さんきゅ～！！！

あり http://puu.sh/rxdih/e70989f6e0.zip

yo

1. コラボパートを書こう
   
2. artist名この辺見てるとNana Mizukiのほうがいいかな？って思います。
   http://www.mizukinana.jp/discography/album18.html
   http://www.mizukinana.jp/profile/
   
3. soft-hitclapが宮川大輔だったから修正したやつ使ってネ http://puu.sh/rxpgw/236e002e78.zip
   
4. 00:46:359 (1) - ちょっと近く感じので00:44:095 (1) - ここと同じようにx3.00付近まで間あけてみてはどうでしょう
   
5. 01:18:624 (6) - ちょっと左に動かすと綺麗だと思う
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:21:595 (3) - そこまで大きいジャンプさせるような音が無いので減らしてもいいかも・・・
7. 02:24:991 (3) - ^
   
8. 02:52:444 - ,04:36:171 - ここのノイズが目立つから無音のsliderslide追加したほうがいいと思う
   
9. 03:33:199 (5) - ここ無いほうが好きだな～03:32:491 (2,3) - ここと同じように！
   
10. 03:54:708 (1) - 始点finish?
    
11. 04:04:473 (3,4,5) - この辺も前後のパターンのようにNormal-whistle追加するのはどう？
    
12. 04:14:095 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 音がだんだん大きくなるように聞こえるから間隔も徐々に空けていってみたらかっこいいかも
    
13. 05:12:963 (1,2,3,4) - 今のままでも充分いいけど、(2,4)の始点にfinishの強い音があるからジャンプさせるとよりかっこいいな～

優勝

alacat wrote:

yo

1. コラボパートを書こう はーい
   
2. artist名この辺見てるとNana Mizukiのほうがいいかな？って思います。 Nana Mizuki にしました！
   http://www.mizukinana.jp/discography/album18.html
   http://www.mizukinana.jp/profile/
   
3. soft-hitclapが宮川大輔だったから修正したやつ使ってネ http://puu.sh/rxpgw/236e002e78.zip wow sorry すみません；；
   
4. 00:46:359 (1) - ちょっと近く感じので00:44:095 (1) - ここと同じようにx3.00付近まで間あけてみてはどうでしょう 2.9x OK
   
5. 05:12:963 (1,2,3,4) - 今のままでも充分いいけど、(2,4)の始点にfinishの強い音があるからジャンプさせるとよりかっこいいな～ 変えてみたけどもしかして意味を理解できてないかもしれない・・・・・・・

優勝

modありがとうございます！
ありえんよさみが深い

alacat wrote:

yo

1. 
   
2. 01:18:624 (6) - ちょっと左に動かすと綺麗だと思う
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:21:595 (3) - そこまで大きいジャンプさせるような音が無いので減らしてもいいかも・・・
4. 02:24:991 (3) - ^
   
5. 03:33:199 (5) - ここ無いほうが好きだな～03:32:491 (2,3) - ここと同じように！
   
6. 04:04:473 (3,4,5) - この辺も前後のパターンのようにNormal-whistle追加するのはどう？
   
7. 04:14:095 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 音がだんだん大きくなるように聞こえるから間隔も徐々に空けていってみたらかっこいいかも
   

優勝

ara猫さんありがとうううう！！！
全部直しました～
あと01:04:473 - この辺を少しだけ変えました

http://puu.sh/rxBGw/6033b5b2cc.zip

update

AWESOME

nice, an easier map of this

unrankable thing:

00:17:492 -inconsistent settings for red/green line on same spot (sampleset), make them both S:C7 i guess?

other things:
too lazy to check collab parts
00:02:208 (1) - why the drumclap? soft whistle or something on spinnerend would fit the song better I think
00:39:567 (7,8,1) - would be nicer if 8-1 was spaced more/same visually as 7-8 to make it stand out more
00:53:930 (2) - would just remove this 1/4, doesn't really work with the other rhythms you used, it feels way too random here
01:14:944 (4,1) - why the sudden stack in such a fast section? really kills momentum and doesnt fit the song since 01:15:086 (1) - is pretty important
01:48:482 - really feels like it deserves a bigger jump for emphasis, also jump on 01:49:190 (4) - could be a bit reduced since the tick is rather weak
01:51:454 (1) - 1/3 snapping like http://i.imgur.com/JFMZiTX.jpg seems to fit better
01:55:133 (2) - why not start the 1/2 circle pattern from here? fit better since the musical pattern starts here
02:01:642 (8) - why would you reduce spacing so much here when music is still building up? should have more or at least similar spacing to before
02:06:029 (1) - really lacks emphasis, how about moving 3 to get something like http://i.imgur.com/Xlk0gng.jpg
02:06:029 (1,4,5,6) - looks like you wanted to have 1-456 manually stacked? it's off a bit in that case http://i.imgur.com/1RkjRpL.jpg
02:06:737 (3,4,5,6,1) - whole pattern is really uncomfortable to play (at least for me), because of the stop combined with weirdly low spacing on 1 and the angle. maybe you can rework this pattern a bit
02:46:572 (11,1,1) - can you make this cleaner somehow, looks really unpolished
02:48:341 (1,2,3) - spacing feels overdone compared to song and other spacing you use around here
02:56:548 (1,2) - I'd actually ctrlg this rhythm since it doesn't belong to the musical pattern before/sounds are way different. that would greatly emphasize the vocals too http://i.imgur.com/PENlORJ.jpg
03:06:737 (3,1) - why is this suddenly not spaced?
03:33:341 (1,2,3,4) - ignores the song completely, listen to what the melody does. following that would be so much better
04:44:661 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - rhythm combined with ignored the vocals on white ticks is really awful to play
05:04:897 (1,4,5,6) - http://i.imgur.com/wOSHp98.jpg manually stack this or something
05:18:907 (5,1) - should probably be spaced // same for 05:23:718 (4,1) - to fit your other 1/4 repeat patterns better

