1. Advanced (2.43 stars, 200 notes)
2. Normal (2.04 stars, 156 notes)
3. Violets (feat. VIOLETZ) (3.35 stars, 303 notes)

Pandano wrote:

Hi, NM as requested.
I see that there's no mods on your thread yet but the song you made yourself is awesome already. Not much to fix in "Normal" diff, but there's some spacing problem in "Hard"!

Normal

Great diff!
Just want you to change the circle size from 4 to 3. Looks kinda small for a "Normal" diff.

Hard

00:07:099 (3,4) - Either stack them or separate them apart.
00:09:499 (3,4) - Same as above. Also make sure to give them the same distance as the length between them is equal.
00:11:899 (4) - Could make it closer to (3)'s slider end
00:17:899 (5) - Same as above
00:20:299 (8) - Could give it a new combo. Also keep it away from (7)'s slider start
00:25:099 (9) - Closer to (8)'s slider end
00:25:399 (1) - Place it onto (3)'s slider start
00:29:599 (7,8) - Stack them onto 00:29:899 (9)
00:31:998 (4,5) - Same as above
00:34:549 (5,6) - Same as above but place it on (4)'s slider end
00:36:798 (1,2) - Stack onto (3)
00:37:698 (4,5) - Space them away from (3)
00:39:348 (8) - Place it between (7) and (9) like this:

00:39:498 (9) - Mirror this one just like (7) before
00:41:598 (5,6) - Stack onto (7) after
00:43:998 (5,6,7) - Stack them, away from (8) works best
00:55:698 (1) - Hmm... The distance between (6) earlier is pretty close to this one. Consider making them closer or the player won't reflect in time
01:03:798 (5) - This part you made small triangle looks fine to me, but this one should be away from those triangles to prevent continual clicks.
01:04:697 (4) - Same as above
01:19:397 (6,7) - Make them closer together
01:20:147 (2) - Closer to (1) and (3), like this:

01:20:897 - From this part, do it like this: (Or you can stack those if you prefer)

01:23:297 - From here, making these circles a small stream works better, I think:

01:24:797 - Closer to (5,6)
01:25:697 - Same as above
01:34:547 - Stack them however you like, just don't make them spaced like this
01:49:096 - Let its slider start stay close to (5)'s slider end.
01:50:895 - Like above

The rest of it is mainly okay

That's all I can do to mod your map. This map is well-structured so really looking forward to seeing it get ranked and played worldwide

1. try normal hp3 and hard hp5, better for the diff spread, generally ppl dont use hp>od i think
2. 320kbps mp3 is unrankable, u should encode it to 128-192kbps

1. 00:23:299 (3) - 3->1 missing ds
2. 02:22:095 (1) - 1->2 missing ds
   really well-structured normal

1. 00:12:499 (6) - add nc?
2. 00:18:499 (7,1,2) - 1/1 gap and 1/2 gap featuring with same distance is bad for reading, do sth different here?
3. 00:21:799 (4,5) - looks too close visually, try this maybe
4. 00:29:599 (7,8) - this is very hard to read, doing a trick here makes no sense to me.. just do a simple triplet like 00:31:998 (4,5,6) - ?
5. 00:39:498 (9,1) - the distance for this 1/2 gap is pretty similar to previous 1/4 gap -> 00:38:298 (6,7) - , so spacing 00:40:098 (1) - out would be more intuitive to read
6. 01:25:697 (7,8,9) - similarly, space the triplet farther from 01:26:297 (1) -
7. 02:18:495 (9) - similar point u know
8. 01:37:096 (2) - nc on this object to make 01:36:497 (1) - the slowdown more special
9. 01:57:796 (5,6) - this would flow better to 6 visually imo, also looks kinda consistent with 4
10. 02:16:995 (5,6) - this jump is really too sudden

Garden wrote:

[General]

1. try normal hp3 and hard hp5, better for the diff spread, generally ppl dont use hp>od i think
2. 320kbps mp3 is unrankable, u should encode it to 128-192kbps dunno how to convert an mp3 file's kbps, do u know someone who can?

