00:28:613 (2,3) - don't overlap like this, Slider reading could be difficult. 02:30:943 (2,3) - is too haven't seen a single testplayer show even slightest bit of misread or hesitation in playing these combos
00:31:828 (1,2,3) - reading is difficult. ^^^ same can be said here
03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - WHF This is really diffucult... lol i even nerfed these, these all used to have jumps in between and even then, melloe FC'd that combo both times he played it when it was way harder (the map used to be 6.38* LOL)
Good luck

• [Yoshi's FL Challenge]

1. 00:20:685 - the 1/2 gap here deserve much larger spacing, or itll cause misread cuz the gap here seems like 1/4, just compare the spacing with 00:21:328 (3,1) - here
2. 00:31:828 (1,2,3) - hmm same structure usage but different gap might cause misread here cuz player would thought the gap 00:32:042 (2,3,4) - is 1/2 not 1/4
3. 01:02:343 (1,2) - ill say do sth similar as 00:00:542 (2,3) -
4. 01:23:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - spacing should be increasing here not decreasing cuz the music is getting more and more intense
5. 02:22:918 (1) - blanket at slidertail isnt perfect
6. 03:34:160 (2,3,4,5,6) - i prefer sth like 03:15:892 (3,4,5,6,7) - for more consist structure, cuz the current structure plays a little boring
7. 03:36:678 (2,3) - hitnormal isnt rly fot the sound here, consider to change one
8. 03:39:946 (4) - NC for consistent
9. 03:46:803 (4) - ^
10. 04:52:303 (2) - start at 04:52:267 - fit better to vocal

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

M4M

• [Yoshi's FL Challenge]

1. 00:20:685 - the 1/2 gap here deserve much larger spacing, or itll cause misread cuz the gap here seems like 1/4, just compare the spacing with 00:21:328 (3,1) - here i switched the order of 00:21:006 (2,3) - , the gap between objects is no larger but the space the cursor has to travel is. also, this way the cursor flows nicely into the next triangle
2. 00:31:828 (1,2,3) - hmm same structure usage but different gap might cause misread here cuz player would thought the gap 00:32:042 (2,3,4) - is 1/2 not 1/4 im making sure when i watch testplayers to note how they respond to this and 00:28:613 (2,3,4,5) - . so far, no one has shown any sign of misread or hesitation in choosing which object to hit and at what speed
3. 01:02:343 (1,2) - ill say do sth similar as 00:00:542 (2,3) - but then rip 01:01:559 (1,1,1,1) - claps :c
4. 01:23:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - spacing should be increasing here not decreasing cuz the music is getting more and more intense LET ME JUST GO AND REMAP THIS ENTIRE JUMP SEQUENCE RLY QUIK xd
5. 02:22:918 (1) - blanket at slidertail isnt perfect i think its closer now
6. 03:34:160 (2,3,4,5,6) - i prefer sth like 03:15:892 (3,4,5,6,7) - for more consist structure, cuz the current structure plays a little boring well its a different musical chunk, and i think the aesthetic of it is very lively but if more people express their boredom of this combo then i have other ways i can map it
7. 03:36:678 (2,3) - hitnormal isnt rly fot the sound here, consider to change one the audio or the object? like from soft to normal or circle to slider? the object choice is consistent with the rest of the map but ill leave the hit soft for now
8. 03:39:946 (4) - NC for consistent fixed in first kiai as well
9. 03:46:803 (4) - ^ updoot
10. 04:52:303 (2) - start at 04:52:267 - fit better to vocal this section is super weird so im going to take your word for it lol

sick map !(8*^_^)7
GL~
just asking can i make a GD of this song cuz ive already some idea lol

HML wrote:

Moderino

00:00:828 (3) - NC to help read (even though I don't have this problem, it looks nicer, and helps other players) awkwardly breaks the measure into 2/3 and is not what im trying to get out of it
00:01:256 (5) - ^ ^
00:02:114 (2) - ^ ^
00:02:542 (4) - ^ ^
00:03:828 (2,4,6) - ^ ^
00:07:256 (2,4,6,8,2,4,6) - ^ ^
00:15:542 (1) - Move over to the right more to help with flow from 00:15:114 (2,1,2) - ? moved 00:15:114 (2) - instead
00:15:114 (2) - , 00:18:542 (2) - , 00:23:685 (3) - These are ugly imo. Maybe reshape them? changed just 00:23:685 (3) - because i thought that one was ugly but tbh i like the others, same applied at the end of map
00:17:685 (3,4,1) - This is a bit weird. Maybe space 00:17:899 (4,1) - More so it doesn't feel like it's cut off. 00:16:828 (3,1,2,4,1) - part of the hexagon
00:24:971 (3,1,2,3) - Space more so the time gap from 00:24:971 (3,1) - is easier to read. changed orientation
00:28:613 (2,3,4,5) - I hated plating these. They don't flow well, and they don't look the best. basically the personality of the map so not changing these sry
00:29:685 (3,4) - Ctrl+G? Imo it flows poorly 00:29:256 (1,2,3,4) - jump size decreases as voice fades to set up 00:30:114 -
00:30:328 (2,3,4,5) - These thingies again weo
00:32:149 (3,4) - Why the huge change in DS here? the drums and claps have been receiving the emphasis the entire section, nothing is changing in the formatting of the section
00:58:115 (3,4,1) - Ctrl+G. Flows a lot better sure
01:02:343 (1,2,3) - Space more for the time gap. Makes reading 01:03:117 (1,2,3) - Easier too because teh player will see it's teh same and think it plays that way too. was mentioned in earlier mod and i guess this is a reoccurring theme so sure