rip ending : (

guess you can get alacat to rebubble, good luck!

oops, sorry my bad. Thanks Lasse!

Lasse wrote:

nice, an easier map of this

unrankable thing:

00:17:492 -inconsistent settings for red/green line on same spot (sampleset), make them both S:C7 i guess? fixed

other things:
too lazy to check collab parts
00:02:208 (1) - why the drumclap? soft whistle or something on spinnerend would fit the song better I think yea
00:39:567 (7,8,1) - would be nicer if 8-1 was spaced more/same visually as 7-8 to make it stand out more a little
00:53:930 (2) - would just remove this 1/4, doesn't really work with the other rhythms you used, it feels way too random here no change. i represented the momentum of the song
01:14:944 (4,1) - why the sudden stack in such a fast section? really kills momentum and doesnt fit the song since 01:15:086 (1) - is pretty important changed some part
01:51:454 (1) - 1/3 snapping like http://i.imgur.com/JFMZiTX.jpg seems to fit better wow ok
01:55:133 (2) - why not start the 1/2 circle pattern from here? fit better since the musical pattern starts here no
02:01:642 (8) - why would you reduce spacing so much here when music is still building up? should have more or at least similar spacing to before feeling
03:06:737 (3,1) - why is this suddenly not spaced? because it has changed from the slider to circle. and i like this
05:18:907 (5,1) - should probably be spaced // same for 05:23:718 (4,1) - to fit your other 1/4 repeat patterns better k

rip ending : (

guess you can get alacat to rebubble, good luck!

thanks Lasse :3

thx lasse

quite better for now. Rebubbled #1

alacatさんありがとう！！！

2

ooooooo thanks Lasse

i will check this weekend, sorry for the big delay ;w;

[GENESIS]

1. 01:45:227 (5,6) - pausing the rhythm feels kinda weird to me, there are still drums on 01:45:369 - and 01:45:652 - so maybe you could use 1/2 sliders
2. 02:46:925 - considering that you were following drums, it feels empty, you could even add a triple here, like this maybe
3. 03:05:227 (2,3) - and 03:05:793 (2,3) - could add NC in order to make irregular rhythm easier to read
4. 05:05:746 (4,5,6) - i don't really feel the triple here, i think 1/2 works better, maybe something like this, just a suggestion tho

very nice map, i like it a lot (:

np Kagetsu :3
I'm glad that only get to check

Kagetsu wrote:

i will check this weekend, sorry for the big delay ;w;

[GENESIS]

1. 03:05:227 (2,3) - and 03:05:793 (2,3) - could add NC in order to make irregular rhythm easier to read ok

very nice map, i like it a lot (: i'm happy :3

thank you for modding!!!

hype

Kagetsu wrote:

i will check this weekend, sorry for the big delay ;w;

[GENESIS]

1. 01:45:227 (5,6) - pausing the rhythm feels kinda weird to me, there are still drums on 01:45:369 - and 01:45:652 - so maybe you could use 1/2 sliders
2. 02:46:925 - considering that you were following drums, it feels empty, you could even add a triple here, like this maybe
3. 05:05:746 (4,5,6) - i don't really feel the triple here, i think 1/2 works better, maybe something like this, just a suggestion tho

fix

thx kagetsu san!

http://puu.sh/s0pT1/ee770b73f8.zip

update!

q

ariggato!

やった～～

おめでとうございます～

おめです！

Gratzz~ :3

Why is writting of artist different then other ranked maps?

According to the official site Nana Mizuki is correct.

AnatOWJIya wrote:

Why is writting of artist different then other ranked maps?

You shouldn't judge the metadata from the ranked mapsets. you have to prove that the metadata is fine from an official website of the artist for instance. as Namki said, the artist is fine plus we are using surname firstname for Japanese, Chinese and Korean for example so it comes Nana Mizuki instead of Mizuki Nana.

おめでとうございます

みなさんありがとう

ByBy wrote:

AnatOWJIya wrote:

Why is writting of artist different then other ranked maps?

You shouldn't judge the metadata from the ranked mapsets. you have to prove that the metadata is fine from an official website of the artist for instance. as Namki said, the artist is fine plus we are using surname firstname for Japanese, Chinese and Korean for example so it comes Nana Mizuki instead of Mizuki Nana.

I'm not judging,i'm just asking for the future 0w0

o this is ranked, gratz!