1. Easy (1,54 stars, 71 notes)
2. Hard (2,76 stars, 148 notes)
3. Insane (3,41 stars, 212 notes)
4. Normal (2,11 stars, 122 notes)

1. 00:00:132 (1) - You surely can extend this to 00:02:963 (1) - , is better IMO to feel in rythm. (Like in normal)
2. 00:10:041 (4) - Maybe straight is better
3. 00:19:951 (3) - I really don't like the overlap with 00:18:299 (5) - :c
4. 00:34:107 (1,2) - blanket (?
5. 01:00:533 (1,2,3,4) - You can do this

1. 00:27:029 (2,3,4) - Maybe like this would better

1. 00:25:141 (2,3) - Why not this

1. 00:45:904 (3,4) - Why not like this
2. 01:04:190 (12) - You can add a object here and extend the stream

DaxMasterix wrote:

FIRST. (Editing 4 mod)

You surely need to cut the .mp3 or map some more will do later
Oh and Disable countdown done

Easy:

1. 00:00:132 (1) - You surely can extend this to 00:02:963 (1) - , is better IMO to feel in rythm. (Like in normal) ok
2. 00:10:041 (4) - Maybe straight is better fix
3. 00:19:951 (3) - I really don't like the overlap with 00:18:299 (5) - :c fix
4. 00:34:107 (1,2) - blanket (? intentional
5. 01:00:533 (1,2,3,4) - You can do this

fix

Normal:

1. 00:27:029 (2,3,4) - Maybe like this would better

fix

Hard:

1. 00:25:141 (2,3) - Why not this

intentional, i kindy like this part slider i don't think is bad

Insane:

1. 00:45:904 (3,4) - Why not like thissame before
2. 01:04:190 (12) - You can add a object here and extend the stream is you listen the song as 75% or 50% there no sound melody similiar before, just only beat, i did that try, just is not good sound to play. I prefer stay this.

That's all, good luck with all

1. ok

1. 01:02:892 (5) - New combo

1. Nothing wrong here

1. HP: 5?
2. 00:40:242 (2) - This looks not good under (3), you can move up (1) and (2), like this

1. HP: 6?

MoodyRPG wrote:

General

1. ok

Easy

1. 01:02:892 (5) - New combo

fix

Normal

1. Nothing wrong here

Hard

1. HP: 5? b]fix[/b]
2. 00:40:242 (2) - This looks not good under (3), you can move up (1) and (2), like this

b]fix[/b]

Insane

1. HP: 6?

b]fix[/b]

Great mapset as always

Good luck Pereira

SPOILER

1. 00:00:132 (1,1) - If you're going to use a smaller gap than recommended for this spinner to note, I suggest placing the first note more towards the middle. This will help new players who spin wildly and may have little time to react moving their mouse to the far corner of the screen instead of in the center.
2. 00:15:709 (2,3) - I think some symmetry would work well here. (note you may have to adjust upcoming notes)
   
   SPOILER

   
   
3. 00:19:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Try making 1,2,3 or 4,5,6 a mirror of eachother while still rising. The example below takes a flipped 4,5,6 and moves it to x204 y292
   
   SPOILER

   

• 00:00:132 (1) - Spinner is not snapped. It’s off by 5ms
  
  00:34:107 - Timing line here is also not snapped, off by 5 ms

• 00:07:923 (2,3) - This flow seems little too sharp. I think moving is up or down by little will smooth it out like 00:15:473 (2,3) -
  
  00:30:809 (3) - ^
  
  00:10:046 (2,3) - Sorry about pixel mod /w\ but how about moving these down a few pixels to avoid overlap at 00:09:338 (8,3) - .
  
  00:16:888 (8,1,2) - 00:31:989 (8,1,2,3) - I think these two parts should be more similar to each other. First of all, Distance at 00:16:888 (8,1) - 00:31:989 (8,1) - are dissimilar, and the flow is much sharper at 00:16:888 (8,1,2) -. I think it would be good to avoid big overlap at 00:16:888 (8,3) - . Maybe something like ( http://puu.sh/qQXwt/2999bb0e26.jpg) could work?
  
  00:31:635 (6) - ^
  
  00:33:640 (5,6,1) - I think making this angle very sharp could emphasize the change very well

• 00:06:035 (1,2) - 00:05:327 (5,6) - 00:13:585 (1,2) - Blankets could be improved if you want

• 00:08:159 (2,3,4) - Maybe it’s just my personal preference, but I think it looks better when it’s clearly straight line or more distintively zig-zag like ( http://puu.sh/qQXZJ/b93472f4b8.jpg )
  
  00:23:259 (2,3,4) - I think this would look better if 00:24:203 (4) - was raised up a little so it will look like 00:30:809 (2,3,4) -
  
  00:40:247 (5,6) - Consider making it less curved. This stands out because of its curve compared to 00:34:584 (2,3) - , 00:36:472 (5,6) - , 00:38:359 (2,3) - , 00:42:134 (2,3) - , etc

• 00:00:132 (1,1) - The circle is visible one beat before the spinner ends ( http://puu.sh/qQYdo/35d176443a.jpg ), is this ok?

Lanturn wrote:

So the Japanese and US versions do use the same track for the past track.

This means we can use the track listing from the official soundtrack 20th anniversary thingy scan.



Artist: Masafumi Ogata / 尾形雅史

Title: Collision Chaos "P" mix

Source:
ソニック・ザ・ヘッジホッグCD - http://sonic.sega.jp/20th/history/ Official Japanese name.
Sonic CD - http://www.sega.com/games/sonic-cd%E2%84%A2 Official English name.
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG CD can also be used as it is on the Japanese cover of the game.

SPOILER

As such, in your Tags, you can safely remove all of the artists, and put "The Hedgehog" "Sega" "Past" "Mega" and what you didn't use in the source as needed.

-------------------------

[General]
Your timing should technically start at 00:03:912 - to begin on the correct measure. While optional, this helps mods like Nightcore and certain pulses play on the strongest notes. Your current timing starts in the anacrusis of the song.


[Easy]

1. 00:00:132 (1,1) - If you're going to use a smaller gap than recommended for this spinner to note, I suggest placing the first note more towards the middle. This will help new players who spin wildly and may have little time to react moving their mouse to the far corner of the screen instead of in the center.
2. 00:15:709 (2,3) - I think some symmetry would work well here. (note you may have to adjust upcoming notes)
   
   SPOILER

   
   
3. 00:19:012 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Try making 1,2,3 or 4,5,6 a mirror of eachother while still rising. The example below takes a flipped 4,5,6 and moves it to x204 y292
   
   SPOILER

   

If I get more spare time, I'll mod the other diffs, for now, have the metadata at least.

CaffeAmericano wrote:

Hi Pereira,

Sorry I'm little late ;-;

General

• 00:00:132 (1) - Spinner is not snapped. It’s off by 5ms fix
  
  00:34:107 - Timing line here is also not snapped, off by 5 ms

fix

Insane

• 00:07:923 (2,3) - This flow seems little too sharp. I think moving is up or down by little will smooth it out like 00:15:473 (2,3) - fix
  
  00:30:809 (3) - ^ fix
  
  00:10:046 (2,3) - Sorry about pixel mod /w\ but how about moving these down a few pixels to avoid overlap at 00:09:338 (8,3) - . fix
  
  00:16:888 (8,1,2) - 00:31:989 (8,1,2,3) - I think these two parts should be more similar to each other. First of all, Distance at 00:16:888 (8,1) - 00:31:989 (8,1) - are dissimilar, and the flow is much sharper at 00:16:888 (8,1,2) -. I think it would be good to avoid big overlap at 00:16:888 (8,3) - . Maybe something like ( http://puu.sh/qQXwt/2999bb0e26.jpg) could work? Fix my own, just change placement, but there no need be distance consistency, becuase this is level Insane, example that in 00:16:888 (8,1,2) distance spacing is 1.40, my normal spacing is 1.20x, when there happen number big than normal, is jump, then another 00:31:989 (8,1,2,3) - is 1.50x is just +10 when you test play they look same, I can pick I wanna number big to jump expect BIGGER jump like 3.00x, and I fix overlap
  
  00:31:635 (6) - ^ ?
  
  00:33:640 (5,6,1) - I think making this angle very sharp could emphasize the change very well fix

Hard

• 00:06:035 (1,2) - 00:05:327 (5,6) - 00:13:585 (1,2) - Blankets could be improved if you want they still blanket but meh, fix

Normal

• 00:08:159 (2,3,4) - Maybe it’s just my personal preference, but I think it looks better when it’s clearly straight line or more distintively zig-zag like ( http://puu.sh/qQXZJ/b93472f4b8.jpg ) fix
  
  00:23:259 (2,3,4) - I think this would look better if 00:24:203 (4) - was raised up a little so it will look like 00:30:809 (2,3,4) - fix
  
  00:40:247 (5,6) - Consider making it less curved. This stands out because of its curve compared to 00:34:584 (2,3) - , 00:36:472 (5,6) - , 00:38:359 (2,3) - , 00:42:134 (2,3) - , etc fix some curve

Easy

• 00:00:132 (1,1) - The circle is visible one beat before the spinner ends ( http://puu.sh/qQYdo/35d176443a.jpg ), is this ok? fix

Other than these minor things, mapset already looks good to me. Good luck

1. Unicode Artist conflicts with easy difficulty

1. AR 8.3 is kinda high , AR 8 will work better
2. 00:05:563 (7) - It shouldnt end on the downbeat since the downbeat has a louder sound than 00:05:563 - so it should be clickable
3. 00:09:338 (8) - Same here
4. 00:09:810 (1,2) - Why does this has same spacing as 00:09:338 (8,1) - ? actually the spacing between 00:09:810 (1,2) - should be higher since there is a loud kick sound at 00:10:046 - which should be emphasized more than 00:09:810 (1) -
5. 00:17:596 (2) - move it farther from 00:17:360 (1) - since 1.2x spacing is just too low because of the kick sound in the song
6. 00:24:439 (8,1,2) - as i said before 00:24:910 (1,2) - These two should have atleast a little more spacing than the previous two notes for proper emphasis
7. 00:50:156 (5,7) - http://puu.sh/qTKSD/93cba620e7.jpg enable stacking and check stacks like these , the tiny overlaps look really bad ~ same goes for 00:57:706 (5,7) -
8. 01:04:313 (1) - Higher spacing for emphasis?

1. 00:14:529 (3,4,5) - They dont make a proper triangle which looks kinda messy
2. AR 6.5?

1. 00:10:046 - 00:17:596 - Song is same in both parts but the rhythm is alot more complex at 00:17:596 - . i think u should use the same rhythm in both parts for consistency
2. 00:25:146 - 00:32:696 - same goes for these
3. 00:49:212 - This is a pretty important beat since kiai starts here and there is a loud cymbal and kick sound . you should manage to make it clickable somehow ~ it will be alot better that way
4. 00:53:931 (3,2) - Stack?

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

[General]

1. Unicode Artist conflicts with easy difficulty fix

[Insane]

1. AR 8.3 is kinda high , AR 8 will work better AR 8.3 look better
2. 00:05:563 (7) - It shouldnt end on the downbeat since the downbeat has a louder sound than 00:05:563 - so it should be clickable Idon't follow downbeat, upbeat, etc.. Follow my main melody/instrument because that (7) if you listen of begin, the melody is mos better than downbeat, also the play look very well, stay
3. 00:09:338 (8) - Same here same
4. 00:09:810 (1,2) - Why does this has same spacing as 00:09:338 (8,1) - ? actually the spacing between 00:09:810 (1,2) - should be higher since there is a loud kick sound at 00:10:046 - which should be emphasized more than 00:09:810 (1) - ya
5. 00:17:596 (2) - move it farther from 00:17:360 (1) - since 1.2x spacing is just too low because of the kick sound in the song [b]no, because 1 and 2 there no strong instruments, just normal then after object slider start high instrument this why i make jump. I prefer this way[/b]
6. 00:24:439 (8,1,2) - as i said before 00:24:910 (1,2) - These two should have atleast a little more spacing than the previous two notes for proper emphasis ya
7. 00:50:156 (5,7) - http://puu.sh/qTKSD/93cba620e7.jpg enable stacking and check stacks like these , the tiny overlaps look really bad ~ same goes for 00:57:706 (5,7) - the overlap doesn't look bad for me
8. 01:04:313 (1) - Higher spacing for emphasis? no

[Hard]