01:27:118 (1) - This looks ugly imo. 01:27:118 (1,1) - :C look at them together, not as an individual. most of the map aesthetically should be seen as connected objects rather than individual stylized pieces
01:34:168 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - These don't play well at all. huge disagree but i respect your opinion
01:43:768 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^
02:12:568 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^
02:22:168 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^
02:26:143 (2,5,2,5,2,5,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,3,2,5,2,5,2,5) - Overmapped. Every one of em. preferencial, haven't had any qualms over they're playability and fits the rhythm so why not, but we'll see
02:41:487 (5,2,5,2,5,1,3) - ^ Same dealio ^
02:58:457 (2,3) - This is extremely hard to read. Place 02:58:457 (2) - on top of 02:58:558 (3) - haven't seen a single person read this wrong, and in any case im considering remapping from 02:46:093 - to 03:09:946 - anyway. anything listed below regarding this section will be skipped because im like 50% sure i know how i want to remap it
03:00:088 (2,3) - ^
03:01:735 (2,3,2,3) - ^
03:13:374 (1,2) - Space more why tho, the flow coming off of 03:12:946 (1) - contrasted by slower anti flow makes the directional change 03:14:446 (5) - fit much better
03:23:660 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - This is cancer to read. Remake an easier to read pattern? only thing ill consider nerfing in the future would be to stack 03:24:303 (5) - on 03:23:982 (3) - . this entire pattern follows standard time and distance rules like every other slow section before fast sliders
03:37:374 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - ^ ^
03:38:232 (1,2,3) - I feel like this should be more intense because of the vocals. ^ may consider bufing those under the same logic
03:40:267 (2) - Make this a triple like you did here 03:39:839 (2,3,1) - because it's a different beat thats not the element im following
03:51:089 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - This pattern is not fun. lol
03:55:374 (5,1,2) - Line up better. as parallel as i can get, shits rough :c
04:07:589 (2,3,4,5) - These again hi
04:09:303 (2,3,4,5) - ^ mom
04:30:089 (3) - This looks ugly imo yes
04:32:232 (1) - ^ bass clef
04:34:232 (2,4,6,8,2,4,6,8,2,4,6,8,2,4,6) - NC 2/3 thing again
04:51:446 (2,3) - Space more the section is pretty sedate

Coolio maparino thank C:

M o c h a wrote:

hi, im pro modder ;chi pro modder im yoshi c:

Everything I say is just what I think > <. Feel free to ignore everything

Solitude

1. 00:07:256 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - I think you should change the spacing (making it go big to small or something) on these instead of making it all the same (like you did with the beginning) already follows same principle
   
2. 00:31:828 (1,2,3) - it bothers me that the spacing looks almost the same as 00:31:185 (2,3,4) - (i didnt notice it when i was playing though) so the player side of you is okay with this c:
   
3. 00:44:471 (8,9,1) - i guess this works, but it's hard to read (just letting you know) hi pro modder
   
4. 01:23:518 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - the spacing (or shape) didnt feel right when i was playing this wel idk, the jump sizes are increasing with buildup so hwy nto xd
   
5. 02:02:668 (3) - idk if there should be a clickable note here reverse bass
   
6. 03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - LOL i think this could be improved (has potential to be something way better). its fine the way it is though yeah this is the only thing i fucking hate about my own map, i have a diff rn just for remapping a large portion of that section and this is 100% included in there because hoYl fuck its ugly
   
7. 04:05:017 (2,3) - not sure what you were following here, but i think you should map the other sounds too i filled 04:05:232 -
   
8. 04:28:589 (3,1) - the spacing on this should be larger (unless you we doing something else) ya sure
   
9. 04:29:446 (3,1) - ^ xd
   
10. 04:51:946 (1,2) - hm, you think its ok like that? sounds a bit late to me I DONT KNOW ANYMORE :CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

yay the map looks really hard but i think its very cool

Overall, very good map!!!!!!!!!!! (to me). I tried really hard to look for patterns, but the spacing on some parts looked/felt random to me (i cant pass this map btw LOL)

Lamborghini wrote:

While I'm in the pending section I randomly think 'hey I wonder if anyone has mapped this song yet" and just as I say that BOOM this comes up. Thanks for mapping Will you add another difficulty to the song?

