This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on March 3, 2017 at 2:10:39 PM

Artist: Capi
Title: Sekai Wa Koi ni Ochiteiru -acoustic version-
Source: アオハライド
Tags: HoneyWorks Kyoku Utattemita 5 C87 Utaite Cover AO-HARU-RIDE CHiCO
BPM: 120
Filesize: 9828kb
Play Time: 05:32
Difficulties Available:

1. Blossoming Love (3.04 stars, 702 notes)

Download: Capi - Sekai Wa Koi ni Ochiteiru -acoustic version-
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------

first

kds please

I sexually identify as a piece of celery

OMG pkk, Ime popular

m4m

ikorza wrote:

m4m

SPOILER

00:01:020 (1,2) - here you map the instrument over the vocal as you skip over 00:01:395 -
but then at 00:03:020 (3,1,2) - which is ensentially the same 00:03:395 - you start on this vocal and miss out on 00:03:520 -
also nothing is at 00:02:520 (1) -
and at 00:04:395 (3) - how come you end the slider on nothing as opposed to the vocal on 00:04:770 -
i would prioritize the instrument in this section imo but your rhythm choice atm doesnt make much sense to me
To fit how I mapped almost the entire song, I followed the vocals and fixed the rhythm, for it.


00:17:020 (1) - more spacing Done
00:17:770 (3) - why are you not mapping the stuff that the slider goes over? Ended slider on 00:18:270 - and added a circle where the lider used to end
00:23:020 (5,6,1) - http://puu.sh/qNEyu/beafb2232b.jpg http://puu.sh/qNEwl/95e48b0196.jpg maybeone of those would be better? I'll keep it like it is
00:25:770 (2,3,4) - just a 1/2 slider Done
00:32:020 (1,2,3,4) - id just do a stream instead, its only 120bpm so its not going to be that hard The reason I didn't want to do a stream here is even though yes 120 bom streams are easy, for people who play 2.91 stars they don't really know how to play streams. So instead I used sliders
00:35:020 (7) - more spacing, youve shown your map can use more spacing at 00:17:270 (2,3) - and makes a lot of sense here The example you gave has 1/2 beat between, while the notes here have a 1/4 beat, so the example for higher spacing doesn't really work, also, the spacing there isn't that high compared to the kiai sections. This is assuming you wanted me to space more between the 7 and 8. If you wanted me to space it more from the notes before it, I don't see why I would, nothing really justifies a change in spacing there
00:36:520 - start note here It is true that there is a sound there, but it is poart of a note she holds, and since I'm following vocals, I made it into 1 slider. In order to still acknowledge that sound, I used the slider shape.
00:37:895 - start note here and 00:38:270 - http://puu.sh/qNEMm/7f78b730a1.jpg so itd look like that instead I moved the 5 to hasve it on the time you showed, but I'm not too sure what you want me to do for the thing after that
00:43:020 - start note here Done
00:45:020 - ^ Done
00:45:770 (7) - why is this a 1/1 slider when you miss over 00:46:020 - and theres not much of a hold sound Kept as is, the hold aound is the held piano note, and there isn't any sound with the piano on the time you indicated, there's only a quiet guitar sound
00:53:020 - start note here Done
01:11:020 - start the second spinner here No since the first needs to end on a beat that's actually there
01:20:520 - start note here Done

01:52:020 (3) - emphais somehow that at 3 the stream got a lot louder Increase spacing after that point
02:12:520 (4) - should start a note on each vocal here Done
02:21:270 (2,3,4) - why is there a triple here? i think you got it mixed up with over 02:21:895 - There is a pretty clear triple with the piano which is what I'm following in this part

03:08:020 - you shouldnt be starting strong sounds on slider ends on that as far as im aware Fixed

04:09:520 (4,5,6) - id just do one repeat slider here because going to 1/6 would be to tricky for a 3 star diff imo Since they are sliders, I think 1/6 will be fine here

04:15:020 - k (I'm assuming you want me to not deal with strong beats with slider ends, and I changed it, but still, can you please write more about what you want me to do, I shouldn't have to guess your mod)
04:23:020 - downbeats should almost always have a note starting on them Fixed
04:43:020 - like places like here tho would be your choice I'll keep

05:24:020 (3,4) - i think this is 1/6 here You can't tell me to not do 1/6 and do 1/6 inside of the same mod dude, also no, it's not 1/6 here



i didnt list everything but a lot of your rhythm choice seems wrong to me please fix that up or explain why im wrong.

