1. try normal hp3 and hard hp5, better for the diff spread, generally ppl dont use hp>od i think
2. 320kbps mp3 is unrankable, u should encode it to 128-192kbps

1. 00:23:299 (3) - 3->1 missing ds
2. 02:22:095 (1) - 1->2 missing ds
   really well-structured normal

1. 00:12:499 (6) - add nc?
2. 00:18:499 (7,1,2) - 1/1 gap and 1/2 gap featuring with same distance is bad for reading, do sth different here?
3. 00:21:799 (4,5) - looks too close visually, try this maybe
4. 00:29:599 (7,8) - this is very hard to read, doing a trick here makes no sense to me.. just do a simple triplet like 00:31:998 (4,5,6) - ?
5. 00:39:498 (9,1) - the distance for this 1/2 gap is pretty similar to previous 1/4 gap -> 00:38:298 (6,7) - , so spacing 00:40:098 (1) - out would be more intuitive to read
6. 01:25:697 (7,8,9) - similarly, space the triplet farther from 01:26:297 (1) -
7. 02:18:495 (9) - similar point u know
8. 01:37:096 (2) - nc on this object to make 01:36:497 (1) - the slowdown more special
9. 01:57:796 (5,6) - this would flow better to 6 visually imo, also looks kinda consistent with 4
10. 02:16:995 (5,6) - this jump is really too sudden

Garden wrote:

[General]

1. try normal hp3 and hard hp5, better for the diff spread, generally ppl dont use hp>od i think
2. 320kbps mp3 is unrankable, u should encode it to 128-192kbps dunno how to convert an mp3 file's kbps, do u know someone who can?

[Normal]

1. 00:23:299 (3) - 3->1 missing ds
2. 02:22:095 (1) - 1->2 missing ds
   really well-structured normal

[Hard]

1. 00:12:499 (6) - add nc? i'm going for a new combo each verse so yeah
2. 00:18:499 (7,1,2) - 1/1 gap and 1/2 gap featuring with same distance is bad for reading, do sth different here?
3. 00:21:799 (4,5) - looks too close visually, try this maybe
4. 00:29:599 (7,8) - this is very hard to read, doing a trick here makes no sense to me.. just do a simple triplet like 00:31:998 (4,5,6) - ?
5. 00:39:498 (9,1) - the distance for this 1/2 gap is pretty similar to previous 1/4 gap -> 00:38:298 (6,7) - , so spacing 00:40:098 (1) - out would be more intuitive to read
6. 01:25:697 (7,8,9) - similarly, space the triplet farther from 01:26:297 (1) -
7. 02:18:495 (9) - similar point u know
8. 01:37:096 (2) - nc on this object to make 01:36:497 (1) - the slowdown more special
9. 01:57:796 (5,6) - this would flow better to 6 visually imo, also looks kinda consistent with 4
10. 02:16:995 (5,6) - this jump is really too sudden

good luck~

Garden wrote:

sth u can try -> https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Audio_editing
or u can also search 'online audio converter', that might be an easier alternative

Annika Flina wrote:

Here is your NM

General

Nothing to say here.

Normal

Looking good!

Hard

I think the AR is too low. 7.5 or 8 would work much better. changed it to 7.5

00:12:549 (6) - NC? done (was pointed out by another modder but i was kinda going for a nc-per-verse thing but when i think about it now tho it's more appropriate for it to be a nc)
01:12:547 (9) - ^ done
02:24:545 (1) - The spinner is too short. I would suggest extending it by 2 beats. done

I hope my mod was helpful.
Good luck on rank

Juiceys wrote:

Normal

00:41:048 (4) - Ctrl + h

Hard

01:07:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This pattern is pretty boring, try this for each 2 circles! https://puu.sh/s5Cor/1820fd0512.png
https://puu.sh/s5CrL/6a35dbcd82.png
etc..
01:43:746 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The flow on this combo is pretty bad, Change it to a zig zag line or something changed it, but not into a zigzag

Melsoon wrote:

Hi! ^^

I really like your map, I hope it will be ranked soon! thanks!

Normal

1. 00:12:249 (4) - maybe it will look better if you move it like this? it'll mess up the distance spacing between them tho
2. 01:40:446 (4) - correct a blanket
3. 02:15:545 (2) - ^

Hard diff looks good for me.
^^

sorry if something's not right - I'm new at modding it's okay hehe you've helped me at least and that's good enough

beefywisdom wrote:

I'm new to Osu! and I'm trying to find songs I know and I really wish this was ranked; just played normal and freaking LOVED it! Keep up the great work, playing 5 keys is so much fun on this song with the beatmap, I really hope it gets more attention and gets ranked in the near future!

cooldude4232 wrote:

From my queue

Hard

the sliders, at least the beginning are way to fast for this difficulty and could throw some players off

01:03:247 (2,3,4) - This pattern is way too hard for this difficulty, space them so you can hit them without moving the cursor
01:04:147 (1,2,3) - ^
01:05:047 (5,6,1) - ^
01:39:246 (4,5,6) - ^
01:19:447 (6,7,1) - overlap
01:24:847 (4,5,6) - ^
1:36:546 (1) - SV change for this level is a bit too extreme
01:57:846 (5) - I don't feel like 1/8 snapping is justified here
02:02:645 (5) - ^
02:21:845 (5) - ^

