1. Remembrance (5,26 stars, 1632 notes)

1. 00:31:613 (5,6,7,8) - hmm mb you could emphasise this 00:31:789 (6) - . I know you ignored that drum woosh thing 00:31:083 (1,2,3,4) - here but icould be a nice addition still (you do it later on with slider and stuff)
2. 00:32:848 (2,3) - you coul nc to indicate a different rythm (on (3) that is)
3. 00:50:319 (4,5,6,7,8) - do some crazy shit with the vocal on 00:50:495 -. https://puu.sh/qzOFY/e7d5ee9acd.png (put the second kick slider over 00:50:848 (1) - cause lyrcs die out RLY fast hehe)
4. 00:56:142 (7) - slow this down for *~contrast~* to 00:56:407 (8,1) -
5. 01:07:789 - wouldnt it be more fitting if you tuned down the slider velo? (like 0,8x)
6. 01:18:995 (4,1,2) - mb you could make this even more extreme. I didnt feel enough contrast playing it
7. 01:18:995 (4,1) - increase spacing and/or 01:19:083 (1,2,3) - space this more than usual.
8. (01:20:672 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/qzOZG/3ff7c3823a.png would fit more with how you mapped this 01:21:201 (1,2,3,4) - since the vocals do similar things) you kinda switched around from 5 note streams and kick patterns.
9. 01:25:789 (3) - mb kick this instead ?
10. 01:30:024 (1,2,3,4) - you could reduce the spacing on those to contrast the speed of the slider 01:30:466 (2) - .
11. 01:36:995 (7,8,9,10,11) - you coudl change it up a bit from time to time so its not only equally spaced streams https://puu.sh/qzPvOfb3ea8d301.png
12. 01:39:289 - mute this one since its ignore 01:39:201 -
13. 01:46:966 - you could make this clickable and folly the melody instead
14. 02:18:377 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - arent the vocals a bit to subtle to map the usual spaced stream over them. The drums arent as monotone either. https://puu.sh/qzPWY/388e71a86a.jpg some rythm like this might fit with with somewhat low spacing on the triplets
15. 02:36:730 (1) - same thin about sv
16. 02:37:789 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) -
17. 02:37:789 (1,2,3,4) - i think half the spacing on this would make a good contrast to emphasise 02:38:142 (1,2,3,4,5) - better https://puu.sh/qzQ7z/8d750333f3.png. (dont foce yourself t follow patterns, the stacking game 02:36:907 (3) - 02:37:260 (3) - )
18. 02:53:142 (4) - 02:53:672 (4) - you could ctrl+h them so they slowly indicate that the next pattern will be up there. Also the "TE" on both of those owuld be emphasized better imo (cant explain why, mb because it points away from first part f the pattern (02:52:789 (1,2,3) - ) and thuse looks it want to escape break free (wtf am i tlking about))
19. 02:55:083 (1,2,3,4,5) - 2 double rythm would emphasis the vocals better https://puu.sh/qzQm6/9f3d3119df.pnga slider on (2) would make for a great pattern imo
20. 02:58:436 - mb you like this kind of stuff
    https://puu.sh/qzQpF/dbf826b00d.png. It feels kinda empty
21. 03:30:024 (1,2,3,4,5) - this was kinda wierd to play. mb 2 kicksliders would fit better ?
22. 03:31:789 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - sick
23. 04:40:966 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - where is this coming from? The song does have constant 1/4 rythm but its not as bland as this :/
24. 05:00:024 - 5 min mark... sick

Smokeman wrote:

m4m (picked this one cause it was the only one i could play ._.)

[drum'n'weeb]