1. I don't know if you're going for rank or not, but your mp3 is in 190kbps. I don't think there's really a problem there, it's just that you could probably find a bit better mp3 quality if you wanted to.
2. Same for bg, you could get higher dimensions but again, this set doesn't look like you're going for rank (maybe I'm wrong heh)

1. 00:01:828 (1) - super subjective, but you could make the jump from 00:01:685 (7,1) these two bigger if you wanted to move some more stuff around
2. 00:05:114 (8,1) - here too
3. 00:20:256 (2) - move this down a bit? 00:19:614 (4,2) will make this look cleaner
4. 01:08:362 (1) - move this to the right some to avoid overlap?
5. 03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - don't think I passed this map once without NF because of this stream.. idk if you're interested in nerfing it but yeah I'm not a big fan of this part

Logic Agent wrote:

hi m4m stuff. sorry it took so long and sorry if it's short/ not very helpful as I really like the map! its k i haven't gone anywhere c:

[General]

1. I don't know if you're going for rank or not, but your mp3 is in 190kbps. I don't think there's really a problem there, it's just that you could probably find a bit better mp3 quality if you wanted to. ill go digging
2. Same for bg, you could get higher dimensions but again, this set doesn't look like you're going for rank (maybe I'm wrong heh) LOL tbh i low-key have my eyes on that new "loved" section, i need to ask nino tho... as it stands right now im going to delete the FL difficulties when bubbles come in

[Solitude]

1. 00:01:828 (1) - super subjective, but you could make the jump from 00:01:685 (7,1) these two bigger if you wanted to move some more stuff around will remember this if a good idea comes up, right now tho i think the distance is nice because the sharp change in flow
2. 00:05:114 (8,1) - here too ya same
3. 00:20:256 (2) - move this down a bit? 00:19:614 (4,2) will make this look cleaner i wanted to keep the straight follow point from 00:19:828 (1,2) - so i just moved 00:20:685 (1,2,3) - to the left a bit in a way that keeps 00:19:614 (4,2,3) - relatively triangular, but yeah i agree this does look cleaner
4. 01:08:362 (1) - move this to the right some to avoid overlap? that would have completely fucked up the clock 01:08:362 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - so i just changed the orientation of 01:07:996 (2,3) - that flows relatively similar
5. 03:08:232 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - don't think I passed this map once without NF because of this stream.. idk if you're interested in nerfing it but yeah I'm not a big fan of this part "I'm not a big fan of this part" hey cool me neither! tbh i have no fucking clue how to make this flow the same with better aesthetic, because imo it just looks plain fucking stupid. i seriously need suggestions on fixing this combo because its basically like... pre second kiai boner killer and nothing else tbh i fucking hate it too

okay yeah this mod was very short. I knew I wasn't going to find anything, I really like this map lmao. gl

_Meep_ wrote:

ze m 4 ze m

FL challenge
01:51:718 (1) - curve around 01:51:418 (6) - more, https://gyazo.com/8f4f7ab3cf562b3a2b2c1b2ee87496c4 WAU OK DAD FUCK
02:34:843 (1) - I recommend removing NC since it's simply repeating the same tune as 02:34:543 (2,3) - FUCK THE FOLLOW POINTS MOM
04:53:374 (5) - this could be mapped as a slider YEAH I GUESS IT COULD BE
04:54:017 (6) - sound is on 04:54:035 - though YEAH
04:51:660 (3) - sound is on 04:51:678 - UH HUH
04:52:267 (2) - sound is on 04:52:294 - OK
04:54:017 (6) - sound is on 04:54:035 - RIGHT
04:56:232 (1) - slider should end 04:56:687 - SURE
04:57:089 (2) - sound is on 04:57:115 - MMHMM
04:59:660 (6) - sound is on 04:59:687 - DEFINITELY
04:59:874 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - move 1 tick infront in 1/16 OK YEAH I GUESS
01:30:718 (1) - Why not curve the red bezier part to be exactly the same angle as 01:30:118 (1) - ,where they overlap? CUS TBH I JUST LIKED THE AESTHETIC OF THIS MORE. DOING A PERFECT SLIDER TRACK OVERLAP JUST LOOKED OVER USED, ESPECIALLY SINCE I DO A SIMILAR THING RIGHT HERE LO 01:31:618 (3) - SO HAVING THEM VARY IN SLIDER TRACK PLACEMENT MAKES THEM DISCERNIBLE AND UNIQUE FROM EACHOTHER WHILE STILL VERY CLEARLY BUILDING ON WHAT WAS JUST LEFT FROM THE PREVIOUS SLIDER

Thats alll I could find in this absolutely polished map,sorry if its short. Maybe I'll dig out a better BG for u (not)(maybe)(who knows)(why are you still reading this)(stop)(no)(its impossible)(is it?)(I dont know)(kk stop)