Thanks for the mod, just message me when you want me to complete the m4m

Blossoming Love
- 00:01:770 (3,1,2,3) - I'd imagine this rhythm would be confusing for people playing the map blind since there's a poor polarity switch here.
- 00:04:020 (2,3) - Polarity issue here too, the random switch to blue ticks can be pretty jarring.
- 00:18:770 (5,6) - This one especially because it's right after a downbeat.
- 00:21:020 (3) - You should be starting NCs on the downbeats in my opinion since these have pretty significant guitar notes. Same applies for 00:23:020 (5) and 00:25:020 (4). It happens quite a few times and I'm too lazy to list every single one out, so I won't bother unless you want me to.
- 00:33:020 (1,2,3) - I think there are better rhythm choices if you're following the vocals here. You miss a note on 00:33:770 and furthermore 00:34:020 should ideally be mapped with an active note for better emphasis. - 00:37:895 (5,1) - Poor polarity.
- 00:40:020 (1,2) - Keeping with a slider-circle rhythm would be better here since offbeat sliders can be a little unusual, plus having a repetitive rhythm to 00:39:020 (1,2,3) isn't a bad thing since the vocals follow a similar repetitive rhythm through these parts.
- 00:51:020 - This beat should ideally be mapped to an active note since it's a downbeat and is significant in the music.
- 01:00:895 (1,2) - Polarity. There isn't even anything significant on the blue tick here in my opinion.
- 01:25:020 (1,2,3,4) - These are confusing to play since they appear shorter than 01:24:520 (4) which is a 1/2 slider, but these are extended 3/4 sliders and so the player releases these way too early anticipating them to be 1/2 or shorter.
- 01:26:520 (4) - Instead of keeping it repetitive for four notes, you could map the red tick on 01:26:770 to follow the piano and add variety.
- 01:47:020 (2,3) - Polarity thing.
- 02:08:770 (5) - If you're prioritising the lyrics then you could remove this to follow the effect of the vocals silencing here. Alternatively you could make this a 1/4 slider to follow the guitar more accurately.
- 02:19:020 - Similar thing here, I think this would be better mapped to an active beat.
- 02:21:020 - And here.
- 02:25:770 (2,3,4,5) - The offbeat sliders here don't seem appropriate since the beats on the white ticks are more significant in the music than the red ticks.
- 02:31:895 (2) - Polarity thing.
- 02:35:020 - Active note thing.
- 02:37:020 - And again.
- 02:41:020 - 02:43:020 - Yeah.
- 02:46:395 (1) - Polarity thing.
- 02:51:020 (1,2,3) - Similar thing as before about the extended sliders.
- 03:34:770 (2) - Two circles would probably be more appropriate here since the downbeat should ideally be mapped to an active note.
- 03:48:770 (2) - Similar thing here.
- 03:52:770 (1,2,3) - This spacing may be a little confusing to play. It's probably fine though.
- 04:09:020 - Active note thing. Even though this is lower intensity it makes sense here since there's a new chord.
- 04:18:520 (1) - You could make this a 1/1 repeating slider instead of just one long slider. It'll still give the same low intensity feel to this section while also mapping the vocals pretty well.
- 05:03:020 - Active note thing.
- 05:22:270 (4) - Similar thing as before. You could make these two circles to map the piano better.

Beautiful song. Good luck.

Wow I'm lazy, sorry I took so long to reply

-Mo- wrote:

Blossoming Love
- 00:01:770 (3,1,2,3) - I'd imagine this rhythm would be confusing for people playing the map blind since there's a poor polarity switch here. Changed it so a repeating slider hits the blue tick.
- 00:04:020 (2,3) - Polarity issue here too, the random switch to blue ticks can be pretty jarring. Again used a repeating slider to deal witht he polarity switch
- 00:18:770 (5,6) - This one especially because it's right after a downbeat. Done
- 00:21:020 (3) - You should be starting NCs on the downbeats in my opinion since these have pretty significant guitar notes. Same applies for 00:23:020 (5) and 00:25:020 (4). It happens quite a few times and I'm too lazy to list every single one out, so I won't bother unless you want me to. Went through a big part of the map and fixed Nc, and I'll probably continue to fix it when I continue working on the map
- 00:33:020 (1,2,3) - I think there are better rhythm choices if you're following the vocals here. You miss a note on 00:33:770 and furthermore 00:34:020 should ideally be mapped with an active note for better emphasis. Instead of another 1/2 slider, I replaced the slider 00:33:645 - with a 1/4 slider, since I feel sit captures the song better, and I want and put a note on the active note part