1. 00:31:613 (5,6,7,8) - hmm mb you could emphasise this 00:31:789 (6) - . I know you ignored that drum woosh thing 00:31:083 (1,2,3,4) - here but icould be a nice addition still (you do it later on with slider and stuff) ???
2. 00:32:848 (2,3) - you coul nc to indicate a different rythm (on (3) that is)
3. 00:50:319 (4,5,6,7,8) - do some crazy shit with the vocal on 00:50:495 -. https://puu.sh/qzOFY/e7d5ee9acd.png (put the second kick slider over 00:50:848 (1) - cause lyrcs die out RLY fast hehe)
4. 00:56:142 (7) - slow this down for *~contrast~* to 00:56:407 (8,1) - no neeed
5. 01:07:789 - wouldnt it be more fitting if you tuned down the slider velo? (like 0,8x) probably, too lazy though
6. 01:18:995 (4,1,2) - mb you could make this even more extreme. I didnt feel enough contrast playing it
7. 01:18:995 (4,1) - increase spacing and/or 01:19:083 (1,2,3) - space this more than usual. Transition into chorus sounds rather smooth for me
8. (01:20:672 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/qzOZG/3ff7c3823a.png would fit more with how you mapped this 01:21:201 (1,2,3,4) - since the vocals do similar things) you kinda switched around from 5 note streams and kick patterns. no they don't it's straight up 5 syllables vs 2+2+1+1
9. 01:25:789 (3) - mb kick this instead ? I think smooth stream fits better, next note is super ghosty but this rhythm is better for overall reception
10. 01:30:024 (1,2,3,4) - you could reduce the spacing on those to contrast the speed of the slider 01:30:466 (2) - .
11. 01:36:995 (7,8,9,10,11) - you coudl change it up a bit from time to time so its not only equally spaced streams https://puu.sh/qzPvOfb3ea8d301.png
12. 01:39:289 - mute this one since its ignore 01:39:201 -
13. 01:46:966 - you could make this clickable and folly the melody instead
14. 02:18:377 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - arent the vocals a bit to subtle to map the usual spaced stream over them. The drums arent as monotone either. https://puu.sh/qzPWY/388e71a86a.jpg some rythm like this might fit with with somewhat low spacing on the triplets I think they stand out a lot
15. 02:36:730 (1) - same thin about sv
16. 02:37:789 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) -
17. 02:37:789 (1,2,3,4) - i think half the spacing on this would make a good contrast to emphasise 02:38:142 (1,2,3,4,5) - better https://puu.sh/qzQ7z/8d750333f3.png. (dont foce yourself t follow patterns, the stacking game 02:36:907 (3) - 02:37:260 (3) - ) I like the stacking game
18. 02:53:142 (4) - 02:53:672 (4) - you could ctrl+h them so they slowly indicate that the next pattern will be up there. Also the "TE" on both of those owuld be emphasized better imo (cant explain why, mb because it points away from first part f the pattern (02:52:789 (1,2,3) - ) and thuse looks it want to escape break free (wtf am i tlking about)) no idea lol, but I need to change the rhythm of the first sequence
19. 02:55:083 (1,2,3,4,5) - 2 double rythm would emphasis the vocals better https://puu.sh/qzQm6/9f3d3119df.pnga slider on (2) would make for a great pattern imo I feel like it's 5 equal syllables
20. 02:58:436 - mb you like this kind of stuff
    https://puu.sh/qzQpF/dbf826b00d.png. It feels kinda empty
21. 03:30:024 (1,2,3,4,5) - this was kinda wierd to play. mb 2 kicksliders would fit better ? ctrl+G'd
22. 03:31:789 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - sick
23. 04:40:966 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - where is this coming from? The song does have constant 1/4 rythm but its not as bland as this :/ no idea lol
24. 05:00:024 - 5 min mark... sick

pretty cool actually!
Only those switches from 5 note streams to kickslder pattern in the kiais were wierd and unpredictable at times.

good luck!

Mazziv wrote:

+1 for song choice akali

Louis Cyphre wrote:

m4m

[General]

- add in tags 'Shin Megami Tensei, ATLUS' and that would be enough. added with some moonrunes/whatever
- I don't know, probably because i'm a great fan of persona, that background just doesn't fit at all for me and i believe for others who played persona 3. It's up to you, but i'd set Persona background instead. I like it and fits the atmosphere of the song super well for me

[Remembrance]

00:54:730 (8,1) - extend the slider till blue tick so it will go right according to vocal, since you follow vocal rhytm right after at 00:55:083 (1,2,3,4) - vocal starts on 00:54:554 (7) - and I think it's ok to map it as note+1/2 slider to avoid skipping clap
00:57:024 (3,4,5,6,7) - there are tones of such streams in entire map. I understand that there are sounds on background of the song, but i personally find this useless, it abuses the map. It's to keep the flow going and rhythm more varied, it's ok in dnb for the most part
00:59:848 (5,6) - I'd add here a jump, since there are jumps at 00:59:936 (6,7) - 01:00:642 (10) - which fits with song very well. 1/4 jumps after notes have different impact than the ones after sliders which are way more lenient and note placement after them doesn't matter that much
01:04:436 (5) - i don't want to be nazi, but urrr... perfectionism inside my heart just had an insult. Please stack perfectly with this slider 01:04:083 (4) - editor does that rip
01:08:319 (3,4,5,6,7) - delete '5' it breaks the rhythm. You did it right at 01:09:730 (3,4,5,6) -
01:11:142 (2,3,4,5) - ^
01:13:966 (2,3,4) - ^ again it's dnb rhythm, it's not overmapped and is interchangeable for the sake of variety and rhythm structure I want to use, (quint /doubles/quint/doubles/ 1/2 build up part)
01:25:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - it's better to make jump from '6' to '1' instead of '1' to '2'. jump after 01:25:436 (1) - doesn't matter that much again but added it on the next slider
01:40:260 (1) - i'll mention just once. I always diagree to use non linear shapes in short sliders. Seriously, this is not looking good. depends but agreed here
02:07:083 (1,2,3,4,5) - i'd delete '2' and extend slider '1' till blue tick. Fits better imo. ye why not
02:25:260 (1) - this is the only slider of such shape. I'd understand if it was at unique part of the song, but unfortunatly it isn't. Consider to fix it. never liked it dunno why I kept it
02:59:583 (2,3) - fix the overlap

WORSTPOLACKEU wrote:

Hejka

00:38:142 (1,3) - Stack nie jest perfekcyjny.
00:44:319 (3,1) - Nie wiem czy to to ze jest zmieniony angle i sie dziwnie przechodzi czy to spacing, ja bym troszke podwiekszyl spacing! powiększył, tutaj raczej zwiększył
00:51:907 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Napewno da sie to jakos ladniej urzadzic! nr 3 nie jest symetrycznie a moglo by byc! https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6093339 (chba ze jestem slepy i zle widze bo juz watpie sam czy to jest tak czy nie ale po mojemu to troche krzywe)
01:01:083 (2,3) - Zeby pasowalo, powinno byc CTRL-G odwrotnie, slider-note wtedy zlapiesz kazdy strong beat na poczatku kicksliderow i sie fajniej gra!
ewentualnie tak -> http://puu.sh/rbbsE/ec57fe9767.jpg
01:16:966 (5) - Pasuje to troche dalej dac, more spacing
01:25:701 - Ta nutka jest niepotrzebna!
01:30:377 (1,2) - To musi byc jakos oznakowane ze tam jest jedna nutka jeszcze pod spodem, nikt sie teko nie bedzie spodziewal jesli jest polozone w taki sposob ale z drugiej strony to nie bedzie tego elementu doubla.. hmm nie wiem ale mi sie to nie bardzo podoba, dziwnie sie gra akurat ten part. bardzo bym chcial to zostawic
02:14:760 (5,6,7,8,9) - To sie troszke dziwnie gra, bez zadnego przygotowawczego slidera albo nutki, tak z dupy ze tak powiem wiem czemu tak jest rozumiem tok myslenia ale nie wiem czy to jest dobry pomysl, ja bym tam pewnie dodal jedna nutke albo zaczal od slidera zeby miec poczucie tego offbeata.
02:20:142 (2,3) - Tak samo tutaj, CTRL-G na te dwa to kickslidery lapia wszystkie dzwieki ktore powinny. Ewentualnie tak -> http://puu.sh/rbbsE/ec57fe9767.jpg
03:54:377 (1,3) - Stack
04:04:260 (3,6) - Stack
04:09:907 (3) - Stack
04:50:495 (4) - Troche za blisko w porownaniu do 04:49:789 (2,3) -

To by bylo na tyle, jestesm strasznie slaby w mapowaniu DnB ale probowalem, jesli uwazasz ze mod za krotki podaj inna mapke w grze to zrobie kolejnego moda bo za duzo nie znalazlem, wg mnie mapka ok Bardzo fajnie sie gra a ja generalnie nie lubie doubli :>

GL

Hula wrote:

[mod cos i have to]
The keysounding on the parts at the start with the piano aren't obvious that they're hitsounded at all, it just sounds like it's a part of the music, try finding a light whistle-like hitsound to put on top of them as well as your keysound so it's more emphasised. Since as it stands, when playing 00:03:377 (4,5,6,7) - this is more emphasised than 00:02:848 (1,2,3) - , make it so it's at least even on emphasis =].

00:10:524 (3,4,5,6) - Replace this rhythm with 2x1/4 sliders starting on that blue tick? It would fit the wooshy sounds that are on the blue ticks there better, giving stronger emphasis I think this fits + is more obvious rhythmically?
00:21:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - These hitsounds are rly quiet, try using another hitfinish? In dnb songs, I tend to use this hitfinish http://puu.sh/rd5ge/6f4838cbdd.wav , just a suggestion. That or increase the volume of your hitsound here.
Your method of hitsounding by putting kicks on the whistles is odd. these are all drum claps and toms
00:24:907 (4) - Unnecessary hitsound
00:26:672 (7,8,1) - Hitsound unnecessaryu on the (7) and especially so since you're putting 1/4 there for the 1/8, it feels like a mess and with the hitsounding feels like it should play as 1/2. You could however choose to hitsound it like you did here 00:32:319 (9,10,1) - , which masks the 1/8 much better and allows for a more natural 1/4 play. removed + I leave on second instance because it's end of the stanza = build up/emphasis/whatever
00:41:319 (3) - Blanket the 1 and have it so it is symmetrical either side of the y-axis. It is blanketed just far away, moving note after it instead of Y symmetry (symmetrical but tilted a bit)
00:43:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Same as earlier
00:44:848 (1,2,3,4,1) - Increase spacing to emphasise this more from the previous streams
00:46:966 (2,3,4,5,6) - This shouldn't be 1/4 boring hi-hat patterning here, since the drum beat on the white tick makes it hard and rubbish to play, since you place no emphasis on the drum beat here, you spam 1/4 hit hat patterns when the part of the rhythm is empty of kicks and snares and shit =] Instead, try having it so that it is slider, circle, slider, with there being a jump to the blue tick circle, it would fit the song much more. I use those when something happens with the vocals, I think boring standard hihat pattern fits here, then vocal starts again 00:47:495 (6,7) - and it's a small jump

SPOILER

00:47:495 (6) - Why have you put this hitsound here? cuz succ
00:50:319 (4,5,6,7) - Nice
00:53:142 (7) - Why have you placed all these hitsounds on here and why is it spaced so much less when you're obviously trying to emphasise it with all these hitsounds and the vocals give a good reason to increase or maintain the spacing.
00:54:201 (3,4,5,6,7) - Same as previously mentioned about the strong drum beat in the middle of the hi-hat spam things. Instead, this time you could do it so it's idk how it's strong if it's just kicks all day and it blends, but cool idea with the rhythm tbh

SPOILER

00:55:348 (2,3) - You did it good here
00:57:024 (3,4,5,6,7) - Again =[
I won't mention the white tick things in the middle of the 1/4 anymore, since I think you get the idea
01:00:201 (7) - Remove whistle
01:01:083 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Rhythm works better when it looks like this, since the saxophone is more dominant than the vocals 01:01:436 - sax hit is here, so I want to keep it consistent with (2,3) so it's a stack on the slider not a return, kinda weak

SPOILER

01:03:554 (1,2,3,4,5) - Too many whistles, keep to the drum beat ye pretty ass
01:04:083 (4,5) - These sliders are too long by 1/4 of a beat each, even when they're 1/2 they play like ass, since they retract from the momentum plays fine for me idk
I won't comment more on the hitsounds, you get my drift about the hitsounds right? You keep putting kicks when there are no kicks in the song so it sounds/plays confusingly
01:13:260 (9,10,1) - Why clap spam though should have been whistles lul
01:30:024 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Seriously avoid this, I know there are vocals on the blue tick, but it's totally unexpected and the drum here is way more dominant than the vocals which start on a 1/4 beat, just have a standard quintuple here bro and put the slider on the downbeat, since it plays like ass.
01:53:760 (4) - How come this isn't a 1/2 slider? variety
02:16:172 (3,4,5,6) - Incorrect spacing?
02:51:907 (5) - Missing whistle thing
03:14:848 (1,2) - Flows poorly from the previous slider, maybe try having it so it looks something like this? what, it doesn't

SPOILER

03:22:966 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Same as previously mentioned about this
03:30:024 (1,2,3,4,5) - Flow direction changes all over the place. The slider coming out of the pattern is counterintuitive.
03:32:848 (1) - looks like it's gonna only be a 1/4 slider, could be an issue
03:39:466 (6) - I'm confused why this is a 1/4 slider here since this is probably the least dominant 1/4 in this stream. If anything 03:39:377 (5) - should be a 1/4 slider cos this is a vocal and the consequent 1/4 lacks a vocal. I did it to introduce player to the idea that the mixed vocal/synth rhythm part is incoming which happens in the upcoming kiai so I have a bit of focus switch here I suggest changing the rhythm of 03:39:024 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - to this

SPOILER

03:43:083 (1,3) - Confused why these are sliders, they play really slowly and poorly. vocals, variety, will think about changing this
03:45:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - The flow between these two patterns is fucked, 03:45:554 (1,2,3,4,1) - Ctrl h this and move the slider shape a bit and it already flows so much better. There's no justification for the really awkward direction of play change between the two patterns in this buildup
03:54:907 (3) - Whistle missing on the slider end
04:18:642 (4,5,6) - Why this hitsounding all of a sudden though? additions set fked, but things calm down so changing after this
04:32:495 (1) - Blanket the start of the (5) slider
04:41:319 (5,6,7) - Keep spacing the same here, there is a jump from 6 to 7
gl hf

1. 00:00:025 - check that custom sample settings are the same for the red/green lines
2. 00:21:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - kinda wondering what your ds pattern is for these combos, like shouldnt these 00:21:554 (1,2,3) - be 0.6ds since you never have a drop from 0.8 to 0.4 only a gradually one like 01:06:730 (1,2,3) - and 03:22:966 (1,2,3,4) - shouldnt these be 0.8 like the other similar ones? can't really hear anything that made them stand out, same for 02:37:436 (1,2,3) - used to be 1.0ds for similar parts
3. 00:32:848 (2) - sliderbodywhistle seems unintentional here
4. 00:42:024 (6) - shouldn't this be a slider from the pattern your following (High pitch end = 1/2 low pitch = circle?)
5. 01:40:260 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no custom hitsounds for the drums here?
6. 01:41:936 (2) - finding the middle beat your skipping here for these during section pretty strong,since it has a beat for the instrument your following here aswell, could maybe bring 01:39:113 (2,3) - back sometimes during this section instead of all 4 sliders for some variety?
7. 01:46:789 (4,5,6) - would increase the ds a bit between 4-5 like the others
8. 01:52:613 (5,6) - swap hitsounds
9. 02:43:613 (1,3) - NC on 3 instead? since the new sentence starts there and you also have a bit of an indicitator for the stacks to spaced stream thingy
10. 02:47:142 (3) - whisle on tail
11. 03:28:966 (1) - knick in the middle to represent the skipped vocal here?
12. 03:54:907 (3) - whisle on tail
13. 03:59:672 (4) - maybe control +h ish this, kinda hard flow for this combo since you already broke here 03:59:319 (2,3) -
14. 04:41:142 (3) - seems a bit weird this is the only one whisled, could also whisle the red tick in the returns or atleast whistle the end of 04:39:907 (3) - aswell since its the same with that strong piano
15. 04:42:024 (7) - any reason why this is kinda emphasized wiht a jump? loses a bit of impact for 04:42:377 (1) - imo
16. 04:42:377 (1) - whisle on tail like the others in the combo for that sound
17. 04:59:936 - can delete the timing point here since its the same as previous
18. I think someone mentioned this before but the drain is actually 1ms short and you know how strict the minumum 5 minutes are so maybe extend the spinner a small bit by 1/16th or something, looks bad but isnt noticable and you get the 5 minutes rather then extending the mp3 file a second

Wishkey wrote:

Yow! saw this was the map for m4m

General
Seems like normal-hitclap2.wav is unused

00:00:025 - check that custom sample settings are the same for the red/green lines
I think someone mentioned this before but the drain is actually 1ms short and you know how strict the minumum 5 minutes are so maybe extend the spinner a small bit by 1/16th or something, looks bad but isnt noticable and you get the 5 minutes rather then extending the mp3 file a second

Wishkey wrote:

Yow! saw this was the map for m4m

General
Seems like normal-hitclap2.wav is unused

Remembrance

1. 00:00:025 - check that custom sample settings are the same for the red/green lines
2. 00:21:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - kinda wondering what your ds pattern is for these combos, like shouldnt these 00:21:554 (1,2,3) - be 0.6ds since you never have a drop from 0.8 to 0.4 only a gradually one like 01:06:730 (1,2,3) - and 03:22:966 (1,2,3,4) - shouldnt these be 0.8 like the other similar ones? can't really hear anything that made them stand out, same for 02:37:436 (1,2,3) - used to be 1.0ds for similar parts
3. 00:32:848 (2) - sliderbodywhistle seems unintentional here
4. 00:42:024 (6) - shouldn't this be a slider from the pattern your following (High pitch end = 1/2 low pitch = circle?) not really following any pattern, just felt like it
5. 01:40:260 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no custom hitsounds for the drums here? no because you don't click all of them
6. 01:41:936 (2) - finding the middle beat your skipping here for these during section pretty strong,since it has a beat for the instrument your following here aswell, could maybe bring 01:39:113 (2,3) - back sometimes during this section instead of all 4 sliders for some variety? I want it this way, want this part to be less intense clicking wise
7. 01:46:789 (4,5,6) - would increase the ds a bit between 4-5 like the others
8. 01:52:613 (5,6) - swap hitsounds
9. 02:43:613 (1,3) - NC on 3 instead? since the new sentence starts there and you also have a bit of an indicitator for the stacks to spaced stream thingy
10. 02:47:142 (3) - whisle on tail
11. 03:28:966 (1) - knick in the middle to represent the skipped vocal here? whaat
12. 03:54:907 (3) - whisle on tail
13. 03:59:672 (4) - maybe control +h ish this, kinda hard flow for this combo since you already broke here 03:59:319 (2,3) -
14. 04:41:142 (3) - seems a bit weird this is the only one whisled, could also whisle the red tick in the returns or atleast whistle the end of 04:39:907 (3) - aswell since its the same with that strong piano
15. 04:42:024 (7) - any reason why this is kinda emphasized wiht a jump? loses a bit of impact for 04:42:377 (1) - imo
16. 04:42:377 (1) - whisle on tail like the others in the combo for that sound I try to hitsounds only active parts if I can
17. 04:59:936 - can delete the timing point here since its the same as previous
18. I think someone mentioned this before but the drain is actually 1ms short and you know how strict the minumum 5 minutes are so maybe extend the spinner a small bit by 1/16th or something, looks bad but isnt noticable and you get the 5 minutes rather then extending the mp3 file a second

Nice map, GL!

Strategas wrote:

Wishkey wrote:

Yow! saw this was the map for m4m

General
Seems like normal-hitclap2.wav is unused

00:00:025 - check that custom sample settings are the same for the red/green lines
I think someone mentioned this before but the drain is actually 1ms short and you know how strict the minumum 5 minutes are so maybe extend the spinner a small bit by 1/16th or something, looks bad but isnt noticable and you get the 5 minutes rather then extending the mp3 file a second

uh your drumclap3 and drumclap4 has a buildup sound before the actual "hit" goes off, so it might feel delayed, would be cool if you could cut it off imo

00:14:672 (5,6,7,1) - pretty disgusting overlap

00:16:613 (7) - move to 440,84 for better visuals

00:18:377 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - spacing looks messy for this whole patern

00:32:848 (2) - there's a whistle on the whole slider :X please remove it

00:43:788 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - expected you to change the spacing on these like on the rest 00:21:201 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - etc 00:44:848 (1,2,3,4) - want these to be spread because vocals, so having constant decrese on previous too would be meh

01:03:201 (7,8,1,2,3) - I guess you're going for star here but it doesn't fit that well here. sound on 01:03:201 (7,1,3) - gets intense with each hit but you keep the star patern as same distance, so as a result 01:03:377 (8) - feels too much spaced and 01:03:907 (3) - feels too little spaced

01:17:672 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - pretty inconsistent also
01:28:966 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - and so on.. these have vocals on them

02:04:083 (7,1) - pretty anticlimatic way to go into the new section

02:09:024 - why is this empty

02:34:613 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - don't reallty get how come you start from big spacing and reduce it when the buildup is happening evened it out

03:36:201 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - too much spacing for such calm section, they way you did it at 03:24:907 (2,3,4,5,6) - 03:26:142 (1,2,3,4,5) - etc seems more appropriate made it smallerbut still more than previously, music changes

04:18:642 (4) - seems off rhythm wise, starting on white ticks is better imo
04:18:907 (5,6) - sounds off aswell

map is alright but still can use more polish before calling me back