Hanatan - Sekai wa Koi ni Ochiteiru

posted
Total Posts
50
show more
Kawashiro
18:07 UnLock-: 00:11:204 (3,1) - 스택하면 안됨?????
18:08 Cellina: 안됨
18:08 Cellina: 애초에 블랭킷 노리고 만들었는데
18:08 Cellina: zz
18:08 UnLock-: 그냥 3번 슬라를 돌돌 꼬아버리는게 나을듯
18:08 UnLock-: 박자간격이 너무 멀어서 블랭킷 해도 득볼게 없다고 봄
18:09 Cellina: 그정도도 리딩을 못할거라고 생각하진 않는데
18:09 Cellina: 놔두고싶음 일단
18:09 Cellina: 저걸로 하트모양을 만드는게 아닌 이상
18:09 Cellina: ㅋ
18:10 UnLock-: 남자답게
18:10 UnLock-: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6035946 어떰
18:10 Cellina: 별로
18:11 UnLock-: 00:32:435 (1,2) - 이런거 좋아함?
18:11 Cellina: 그거 이미 지적을 받았는데
18:11 Cellina: 바꿔야겠네
18:11 UnLock-: 00:52:743 (1,2,3,4,1) - 이 흐름을 타고 가다가
18:12 UnLock-: 00:55:051 (2,3) - 갑자기 이런 스택으로 끊는건 좀 안어울린다고 봄
18:12 UnLock-: 차라리 00:54:589 (1,2,3) - 이 셋을 Ctrl G 한다면 스택도 어울릴지도 모름
18:12 Cellina: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6035951
18:12 Cellina: 이런건
18:13 UnLock-: 좋아함
18:15 UnLock-: 01:03:127 (4,1) -
18:15 UnLock-: 뉴콤 왜이럼
18:15 UnLock-: 아무리 다운비트가 좋다고 해도 노래에 맞춰서 조금은 뉴콤박자 바꿀수도 있지 않음?
18:16 Cellina: 음
18:16 Cellina: ㅇㅋ
18:17 UnLock-: 01:34:974 (8,1) - 1번이 약해지는 부분인데 클릭으로 둔다는건 맘에 안듬
18:17 UnLock-: 8번 노트를 1/2 슬라로 하면 어떰?
18:18 Cellina: 그래도
18:18 Cellina: 1번에서 보컬이 좀 더 강조를 하기도 했고
18:19 Cellina: 한 파트의 마지막 음인데 1/2로 클릭을 안주기는 싫음
18:19 UnLock-: 그래도 뒤에 스피너도 달린 노트라
18:19 UnLock-: 생각보다 강하게 치게 되는데
18:19 UnLock-: 어떻게 선처 안됨?
18:19 UnLock-: 1/2로 바꿔도 보컬 강조는 스피너가 해줄거라고 생각됨
18:19 Cellina: 안됨
18:20 Cellina: 애초에 스피너는
18:20 Cellina: 피아노? 소리 점점 커지는걸 표현한건데
18:20 Cellina: 완전 다르지
18:20 UnLock-: 그 피아노소리가 '지' 부터 시작하잖음
18:21 Cellina: 그렇긴한데 어차피 거기선 거의 안들리는 수준이고
18:21 Cellina: 스피너 돌릴때쯤이야 들리기 시작하니
18:23 UnLock-: 04:05:435 (2,1) - 이 사이에 소리 안들림?????
18:23 Cellina: 내가 착각한게 아니였네
18:23 Cellina: ㅋㅋ
18:23 UnLock-: 넣으셈
18:23 Cellina: 근데 이어폰을 못끼는상황인데
18:23 UnLock-: 04:06:012 - 여기서부터 04:06:358 - 여기까지 슬라 박자
18:24 Cellina: 근데
18:24 Cellina: 04:05:435 (2,1) - 여기서는 안들리고
18:24 Cellina: 04:05:435 (2,1) -
18:24 Cellina: 04:05:320 -
18:24 Cellina: 여기서는 안들리고
18:24 Cellina: 04:05:551 - 여기서 들리는데?
18:25 UnLock-: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6035986
18:25 UnLock-: 이게 맞는박자같음
18:25 UnLock-: 35만원짜리 똥헤드폰이 인증함
18:26 Cellina: https://puu.sh/r2P9q/4455ad42ab.png
18:26 Cellina: 이거같은데
18:27 Cellina: 애초에 피아노소리 따라간거였고
18:27 UnLock-: 아 그게 맞음
18:27 UnLock-: 그리고 04:06:358 - 여기도 소리 있음
18:27 UnLock-: 이런 똥헤드폰
18:28 UnLock-: 358이 아니라 243
18:28 UnLock-: 잘못 복사함
18:28 Cellina: 허허
18:28 Cellina: 리듬 어케짜야하지
18:28 Cellina: 일단 노트만 놔둠
18:28 UnLock-: 님이 한게 맞음
18:29 UnLock-: 243에도 노트 하나 박으면 완벽
18:29 UnLock-: 그리고 마지막으로 하나 잡자면
18:29 UnLock-: 00:13:974 (1,2,3,4) - 여기는 왜 박고
18:29 UnLock-: 04:21:358 - 여기는 왜 안박음???
18:29 UnLock-: 이 반대면 뭔가 인정해줄만 한데
18:29 UnLock-: 지금은 좀 이상함
18:29 Cellina: ㅇㅋ
18:30 UnLock-: 솔직히 어떻게 사람이
18:30 UnLock-: 5분짜리를 정성스럽게 봐줌
18:30 UnLock-: 그만함 ㅅㄱ

