[SP]00:14:820 (2) - 00:17:897 (2) - 00:20:974 (2) - 00:24:051 (2) - not sure why you ignore the red tick after these, doesn't sound too good. Only works on the ones later like 00:29:435 (1) -
00:37:127 (1,2,3) - r u trying to make this straight, because if not, you should
00:46:743 (1,2,3) - looks much better like this
00:48:474 (2) - instead of having an awkward gap maybe make this a reverse slider
00:52:320 (1) - might be nicer with a 4th reverse and no 00:53:474 (2) - , or if not this then make 00:52:320 (1) - into two 1/1 sliders like this
with the potential to make the second slider a reverse slider, better represents the song
01:07:704 (4,5) - ^
01:00:781 (3) - I don;'t think you should have sliders like this and sliders like 00:58:474 (3) - in the same map, they either need to look good or look weird, not both, maybe something like
01:14:820 (2) - dont think such a hard note should be on a slider end
if you folow the rhythm of the 3rd kiai you see that it changes twice, once here 01:19:243 (2) - and once here 01:23:281 (2,3) - i think the second rythm change is very poor and seems awkward to play along to
[xchorse]00:20:974 (4,5) - I don't see why these are stacked, doesn;'t match the rest of the section before them
00:31:743 (5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - I think this is a lot of weird movement with the stack into triple which goes into a slider not to mention you dont stack it earlier either. Would be betetr like 00:26:935 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) -
00:42:704 (5) - i dont think you really nice to hide this under the slider
00:52:127 (4) - i think this should be the same as the pervious 3 sliders just at a different angle and the change should happen at the NC where you repeat another pattern for 4 sliders
I thionk you should do a back forwards thing here 00:54:435 (2,3,4) - like this
00:58:089 (4) - I don't thinkl this needs to be under the slider end
01:09:435 (1) - maybe this should go under 01:08:858 (3) - instead?
01:26:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - since your folling the bass here maybe make 01:26:551 (3) - a reverse slider?
[shiguma]b= blanket
00:17:416 (2,3) - b
00:16:358 (4,5) - b
00:18:666 (1,2) - b
00:24:820 (1,2) - b
00:29:820 (5,8) - b
00:14:627 (3,2) - make the space between these to equal tio 00:14:339 (2,3) -
00:14:820 (1,2,3,4,1) - not quite sure why you're increasing the ds here, you could just make this pattern a sqaure and it would be much betetr and less pp farm
00:20:204 (1,3) - space these away so that the end of the sliderball area doesnt cross the circle
00:20:974 (1,2,3,4) - make it a square like i mentioned before
00:22:512 (4,5) - change angle of 5 end so that it b propperly
00:44:051 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i dont think intensity changes between these two ds in the stream
00:46:743 (2,3,4,5) - space out so that they done fade into each other ( if you dont have fade turned on, if you take and random circle and move 1/4 behind it in the timeline that will be the apporximate ffade of the circle, you can them move it while still looking 1/4 back to amke sure they dont fade into each other. Alternitivly you can superimpose the fade by semistacking them
00:47:897 (1,2) - doesnlt flow together change angle of 1
00:49:051 (4,5) - ctrl+g and then sellect both of them individually and cirl +g and then move this structure 00:49:051 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - so that its close to the slider but not by a lot ( like this
maybe 01:00:974 (5) - cirl +j ctrl+ h and chasnge the angle slightly be keep it in the same star formation to move to the left?
01:05:108 (2) - dunno why theres a jump here
01:13:281 (3,4,5,6) - square (btw should look like this 01:14:051 (1) - to flow out of the circle nicly out of the circle nicly
[extra]00:14:821 (6,7) - make ds of these two same as 00:15:205 (8,9) -
00:16:167 (5,6) - this jump should be bigger
00:16:744 (1) - the slider end should be clickable, really.