[Normal]

1. 00:23:299 (3) - 3->1 missing ds
2. 02:22:095 (1) - 1->2 missing ds
   really well-structured normal

[Hard]

1. 00:12:499 (6) - add nc? i'm going for a new combo each verse so yeah
2. 00:18:499 (7,1,2) - 1/1 gap and 1/2 gap featuring with same distance is bad for reading, do sth different here?
3. 00:21:799 (4,5) - looks too close visually, try this maybe
4. 00:29:599 (7,8) - this is very hard to read, doing a trick here makes no sense to me.. just do a simple triplet like 00:31:998 (4,5,6) - ?
5. 00:39:498 (9,1) - the distance for this 1/2 gap is pretty similar to previous 1/4 gap -> 00:38:298 (6,7) - , so spacing 00:40:098 (1) - out would be more intuitive to read
6. 01:25:697 (7,8,9) - similarly, space the triplet farther from 01:26:297 (1) -
7. 02:18:495 (9) - similar point u know
8. 01:37:096 (2) - nc on this object to make 01:36:497 (1) - the slowdown more special
9. 01:57:796 (5,6) - this would flow better to 6 visually imo, also looks kinda consistent with 4
10. 02:16:995 (5,6) - this jump is really too sudden

good luck~

Garden wrote:

sth u can try -> https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Audio_editing
or u can also search 'online audio converter', that might be an easier alternative

Annika Flina wrote:

Here is your NM

General

Nothing to say here.

Normal

Looking good!

Hard

I think the AR is too low. 7.5 or 8 would work much better. changed it to 7.5

00:12:549 (6) - NC? done (was pointed out by another modder but i was kinda going for a nc-per-verse thing but when i think about it now tho it's more appropriate for it to be a nc)
01:12:547 (9) - ^ done
02:24:545 (1) - The spinner is too short. I would suggest extending it by 2 beats. done

I hope my mod was helpful.
Good luck on rank

Juiceys wrote:

Normal

00:41:048 (4) - Ctrl + h

Hard

01:07:747 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This pattern is pretty boring, try this for each 2 circles! https://puu.sh/s5Cor/1820fd0512.png
https://puu.sh/s5CrL/6a35dbcd82.png
etc..
01:43:746 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The flow on this combo is pretty bad, Change it to a zig zag line or something changed it, but not into a zigzag

Melsoon wrote:

Hi! ^^

I really like your map, I hope it will be ranked soon! thanks!

Normal

1. 00:12:249 (4) - maybe it will look better if you move it like this? it'll mess up the distance spacing between them tho
2. 01:40:446 (4) - correct a blanket
3. 02:15:545 (2) - ^

Hard diff looks good for me.
^^

sorry if something's not right - I'm new at modding it's okay hehe you've helped me at least and that's good enough

beefywisdom wrote:

I'm new to Osu! and I'm trying to find songs I know and I really wish this was ranked; just played normal and freaking LOVED it! Keep up the great work, playing 5 keys is so much fun on this song with the beatmap, I really hope it gets more attention and gets ranked in the near future!

cooldude4232 wrote:

From my queue

Hard

the sliders, at least the beginning are way to fast for this difficulty and could throw some players off

01:03:247 (2,3,4) - This pattern is way too hard for this difficulty, space them so you can hit them without moving the cursor
01:04:147 (1,2,3) - ^
01:05:047 (5,6,1) - ^
01:39:246 (4,5,6) - ^
01:19:447 (6,7,1) - overlap
01:24:847 (4,5,6) - ^
1:36:546 (1) - SV change for this level is a bit too extreme
01:57:846 (5) - I don't feel like 1/8 snapping is justified here
02:02:645 (5) - ^
02:21:845 (5) - ^

I can't mod normal diffs... it's ok

Einja wrote:

hi from my queue

Normal

AR5 is normally used for normal diffs, so i would use that instead of four

The drum hitsound doesn't make any sound what do you mean? it does

00:41:648 (5) - shorten this to a 1/2 slider and make it a reverse slider
01:26:947 (1) - the preview point here should be on the white tick
01:35:047 (3,4) - space these 2 slightly away from 01:34:747 (2) stacked 01:34:747 (2) with 01:35:047 (3) instead
02:23:045 (2,3,4) - make the circles and slider head a proper triangle
02:24:545 (1) - spinner should be silenced
01:53:346 - add a spinner here? since this is a normal diff, the end of the spinner (a white tick before the next slider) would be too close to 01:55:746 (1)

Yales wrote:

Hard:
00:20:649 (2) - sound more natural to put it on the next white tick. It catch the vocal better i made the new combo start with the slider instead and put a circle on 00:21:549 (3) - . is it better?
00:35:948 (8,1) - Spacing feels a bit weird because 00:35:048 (7,8) - was pretty spaced. (and same for everything else actually) made some rearranging from 00:35:048 (7) - to 00:40:748 (3) -
01:41:346 (1) - If you get rid off the red anchor you can make a nice blanket with 01:41:046 (9) - it looks nice overall but well it's meant to be symmetrical with 01:42:546 (4) - though. and it sorta blankets the 9 already lol like a sharp blanket so yeah
01:55:746 (1) - not centered with 01:55:146 (10) - also 01:55:746 (1) - looks better around x189 y350 in my opinion moved it to (204, 360) also rearranged some objects up to 01:57:246 (4) -