forum

S3RL - Classic Mashup 2

posted
Total Posts
18
show more
Topic Starter
Violet-Fox

S A V E R Y wrote:

Hi there! From #modreqs

M4M: http://osu.ppy.sh/b/985876

[SSSSSS333333333333333RRRRRRRRRRLLLLLLLLL]
Basic sliderspeed is 1.4? I think if you increase the speed, it will be better...
Not used any hitsound effects? Please check again...(Whistle, Finish, Clap)

00:12:465 (5) - Add NC
00:34:408 (1,2) - This?
03:30:980 (2) - Add NC cause speedchange.
03:51:894 (5,6,7) - ↑
There are whistle and clap hitsounds in the map ^^ but thanks for the rest
hi-mei
m4m?

my mod:

00:12:465 (1) - nc
00:13:922 (2) - theres no sound you emphasizing with slider (especially placing him on blue tick), tho you got 00:13:665 (1) - on down beat for some reasson, please remap this.
00:18:979 (5) - nc here, not 00:19:322 (1) - here.
00:21:894 (6) - you got sliderend on such strong note, and then you got 00:22:408 (7) - ???
also 00:23:437 (1) - heres no sound at all, why u using slider?
00:22:408 (7,8,1) - ds???
i wud recommend something like this http://puu.sh/qUVj6/c325a56dee.jpg
cuz its retarded as it is now
00:23:437 (1) - nc
00:23:951 (2) - s-end on new vocal interval? rly?
00:24:808 (1) - such a strong moment here, increase ds
00:27:379 (6,1) - ds?
00:28:579 (6) - why u emphasizing the vocals here when you already started emphasizing the downbeats?

ill finish it in few hours.
00:31:665 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - no wristle plz
00:31:922 (4) - wristle
00:32:865 (1,2,3) - sample: auto, additional: auto, sound: wristle
00:36:465 (3,4) - ds?
00:41:265 (1) - why u switched to another sound line here once u already started emphasizing first one here 00:38:522 (1) - ??
You got the same shit over and over again so I wont waste my time on such type of issue you are facing. Just pick one sound line and follow it. For now its really confusing.
00:44:008 (1) - nc
00:43:837 (4) - strange overlap, plz change the triangle direction
00:45:208 (1) - slider wud be nice here
00:47:437 (3,4) - increase ds
00:48:808 (8) - nc
00:52:065 (3) - delete this note
00:53:780 (7,1) - ds?
00:57:380 - s-end shud be here
00:57:722 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - take a closer look over here, chose what exactly you want to do and what you want to emphasize
01:00:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make this more aesthetic by using ctrl+shift+s / ctrl+shift+r
01:08:008 - no nc here
01:08:694 - nc
01:11:094 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - already mentioned this above (sound line shit)
actually the whole map is full of such issues, maybe its playing good but dude, in editor its just some random objects.
like you always switching between bass line and vocal line, like way too random and way too often
01:27:722 (3) - nc

alright its pointless to continue cuz you got them same problems over and over again. just fix it and call me again ingame.
i got no time and will to check all 7 mins when you facing the same problems again and again.

summary: its pretty easy songs to map, but you should choose what you want to emphasize and why.
switching between bassline and vocal line is acceptable but not like every 5-7 seconds cuz you never know what sound line you following when you playing it.
Topic Starter
Violet-Fox

-himei wrote:

m4m?

my mod:

00:12:465 (1) - nc
00:13:922 (2) - theres no sound you emphasizing with slider (especially placing him on blue tick), tho you got 00:13:665 (1) - on down beat for some reasson, please remap this.
00:18:979 (5) - nc here, not 00:19:322 (1) - here.
00:21:894 (6) - you got sliderend on such strong note, and then you got 00:22:408 (7) - ???
also 00:23:437 (1) - heres no sound at all, why u using slider?
00:22:408 (7,8,1) - ds???
i wud recommend something like this http://puu.sh/qUVj6/c325a56dee.jpg
cuz its retarded as it is now
00:23:437 (1) - nc
00:23:951 (2) - s-end on new vocal interval? rly?
00:24:808 (1) - such a strong moment here, increase ds
00:27:379 (6,1) - ds?
00:28:579 (6) - why u emphasizing the vocals here when you already started emphasizing the downbeats?