스섹
Reillia
콤보컬러 셋팅 ㄱㄱ
00:12:127 (1) - 모양 요로케 해보는건 오똘까요
00:56:435 (1) - 중간에 점있고없고 차이가 업는거 같아요..
01:11:204 (1,2) - 블랭킷 ㅅㄱ
01:20:435 (1,2) - 서클로 처리하는건 오똘까요 님..
01:34:512 (4,5,6,7,8) - 요로케 리버스슬라 하나 끼우는것도 좋아보여욤..
01:51:127 (1,2,3,4,5) - 스페이싱이 너무 크다고 생각했어욤..
02:42:127 (3,1) - 스택을 해보는게 어떨까욤
02:49:051 (1) - 여기에 힘을 실어주기위해 02:48:127 (1,2) - 이거 디스턴스 줄여보는건 어떨까욤
02:50:897 (1,2) - 블랭킷...넵
02:58:281 (1) - 각진 슬라는 안어울린다고 생각했는데 s자로 해보는건 어떨까욤
04:05:666 (3,4) - 이거 거리조금 별려보는건 어떨까요 스택은 어울리지 않는다고 생각했음
04:43:051 (1) - 뉴콤 넣어보는건 어떨까욤
04:50:897 (7) - ^
Topic Starter
Cellina

[C u r i] wrote:

콤보컬러 셋팅 ㄱㄱ
00:12:127 (1) - 모양 요로케 해보는건 오똘까요
지금도 괜찮은거같아요 ㅎ
00:56:435 (1) - 중간에 점있고없고 차이가 업는거 같아요..
01:11:204 (1,2) - 블랭킷 ㅅㄱ
01:20:435 (1,2) - 서클로 처리하는건 오똘까요 님.. 마지막 패턴만 강조하기 위해서 그 전부분은 슬라로...
01:34:512 (4,5,6,7,8) - 요로케 리버스슬라 하나 끼우는것도 좋아보여욤..
01:51:127 (1,2,3,4,5) - 스페이싱이 너무 크다고 생각했어욤.. 그다지...
02:42:127 (3,1) - 스택을 해보는게 어떨까욤 블랭킷
02:49:051 (1) - 여기에 힘을 실어주기위해 02:48:127 (1,2) - 이거 디스턴스 줄여보는건 어떨까욤 패턴때문에...
02:50:897 (1,2) - 블랭킷...넵
02:58:281 (1) - 각진 슬라는 안어울린다고 생각했는데 s자로 해보는건 어떨까욤 너무 슬라이더 돌려쓰기하는거같아서 좀 다른모양좀 써봄
04:05:666 (3,4) - 이거 거리조금 별려보는건 어떨까요 스택은 어울리지 않는다고 생각했음
04:43:051 (1) - 뉴콤 넣어보는건 어떨까욤
04:50:897 (7) - ^ ㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴ
sahuang
안녕~~I'm Korean BN :o

My map for mod: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/505415

[General]
  1. Combo colours are not set.
  2. While ar8.2 is fine, i think 8 is more suitable for this 130bpm song.
    The timing is incorrect, you probably need someone good at timing to check for you.
    e.g.
    03:46:743 (5) - drum appears slightly before the note;03:49:974 (1) - etc same.
    03:50:435 (2) - the snap is also weird here,there's no sound 03:50:589 - at all.
[Falling in Love]
  1. 00:29:089 - why ignore the drum here?Keep it consistent with 00:21:358 (1,2) - .
  2. 00:29:435 (2,1) - Should be snapped to 1/6.
  3. 00:30:589 (1,2) - 00:31:166 (3,4) - 00:34:743 (2,3) - the stack for 1/4 spacing is really hard to hit. For 00:30:589 (1,2,3,4) - ,I would suggest follow drum cuz 00:31:051 - is too strong to be ignored.For 00:34:743 (2,3) - imo you should do like 01:08:435 (3,4) - and use a small overlap,which is easier to read and hit.
  4. 00:37:974 (1,2) - 00:38:551 (3,4) -same as above,the drum is ignored but when playing this part ppl tend to hit according to drum sound.It is really confusing.
  5. 01:42:820 (2,3,4) - the beat here is weak compared to normal triples,use a reverse slider instead.
  6. 01:49:974 (1,2,3) - snap here is wrong. I see you try to follow piano sound 01:49:974 (1) - but 01:50:781 (2,3) - truned to drums. And there's no piano sound 01:50:897 - ,it's a little bit later than this.So for this part you'd better follow drums, this will work better. http://puu.sh/r9CBE/3f0fdd0819.jpg
  7. 01:51:820 (1,2) - use a bit overlap as 01:53:666 (1,2) -
  8. 01:59:204 (1,2) - ^
  9. 02:52:743 (1) - break it into 1/2 slider+a circle.No reason should you ignore 02:52:974 -

The biggest issue is no doubt the part from 03:38:435 - to 03:53:666 - .Offeset seems pretty bad to me,I doubt whether timing is correct. Also many notes are wrongly snapped in this part. Please pay attention to this and use the correct timing.

Since SP is not even 12 and there're some unrankable issues, i can't do anything atm, good luck :)
Topic Starter
Cellina

sahuang wrote:

안녕~~I'm Korean BN :o

My map for mod: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/505415

[General]
  1. Combo colours are not set.
  2. While ar8.2 is fine, i think 8 is more suitable for this 130bpm song.
    The timing is incorrect, you probably need someone good at timing to check for you.
    e.g.
    03:46:743 (5) - drum appears slightly before the note;03:49:974 (1) - etc same.
    03:50:435 (2) - the snap is also weird here,there's no sound 03:50:589 - at all.
[Falling in Love]
  1. 00:29:089 - why ignore the drum here?Keep it consistent with 00:21:358 (1,2) - .
  2. 00:29:435 (2,1) - Should be snapped to 1/6. Well I don't really think so... I will get some more opinions
  3. 00:30:589 (1,2) - 00:31:166 (3,4) - 00:34:743 (2,3) - the stack for 1/4 spacing is really hard to hit. For 00:30:589 (1,2,3,4) - ,I would suggest follow drum cuz 00:31:051 - is too strong to be ignored.For 00:34:743 (2,3) - imo you should do like 01:08:435 (3,4) - and use a small overlap,which is easier to read and hit. I fixed those weird stacks as overlaps, but I disagree about following drums. I really wanted to follow all instruments as much as possible, and the drum sound you pointed out has no enough volumes to map those entire sections as drums.
  4. 00:37:974 (1,2) - 00:38:551 (3,4) -same as above,the drum is ignored but when playing this part ppl tend to hit according to drum sound.It is really confusing.
  5. 01:42:820 (2,3,4) - the beat here is weak compared to normal triples,use a reverse slider instead. imo, it has enough sounds to use a normal triples.
  6. 01:49:974 (1,2,3) - snap here is wrong. I see you try to follow piano sound 01:49:974 (1) - but 01:50:781 (2,3) - truned to drums. And there's no piano sound 01:50:897 - ,it's a little bit later than this.So for this part you'd better follow drums, this will work better. http://puu.sh/r9CBE/3f0fdd0819.jpg I tried to follow all instruments (includes vocal) in this song. I couldn't hear drum beat until 01:50:651 - , and when the drum sounds appeared I followed them instead of piano since it has louder volumes.
  7. 01:51:820 (1,2) - use a bit overlap as 01:53:666 (1,2) -
  8. 01:59:204 (1,2) - ^
  9. 02:52:743 (1) - break it into 1/2 slider+a circle.No reason should you ignore 02:52:974 -

The biggest issue is no doubt the part from 03:38:435 - to 03:53:666 - .Offeset seems pretty bad to me,I doubt whether timing is correct. Also many notes are wrongly snapped in this part. Please pay attention to this and use the correct timing.

Since SP is not even 12 and there're some unrankable issues, i can't do anything atm, good luck :)
Chaoslitz fixed offset for me, and I hope you understand the basic concept of this map.
Thanks!
Abelia
[Falling in Love]

00:22:036 (3,4,5) - 연타 진행 방향이랑 숏슬라 방향이랑 너무 엇갈려서 이상해보여요. 이렇게 쓰는 사람이 많은 걸 보면 취향차이일지도 모르겠는데. http://puu.sh/rlkAG/ab17d9bc59.jpg 요런 모양도 괜찮지 않을까요?
01:17:651 (3,4,5) - ^
00:31:151 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/rlkox/1a65a7334a.jpg 이렇게 해야될듯?
00:38:536 (3,4) - ^
01:28:382 (3) - 이 아이는 1/2로 바꾸는 건 어떨까요? 저긴 꽉꽉 채워도 좋을 것 같아 보여요.
01:28:959 - 여기 이렇게 http://puu.sh/rlkJs/da9af321ea.jpg 채워넣으면 촥촥 감길텐데 아쉽네요...
02:08:420 (1,2) - 블랭킷 더 잘 할 수 있을 것 같아요.
03:07:497 (1) - 너무 벌어져서 모양이 엉성해보여요.





제가 드럼충이라서 음 따라서 찍은 패턴에 거부감이 있는듯...

랭크되길 바랍니다!! :):)
Topic Starter
Cellina

Moly wrote:

[Falling in Love]

00:22:036 (3,4,5) - 연타 진행 방향이랑 숏슬라 방향이랑 너무 엇갈려서 이상해보여요. 이렇게 쓰는 사람이 많은 걸 보면 취향차이일지도 모르겠는데. http://puu.sh/rlkAG/ab17d9bc59.jpg 요런 모양도 괜찮지 않을까요? 딱히 문제는 없는거같아요
01:17:651 (3,4,5) - ^ ^
00:31:151 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/rlkox/1a65a7334a.jpg 이렇게 해야될듯? 보컬을 따라간건데.. 지금 리듬이 맞는거같네요
00:38:536 (3,4) - ^ ^
01:28:382 (3) - 이 아이는 1/2로 바꾸는 건 어떨까요? 저긴 꽉꽉 채워도 좋을 것 같아 보여요. 기타음 따라간거에요
01:28:959 - 여기 이렇게 http://puu.sh/rlkJs/da9af321ea.jpg 채워넣으면 촥촥 감길텐데 아쉽네요... 냅둘께요
02:08:420 (1,2) - 블랭킷 더 잘 할 수 있을 것 같아요.
03:07:497 (1) - 너무 벌어져서 모양이 엉성해보여요.