Example

- 00:37:895 (5,1) - Poor polarity. Fixed
- 00:40:020 (1,2) - Keeping with a slider-circle rhythm would be better here since offbeat sliders can be a little unusual, plus having a repetitive rhythm to 00:39:020 (1,2,3) isn't a bad thing since the vocals follow a similar repetitive rhythm through these parts. Done
- 00:51:020 - This beat should ideally be mapped to an active note since it's a downbeat and is significant in the music. I had a lot of trouble with this part and here is why I ended up going with a 1/1 slider, even though there is a downbeat. I thought of having a 1/2 slider -> circle thing, but here's the catch, between 00:50:520 - 00:51:020 - everything stops, with the exception of the vocalist holding the note. So that's why I had trouble with this part. I can't put a not in the middle, there's nothing there to support a note, and I can't put a pause, since the vocals are pretty important. That,s why I opted for the 1/1 slider that would end on the downbeat. I prefer to follow that part over having an active note on the downbeat. I hope that was a good enough explanation for my reasoning here.
- 01:00:895 (1,2) - Polarity. There isn't even anything significant on the blue tick here in my opinion. Removed the note on blue tick
- 01:25:020 (1,2,3,4) - These are confusing to play since they appear shorter than 01:24:520 (4) which is a 1/2 slider, but these are extended 3/4 sliders and so the player releases these way too early anticipating them to be 1/2 or shorter. Switched the slider velocity so it's faster at the start and the it slows down, to make it easier for players
- 01:26:520 (4) - Instead of keeping it repetitive for four notes, you could map the red tick on 01:26:770 to follow the piano and add variety. Done
- 01:47:020 (2,3) - Polarity thing. Made these two into a slider
- 02:08:770 (5) - If you're prioritising the lyrics then you could remove this to follow the effect of the vocals silencing here. Alternatively you could make this a 1/4 slider to follow the guitar more accurately. Since vocals are the main thing I'm following for the song, I went with the removal
- 02:19:020 - Similar thing here, I think this would be better mapped to an active beat. Done
- 02:21:020 - And here. For here, it,s pretty much the same thing as the huge paragraph earlier, so I'll keep as is
- 02:25:770 (2,3,4,5) - The offbeat sliders here don't seem appropriate since the beats on the white ticks are more significant in the music than the red ticks. Done
- 02:31:895 (2) - Polarity thing. Fixed by replacing that note by a 1/4 slider starting on the red tick before it, since that also covers some piano as well as the vocals
- 02:35:020 - Active note thing. Done
- 02:37:020 - And again. Done
- 02:41:020 - 02:43:020 - Yeah. Done
- 02:46:395 (1) - Polarity thing. Not too sure about the fix here, since I replaced the double with a 1/4 slider but we'll see
- 02:51:020 (1,2,3) - Similar thing as before about the extended sliders. Done
- 03:34:770 (2) - Two circles would probably be more appropriate here since the downbeat should ideally be mapped to an active note. Done
- 03:48:770 (2) - Similar thing here.
- 03:52:770 (1,2,3) - This spacing may be a little confusing to play. It's probably fine though. I'll keep it as is, I like the overlays here, and I think there's enough time betweent he parts for the overlay to work even for a hard difficulty
- 04:09:020 - Active note thing. Even though this is lower intensity it makes sense here since there's a new chord. Fixed
- 04:18:520 (1) - You could make this a 1/1 repeating slider instead of just one long slider. It'll still give the same low intensity feel to this section while also mapping the vocals pretty well. I understand, but I kinda like having a long slider, and red anchors are mapped to the song, so I don't fell like a repeating slider is needed
- 05:03:020 - Active note thing. Done
- 05:22:270 (4) - Similar thing as before. You could make these two circles to map the piano better. Done

Beautiful song. Good luck.

Thanks a lot for this great mod, and thanks for all the polarity stuff, that's going to be useful for future maps. Also, with all the polarity switches in the map, I went through and fixed more changes that weren't noted here.

hiiiii!! just two small things~

04:05:770 - the (3)+(4) could be changed into a slider just for consistencyy
04:09:520 - might be easier to read as one slider or maybe even two since it's 1/3, seems kinda out of place for the map/difficulty ;~;

very cute song~!! good luck n_n

Reihara wrote:

hiiiii!! just two small things~

04:05:770 - the (3)+(4) could be changed into a slider just for consistencyy Done
04:09:520 - might be easier to read as one slider or maybe even two since it's 1/3, seems kinda out of place for the map/difficulty ;~; Made it into 2 sliders to make it easier

very cute song~!! good luck n_n

Thanks for the mod, every bit of help for this map is appreciated

Hi friend, m4m stuff

[General]

1. No combo colors?!?! Pick some out~
2. The places where you turn the first and last kiai on are just a bit before the kiai should actually turn on. I don't think kiai's not being on white ticks is unrankable (not positive) but why not just move the kiais over to the white tick?

[Blossoming Love]

1. 00:02:020 (4,1) - maybe blanket the 1 into the 4? the overlap 00:03:020 (5,1) here isn't pretty
2. 00:04:020 (2,3) - blanket these?
3. 00:06:020 (2,3) - move these to stack on the head of 00:05:020 (3) (which I am hoping you moved from the last point)
4. 00:07:020 (4,6) - overlap isn't good looking (since this is a long map I'm going to just point these out with a simple "overlap")
5. 00:17:020 (1,2,3) - maybe space all these out a big to get rid of overlaps
6. 00:18:520 (4,1) - stack these on the tail of 00:17:270 (2)
7. 00:19:020 (6,1) - overlap
8. 00:21:020 (1) - starting here I honestly don't really agree with the change in rhythm. The song is very slow so the use of 1/1 sliders is fitting with the guitar to keep it feeling very drawn out and melodic.. the current rhythm is more dense in the amount of notes, so in my opinion I woudl remap this section with the intent of using 1/1 sliders on the more powerful guitar sounds
9. 00:21:520 (3,6) - stack
10. 00:23:020 (1,2,3,4,5) - give these more space
11. I'm pretty lazy and I don't want to make a huge mod pointing out a bunch of tiny aesthetic changes. That's annoying for both of us. So let me just say now that any time I see something like this, it is my opinion that you should space them out to get rid of the tiny, unintended overlap. Like I said, I don't wanna point all of these out, so if you agree with my opinion on these overlaps than please go back through your map and try to get rid of as many of these are you can~
12. 00:32:020 (1,2,3,4) - I don't really agree with using kicksliders like this in such a slow map... I reccomend changing these to maybe repeat sliders or something that create the same effect but are less taxing on the player
13. 00:33:020 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the note density here is high compared to the rest of the verse where you use longer sliders on the lyrics. I reccomend changing this part to match those
14. 00:34:770 (7,2) - stack
15. 00:51:270 (2) - you could stack this on the tail of 00:51:520 (3) this if you wanted
16. 01:01:520 (2,3,4) - maybe rotate all this so the 4 stacks on the tail of the 1
17. 01:04:020 (2) - no nc, seeing as how you didn't nc 00:47:020 (1,2)
18. 01:08:020 (1,2,3) - there's not a triple here
19. 01:09:145 (1,1) - need to leave a tick of space between these spinners
20. 01:13:020 (1) - starting here the rhythms are pretty odd for the pacing of the song. Yeah I know it's the kiai and all, and the rhythms kinda harmonize with the song, but they're kinda mapped to nothing and are difficult to play for newer players. I reccomend remapping the first section of your kiai to make the rhythm simpler.
21. 01:16:270 (2,3,6,7) - these doubles really don't make sense to me either, so I would get rid of them for the sake of simplicity
22. 01:18:270 (6,7,1) - overlap
23. 01:21:020 (1,2) - move this to stack the tali of 1 onto the 01:20:020 (3)?
24. 01:33:020 (1,4) - overlap