ill finish it in few hours.
00:31:665 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - no wristle plz
00:31:922 (4) - wristle
00:32:865 (1,2,3) - sample: auto, additional: auto, sound: wristle
00:36:465 (3,4) - ds?
00:41:265 (1) - why u switched to another sound line here once u already started emphasizing first one here 00:38:522 (1) - ??
You got the same shit over and over again so I wont waste my time on such type of issue you are facing. Just pick one sound line and follow it. For now its really confusing.
00:44:008 (1) - nc
00:43:837 (4) - strange overlap, plz change the triangle direction
00:45:208 (1) - slider wud be nice here
00:47:437 (3,4) - increase ds
00:48:808 (8) - nc
00:52:065 (3) - delete this note
00:53:780 (7,1) - ds?
00:57:380 - s-end shud be here
00:57:722 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - take a closer look over here, chose what exactly you want to do and what you want to emphasize
01:00:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make this more aesthetic by using ctrl+shift+s / ctrl+shift+r
01:08:008 - no nc here
01:08:694 - nc
01:11:094 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - already mentioned this above (sound line shit)
actually the whole map is full of such issues, maybe its playing good but dude, in editor its just some random objects.
like you always switching between bass line and vocal line, like way too random and way too often
01:27:722 (3) - nc

alright its pointless to continue cuz you got them same problems over and over again. just fix it and call me again ingame.
i got no time and will to check all 7 mins when you facing the same problems again and again.

summary: its pretty easy songs to map, but you should choose what you want to emphasize and why.
switching between bassline and vocal line is acceptable but not like every 5-7 seconds cuz you never know what sound line you following when you playing it.
The swaps between vocal and bass is because the songs switch which is more emphasized, for example 00:41:265 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - these are not like the previous pattern because the bassline was almost unhearable before but now its put right out in front at this part. the pattern changes are a way to follow the difference in pitch in the background.

Also for 01:11:265 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This is following the lyrics I don't see what the issue is because its following the lyrics both right before and right after as well

I have taken what USEFUL things you've said in consideration but you exaggerate a lot, unless the bass is hugely emphasized or lyrics are absent, the entire map follows the lyrics. except for very few (as in 3 or less) exceptions
hi-mei
i used to be more nice to things like this, but seems like you dont really understand what exactly you want to show, and your map lacks the global ideas.
tho please watch some pishi vids to help yourself out with basics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BC_I2ufqC8 for example.
Topic Starter
Violet-Fox
I have watched that video and he even makes it clear when rhythm emphasis changes in the song, so can the rhythm emphasis of the map.

I changed the part you mentioned but the rest of the map changing when bass is emphasized is fine
Lavi
Really like the map but the beginning part (like 1min) feels terribly random.

Also I'm not sure but I think the offset may be slightly off, I moved everything by 10 and I think it feels better. But that may be just me. Good luck
Topic Starter
Violet-Fox
might just be you, no one else i've shown the map to has reported any issues with offset, i'll look into fixing the randomness xD
Toaster Chan
00:12:294 (4) - I find this note to be in an awkward position. It may be hard for some players to read this note
00:46:751 - Kiai time should be put here to synthesise with the drop
01:42:294 (3) - Should be two notes to match the rhythm of the synthesizer
01:44:351 (4) - New combo as everything before matches 8 beat rhythm
02:00:808 (3) - New combo with reason stated above
02:06:294 (2) - Combo should start here instead of the one behind to match the rhythm
02:46:580 - Kiai time started too early. Have it start at the drop
03:31:837 - Kiai started late this time
04:03:894 (5) - One note should suffice. This kick slider feels a bit awkward to listen to when trying to match the rhythm
04:14:094 (7) - Slider started too early. Doesnt fit to the rhythm listening and playing it.
04:18:808 (1,2,3,4) - Either all notes or better timed sliders. Doesnt fit nicely with the beat
04:23:951 (2,3,4,5) - Ditto as before
04:25:151 - Kiai started too early again.
05:12:637 (8,1) - Spacing might be a bit awkward to read
06:48:808 (5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Stream feels incomplete without a note before the slider