제가 드럼충이라서 음 따라서 찍은 패턴에 거부감이 있는듯...

랭크되길 바랍니다!! :):)
Lami
00:31:151 (3) - 이거 보컬인가요? 드럼이라고 하기도 좀 그런게 00:31:036 (3) - 는 빠져있어서..
뭔가 좀 빠진느낌이드는데 보컬이면 빨간리듬에 리듬넣고 드럼이면 흰틱에 넣는게 좋을듯하네요
보컬은 빨간리듬에서 끝나는거같은데 흠
00:56:420 (1,2) - 블랭킷 좀 많이 off
01:02:882 (3,4,5,6) - 배치 일직선으로 하는게 나을듯
01:12:112 (1) - 뉴콤 제거
02:31:497 (1) - ^
04:27:805 (1) - ^
02:24:459 (4) - 드럼힛사 miss
02:53:305 (4,5) - 스트림 간격 miss
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - 같은 뉴콤에 리듬은 막 다른게 나오는데 하다못해 간격이라도
04:50:882 (7) - 같은부분 앞에서 뉴콤넣었으면 여기도 넣어야할꺼같네요
05:06:689 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 노래상 드럼이 1/4에 스냅되어있지 않은거같은데요..?
만약 피아노에 맞추신거면 힛사도 1/4에 제대로 되있지않은 드럼보단 피아노에 맞춰서 가야할꺼같은데..

ㅇㅇ
Kibbleru
d

04:06:228 (4) - sounds like it should be on the 1/8th 04:06:286 -
04:52:728 (1,4) - overlap doesnt look nice here
04:58:843 (4) - i'd prefer something like this
00:30:920 (2,3) - this would be more comfortable to play
as well as the other one similar to this ^
01:59:536 (2,3) - same
02:54:574 (1) - i think these look better if the head and tail didnt touch :d
03:25:728 - why skip this? i thought you like to focus on instrumentals
03:33:112 - ^
03:45:343 (2,3) - why not just extend these by 1 repeat
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - although vague, i think this part should be snapped something like this
01:12:112 (1) - 02:31:497 (1) - 04:27:805 (1) - what are these NC for?..
Topic Starter
Cellina

Lami wrote:

00:31:151 (3) - 이거 보컬인가요? 드럼이라고 하기도 좀 그런게 00:31:036 (3) - 는 빠져있어서..
뭔가 좀 빠진느낌이드는데 보컬이면 빨간리듬에 리듬넣고 드럼이면 흰틱에 넣는게 좋을듯하네요
보컬은 빨간리듬에서 끝나는거같은데 흠
00:56:420 (1,2) - 블랭킷 좀 많이 off 제눈에는 완벽한거같은데
01:02:882 (3,4,5,6) - 배치 일직선으로 하는게 나을듯
01:12:112 (1) - 뉴콤 제거
02:31:497 (1) - ^
04:27:805 (1) - ^
02:24:459 (4) - 드럼힛사 miss
02:53:305 (4,5) - 스트림 간격 miss
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - 같은 뉴콤에 리듬은 막 다른게 나오는데 하다못해 간격이라도
04:50:882 (7) - 같은부분 앞에서 뉴콤넣었으면 여기도 넣어야할꺼같네요 여기는 모딩받고 뺀부분이여서 일단 놔둘께요
05:06:689 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 노래상 드럼이 1/4에 스냅되어있지 않은거같은데요..?
만약 피아노에 맞추신거면 힛사도 1/4에 제대로 되있지않은 드럼보단 피아노에 맞춰서 가야할꺼같은데.. 저는 괜찮은거같은데