00:18:090 (7,1) - the fade crosses over
00:18:282 (8,1) - not propperly blanketed, if you care
00:18:666 (1) - do you really want this to land on a hard note, i thionk two long sliders with a 1/4 gap between them at where the notes start and a circle at the end would be much betetr
like this
00:22:513 (6) - ^
00:23:858 (6,3) - move these apart
00:30:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't understand the positioning of this or why it's curving, it shoul;d be the same angle as 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - the same distance spacing as it too, no way is a different set on notes justifiable for larger distance spacing and even if it is, the intensity does not change beteween
00:29:436 (1) - and 00:32:127 (7) - so there is no reason at all to be increasing the ds of the stream to a spaced one. sure in the next section at 00:32:512 (1) - you can but thats because the song gets more intense
following on the angle and positioning of 00:30:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - , it should be a ctrl +h of 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - positioned at x=281 y =248 when selecting all 5 circles
which means you'll also need to change the p[oistion of 00:30:590 (6,7) - and the angle of 00:30:974 (1,2,3,4,5) - , which imo should be a 90 degree rotation of 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) -
00:31:936 (5,6,7) - I don't see any reason why the tail of this stream turns like it does. if you're struggling for space then just make it a circular stream but theres legit no reason for the turn
00:32:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as the previous curved streams, its much better to play when they are straight
00:33:089 (6,7,8) - don't hide notes under the stream because it can easily lead to misreading
00:37:224 (2,3,4,5) - ds should be higher and i think somethintg going off at an angle like this would be much better for flow to the doubles
00:40:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - never have i ever seen such random sliders which dont even try to lead on to each other in any way. Not really an issue but its like why would you not want them to lead on to each other, you could do some nice curved sliders which are offset by like 120 degrees or something like that
00:49:051 (6) - this should be 2 circles, possibly stacked ontop of each other
01:02:320 (5) - this doesn't actually land on anything, either make it longer so that it is 1/4 away from the next note and silence the end or just use a circle
01:05:205 (1,3) - move these further apart so that the dont fade in to each other or, if you want them to fade into each other then superimpose the face (move them closed so that they are like half stacked )
01:16:551 (10) - there is no need for this
01:17:127 (3) - 01:25:974 (5) - as this sction is almost identical to the other kiai, the same criticisms apply
00:37:127 (1,2,3) - r u trying to make this straight, because if not, you should
00:46:743 (1,2,3) - looks much better like this
00:48:474 (2) - instead of having an awkward gap maybe make this a reverse slider
00:52:320 (1) - might be nicer with a 4th reverse and no 00:53:474 (2) - , or if not this then make 00:52:320 (1) - into two 1/1 sliders like this
with the potential to make the second slider a reverse slider, better represents the song
01:07:704 (4,5) - ^
01:00:781 (3) - I don;'t think you should have sliders like this and sliders like 00:58:474 (3) - in the same map, they either need to look good or look weird, not both, maybe something like
01:14:820 (2) - dont think such a hard note should be on a slider end
if you folow the rhythm of the 3rd kiai you see that it changes twice, once here 01:19:243 (2) - and once here 01:23:281 (2,3) - i think the second rythm change is very poor and seems awkward to play along to
[xchorse]00:20:974 (4,5) - I don't see why these are stacked, doesn;'t match the rest of the section before them
00:31:743 (5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - I think this is a lot of weird movement with the stack into triple which goes into a slider not to mention you dont stack it earlier either. Would be betetr like 00:26:935 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) -
00:42:704 (5) - i dont think you really nice to hide this under the slider
00:52:127 (4) - i think this should be the same as the pervious 3 sliders just at a different angle and the change should happen at the NC where you repeat another pattern for 4 sliders
I thionk you should do a back forwards thing here 00:54:435 (2,3,4) - like this
00:58:089 (4) - I don't thinkl this needs to be under the slider end
01:09:435 (1) - maybe this should go under 01:08:858 (3) - instead?
01:26:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - since your folling the bass here maybe make 01:26:551 (3) - a reverse slider?
[shiguma]b= blanket
00:17:416 (2,3) - b
00:16:358 (4,5) - b
00:18:666 (1,2) - b
00:24:820 (1,2) - b
00:29:820 (5,8) - b
00:14:627 (3,2) - make the space between these to equal tio 00:14:339 (2,3) -
00:14:820 (1,2,3,4,1) - not quite sure why you're increasing the ds here, you could just make this pattern a sqaure and it would be much betetr and less pp farm
00:20:204 (1,3) - space these away so that the end of the sliderball area doesnt cross the circle
00:20:974 (1,2,3,4) - make it a square like i mentioned before
00:22:512 (4,5) - change angle of 5 end so that it b propperly
00:44:051 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i dont think intensity changes between these two ds in the stream
00:46:743 (2,3,4,5) - space out so that they done fade into each other ( if you dont have fade turned on, if you take and random circle and move 1/4 behind it in the timeline that will be the apporximate ffade of the circle, you can them move it while still looking 1/4 back to amke sure they dont fade into each other. Alternitivly you can superimpose the fade by semistacking them
00:47:897 (1,2) - doesnlt flow together change angle of 1
00:49:051 (4,5) - ctrl+g and then sellect both of them individually and cirl +g and then move this structure 00:49:051 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - so that its close to the slider but not by a lot ( like this
maybe 01:00:974 (5) - cirl +j ctrl+ h and chasnge the angle slightly be keep it in the same star formation to move to the left?
01:05:108 (2) - dunno why theres a jump here
01:13:281 (3,4,5,6) - square (btw should look like this 01:14:051 (1) - to flow out of the circle nicly out of the circle nicly
[extra]00:14:821 (6,7) - make ds of these two same as 00:15:205 (8,9) -
00:16:167 (5,6) - this jump should be bigger
00:16:744 (1) - the slider end should be clickable, really.
00:18:090 (7,1) - the fade crosses over
00:18:282 (8,1) - not propperly blanketed, if you care
00:18:666 (1) - do you really want this to land on a hard note, i thionk two long sliders with a 1/4 gap between them at where the notes start and a circle at the end would be much betetr
like this
00:22:513 (6) - ^
00:23:858 (6,3) - move these apart
00:30:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't understand the positioning of this or why it's curving, it shoul;d be the same angle as 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - the same distance spacing as it too, no way is a different set on notes justifiable for larger distance spacing and even if it is, the intensity does not change beteween
00:29:436 (1) - and 00:32:127 (7) - so there is no reason at all to be increasing the ds of the stream to a spaced one. sure in the next section at 00:32:512 (1) - you can but thats because the song gets more intense
following on the angle and positioning of 00:30:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - , it should be a ctrl +h of 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - positioned at x=281 y =248 when selecting all 5 circles
which means you'll also need to change the p[oistion of 00:30:590 (6,7) - and the angle of 00:30:974 (1,2,3,4,5) - , which imo should be a 90 degree rotation of 00:29:436 (1,2,3,4,5) -
00:31:936 (5,6,7) - I don't see any reason why the tail of this stream turns like it does. if you're struggling for space then just make it a circular stream but theres legit no reason for the turn
00:32:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as the previous curved streams, its much better to play when they are straight
00:33:089 (6,7,8) - don't hide notes under the stream because it can easily lead to misreading
00:37:224 (2,3,4,5) - ds should be higher and i think somethintg going off at an angle like this would be much better for flow to the doubles
00:40:012 (1,2,3,4,5) - never have i ever seen such random sliders which dont even try to lead on to each other in any way. Not really an issue but its like why would you not want them to lead on to each other, you could do some nice curved sliders which are offset by like 120 degrees or something like that
00:49:051 (6) - this should be 2 circles, possibly stacked ontop of each other
01:02:320 (5) - this doesn't actually land on anything, either make it longer so that it is 1/4 away from the next note and silence the end or just use a circle
01:05:205 (1,3) - move these further apart so that the dont fade in to each other or, if you want them to fade into each other then superimpose the face (move them closed so that they are like half stacked )
01:16:551 (10) - there is no need for this
01:17:127 (3) - 01:25:974 (5) - as this sction is almost identical to the other kiai, the same criticisms apply