I'll add more when I have a fresher mind
agubelu
00:11:779 (1,2,3,4) - You can't really hear what this has been mapped to, might consider lowering this section volume or gradually increasing it with each slider.
00:24:808 (1,2,3) - This doesn't make much sense if you're following the vocals, this might be more consistent with the vocal line and the previous mapping:
00:26:008 (1,2,3,4,5) - Doesn't really feel like it matches the vocals and then immediately switches to the bassline. I'd rather wait until 00:28:922 (1) because that's when the bass starts kicking in and look for a smoother transition.
00:35:437 (5) - Replace with a hitcircle.
01:33:208 (4,5,6) - Feels weird
01:34:580 (4,5,6) - If you're following the bassline, then don't map the vocals for a couple of seconds and then continue with the bass. The pause, hitcircle and pause again breaks the momentum.
01:37:837 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Another sudden stop and switch to vocals.
02:22:751 (6) - This slider looks so 2006-ish :D
02:43:322 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Too much spacing between jumps?
03:07:665 (7) - Consider adding two more notes after that one.
04:06:980 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Sudden stop and switch away from bassline
04:12:465 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same but this one doesn't feel as disruptive as the previous.
04:17:951 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - ↑
04:20:180 (7) - New combo
04:22:922 (6,7,8) - Feels lacking without a hitcircle after the triple.
04:23:951 (2) - Shorten this slider 1 tick
04:24:808 (6) - Wouldn't it feel better with another circle between that one and the new combo?
04:35:265 (4,1) - Add a circle between those two and make it the same combo, matches better the vocals
04:40:751 (4,5) - ↑
05:23:780 (5) - Another sudden change to vocals.
05:24:294 (1) - If you want to follow the vocals, make this slider longer (until the red tick), matches better the voice and it's consistent with 05:25:665 (6).
05:27:894 (1,2) - Again, if you're following the vocals, don't stop suddenly to focus something in the background. You're missing the first syllabus at the red tick after the second slider.
05:33:380 (1,2) - ↑
05:30:637 (6) - Add a note after that slider?
05:55:322 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - 3 long sliders might be more appropriate than those chained sliders.
06:02:865 (1,2,3,4,5) - Mistimed
06:11:265 (1) - Maybe delete this note?
06:13:408 (2,3) - I'm not too convinced about that doble, a triple might fit better.
06:16:151 (2,3) - ↑
07:03:894 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is literally screaming "stream incoming" but there is no stream after it. Also a bit overspaced imo.

Regarding kiais:

Kiai #1 should end at 01:08:694 (2), or at 01:29:094 (6) if you consider the pikagirl lyrics as part of the kiai.
Kiai #2 should start at 02:47:437 (1) and end a beat after 03:07:665 (7).
Kiai #3 should start at 03:31:322 (2), end time is ok.
Kiai #4 should end at 04:48:122 (5), start time is ok.
Kiai #5 should end at 05:37:322 (4), start time is ok.
There should be a kiai between 05:38:865 (1) and 06:00:808 (3).
Kiai #6 looks fine.
Kiai #7 should end at 07:27:208 (1).

On a more general view, I felt like there was a lack of triples, especially when it comes to following the bassline because it usually allows for them more than the vocals and make it less plain than just using sliders. Also the "back and forth" pattern might be nice if ocasionally used but it feels a bit overused: 02:53:608 (3,4,5,6) - 03:06:637 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 03:26:351 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 03:31:837 (1,2,3,4,5) - 03:42:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 04:11:094 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7), etc. Please considering adding other patterns because it starts to feel repetitive after a few uses.
-Keitaro
M4M from #modreqs :3

Map: http://osu.ppy.sh/s/512035

00:18:867 (1,2,3) - This seems kinda awkward for me, move (2) to stack with 00:18:353 (3) - maybe?
00:26:067 (2,3) - quarter blanket?
00:31:724 (3,2) - Stack these
00:36:868 (5) - Looks strange, move to x:204 y:144? (blanket with 00:36:353 (3) - )
00:41:496 (2,6) - Stack with the end of slider
00:45:782 (4,2) - ^
00:48:182 (7) - Fix this shape, it looks strange :x
00:48:182 (7,2) - Stack with the end of slider (maybe)
00:49:725 (2,5) - Stack with the start of slider
01:05:839 (1) - x:384 y:92 looks better
01:12:182 (3,6) - blanket?
01:29:496 (3,6) - Stack these
01:45:782 (1,2,3,4,5) - fix this star
01:47:839 (2,5) - stack these
02:04:810 (5) - x:276 y:60 to blanket 02:03:953 (3) -
02:29:496 (6,3) - Stack with the start of the slider
02:55:639 (4,5) - not a perfect time to continue the stream, delete these
03:02:068 (2) - x:128 y:268 (blanket with 03:01:553 (4) - )
03:09:610 (2) - x:164 Y:92 (^ 03:08:925 (2) - )
04:34:639 (1,2,3,4,5) - Fix this star :/


pika~
Topic Starter
Violet-Fox
those stars didnt actually mean to be stars but since you pointed them out i made them stars ^^ and didnt think that such an aesthetic difference blanketing notes even 4 ticks apart would be a thing, thank you for the mod i posted mine for your map :)
SonyOne
rank pls
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply