impressionism
-00:11:852 (4,1) - spacing is kinda too low for such strong sound imo
-00:33:670 (4,1) - slider ends almost touch eachother, i'd recommend you to increase spacing between slider ends a little bit
-00:32:648 (1,2,3,4) - youre missing 1/3 sounds there since you used 1/2 sliders, i recommend you to make first one a slider and rest 2/3 sliders, like this
-00:37:250 - 00:37:932 - you can add a notes here for vocals if you want, seems better to me
-there are sounds at 00:44:125 - 00:44:466 - and 00:44:807 - , i would recommend you to map them
-00:41:511 (2,1) - maybe increase the spacing a little bit so they arent too close to eachother, they almost touch
-00:43:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - i know you used low spacing at 00:44:807 (7,1) - because the pitch gets lower, but i recommend you to use same spacing on all these three doubles because you did same on 00:38:670 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - AND sound at 00:44:920 - is quite strong to be used such low spacing i m o
-01:13:557 (1,3) - i personally dont like this overlap so i wonder if you could do something else, tho i guess its ok if you want to keep it
-01:19:864 (4,1) - why this spacing, you did same on 01:14:239 (3,1) - but its 1/4 vs 1/2, i recommend you to change it to 1/4 so its consistent with 01:30:773 (3,1) -
hard
-00:22:420 (3,4) - is this spacing intended? you used consistent throughout that section but that one
-00:36:398 (3,1) - i wouldnt recommend you to decrease spacing here as i think 00:36:739 - is quite strong and you were using similar ds throughout the section
-01:08:784 (3,1) - they r too close tbh try to space them a little so they dont almost touch eachother
gl
-00:11:852 (4,1) - spacing is kinda too low for such strong sound imo
-00:33:670 (4,1) - slider ends almost touch eachother, i'd recommend you to increase spacing between slider ends a little bit
-00:32:648 (1,2,3,4) - youre missing 1/3 sounds there since you used 1/2 sliders, i recommend you to make first one a slider and rest 2/3 sliders, like this
-00:37:250 - 00:37:932 - you can add a notes here for vocals if you want, seems better to me
-there are sounds at 00:44:125 - 00:44:466 - and 00:44:807 - , i would recommend you to map them
-00:41:511 (2,1) - maybe increase the spacing a little bit so they arent too close to eachother, they almost touch
-00:43:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - i know you used low spacing at 00:44:807 (7,1) - because the pitch gets lower, but i recommend you to use same spacing on all these three doubles because you did same on 00:38:670 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - AND sound at 00:44:920 - is quite strong to be used such low spacing i m o
-01:13:557 (1,3) - i personally dont like this overlap so i wonder if you could do something else, tho i guess its ok if you want to keep it
-01:19:864 (4,1) - why this spacing, you did same on 01:14:239 (3,1) - but its 1/4 vs 1/2, i recommend you to change it to 1/4 so its consistent with 01:30:773 (3,1) -
hard
-00:22:420 (3,4) - is this spacing intended? you used consistent throughout that section but that one
-00:36:398 (3,1) - i wouldnt recommend you to decrease spacing here as i think 00:36:739 - is quite strong and you were using similar ds throughout the section
-01:08:784 (3,1) - they r too close tbh try to space them a little so they dont almost touch eachother
gl