grvaity blsat!!!!
Ok good luck ranking grabity vrast! I really had a fun time playing rgavity lbast and I hope that graivyt balts getsranked loved ranked in the future
EDIT: we did some fixes over pm
mod
I didn't mod the higher diffs but I played them and they're fun all
wft 180.033
00:01:065 - i see that the timing matches the voice here, but the start of it sample itself is such an abrupt sound that I think the first LN might feel more natural at 00:00:982 -
00:02:315 - to 00:31:643 - the LNs are all placed randomly and unevenly you can do better than that
01:55:710 - I think these are timed wrong. for example, doesn't the sound for 01:55:988 (115988|2) - start at least by 01:55:960 - ? some of the others seem late as well
01:56:960 - to 01:57:960 - BEEP BEEP MISSNAP ALERT! check consistency between difficulties, but I think it should all be 1/3 (including the note at 01:57:793 - in every diff but extra)
Normal
what's up with your lane distribution?? the first lane is so empty it looks like 5+1k but it's not actually used for a special purpose
02:19:623 - wtf the pitch here matches this pattern perfectly http://puu.sh/sVWau.jpg but you didn't use it??
02:32:287 (152287|3,152620|3) - are these necessary? I don't feel like they fit. but you also emphasized those beats on the other diffs too so maybe we're hearing the song differently . also notice how 02:32:176 (152176|2,152287|3,152509|2,152620|3,152843|2,152954|3,153176|2,153287|3) - looks like it's one coherent pattern, which is misleading because it covers two different sections and is inconsistent with 02:31:843 (151843|1) -
Hard
http://puu.sh/sVWEz.jpg I hereby dub this pattern "beehive." I don't like beehives very much (both in osu and irl) cus they tend to be rhythmically irregular for the individual hands and/or full of bees, but I'm only bringing it up cus you're a friend. (Don't change it, my opinions aren't very popular.) It looks pretty cool in any case
here's a suggestion, if you make 00:25:644 (25644|1,25727|2,25810|4,25894|3,25977|1,26060|2) - go outward and 00:26:144 (26144|3,26227|4) - go inward then you'll preserve the pitch-based structure of 00:25:977 (25977|1,26060|2,26144|3,26227|4) - by separating it into groups of two notes rather than sticking them together into a staircase.
00:30:976 - same
00:33:309 - do a jack like Normal (yes this is a command not a suggestion)
00:55:805 (55805|2,55805|5,55888|3,56055|4,56055|1,56138|2) - these gallops are inconsistent; the doubles are usually on the second beat (not the first)
01:00:387 - missing note?
01:00:971 (60971|2) - maybe move this to the right hand? to preserve the back-and-forth pattern and finish it with a strong chord. two notes on one hand feel stronger than one note on each hand
01:01:137 (61137|4,61220|3,61220|0) - also a thing I noticed, all of the two-beat sequences in this difficulties have double that are split up between hands. Why is that? It's cool as a thematic element but to me it seems less intuitive (I think it's because it plays like two separate patterns, one in each hand, though it's really just one thing in the music, while the other option (both notes of the double being on one hand, preceded by a single in the opposite hand) is more cohesive) and there are places in the music where it would be useful to have the emphasis from having a double with both notes on the same hand. At this point I've clearly gone too deep into theoretical expressive patterning (you can tell because of the nested parentheses) so I should probably stop
jk not stopping, another thing I noticed is that you avoid creating bars (doubles with notes on consecutive lanes), which I applaud because it's super aesthetic, but you didn't do it consistently (00:12:979 - 00:50:139 - 01:48:628 - 01:52:128 - 02:22:289 - 02:30:454 - 02:32:287 - 02:32:620 - 02:35:620 - ). You also tend to avoid [13] and [46] chords (the only non-bar one-handed doubles) but not as much. and more importantly, for 6K at this density, avoiding bars might actually limit your patterning in non-insignificant ways AND make your map feel overly homogeneous. Well, from my point of view, anyway. I might just be spewing garbage. It's related to the gallops because the option you kept taking for gallops is much more conducive to avoiding bars! I suggest using bars in a more purposeful manner (rather than just letting them slip through every now and then) to emphasize strong beats and create structure. It could be a way to make the section at 02:19:623 - look different from the sections before and after it, or to recognize the breakdowns at 01:00:971 - and 01:48:962 -, or to represent crashes etc
At this point I'm afraid I'm just telling you how I map instead of giving impartial suggestions so I really am going to stop
01:04:970 - to 01:06:303 - why go from a harder pattern to an easier pattern in this breakdown?
01:18:134 (78134|0,78301|1,78634|0,78801|1,79300|0,79467|1,79967|0,80134|1,80467|0,80634|1,80967|0,81133|1,81467|0,81633|1,82133|0,82300|1) - this is the 3* version of 16-note anchors
01:55:377 - missing note? except it was also missing on Normal so now I'm suspicious of my hearing :/ (specifically, on Normal 01:55:211 (115211|1,115294|2) - has a different rhythm from the stuff before it). To me it sounds like that missing note is the same tone and strength, just lower pitched
yes i wrote that much about a 3* diff what are you going to do about it
wft 180.033
00:01:065 - i see that the timing matches the voice here, but the start of it sample itself is such an abrupt sound that I think the first LN might feel more natural at 00:00:982 -
00:02:315 - to 00:31:643 - the LNs are all placed randomly and unevenly you can do better than that
01:55:710 - I think these are timed wrong. for example, doesn't the sound for 01:55:988 (115988|2) - start at least by 01:55:960 - ? some of the others seem late as well
01:56:960 - to 01:57:960 - BEEP BEEP MISSNAP ALERT! check consistency between difficulties, but I think it should all be 1/3 (including the note at 01:57:793 - in every diff but extra)
Normal
what's up with your lane distribution?? the first lane is so empty it looks like 5+1k but it's not actually used for a special purpose
02:19:623 - wtf the pitch here matches this pattern perfectly http://puu.sh/sVWau.jpg but you didn't use it??
02:32:287 (152287|3,152620|3) - are these necessary? I don't feel like they fit. but you also emphasized those beats on the other diffs too so maybe we're hearing the song differently . also notice how 02:32:176 (152176|2,152287|3,152509|2,152620|3,152843|2,152954|3,153176|2,153287|3) - looks like it's one coherent pattern, which is misleading because it covers two different sections and is inconsistent with 02:31:843 (151843|1) -
Hard
http://puu.sh/sVWEz.jpg I hereby dub this pattern "beehive." I don't like beehives very much (both in osu and irl) cus they tend to be rhythmically irregular for the individual hands and/or full of bees, but I'm only bringing it up cus you're a friend. (Don't change it, my opinions aren't very popular.) It looks pretty cool in any case
here's a suggestion, if you make 00:25:644 (25644|1,25727|2,25810|4,25894|3,25977|1,26060|2) - go outward and 00:26:144 (26144|3,26227|4) - go inward then you'll preserve the pitch-based structure of 00:25:977 (25977|1,26060|2,26144|3,26227|4) - by separating it into groups of two notes rather than sticking them together into a staircase.
00:30:976 - same
00:33:309 - do a jack like Normal (yes this is a command not a suggestion)
00:55:805 (55805|2,55805|5,55888|3,56055|4,56055|1,56138|2) - these gallops are inconsistent; the doubles are usually on the second beat (not the first)
01:00:387 - missing note?
01:00:971 (60971|2) - maybe move this to the right hand? to preserve the back-and-forth pattern and finish it with a strong chord. two notes on one hand feel stronger than one note on each hand
01:01:137 (61137|4,61220|3,61220|0) - also a thing I noticed, all of the two-beat sequences in this difficulties have double that are split up between hands. Why is that? It's cool as a thematic element but to me it seems less intuitive (I think it's because it plays like two separate patterns, one in each hand, though it's really just one thing in the music, while the other option (both notes of the double being on one hand, preceded by a single in the opposite hand) is more cohesive) and there are places in the music where it would be useful to have the emphasis from having a double with both notes on the same hand. At this point I've clearly gone too deep into theoretical expressive patterning (you can tell because of the nested parentheses) so I should probably stop
jk not stopping, another thing I noticed is that you avoid creating bars (doubles with notes on consecutive lanes), which I applaud because it's super aesthetic, but you didn't do it consistently (00:12:979 - 00:50:139 - 01:48:628 - 01:52:128 - 02:22:289 - 02:30:454 - 02:32:287 - 02:32:620 - 02:35:620 - ). You also tend to avoid [13] and [46] chords (the only non-bar one-handed doubles) but not as much. and more importantly, for 6K at this density, avoiding bars might actually limit your patterning in non-insignificant ways AND make your map feel overly homogeneous. Well, from my point of view, anyway. I might just be spewing garbage. It's related to the gallops because the option you kept taking for gallops is much more conducive to avoiding bars! I suggest using bars in a more purposeful manner (rather than just letting them slip through every now and then) to emphasize strong beats and create structure. It could be a way to make the section at 02:19:623 - look different from the sections before and after it, or to recognize the breakdowns at 01:00:971 - and 01:48:962 -, or to represent crashes etc
At this point I'm afraid I'm just telling you how I map instead of giving impartial suggestions so I really am going to stop
01:04:970 - to 01:06:303 - why go from a harder pattern to an easier pattern in this breakdown?
01:18:134 (78134|0,78301|1,78634|0,78801|1,79300|0,79467|1,79967|0,80134|1,80467|0,80634|1,80967|0,81133|1,81467|0,81633|1,82133|0,82300|1) - this is the 3* version of 16-note anchors
01:55:377 - missing note? except it was also missing on Normal so now I'm suspicious of my hearing :/ (specifically, on Normal 01:55:211 (115211|1,115294|2) - has a different rhythm from the stuff before it). To me it sounds like that missing note is the same tone and strength, just lower pitched
yes i wrote that much about a 3* diff what are you going to do about it
Ok good luck ranking grabity vrast! I really had a fun time playing rgavity lbast and I hope that graivyt balts gets
EDIT: we did some fixes over pm