1. 00:14:529 (3,4,5) - They dont make a proper triangle which looks kinda messy ok
2. AR 6.5? no

[Normal]
cool diff
[Easy]

1. 00:10:046 - 00:17:596 - Song is same in both parts but the rhythm is alot more complex at 00:17:596 - . i think u should use the same rhythm in both parts for consistency the instruments is different, compare begin and last, the begin look there 2 instruments strong and end there 4 they really look better
2. 00:25:146 - 00:32:696 - same goes for these no
3. 00:49:212 - This is a pretty important beat since kiai starts here and there is a loud cymbal and kick sound . you should manage to make it clickable somehow ~ it will be alot better that way hmmm maybe, fix
4. 00:53:931 (3,2) - Stack? ok

Nice map ~
my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/497583
gl

Hi!~ M4M from your queue!~

General

1. I think you should add 1-2 more combo colour xd
   

   Combo4 : 255,255,128
   Combo5 : 0,0,245

   
   nah, i think is enough for me
2. Artist unicode:
   Easy: 形雅史
   Normal: 尾形雅史
   Hard: 尾形雅史
   Insane: 尾形雅史 ya

Easy

1. 00:00:137 (1) - maybe cut it to 00:02:024 ?
2. 00:05:799 (4) - x:392 y:44 (triangle will looks better)
3. 00:04:383 (2,3) - spacing?
4. 00:06:271 (5,6) - ^
5. 00:09:102 (3) - x:156 y:92
6. 00:10:046 (4) - make it looks like for better look
7. 00:13:349 (3) - x:272 y:184
8. 00:13:821 (4) - x:360 y:100
9. 00:14:293 (5) - make it similar 00:15:709 (2)
10. 00:54:403 (4) - x:188 y:208
11. 01:01:953 (4) - x:232 y:72

Normal

1. 00:06:271 (6) - make it similar 00:05:091 (4)
2. 00:12:641 (4) - x:320 y:256
3. 00:14:293 (7) - x:124 y:124
4. 00:22:079 (8) - x:336 y:252
5. 00:27:742 (4) - x:192 y:236

Hard

1. 00:09:102 (6) - make it similar 00:08:159 (2) and Ctrl + J
2. 00:16:652 (6) - make it similar 00:15:709 (2)
3. 00:24:203 (6) - ^ 00:23:259 (2)
4. 00:16:181 (3) - x:52 y:76
5. 00:15:709 (2) - x:184 y:156
6. 00:16:416 (4,5,6) - x:8 y:160
7. 00:24:910 (1) - x:232 y:352
8. 00:33:876 (6,2) - looks not beautiful
9. 00:43:550 (1,3) - make overlap here
10. 00:53:931 (4) - x:260 y:200
11. 00:55:583 (3) - x:312 y:284
12. 00:57:234 (2) - x:220 y:280
13. 00:57:470 (3) - x:272 y:188
14. 00:59:358 (3) - x:180 y:228
15. 01:03:369 (4) - x:112 y:36
16. 01:04:313 (1) - x:140 y:128
17. 01:00:538 (1,5) - try to overlap it

Insane

1. 00:03:912 (1,2,3) - that triangle can looks better
2. 00:07:923 (2,4) - x:128 y:276
3. 00:11:934 (3) - x:12 y:140
4. 00:12:877 (6) - x:316 y:32
5. 00:17:596 (2) - x:252 y:68
6. 00:24:439 (8) - x:284 y:24
7. 00:25:854 (3) - x:444 y:88
8. 00:27:742 (5) - x:196 y:288
9. 00:28:921 (2) - x:232 y:328
10. 00:29:629 (4) - x:100 y:248
11. 00:29:865 (5) - x:24 y:172
12. 00:37:179 (4) - x:260 y:308
13. 00:40:011 (2) - x:220 y:36
14. 00:16:888 (8) - slider's end to x:280 y:240
15. 00:29:157 (3) - ^ x:200 y:224
16. 00:31:989 (8) - make it looks like that
17. 00:32:932 (3) - make it similar 00:31:989 (8)

Good Luck!~
I hope it'll help you!
Rank it :3
My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/455482

squirrelpascals wrote:

Hi!!1!one!

I'm not too familiar with 2010 style as much as i am 2008, so I'll try to mod more fundamentally

01:04:785 - Fade out here and make the mp3 smaller will do later lol

Insane

• 00:09:338 (8) - try x68 173 (blankets, and its still 1.2ds) ok

• 00:16:416 (5,6,7,8) - blanket here? ok

• 00:17:124 - Important beat, make it clickable? still clickable, follow main instrument, got testplay, they can SS first try lol

• 00:19:012 (1,2,3) - space the triangle part out more? Like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6001773 so it plays a little bit better and thers exaggeration at 00:19:012 - no

• 00:19:720 (4,7) - Make these two the same slider, except use ctrl+> twice for one of them. Like you did at 00:42:134 (3) - 00:42:134 (3,4) - ya

• 00:24:674 - another important beat no

• 00:36:000 (1) - remove hit-finish no

• 00:43:786 (2) - space evenly no

• 00:50:510 (6,7,3) - 00:51:572 (3,6,7,8,9) - remove the overlap on 3 for both of these the overlap don't look bad and is level insane

Hard

• 00:18:304 (3,4,5) - This is optional, but you can always make this a repeat slider too to go better with 00:17:596 (2) - and separate this part of the music more from 00:19:012 (1,2) - fix my own rhythm

• 00:32:225 - make this clickable? no

• 00:55:347 (2,3,1) - Fix these overlaps ok

This is a good diff

Normal

• 00:05:799 (5) - 00:09:574 (5) - Imo for the whole map, I think you should use nc every 4 beats instead of 8 because that would give a better combo length I prefer this 8 way, I kindy like they because is normal Level

• 00:04:383 (2,3) - ctrl+g gives you a better rhythm. Same for the rest, like 00:06:271 (6,7) - , you would need to move all of the objects of course. i think my rhythm is better because thhose slider is follow melody and note is follow hitt-instrument, they pretty fit IMO

• 00:41:662 (1) - remove hit finish no

• 00:43:550 (4) - space this evenly from 2 and 3. x283 y169 hmm ok

• 00:50:864 - 00:52:752 - You can put notes here if you want to. It's a normal so you might not need to, but you still can.nah, stay, way abuse, is low bpm but still, wanna make good spread hard and easy

• 01:02:897 (6,7) - x344 y164. These spacing things are a small difference yes but it can still make a ok

Easy

• 00:09:102 (3) - Make this a ctrl+g, ctrl+h version of 2 trying

• 00:15:709 (2) - Make this 2 circles, because theres good beats on 00:15:709 - and 00:16:181 - no

• 00:30:809 (2) - Same as above^ no

• 00:42:134 (1) - x264 y104 for blanket ok

• 00:50:156 (2,3) - This is very picky, but I think this would be good as ctrl+g because a circle would go better on the strong beat at 00:51:100 - and the slider at 00:50:156 - could represent the decrease in pitch until then I don't follow beats but when i do CTRL+G look they fit fllow instruments, lol ho well fix but not follow beat

• 00:53:931 (3,4) - Same^ and for the rest of the song too :p

• 01:01:953 (4) - tilt it down like this to flow better with the square maybe? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6002028 you can blanket 1 if you want maybe

Good luck!!

Monstrata wrote:

To next BN: Normal uses some 1/4 rhythms (3/4 slider into circle) just make sure to check and give an opinion on them. I think they can work here since it's relatively low bpm, and the map is spaced so that 1/2 objects don't overlap, so the 3/4 spacing won't be as confusing.

1. 00:17:635 (2) - This note deserves a jump since the beat is very strong here. Also, considering that you did it with 00:17:871 (3) - it would make sense~
2. 00:32:735 (2) - Same here~

ezek wrote:

Hello nice person~
Nice old style~

Monstrata wrote:

To next BN: Normal uses some 1/4 rhythms (3/4 slider into circle) just make sure to check and give an opinion on them. I think they can work here since it's relatively low bpm, and the map is spaced so that 1/2 objects don't overlap, so the 3/4 spacing won't be as confusing.

Yee, I'm fine with that too

Insane

1. 00:17:635 (2) - This note deserves a jump since the beat is very strong here. Also, considering that you did it with 00:17:871 (3) - it would make sense~ hmm sure, fix, add jump
2. 00:32:735 (2) - Same here~ done

Nothing else to complain about~