M4M~!
--EDIT--
Good luck!
[Extra]General
Map
NC on this diff seems random at times. It's pattern-based on some, then note pattern (placement) on some. Would be better to have consistency on those.
- Increase stack leniency. With a current value of 3, it's too low. Setting it to about 7 should do.
Map
- 00:05:144 (5) - To preserve the consistency I suggest avoiding the stack here.(Basis: 00:07:753 (5) - , ... )
- 00:10:035 (5) - (Can be applied to 00:12:644 (5) - as well) I kinda find it weird that the distance between (4,5), which had an increase, and (5,6) evens out here,unlike the parts prior. Music hasn't really changed (well, I guess lol), so I suggest doing the same as the previous ones.
- 00:32:046 (1) - Basing from the pattern that you established, this should have no NC... Right? Meanwhile, 00:32:372 (3) - gets one.
- 00:33:839 (4) - I suggest NC-ing this to keep this part clean, NC-wise.
- 00:44:274 (3) - Maybe stack this with the slider-end of 00:43:622 (5) - to avoid overlapping with it? You may also wanna move 00:44:437 (4,5) - (or some others) afterwards .
- 00:50:796 - I feel like this downbeat should be hit-able.The beat is quite significant imo. That said, I suggest making 00:50:470 (5) - a 1/2 slider then put a circle afterwards.
- 01:00:905 (2,1) - The flow between these two feel weird for me. Guess the transition is too "sharp" or something.
- 01:16:557 (1,2) - Nothing much, but as for this and its other variants, I kinda prefer the positioning used on 00:35:144 - .
- 01:22:100 - Preeeetty sure the kiai should've ended here. Since it's right before the actual change in music.
- 01:31:068 (1) - NC isn't needed here.
- 01:42:155 (3,1,2) - I won't recommend doing this stack. A stack consisting of 1/2 and 1/1 notes wouldn't do.
- 01:53:405 (1) - Hm... I think unstacking this would be nice to emphasize the sound here.
- 02:05:307 (2,3,4) - Something feels weird about this part. Can't put my finger on it.
NC on this diff seems random at times. It's pattern-based on some, then note pattern (placement) on some. Would be better to have consistency on those.
[Polack's Insane]
That's all I have to say. Really nice and clean tbh.
- 00:15:579 (1,3) - Making 00:15:579 (1) - blanket the slider body of the next slider seems a nice touch.
- 00:19:492 (1) - I personally think this is fine, but it would be better if this were to be flipped vertically. It would be good for flow too.
- 00:34:818 (5) - For cleanliness of the note placement, I highly suggest putting this at (36,238).
- 00:40:687 (2,4) - A stack seems nice to avoid this slight overlap.
- 00:42:155 (1) - Wait what. This looks really out of place, map-wise. Just make it a 1/2 a slider and it should be fine, although the vocal might not be emphasized, if that's what you're after.
- 00:46:475 - Hm... Silence the slider-tail? Maybe? Just like what you did here at 01:37:997 - .
- 01:19:981 (1) - The NC isn't really needed here.
- 01:56:013 (1,2) - It could be that you're fine with it, but I suggest avoiding the overlap between these two. Kinda jarring.
That's all I have to say. Really nice and clean tbh.
--EDIT--
[HC's Hard]
- 00:10:361 (1) - Considering consistency in terms of stacking. It would be nice to have this unstacked, just like 00:12:970 (1) - and the previous ones with the same rhythm.
- 00:23:079 (4) - Consider having this placed somewhere else, maybe have the head stacked into the previous sliders. The placement of this slider, imo, makes this part a bit messy with the overlaps and stuff.
- 00:36:611 (2) - This isn't anything important, really, but for aesthetics (I guess?) have its slider-end stacked on the slider end of 00:35:307 (2) - .
- 01:26:503 (2,3) - Fix the blanket? I mean looking at the approach circle, it's off.
- 01:38:302 - This part is basically the same-ish as 01:22:426 - . Why not map it? It's kinda odd to have a break there when there's nothing much has changed in the music. Say, calm sections.
- 02:11:966 - I uh... Really find this odd too. Plus it's too long D: . Would be nice if it's length was just like the previous one, but this one is long.
- 02:44:274 - o:
[HC's Normal]
Um, yeah. Nothing much to say really, I think it's good. As for the breaks (as for Easy as well), I'm not so sure if should point them out since this is an easier difficulty, which is, well, meant for newer players. Consider asking a bn :3
- 00:17:372 (2,3) - Nothing much. It's a bit messy. A nice fix here would be separating the slider-end of 00:17:861 (3) - even by a bit.
- 01:53:242 (1) - This looks okay, but I think you could put this lower so that the flow on 01:52:589 (4,5,1) - would be more distinguished... or apparent? idk.
Um, yeah. Nothing much to say really, I think it's good. As for the breaks (as for Easy as well), I'm not so sure if should point them out since this is an easier difficulty, which is, well, meant for newer players. Consider asking a bn :3
[Easy]
Anything else seems fine to me.
- 00:12:644 (2) - A little bit of DS thing here, 00:11:666 (1,2) - has a distance of 1.15x. I worth pointing out, I guess lol.
- 00:19:492 (1) - For cleanliness, I suggest you stack this with 00:17:861 (2) - .
- 00:32:535 (3) - Considering that you're mapping the vocals, pretty sure the vocals don't just end on 00:33:024. Extending this into a 2/1 would be nice. (May be applied to others)
- 01:02:535 (2) - 00:20:796 (2) - Consistency xd
- 01:40:361 (3,4) - Awkward flow. I can't really explain it well sry. Something about 01:40:361 (3) - not leading much to 01:41:666 (4) - and having an upward movement again.
- 02:20:796 (1) - I don't think this spinner is needed. There's nothing in the song that calls for this one imo.
Anything else seems fine to me.
Good luck!