Okay so the issues I pointed out leading up to and including the first kiai repeat throughout the rest of the map. I don't want to make the same comments over and over, so I'm going to stop here. However if you have any questions about specific things in your map, please pm me so I can clarify what I mean or offer further opinions! I don't want to give you all of this information and then leave you hanging out to dry when it's a lot to go over, so don't hesitate to ask!

Thanks for the mod, even though I took a long time before applying. I applied everything in the mod except for one thing I didn't change and one thing I went with an inbetween.

Logic Agent wrote:

Hi friend, m4m stuff

[*] 00:32:020 (1,2,3,4) - I don't really agree with using kicksliders like this in such a slow map... I reccomend changing these to maybe repeat sliders or something that create the same effect but are less taxing on the player I don't think kicksliders are a problem, plus it's not requiring a faster tap than the other parts of the song. Also, a repeating slider does not fit at all in the part where the kicksliders are.

01:16:270 (2,3,6,7) - these doubles really don't make sense to me either, so I would get rid of them for the sake of simplicity This I went with a compromise. I reduced the amount of doubles, ass well as fixed a few polarity issues, but I still kept a few in the first kiai and the last one. The reason is it's the best way to fit the song. Yes it is more complex to play double but it,s still playable and double fit the song way better. So I made a few easier, but I still kept some.

we did irc stuff

woo came from discord

01:34:770 (5,6,7) - 5 could be moved to make a perfect triangle

02:19:770 (4,1) - Would look nice if the end of 1 was blanketed with 4

02:28:895 (6) - Remove this circle, it makes the map flow better imo

03:31:395 (4) - Since you're following the lyrics at this part this should be extended

03:38:270 (5) - Awkward slider, weird to play

05:08:395 (4) - Another unnecessary circle

Juiceys wrote:

woo came from discord

01:34:770 (5,6,7) - 5 could be moved to make a perfect triangle Applied

02:19:770 (4,1) - Would look nice if the end of 1 was blanketed with 4 I'll keep as the way the parts after are mapped having the blanket here would look weird and not work well with the map

02:28:895 (6) - Remove this circle, it makes the map flow better imo I'll keep the circle, since having it removed would actually make flwo worse. Without it, you'd have a sudden and extreme decrease in spacing for no reason, and people would mistake the slider as having a 1/4 gap between them. Also the note is mapped to a subtle but present guitar sound, so it fits where it is

03:31:395 (4) - Since you're following the lyrics at this part this should be extended Even though the vocalist's note is indeed continuing, on 03:31:770 - is where there is a well defined note, and so where the slider should end. If I continued it, it wouldn't have anything to end on. I did the same thing here: 03:25:020 (1,1,1) -

03:38:270 (5) - Awkward slider, weird to play There are a bunch of sliders like this in the map, and this one isn't any different.

05:08:395 (4) - Another unnecessary circle There is a pretty important piano note there, so the circle here isn't unecessary

Thanks for the mod, every bit of modding helps a lot!

from my reverse m4m queue! t/304087/start=150
[Blossoming Love]
00:05:520 (4) - i think this is too close to 00:05:020 (3) and it looks ugly, change it as the rest (like this 00:03:020 (5,1) )
00:07:020 (4,7) - overlap
00:15:520 (2,3,4) - nc all
00:19:020 (6,1) - swap nc
00:36:520 you are ignoring a very important vocal here
00:38:020 (1) - remove nc, not needed here
00:39:020 (1,2) - swap nc
00:44:270 as before, you are ignoring a big vocal here
00:48:770 (1,2) - swap nc
01:04:020 (2) - nc this
01:13:020 (2) - nc this, the kiai always starts with new combo!!!
01:15:020 (7) - 01:15:020 (7,1) - swap nc
01:27:520 (2,3,4) - nc all
01:30:770 (6,2) - stack?
02:01:020 (1,2) - there are very strong vocals here compared to the rest of the map's vocals, increase the spacing between them
02:03:020 (3) - nc MUST
02:17:020 (5,1) - swap nc
02:18:520 (1,2) - ^^
02:20:520 (1,2) - ^^
02:22:520 (1,2) - ^^
02:26:020 (3,1) - bad overlap here
02:35:020 (7) - nc
02:52:020 (2) - nc??
02:53:520 (2,3,4) - nc all
03:07:020 (1,3) - bad overlap
03:30:520 (2) - nc
03:35:020 (3) - nc
03:36:270 (1,3) - swap nc
03:38:270 (5) - too close to 03:37:770 (4)
03:43:020 (4) - nc
03:44:770 (7) - nc, and if you can make it two circles cause the real nc starts here 03:45:020
03:46:520 (1,2) - swap nc
03:48:520 (1,2) - swap nc, and again, try make the sliders as two circles
03:52:770 (1,2) - swap nc
03:54:270 (5) - nc
04:11:020 (2,3,4,5) - nc all and increase the spacing, strong vocals
04:16:020 (4,1) - swap nc
04:17:020 (4) - nc
04:23:020 (5) - nc
04:28:520 (2) - nc
04:39:020 (4) - nc for consistency
04:43:520 (2,3,4) - nc all
04:59:520 (2,3,4) - ^^
05:01:020 (1,4) - bad overlap
05:09:020 (6,1) - swap nc
05:28:520 (1,2) - swap nc
05:30:520 (1,3) - ^^
05:18:520 (1,3) - swap nc
general
i like the map, but there are a lot of inconsistent nc's and i hope my mod helped you a bit.
gl! i will send you my map in a message