ㅇㅇ

Kibbleru wrote:

d

04:06:228 (4) - sounds like it should be on the 1/8th 04:06:286 -
04:52:728 (1,4) - overlap doesnt look nice here
04:58:843 (4) - i'd prefer something like this
00:30:920 (2,3) - this would be more comfortable to play
I actually like current rhythm so i will keep them
as well as the other one similar to this ^
01:59:536 (2,3) - same
02:54:574 (1) - i think these look better if the head and tail didnt touch :d
03:25:728 - why skip this? i thought you like to focus on instrumentals
03:33:112 - ^
03:45:343 (2,3) - why not just extend these by 1 repeat
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - although vague, i think this part should be snapped something like this
01:12:112 (1) - 02:31:497 (1) - 04:27:805 (1) - what are these NC for?..
Kibbleru
can you reply to my mod properly? i would like to see some reasons for whatever u didn't fix.

get somebody to translate if u need

also i think you should set some combo colours
Topic Starter
Cellina

Kibbleru wrote:

can you reply to my mod properly? i would like to see some reasons for whatever u didn't fix.

get somebody to translate if u need

also i think you should set some combo colours
I fixed evrything from your mod except that rhythm thingy cuz imo those rhythms are suitable for both vocal and instruments. And I thought I set combo colours... I'm unable to check right now, so I will look at it later

+ added combo colours
Kibbleru
.
Topic Starter
Cellina

Kibbleru wrote:

.
thx~
Kibbleru
rebubble
Beomsan
he y
Topic Starter
Cellina

Beomsan wrote:

he y
wh y
Seijiro
#modreqs

02:09:112 (2) - maybe a ctrl + g?
02:33:805 (5,6,7) - I fee like this triplet should be different than 02:33:343 (2,3,4) - , so maybe unstack it?
I'd make 03:09:343 - 03:24:112 - this section with a lower SV in general, since it's really really quiet in comparison to the rest
03:44:420 (1) - (nazi) second curve can be done better, like this
03:45:805 (3) - either add a repeat on it, or reduce spacing between 03:45:343 (2,3) - , since the spacing between 03:45:805 (3,1) - is misleading right now (as a player I'll think it's still a 1/4 snap)
03:52:036 (2,4) - I'd really reduce the jumps on them, since they are really soft and background sounds here, so it's a bit strange to have such big spacing on them
04:30:112 (3) - idk, it feels a bit misleading having it like that, since it looks like a generic 1/4 jump. Try something like this or similar

poke me
Topic Starter
Cellina

MrSergio wrote:

#modreqs

02:09:112 (2) - maybe a ctrl + g?
02:33:805 (5,6,7) - I fee like this triplet should be different than 02:33:343 (2,3,4) - , so maybe unstack it? replaced them as a 1/4 slider
I'd make 03:09:343 - 03:24:112 - this section with a lower SV in general, since it's really really quiet in comparison to the rest well I disagree with it, cuz imo there are enough sounds if it's compared with 02:54:574 - (or even higher), and there are no much difference to use a different sv, so I will leave it.
03:44:420 (1) - (nazi) second curve can be done better, like this
03:45:805 (3) - either add a repeat on it, or reduce spacing between 03:45:343 (2,3) - , since the spacing between 03:45:805 (3,1) - is misleading right now (as a player I'll think it's still a 1/4 snap) added a 1/4
03:52:036 (2,4) - I'd really reduce the jumps on them, since they are really soft and background sounds here, so it's a bit strange to have such big spacing on them not really, i think guitar sounds can make a emphasis for those notes
04:30:112 (3) - idk, it feels a bit misleading having it like that, since it looks like a generic 1/4 jump. Try something like this or similar

poke me
no comment = fixed xD
Seijiro
bul bul #2
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply