[quote="PandaHero"]m4m :3
[Black Another]
00:17:148 (1,2) - make them with similar curve or straight? Will looks better (for example https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/O4KNoQQY) but I like it exactly because they're different!!
00:19:891 (1) - hm, I would like to make two 1/2 sliders instead of this one, like you did here 00:17:148 (1,2), for making rhythm consistent. Also I dont like how you skip beat on this tick - 00:20:234 heck yeah, fixed this pattern in general
00:20:577 (2) - try this angle? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/j1jp2Xs0 Looks better for me, also movement is more fun than you have now I like it as it is now, I don't find any differences in flow
00:27:262 (10,1) - too close imo. try to move this stream - 00:26:920 (6,7,8,9,10) a bit down yeah that was really bad
00:27:777 (5) - nc? o.o yes! and the one below too
00:30:520 (10) - ^
00:36:348 (1,2,3,4,5) and 00:36:862 (6,7,8,9,10) - dunno why you decided to make such spacing here, it looks random for me ~_~ I don't know, me of years ago was rather dumb
00:43:805 (5,6) - sound on 6 is so strong, I would like to make more spacing between 3,4 and 5,6 https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/e1KeAVRw gave it some spacing!
01:19:548 (1) - why nc? o.o indeed a good question, fixed
01:43:547 (1,2) - what about bigger spacing than you have now? Sound on 2 is strong enough https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/vAoRK8T8 yeppu!
[Leader's Another] On his behalf I'm posting his answers since he's too lazy to login from uni
00:12:348 (3) - 00:13:034 (1) - missing normal sampleset on slider's head? fixed
00:37:377 (1,2) - make a 1/2 slider + 1/4 slider like you did here - 00:36:348 (1,2)? Because it feels strange when you skip sound on red tick I don't believe it is that weird?
01:01:548 (2,3) - 1 pixel overlap really trigger me, move 3 slider a bit down? Not so big of a problem, but fixed
01:17:491 (1,2,3) - oh, you suddenly increase spacing here, maybe will be better to make it similar to 01:16:805 (1,2,3) and next jump will feels cool I like the sudden spacing change honestly
01:38:062 (1,2,3,4) - try this placement? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/Tc13FyRE Nah, I prefer the way it is now! thank you for the mod!
[Hyper]
00:14:405 (3) - nc?
00:37:720 (1,3) - swap nc? xd
01:27:091 (1,2) - ugh, I think if you'll stack it in this way it will plays better https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/ZYc85jpo
fixed the ncs but I don't think changing the stack will play any differently..?
[Standard]
I dont recommend you to make sv changes in lowest diff
00:31:548 (2,3,4) - wtf is that jump it probably stacked by missclicking!
00:32:920 (5,1) - I would like to stack it, mom please yes yes
01:02:405 (3) - nc?
01:29:148 (2) - 01:30:520 (2) - add normal sampleset on it's head oK
01:32:577 (1,1) - dc ><[/quote] did you mean nc?
yes I mark fixed things with red text don't bully
[Black Another]
00:17:148 (1,2) - make them with similar curve or straight? Will looks better (for example https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/O4KNoQQY) but I like it exactly because they're different!!
00:19:891 (1) - hm, I would like to make two 1/2 sliders instead of this one, like you did here 00:17:148 (1,2), for making rhythm consistent. Also I dont like how you skip beat on this tick - 00:20:234 heck yeah, fixed this pattern in general
00:20:577 (2) - try this angle? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/j1jp2Xs0 Looks better for me, also movement is more fun than you have now I like it as it is now, I don't find any differences in flow
00:27:262 (10,1) - too close imo. try to move this stream - 00:26:920 (6,7,8,9,10) a bit down yeah that was really bad
00:27:777 (5) - nc? o.o yes! and the one below too
00:30:520 (10) - ^
00:36:348 (1,2,3,4,5) and 00:36:862 (6,7,8,9,10) - dunno why you decided to make such spacing here, it looks random for me ~_~ I don't know, me of years ago was rather dumb
00:43:805 (5,6) - sound on 6 is so strong, I would like to make more spacing between 3,4 and 5,6 https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/e1KeAVRw gave it some spacing!
01:19:548 (1) - why nc? o.o indeed a good question, fixed
01:43:547 (1,2) - what about bigger spacing than you have now? Sound on 2 is strong enough https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/vAoRK8T8 yeppu!
[Leader's Another] On his behalf I'm posting his answers since he's too lazy to login from uni
00:12:348 (3) - 00:13:034 (1) - missing normal sampleset on slider's head? fixed
00:37:377 (1,2) - make a 1/2 slider + 1/4 slider like you did here - 00:36:348 (1,2)? Because it feels strange when you skip sound on red tick I don't believe it is that weird?
01:01:548 (2,3) - 1 pixel overlap really trigger me, move 3 slider a bit down? Not so big of a problem, but fixed
01:17:491 (1,2,3) - oh, you suddenly increase spacing here, maybe will be better to make it similar to 01:16:805 (1,2,3) and next jump will feels cool I like the sudden spacing change honestly
01:38:062 (1,2,3,4) - try this placement? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/Tc13FyRE Nah, I prefer the way it is now! thank you for the mod!
[Hyper]
00:14:405 (3) - nc?
00:37:720 (1,3) - swap nc? xd
01:27:091 (1,2) - ugh, I think if you'll stack it in this way it will plays better https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/ZYc85jpo
fixed the ncs but I don't think changing the stack will play any differently..?
[Standard]
I dont recommend you to make sv changes in lowest diff
00:31:548 (2,3,4) - wtf is that jump it probably stacked by missclicking!
00:32:920 (5,1) - I would like to stack it, mom please yes yes
01:02:405 (3) - nc?
01:29:148 (2) - 01:30:520 (2) - add normal sampleset on it's head oK
01:32:577 (1,1) - dc ><[/quote] did you mean nc?
yes I mark fixed things with red text don't bully