shitty mod post

Blossoming Love

01:31:020 (1) - I feel like this is very under mapped even for a hard diff. I suggest a slider on 01:31:020 (1) - a circle on 01:31:520 (1) - and another slider on 01:32:020. Would feel a lot smoother rather than just a simple slider.

02:01:020 (1,2) - and 02:03:020 (3,4) - should either be stacked together or moved farther apart due to rhythmical difference.

02:51:520 (1,2) - I feel like the "aa aa a a aa a a" sound should be emphasized like you did with 02:52:520 (1)

02:52:520 (1) - I feel like the "oh" sound on the end of the slider should be represented by a circle, rather than with a slider end.

03:52:770 (1,2,3,4,5) - all of this feels messy to me? maybe move 3,4,5 farther away from 1 and 2 a little so it doesn't feel cluttery?

good map! good luck on getting this ranked!

ohad1881 wrote:

from my reverse m4m queue! t/304087/start=150
[Blossoming Love]
00:05:520 (4) - i think this is too close to 00:05:020 (3) and it looks ugly, change it as the rest (like this 00:03:020 (5,1) ) done
00:07:020 (4,7) - overlap fixed
00:15:520 (2,3,4) - nc all I'll keep like it is right now, I don't think it needs to be all NC'ed and I prefer it when it's not
00:36:520 you are ignoring a very important vocal here Fixed
00:39:020 (1,2) - swap nc As it is right now the NC is on the downbeat so I'll keep
00:44:270 as before, you are ignoring a big vocal here Fixed
00:48:770 (1,2) - swap nc
01:04:020 (2) - nc this Why, a new combo isn't an indicator is downbeat, it's to start a new comb. This is in the same combo as the note right before, so why shoudl it be NC'ed? There is more to NCing than just oh downbeat, let's NC
01:15:020 (7) - 01:15:020 (7,1) - swap nc
01:27:520 (2,3,4) - nc all Once again I don't think I need to NC this and I won't for consistency
01:30:770 (6,2) - stack? Done
02:01:020 (1,2) - there are very strong vocals here compared to the rest of the map's vocals, increase the spacing between them For this part I was aiming to have the low spacing because of the 2 similar strong guitar notes, so I'll keep as is
02:03:020 (3) - nc MUST
02:26:020 (3,1) - bad overlap here Done
02:52:020 (2) - nc?? I removed NC to keep in consistency with it earlier
02:53:520 (2,3,4) - nc all ^^
03:07:020 (1,3) - bad overlap Fixed
03:35:020 (3) - nc I NC'ed 03:34:770 (1) - for the combo thing I talked about earlier
03:36:270 (1,3) - swap nc ^^
03:38:270 (5) - too close to 03:37:770 (4) Fixed
03:44:770 (7) - nc, and if you can make it two circles cause the real nc starts here 03:45:020 NC'ed but kept as slider
03:46:520 (1,2) - swap nc
03:48:520 (1,2) - swap nc, and again, try make the sliders as two circles
03:52:770 (1,2) - swap nc
Alright so the last four mods here kinda seem really mindless to me. NC is supposed to go on downbeats yes, but that's when the song actually follow that structure. here the vocals do not follow it, they are kinda all over the place, and so the NC doesn't necessarily go on every downbeat. Once again NC'ing takes more thought than just oh a downbeat, better NC, there are places where it is different, like when the song has a different structure
04:11:020 (2,3,4,5) - nc all and increase the spacing, strong vocals ^^ for NC, and there are no vocals here -_-
04:28:520 (2) - nc For all things like this in the map I didn't NC twice
04:43:520 (2,3,4) - nc all ^^
04:59:520 (2,3,4) - ^^ ^^
05:01:020 (1,4) - bad overlap Fixed
general
i like the map, but there are a lot of inconsistent nc's and i hope my mod helped you a bit.
gl! i will send you my map in a message

The NCs I applied were removed from the quote, because having a thousand green dones was dumb, so that's why it looks like I denied everything. What I applied was removed, don't worry. Thanks for the mod and helping with NC

osuskrub wrote:

shitty mod post

Blossoming Love

01:31:020 (1) - I feel like this is very under mapped even for a hard diff. I suggest a slider on 01:31:020 (1) - a circle on 01:31:520 (1) - and another slider on 01:32:020. Would feel a lot smoother rather than just a simple slider. Changed it like you proposed it

02:01:020 (1,2) - and 02:03:020 (3,4) - should either be stacked together or moved farther apart due to rhythmical difference. I stacked them more together

02:51:520 (1,2) - I feel like the "aa aa a a aa a a" sound should be emphasized like you did with 02:52:520 (1) Not sure what you mean, but I'll assume it's emphasizing by having the slider be squigly. I feel that this is already accomplished with the pattern as a whole. If my assumption was wrong and you meant something else message me and I'll change it