I can't mod normal diffs... it's ok

Einja wrote:

hi from my queue

Normal

AR5 is normally used for normal diffs, so i would use that instead of four

The drum hitsound doesn't make any sound what do you mean? it does

00:41:648 (5) - shorten this to a 1/2 slider and make it a reverse slider
01:26:947 (1) - the preview point here should be on the white tick
01:35:047 (3,4) - space these 2 slightly away from 01:34:747 (2) stacked 01:34:747 (2) with 01:35:047 (3) instead
02:23:045 (2,3,4) - make the circles and slider head a proper triangle
02:24:545 (1) - spinner should be silenced
01:53:346 - add a spinner here? since this is a normal diff, the end of the spinner (a white tick before the next slider) would be too close to 01:55:746 (1)

Yales wrote:

Hard:
00:20:649 (2) - sound more natural to put it on the next white tick. It catch the vocal better i made the new combo start with the slider instead and put a circle on 00:21:549 (3) - . is it better?
00:35:948 (8,1) - Spacing feels a bit weird because 00:35:048 (7,8) - was pretty spaced. (and same for everything else actually) made some rearranging from 00:35:048 (7) - to 00:40:748 (3) -
01:41:346 (1) - If you get rid off the red anchor you can make a nice blanket with 01:41:046 (9) - it looks nice overall but well it's meant to be symmetrical with 01:42:546 (4) - though. and it sorta blankets the 9 already lol like a sharp blanket so yeah
01:55:746 (1) - not centered with 01:55:146 (10) - also 01:55:746 (1) - looks better around x189 y350 in my opinion moved it to (204, 360) also rearranged some objects up to 01:57:246 (4) -

jaminclaw wrote:

From my queue open boxes for my comments

Colour code:
Green:Basically only opinion, it won't make that much of difference changing it or not
Pink: Part opinion. I recommend considering both of doing and not doing what I suggested
Orange: Important but not vital. I recommend you do what I suggested

All difficulties:

The spinner at the end doesn’t work because the music cuts out too early and the spinner goes for too long after the music has finished, if there was a way to stall the fade out, it would be fine deleted them. also added a hit circle on 02:24:245 (5) to both normal and hard difficulties for all of them to finish at the same tick

Easy:

00:23:049 (2): 00:23:349 (3): The circle and slider feel out of place. I suggest moving the slider up 15 grids and placing the circle between the 00:22:449 slider and the 00:23:349 slider so it looks in place. i wanted to keep these objects, from 00:20:649 (2) to 00:23:349 (2) , symmetrical, so i added a loop to 00:22:449 (1) , removed hit circle 2, and reversed 00:23:349 (2) , instead of your idea. because of this, the spacing changed so i slightly nudged objects from 00:25:149 (1) to 00:32:049 (1) upward.
00:26:949 (1): Move the slider up 2 grids turned its white middle anchor to a red one instead to make it less awkward
00:40:111 (2): i'm thinking that you meant to put a curved slider instead of a straight one um no but i also thought it was awkward so instead i made 00:41:048 (4) and 00:41:648 (5) straight. because of this, the spacing changed so i slightly nudged objects from 00:42:548 (1) to 00:53:048 (4) downward.
00:42:548 (1): 00:43:148 (3): the circle at 00:43:148 is 1 grid off from being vertically in line with the following sliders. to fix this move 00:43:148 1 grid up and 1 to the left while moving the circle at 00:42:548 1 grid up and 1 to the right. fixed
02:05:345: Gotta admit I really like that slider thanks!! did you notice i very shortly only used non-curved sliders starting from that slider to 02:14:345 (5) ?

Normal:

00:48:548 (1): the loop slider needs to be moved up 4 grids why? it's fine where it is..?

00:50:548 (3): the circle looks neater when it is in line with the 00:50:348 horizontally,and the loop slider end vertically. This only works if you did the previous step it looks great but it creates a problem with the spacing
01:33:846 (4): the circle needs to go five grids up fixed. because of this, the spacing changed so i nudged objects from 01:34:146 (5) to 01:37:146 (1) upward.

Hard:

00:00:550 (1) - 00:10:149 (1): I don't think this is necessary, none of the other beatmaps have it. Also I think the slider velocity is a bit too high. But it's really not that vital so you don’t have to change it if you don't want to. i'm not getting rid of it. and i think the sv is fine
00:12:549 (6): you should move the slider out of the way of the slider at 00:13:749. Make sure to move the circle at 00:12:249 with it so that cool pattern is kept. fixed. also changed the shape of 00:12:549 (6) .
00:35:048 (7): 00:35:948 (8): the slider shapes don’t fit with this music changed their shapes. also changed this one's shape 00:37:148 (3)
01:24:247 (1): 01:24:397(2): 01:24:547(3): I think you should stack these 3 beats to fit in with the other triple beats i'm not changing it
01:32:946 (4): the squiggle in this slider is unnecessary changed its shape
01:55:146 (10): this bit is a bit weird. Move the end of the slider to the same position as the circle in 01:54:546, then move 01:53:646, 01:54.246 and 01:54:846 5 grids up and 5 grids across i think it's fine the way it is

Overall a great map thank you!!