forum

seiya-murai feat.ALT - Sumidagawa Karenka

posted
Total Posts
4
Topic Starter
Porochu
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
[-CeMAqpOP-]kee
00:06:402 (1,2) - ias time to stop overlapping this much nerdf
00:06:736 (1,2,3,1) - compare spacing to 00:07:902 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
PICK 1 NERD -_ -
00:10:736 (1,2,3) - jus put (2) and (3) under (1)
00:14:069 (6,7) - wtf LLLLOOOOOOOOOOOO move (7) more to the left
00:16:402 (2,3,4) - move (3) to left and down bcuz equal spacing..
jus do this i guess but fix the spacing after it coz its insane LOOOOL
00:28:069 (1,2,3,1) - u can prob do something more flowy/creative than just ugly zigzags js
00:29:402 (3,4,5) - plz flow (3) directly into (4) and fix the overlap with (5) :/
00:30:069 (1,2,3) - ugly overlap plz blanket (3) with (1) or somthing idek anymore man
00:30:736 (4,5) - flow (4) directyl into (5)
00:31:236 (6,7) - and move this to the right after ur done with above (coz spacing consistency (or at least a litel bit more consistent))
00:34:069 (7,8) - imo (8) is too close u could try putting it on the (1) slider right after or idk..
00:38:402 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - u can try spacing this out a little more coz everything is rite next to eachother and it feels like a normal diff
00:40:736 (5,6,1,1) - FUCKING BEAUTIFUL..
00:41:402 (1,1,1) - i dont c why this all needs to be new comboes xd last 2 notes can have it turned off
00:45:736 (1,2,3) - try to equal spacing man
00:43:402 (1,2,3,4) - kinda looks a bit weird try restructuring this -_ -
00:46:736 (2,1) - move (1) away like a lot but dont make it ridiculous coz u gotta make the spacing good for the stuff after too
00:48:736 (3,1,2,3) - larger spacing
00:50:736 (3,4,5,1) - eh hh h hhhhh idk about this try restructuring it LOL idek
00:52:069 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - END IT ALL
00:53:736 (3,1,2,1,2,3) - uh like it goes from big jump to a fucken stack lol just make it equal dude
00:54:402 (3,4) - move (4) more to the left and make (3) flow directly into it plz
00:54:236 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - ^ same with this entire pattern btw i would map the red ticks too coz it just feels more "right"
00:56:069 (2,3) - its a hard map u can make this a stream.. its actually harder like this LMAO
00:57:902 (4,5,6,1) - we have discussed how degen this is in irc :0
00:58:402 (1,2,3) - u could try reshaping (1) and (2) and fitting (3) in to (1) like a blanket mang
00:59:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this is cool but idk its kinda executed poorly, and ik ur mapping it to the thingy in the background
01:01:236 (1,2,1,2,3) - ok slider (3) should be a direct copy of slider (2) coz u can see the difference in shape it just makes it nicer looking lol
+ spacing it fucked AND the flow cud be better like this
btw i made the second slider 1/2 cuz u missed a drum at 01:02:236 - LMAO
01:02:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - holy calm down with the circles/jumps dude..
01:05:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - the rhythm is good (like slider,circle,circle,slider,circle,circle) but restructure the pattern lol itz ugly
01:06:736 (4,1,2) - make this a stream wtf WHY THOOOOOO

ok dione
Topic Starter
Porochu

Fser wrote:

00:06:402 (1,2) - ias time to stop overlapping this much nerdf
00:06:736 (1,2,3,1) - compare spacing to 00:07:902 (2,3,4,5,6,7) -
PICK 1 NERD -_ -
00:10:736 (1,2,3) - jus put (2) and (3) under (1)
00:14:069 (6,7) - wtf LLLLOOOOOOOOOOOO move (7) more to the left
00:16:402 (2,3,4) - move (3) to left and down bcuz equal spacing..
jus do this i guess but fix the spacing after it coz its insane LOOOOL
00:28:069 (1,2,3,1) - u can prob do something more flowy/creative than just ugly zigzags js
00:29:402 (3,4,5) - plz flow (3) directly into (4) and fix the overlap with (5) :/
00:30:069 (1,2,3) - ugly overlap plz blanket (3) with (1) or somthing idek anymore man
00:30:736 (4,5) - flow (4) directyl into (5)
00:31:236 (6,7) - and move this to the right after ur done with above (coz spacing consistency (or at least a litel bit more consistent))
00:34:069 (7,8) - imo (8) is too close u could try putting it on the (1) slider right after or idk..
00:38:402 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - u can try spacing this out a little more coz everything is rite next to eachother and it feels like a normal diff
00:40:736 (5,6,1,1) - FUCKING BEAUTIFUL..
00:41:402 (1,1,1) - i dont c why this all needs to be new comboes xd last 2 notes can have it turned off
00:45:736 (1,2,3) - try to equal spacing man
00:43:402 (1,2,3,4) - kinda looks a bit weird try restructuring this -_ -
00:46:736 (2,1) - move (1) away like a lot but dont make it ridiculous coz u gotta make the spacing good for the stuff after too
00:48:736 (3,1,2,3) - larger spacing
00:50:736 (3,4,5,1) - eh hh h hhhhh idk about this try restructuring it LOL idek
00:52:069 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - END IT ALL
00:53:736 (3,1,2,1,2,3) - uh like it goes from big jump to a fucken stack lol just make it equal dude
00:54:402 (3,4) - move (4) more to the left and make (3) flow directly into it plz
00:54:236 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - ^ same with this entire pattern btw i would map the red ticks too coz it just feels more "right"
00:56:069 (2,3) - its a hard map u can make this a stream.. its actually harder like this LMAO
00:57:902 (4,5,6,1) - we have discussed how degen this is in irc :0
00:58:402 (1,2,3) - u could try reshaping (1) and (2) and fitting (3) in to (1) like a blanket mang
00:59:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this is cool but idk its kinda executed poorly, and ik ur mapping it to the thingy in the background
01:01:236 (1,2,1,2,3) - ok slider (3) should be a direct copy of slider (2) coz u can see the difference in shape it just makes it nicer looking lol
+ spacing it fucked AND the flow cud be better like this
btw i made the second slider 1/2 cuz u missed a drum at 01:02:236 - LMAO
01:02:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - holy calm down with the circles/jumps dude..
01:05:402 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - the rhythm is good (like slider,circle,circle,slider,circle,circle) but restructure the pattern lol itz ugly
01:06:736 (4,1,2) - make this a stream wtf WHY THOOOOOO

ok dione
fix ev ery thing thx <3
A r M i N
i love this
Please sign in to reply.

New reply