02:52:520 (1) - I feel like the "oh" sound on the end of the slider should be represented by a circle, rather than with a slider end. Changed to have a circle at the end

03:52:770 (1,2,3,4,5) - all of this feels messy to me? maybe move 3,4,5 farther away from 1 and 2 a little so it doesn't feel cluttery? Moved them more apart so that it was less overlapping

good map! good luck on getting this ranked! Thx bae

Thanks for the mod, really helps

hi~ w

[celerih's love for celery]

1. You should probably decide whether you want to put ncs on downbeats or the beats before because its different all throughout the map and it's really weird
2. 00:07:020 (4) - Also nc here
3. 01:16:395 (4) - have this end on the red tick to follow vocal
4. 01:17:645 (6,7,8,9) - This rhythm seems out of place compared to the song, maybe try something like this (or some variation of it)
5. 01:31:020 (7) - Another thing here, split up long combos like this, especially because it fits based on the song
6. 01:37:770 (2,3) - It would be more comfortable to play if these sliders were on downbeats, so maybe either remove the circle before or add one before
7. 01:41:270 (2,3) - ^
8. 01:42:520 (5) - Maybe make a 1/2 slider into a circle (i feel like that would fit with how you mapped the other parts)
9. 01:48:020 (4) - Here i feel like you could put a circle on the blue tick before or after, but not where it is now lol
10. 03:44:520 (3,1) - Ctrl G this rhythm
11. 03:48:520 (1,2) - ^
12. 04:40:520 (1,2,3,4,1) - This pattern that overlaps on itself doesn't really look that good, I think you should spread it out
13. 04:42:520 (1) - 1/2 slider and make the downbeat clickable?
14. 04:58:520 (1) - ^
    
    
    

well thats all from me
good luck!~

Look at you all grown up with your qualified map and your squiggles. Thanks for letting me know you had a queue so I could snipe a spot

Ultima Fox wrote:

hi~ w

[celerih's love for celery] YOU BET YOUR ASS I LOVE CELERY <3

1. You should probably decide whether you want to put ncs on downbeats or the beats before because its different all throughout the map and it's really weird I went back through the map and NC'ed correctly, I hate NC so much
2. 00:07:020 (4) - Also nc here Done
3. 01:16:395 (4) - have this end on the red tick to follow vocal This slipped through my checks, fixed
4. 01:17:645 (6,7,8,9) - This rhythm seems out of place compared to the song, maybe try something like this (or some variation of it) Done
5. 01:31:020 (7) - Another thing here, split up long combos like this, especially because it fits based on the song fixed
6. 01:37:770 (2,3) - It would be more comfortable to play if these sliders were on downbeats, so maybe either remove the circle before or add one before Fixed
7. 01:41:270 (2,3) - ^ ^
8. 01:42:520 (5) - Maybe make a 1/2 slider into a circle (i feel like that would fit with how you mapped the other parts) Problem is there is no notes from the vocals or guitar on 01:42:770 - as both are held notes here, so I'll keep it as is to follow the song
9. 01:48:020 (4) - Here i feel like you could put a circle on the blue tick before or after, but not where it is now lol I put a 1/4 slider on the blue tick, otherwise polarity becomes dumb
10. 03:44:520 (3,1) - Ctrl G this rhythm I did it ma, proud of me?
11. 03:48:520 (1,2) - ^ ^
12. 04:40:520 (1,2,3,4,1) - This pattern that overlaps on itself doesn't really look that good, I think you should spread it out Done
13. 04:42:520 (1) - 1/2 slider and make the downbeat clickable? Done
14. 04:58:520 (1) - ^ ^
    
    
    

well thats all from me
good luck!~

Thanks a lot for the mod fam~

Key
MUST FIX
Might be fine
Optional/Ideas



Sounds


Blankets



Placement


Sorry very short mod, map seems fine, gl getting ranked!

HI IM MODDER C:

CAPS MOD BECAUSE MEME, HOPE YOU'RE READY FOR SOME ENTHUSIASM (IM NOT YELLING I PROMISE)


TBH WHEN I WATCHED THIS ANIME I KINDA FELT BAD FOR THE MAIN HEROINE BUT ALSO LOW KEY HATED THE GUY FOR BEING A DICK

ANYWAY GOOD LUCK!

DakiniBrave wrote:

Key

Sounds

SPOILER

Maybe use inherited points to emphasis the slider ticks on this slider 04:18:520 (1) - I emphasized by separating the slider

Blankets

SPOILER

Maybe some blanketing on 00:08:270 (4,1) I did the blanket here - or 00:09:020 (1,2) - could be nice.

Placement

SPOILER

00:23:020 (1,2,3) - Looks a little awkward, might look better with even spacing Increased spacing
00:24:020 (4) - I dont hear any sound this is mapped to, i could be just deaf tho You're not deaf, there is indeed no sound there, fixed
01:17:520 - Completely ignored a very audible strum sound here, maybe add another note onto the end or extend the current slider made another slider to repalce the double I had and it the sound you mentioned
I feel like 03:54:270 (1) - might be better as just a straight slider, this is mostly just design and my opinion, keep it if you wish kept it as is since I like the shape of the slider right now

Sorry very short mod, map seems fine, gl getting ranked!

Thanks for the mod (:

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

HI IM MODDER C: HI I'M CELERY

CAPS MOD BECAUSE MEME, HOPE YOU'RE READY FOR SOME ENTHUSIASM (IM NOT YELLING I PROMISE) IT'S OKAY I'M HYPE TOO

BOX

I THINK THERE ARE PARTS OF THIS MAP THAT WOULD BE EASIER TO UNDERSTAND WITH A TOUCH OF HITSOUNDING, ILL PROVIDE EXAMPLES LATER IN THE MOD AT THE TIME OF YOUR MOD THERE WAS NO HITSOUNDING BUT NOW MO DID IT SO I WILL NOT BE REPLYING TO THOSE PARTS AS THEY NO LONGER APPLY

00:51:020 (1,2) - WHY UNDER EMPHASIZED? COMPARE TO 00:50:020 (3,4) - CUZ I'M DUMB, FIXED

01:08:020 (3,4) - ALSO ITS A LITTLE AESTHETICALLY CONFUSING TO HAVE STACK DISTANCES VARY FOR LITTLE EXPLANATION, COMPARE THIS TO 00:41:020 (1,2) - . FIXED, AND ALSO EMPHASIZED 01:09:020 (6) -

01:13:020 (1,2,3,4,5) - THIS DOESN'T FOLLOW THE SONGS RHYTHM, THIS IS CREATED RHYTHM. WITHOUT HITSOUNDING, THIS IS A BIT CONFUSING. THE VOCAL BEATS START ON 01:13:020 - 01:13:395 - 01:13:770 - 01:14:020 - 01:14:395 - 01:14:770 - , THESE TIMESTAMPS INDICATE WHERE THERE SHOULD BE A CLICK FUNCTION, DISREGARDING 01:13:520 - SINCE THERE IS A VERY NICE AND AUDIBLE STRUM HERE WHICH I APPRECIATE YOU CAPTURING WITH A CIRCLE. (THIS IS ASSUMING YOU'RE MAPPING VOCALS, OTHERWISE WHEN I DELETE THE ENTIRE MAP AND PLAY ON VARYING SPEEDS I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU'RE MAPPING TO HERE OTHER THAN VOCALS) I FIXED IT MUM, PROUD OF ME YET?

01:16:270 (3,4) - THE STACK THING AGAIN, COMPARE TO 01:18:020 (4,5) - PERSONALLY, I LIKE THE SPACING OF THINGS LIKE 01:23:020 (1,2) - BEST FIXED

01:34:770 (5) - THIS IS A PRETTY EMPHASIZED NOTE IN TERMS OF SPACING, CONSIDER NERFING IT BECAUSE MUSICALLY THIS DOES NOT DESERVE AS MUCH EMPHASIS AS IT'S RECEIVING. (3.37 IN COMPARISON TO 01:33:770 (3) - WHICH ONLY GETS 1.98, AND 01:33:770 (3) - IS EQUALLY EMPHASIZED AS 01:34:770 (5) - ) REDUCED SPACING IN ORDER TO BETTER EMPHASIZE THE CORRECT PARTS OF THE SONG

OH HEY LOOK YOU EVEN DID IT NICELY HERE 02:39:020 - , USE THIS AS AN EXAMPLE FOR FIRST KIAI BECAUSE THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE INSTANCE WHERE ITS NOT MAPPER RHYTHM AND FOLLOWS THE VOCALS NICELY THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU MAP SLOWLY, YOUR MAP GETS WAY BETTER AS IT GOES ALONG AND YOU FORGET TO REMAP THE START

03:05:520 (2) - CONSIDER SHORTENING TO HAVE A CIRCLE ON 03:06:020 - , THIS WOULD CAPTURE ALL OF THE SYLLABLES IN VOCAL HERE PROBLEM IS THERE IS NO GOOD PLACE TO END THE SLIDER AS THERE ARE NO SOUNDS BEFORE IT, SO IT FITS TO HAVE THE SLIDER END WHERE IT ENDS RIGHT NOW

03:39:020 - WHY DOES THIS SECTION HAVE LARGER JUMPS THAN 00:30:520 - THO, THESE SHOULD BE SEDATE IN COMPARISON REMAPPED IT AND MADE A NICER PATTERN CUZ THOSE SQUARES WERE EHHHHHH

04:18:520 (1) - DIVIDE INTO A SLIDER THAT ENDS ON 04:18:895 - SO YOU DONT AWKWARDLY CUT OFF THE ON BEAT OF 04:19:020 - , AND THEN YOU CAN DO YOUR SLIDER ART THING DIVIDING AT ONLY ONE PLACE WOULD BE WEIRD SINCE THERE ARE OTHER IMPORTANT PARTS LIKE 04:19:520 - AND 04:20:020 - SO I DIVIDED IT INTO 4. THIS ALSO WORKS WITH HOW I MAPPED OTHER SIMILAR PARTS OF THE MAP IN 4 SLIDERS

04:31:020 (1,2) - THIS STACK REAPPEARED AFTER LIKE 3 MINUTES, LOL, MOST OF THE MAP IS USING 04:36:520 (3,1) - THIS KIND OF STACK, YOU SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THESE PLZ FIXED

04:48:270 (4,5) - OR JUST DO REGULAR STACK LO FIXED

TBH WHEN I WATCHED THIS ANIME I KINDA FELT BAD FOR THE MAIN HEROINE BUT ALSO LOW KEY HATED THE GUY FOR BEING A DICK I DIDN'T WATCH THE ANIME I JUST REALLY LIKE THE SONG LO

ANYWAY GOOD LUCK! THANKS I'LL PROBABLY NEED IT

Ready for BNs? Let's see (:

Overall, the map has nice rhythm and hitsounding. The main two concerns I have are aesthetic (placement of notes and lack of nice sliders, because nice sliders are essential to any slower song), and incorrectly emphasized notes. So overall I think it needs a bit more work to it. Don't let this comment hinder your determination; if anything it should empower it. I wish you luck!

Hey, M4M as we agreed

03:06:767 (4) - Check aimod, this is unsnapped by like 2 ms
Your Kiais are pretty inconsistent, my suggestion would be kiai from 01:13:020 - to 01:27:020 - and then from 01:29:020 - to 01:43:020 - but whatever you do, make them consistent

uh i got a powercut when i was like 1 minute into the map but i'm gonna try to relist everything, might forget some, sorry


[Blossoming Love]

1. 00:05:520 (1) - NC error?
2. 00:06:020 (3,4) - Swap rhythm because right now you're skipping the piano 00:06:520 - here. It looks also pretty out of place to me right now since it's the only time you do it in the small intro
3. 00:11:520 - Add a note here, the guitar is pretty strong
4. 00:21:770 (3) - Turn this into a 1/4 to simulate a triple since there's a sound on each three ticks
5. 00:24:270 (5) - The reverse slider here doesn't work imo, the sound on the white tick is much louder than the other two and yet it's on the reverse arrow, try something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6392581 this. This way you get the strong sound clickable and the stack onto it gives it more impact
6. 00:27:020 (1) - Shorten this by a 1/4 tick and add a note to create a triple
7. 00:31:020 (1) - I feel like this needs more emphasis, the sound really stands out from the rest of the song, you could add a finish to emphasize it, works well imo
8. 00:50:520 (1) - I can see why you'd NC here but for the sake of consistency i'd remove it
9. 00:53:770 (3,1) - Pick one way of NCing between these and make them consistent
10. 00:59:520 (3,4,5) - Not a fan of the rhythm here, mainly because of the slider end 01:00:020 - here on the strong vocals. http://puu.sh/rSQLa/d47a0e1be6.jpg feels better
11. 01:09:020 (6) - NC here
12. 01:14:020 (1) - Remove NC here, for consistency
13. 01:17:020 (1) - This slidershape is a bit weird, not on it's own but i feel like it doesn't fit the rest of your map aesthetically wise, just a simple curve would be ok
14. 01:18:020 (3,4) - You should swap rhythm here to make it consistent with 01:17:020 (1,2) - because it's basically the same sound
15. 01:23:020 (5) - NC here, downbeat
16. 01:23:520 (6) - Awkward rhythm imo, not sure of what you're following here, try something like this http://puu.sh/rSRdH/24c1fe0fe1.jpg instead, fits vocals better
17. 01:29:770 (3,4) - Swap rhythm, the vocals are strong the white tick and it emphasizes them better
18. 01:31:520 (2,3,4) - ^ http://puu.sh/rSRC8/4daa7c80ef.jpg making it like this would also fit the piano sounds at 01:32:020 - and 01:32:520 - too
19. 01:42:520 (5) - Personal opinion, but i feel like http://puu.sh/rSRJQ/62ae74a18f.jpg doing this would emphasize the stop better
20. 01:51:395 - You could add a note here
21. 01:59:520 - Add a note here to avoid the unneccessary 3/4 gap between 01:59:020 (1,2) -
22. 02:06:770 (6,1) - Weird overlap, as in unfitting with the rest of the map imo, 02:07:020 (1) - try moving this towards down right
23. 02:09:020 (1,2) - Really not a fan of this rhythm, try http://puu.sh/rSS0Q/2516255e90.jpg instead, this is a lot more intuitive, you could also use it anywhere else in the map actually.
24. 02:11:020 (1) - ^ Why did you ignore the vocals on the blue tick? Same suggestion. Actually i recommend http://puu.sh/rSS9U/bfb5c7f94b.jpg for the whole measure
25. 02:23:895 (4) - Turn this into a 1/2 slider to avoid skipping the guitar sound 02:24:145 - here
26. 02:41:020 (1,2) - same as my suggestion on the first chorus, the polarity change is really unnecessary and makes you skip a sound on the white tick
27. 02:47:020 (1,2,3,4) - ^
28. 02:49:770 (3,4) - Swap rhythm to have the vocal hold 02:50:020 - here being the 1/2 slider
29. 02:52:520 (1) - Remove NC and put it 02:53:020 (2) - here instead for consistency with similar rhythms before
30. 03:05:020 (1) - Shorten this by a 1/4 tick and add a note. Triples emphasize the last note and it would be cool to emphasize the vocal hold 03:05:520 (3) -
31. 03:09:020 (6) - NC here
32. 03:31:020 (2,3) - For a slow part i'd suggest a passive rhythm http://puu.sh/rSSL7/a0f0076383.jpg to fit the song's atmosphere better
    
    For the whole slow part i'd recommend using this passive rhythm
    And same for the slow part 04:29:020 - here
    
33. 04:45:645 (2,3) - This is the only double with two circles through the whole map if i'm not mistaken, use this http://puu.sh/rSTbZ/1da3f1a966.jpg instead
34. 05:05:770 (2,3) - Swap rhythm here

Welp i guess that's it, sorry i'm pretty uncomfortable modding lower diffs and bpm but i hope it helped, be careful and try to find any inconsistencies in your map since i probably missed some myself

Have a star for this awesome song