forum

SOSOSO (Tsukui Kazuhito) - Fly with me (feat. Hatsune Miku)

posted
Total Posts
34
show more
Topic Starter
Aloda

gaston_2199 wrote:

Hi!
Sorry sorry D:
Sorry for response so late :(
NM from my queue
[Innet Oni]
It's good map, maybe I don't find problems
  1. 00:45:855 (4) - Here is kat for snare and the electro sound
  2. 00:46:497 (8) - kat for electro sound
  3. 00:46:712 (9) - Here snare, change to kat
  4. 00:47:355 (13) - Change to don and add don here 00:47:462 - to follow the electro sound. Is better
  5. 00:48:426 (20) - kat here maybe (snare)
  6. 00:48:640 (21) - kat (electro sound)
  7. 00:49:926 (29) - kat (if you accept 00:46:497 (8) - for consistence)
  8. 01:38:355 (60) - Change to don, is the same that 01:37:926 (58) -
  9. 01:38:462 (61) - Maybe move to 01:38:676 - ? sound is better imo
  10. 01:39:533 - Add don
  11. 01:45:962 (33) - Move to 01:46:390 - to follow electro sound, is rare the sound here 01:45:962 -
  12. 01:49:283 (52) - Maybe change to kat?
  13. 01:59:676 (32) - The same that 01:45:962 (33) -
  14. 02:02:354 (47,49) - Ctrl + G and move this 02:02:461 (48) - to 02:02:676 - . Sound is better imo
  15. 03:44:141 (4,9) - kat (snare)
That's all. Sorry for short mod, the map is very good. Good luck! take my star :)
Thank you for the mod and the star! I applied almost everything! :D
Aisha
Hi! I was about to tell you to revive this xD

General

  1. BG: May I suggest looking for other more interesting? Current one fills the song and all but I think it's a little simple. Maybe this is better :p (or this aswell :p
  2. Audio bitrate: Even it sounds fine at 160 kbps you should find for some 192 (would be even better :P)
  3. Metadata suggestions (tags and design): Maybe add 'Techno' / 'Pop' to Tags (as I've read it's a mix of them). Other than that looks nice
[Inner Oni]
  1. Probably it's more personal but may I suggest 'Fly Oni' as diffname? Totally up to you w/e
  2. I think 1.6 SV doesn't look that good. I know song is currently bit hard talking about SR but I think it would be better stucking at 1.4SV (Current SV is like 160~bpm). If you want to keep it go ahead, but I felt that while testplaying
  3. 00:29:997 - My main concern on this section is why you represent the same sound 00:31:283 (10,11) and 00:32:997 (21,22) with different notes. I think d k is better than d d. (00:36:426 (43,44) - also). If you wanted variation I think it's not that neccesary since it's the beggining and only have 4 repetitions
  4. 00:37:069 (46,47,48,49,50) - 00:37:926 (52,53,54,55,56) - 00:38:783 (58,59,60,61,62) - 00:39:640 (64,65,66,67,68) - may I suggest variating them or making them kkddk? They feel too louder for the electrosound
  5. 00:42:855 - rhythm keeps sounding til 00:43:712 - add some notes
  6. 00:44:997 - what about using +0.01 sv change and finishing with 1.1x on 00:45:426 - ?
  7. 00:46:926 (2,3) - kk probably fills better
  8. 01:11:997 (84) - maybe this as kat is good for variation and making something interesting according to rhythm
  9. 01:12:855 - this section feels a little empty. I know here it becomes more calmer but adding some notes could be interesting
  10. ^if you agree with this you could start longstream from 01:23:140 -
  11. 01:41:569 (9,10,11) - 01:43:283 (19,20,21) - these three singles makes it feel a little empty, maybe a triple between 2nd and 3rd
  12. 02:04:176 (57) - delete and start longstream from 02:04:390 - ?
  13. 02:10:712 - 02:17:569 - overmap this a little prolly, feels so empty
  14. 02:17:997 - same about longstream stuff
  15. 02:48:855 - from the second half of the Kiai you could add some triples like you did on 02:50:355 (12,13,14) - on parts like 02:52:069 -
  16. 03:40:283 - stream xD
    If you don't agree in a first instance with longstreams at that point you could start making them from the last suggestion (if you like ascendant difficulty maps)
  17. 03:43:926 - I don't feel this SV up that neccesary tbh, but if you want to you can hold it
  18. 03:53:997 - LS lol
  19. 04:10:926 (92) - try a kat on here and you emphatise last don better (also follows kick bettah)
  20. 04:13:712 - SV speedup from here (also with the volume raiseup) fills greaat
  21. 04:28:283 - from here you could use the same rhythm follow that you're using on 04:24:855 - some doubles feel so strange (not at first half of this section)
  22. 04:41:783 (9) - delete big note imo
  23. 04:48:747 (33) - :arrow: 04:48:319 - and making 04:48:855 (34) - big note? Repeats through this part (fills better imo)
  24. 05:21:105 - +0.01 from here SV up to make it more smooth?
  25. 05:48:855 - these SV slowdown makes more sense imo, n1
That's all! Sorry for walltext ;; didn't expect that considering it's already a good map. Tell me when you apply this to come back, nice job at this and so fun, correct stream usage aswell ~
Topic Starter
Aloda

xfraczynho wrote:

Hi! I was about to tell you to revive this xD

General

  1. BG: May I suggest looking for other more interesting? Current one fills the song and all but I think it's a little simple. Maybe this is better :p (or this aswell :p As much as I love that second suggestion, I don't really want to use it since there's already another ranked map with that bg. Also I think the current bg is more fitting with the tone and feel of the song.
  2. Audio bitrate: Even it sounds fine at 160 kbps you should find for some 192 (would be even better :P) I spent a while looking for a higher quality MP3 when I first mapped this, and this was the best I could find .w. I think it sounds okay though, so it should be fine
  3. Metadata suggestions (tags and design): Maybe add 'Techno' / 'Pop' to Tags (as I've read it's a mix of them). Other than that looks nice Added
[Inner Oni]
  1. Probably it's more personal but may I suggest 'Fly Oni' as diffname? Totally up to you w/e As cool as that name is, I'd prefer to keep it as a generic Inner Oni rather than something unique. Just personal preference I guess.
  2. I think 1.6 SV doesn't look that good. I know song is currently bit hard talking about SR but I think it would be better stucking at 1.4SV (Current SV is like 160~bpm). If you want to keep it go ahead, but I felt that while testplaying I originally set it to 1.6 just because it felt really slow at 1.4 140bpm, but because of the other SV increases throughout the map, 1.4 is probably right. Changed.
  3. 00:29:997 - My main concern on this section is why you represent the same sound 00:31:283 (10,11) and 00:32:997 (21,22) with different notes. I think d k is better than d d. (00:36:426 (43,44) - also). If you wanted variation I think it's not that neccesary since it's the beggining and only have 4 repetitions Okay, changed all to d k.
  4. 00:37:069 (46,47,48,49,50) - 00:37:926 (52,53,54,55,56) - 00:38:783 (58,59,60,61,62) - 00:39:640 (64,65,66,67,68) - may I suggest variating them or making them kkddk? They feel too louder for the electrosound Though I prefer kkkkk here, people have made this suggestion before, so I guess I'm okay with changing it.
  5. 00:42:855 - rhythm keeps sounding til 00:43:712 - add some notes Taking this pattern all the way to 00:43:712 sounds kind of weird and doesn't play well imo, so I've ended it at 00:43:640 instead.
  6. 00:44:997 - what about using +0.01 sv change and finishing with 1.1x on 00:45:426 - ? Okay.
  7. 00:46:926 (2,3) - kk probably fills better Sure
  8. 01:11:997 (84) - maybe this as kat is good for variation and making something interesting according to rhythm kdkdddk is a little weird to play here imo, so I changed this pattern completely to kkdkkkd, the polar opposite of the similar pattern at 00:58:069 instead. Also changed the pattern at 04:10:069 for consistency.
  9. 01:12:855 - this section feels a little empty. I know here it becomes more calmer but adding some notes could be interesting
  10. ^if you agree with this you could start longstream from 01:23:140 - This section was one of the hardest parts of this song to map for me. Since the section is so calm compared to the sections before and after it, anything interesting I tried in here felt over the top. In the end I went with the simple patterns I have now because they at least felt okay to play. I'll keep this as it is.
  11. 01:41:569 (9,10,11) - 01:43:283 (19,20,21) - these three singles makes it feel a little empty, maybe a triple between 2nd and 3rd Done for the first, but not the second set both, I changed my mind.
  12. 02:04:176 (57) - delete and start longstream from 02:04:390 - ? That doesn't sound quite right to me, so I've changed it to something else instead.
  13. 02:10:712 - 02:17:569 - overmap this a little prolly, feels so empty Done.
  14. 02:17:997 - same about longstream stuff Did something similar to what I did in the last section
  15. 02:48:855 - from the second half of the Kiai you could add some triples like you did on 02:50:355 (12,13,14) - on parts like 02:52:069 - Sounds good. Also applied this in the second Kiai.
  16. 03:40:283 - stream xD Did the same thing I did with the last two of these.
    If you don't agree in a first instance with longstreams at that point you could start making them from the last suggestion (if you like ascendant difficulty maps)
  17. 03:43:926 - I don't feel this SV up that neccesary tbh, but if you want to you can hold it These gradual changes are to get the SV up to be consistent with 00:45:426 - 01:12:855. Keeping them for now.
  18. 03:53:997 - LS lol ;w;
  19. 04:10:926 (92) - try a kat on here and you emphatise last don better (also follows kick bettah) Okay.
  20. 04:13:712 - SV speedup from here (also with the volume raiseup) fills greaat Sure, done.
  21. 04:28:283 - from here you could use the same rhythm follow that you're using on 04:24:855 - some doubles feel so strange (not at first half of this section) They all fit with the song, so I think they're okay.
  22. 04:41:783 (9) - delete big note imo Done.
  23. 04:48:747 (33) - :arrow: 04:48:319 - and making 04:48:855 (34) - big note? Repeats through this part (fills better imo) Nice! Changed.
  24. 05:21:105 - +0.01 from here SV up to make it more smooth? Done.
  25. 05:48:855 - these SV slowdown makes more sense imo, n1 Thanks
That's all! Sorry for walltext ;; didn't expect that considering it's already a good map. Tell me when you apply this to come back, nice job at this and so fun, correct stream usage aswell ~
Thanks a bunch for the mod :) I'll let you know when I think it's ready!
Fuel
brief mod
01:27:212 (4) - Change to k? The offbeat k on its own differentiates that beat in the triplet which seems awkward given most of the emphasis occurs at 01:27:426 (6) with the vocal and cymbal (??) sound.
01:56:355 (14) - Change to k? Or 01:56:569 (16) - I guess.
02:17:783 (67,68,69) - Ctrl+g? Keeps the k on the cymbal sound which occurs for most of the section.
02:19:497 (80) - Maybe change this too, but it might make the stream a bit boring.
02:32:355 (11) - Consider changing to k to further differentiate it from the previous calm section by emphasising the addition of these sounds, though I get the consistent usage of double d.
02:33:212 (16) - ^ Maybe change the kkk triplets to kdd, if you change the above.
Topic Starter
Aloda

Invective wrote:

brief mod
01:27:212 (4) - Change to k? The offbeat k on its own differentiates that beat in the triplet which seems awkward given most of the emphasis occurs at 01:27:426 (6) with the vocal and cymbal (??) sound. Changed
01:56:355 (14) - Change to k? Or 01:56:569 (16) - I guess. Changed 14.
02:17:783 (67,68,69) - Ctrl+g? Keeps the k on the cymbal sound which occurs for most of the section. I don't really like repeating the same pattern here, so I changed this one to something a little different.
02:19:497 (80) - Maybe change this too, but it might make the stream a bit boring. Yeah, no change here.
02:32:355 (11) - Consider changing to k to further differentiate it from the previous calm section by emphasising the addition of these sounds, though I get the consistent usage of double d. I think I'll keep this one as is too. I like those double d's
02:33:212 (16) - ^ Maybe change the kkk triplets to kdd, if you change the above.
Thanks for doing this for me. I owe you one :D
Topic Starter
Aloda
Changed the structure 01:40:283 - 01:53:997 , 02:07:712 - 02:21:426 and 03:29:997 - 03:43:712 a little for more consistency between the similar rhythms.
KamizonoShinobu
IRC mod
10:15 Aloda: \o
10:15 Chocola_2287: o/
10:15 Chocola_2287: np map
10:16 *Aloda is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1044309 SOSOSO (Tsukui Kazuhito) - Fly with me (feat. Hatsune Miku)]
10:16 *Chocola_2287 is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/1044309 SOSOSO (Tsukui Kazuhito) - Fly with me (feat. Hatsune Miku) [Inner Oni]]
10:17 Chocola_2287: I think that you should nerf the beginning a bit as it's quite calm in terms of instrument compared to the part after
10:18 Aloda: I get that, but I don't really see how I could make it easier
10:18 Aloda: Plus there's already a density increase along with an sv increase at 00:29:997 -
10:18 Aloda: Makes it feel okay I think
10:18 Chocola_2287: imo the 2 parts are of same density
10:19 Chocola_2287: you can just emphasize the pitch change
10:20 Chocola_2287: I think you can use x _ _ x _ x _ ..... patterns
10:20 Aloda: I see, I see
10:21 Aloda: I'll think about it
10:21 Chocola_2287: 00:33:212 (22) - k ?
10:22 Chocola_2287: it has a higher pitch than the note before and it took some finisher impact
10:22 Aloda: Done
10:22 Aloda: Same for 00:36:640 (44) - ?
10:22 Chocola_2287: yes, for the sake of consistency
10:23 Aloda: Cool
10:23 Chocola_2287: 00:36:855 (45) - onward, I do think that you need to use variation on 5plets
10:23 Chocola_2287: it is quite boring with 4 same 5plets
10:24 Aloda: Really? I think they fit well with the same pattern
10:24 Aloda: It's the same sound there for all of them too
10:25 Aloda: Feels weird to have something different
10:25 Chocola_2287: 00:42:855 (85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96) - ~~Make it pp :^)~~
10:25 Aloda: Ew no
10:25 Aloda: :p
10:25 Chocola_2287: ddkddkdkkdkk
10:25 Chocola_2287: 00:42:997 (87) - idk why you use a k here tho tbh
10:26 Chocola_2287: 00:43:283 (91) - it sound like you are using k with different purpose
10:26 Chocola_2287: I do think that ddkddkdkkdkk fits more
10:26 Chocola_2287: 00:42:855 (85,91) - imo has to be d to emphasis the snare
10:27 Chocola_2287: or dddkkkdddkkk
10:27 Chocola_2287: Both works
10:27 Chocola_2287: 00:45:319 (4,1) - Quite unpleasant for me to have 1/4 with finisher as the end
10:28 Aloda: I originally didn't have them
10:28 Aloda: But a bunch of people said I should add them in
10:28 Aloda: Plus it's low bpm, so they aren't that bad to play
10:28 Chocola_2287: Yea I know, I don't like it because preferences
10:29 Chocola_2287: But it is fine to leave it there
10:29 Chocola_2287: 00:48:640 (13) - k, similar reason
10:29 Aloda: Okay
10:30 Chocola_2287: 00:50:997 (27,29) - k? 28 has the lowest pitch among 27-29
10:30 Chocola_2287: better if you can emphasize 28 as low pitch
10:31 Aloda: I'll change 29
10:31 Aloda: Keeping 27 as k for contrast with the kats before it
10:31 Aloda: d**
10:32 Chocola_2287: 00:57:855 (73) - k ? I feel that when this being a d it took a lot of emphasizing impact
10:32 Chocola_2287: 01:02:354 (21) - ^^^
10:32 Chocola_2287: 01:09:211 (64) - k,
10:33 Aloda: Okay, changed all
10:33 Chocola_2287: 01:11:247 (78,79,80,81) - you might want to be consistent with 00:57:533 (70,71,72,73) -
10:33 Chocola_2287: and any notes before and after
10:34 Chocola_2287: 01:26:247 (58,59,60,1) - I would go for kkkD here
10:34 Chocola_2287: 01:26:140 (57,58,59,60) - share same instrument
10:35 Aloda: It feels kind of weird to have the kkk right after a 1/6 ending in k imo
10:36 Chocola_2287: 01:53:997 (1) - Shouldn't this part be identical to 01:26:569 (1) - ?
10:37 Aloda: They're the same structure with different patterns aren't they?
10:37 Aloda: Should I make the patterns more similar
10:37 Aloda: Hm
10:37 Chocola_2287: Even with the d/k arrangement
10:38 Chocola_2287: It shouldn't be similar, it should be identical
10:38 Aloda: Okay
10:39 Chocola_2287: 01:40:069 (77,1) - I would invert the color pattern here
10:40 Chocola_2287: but I wont force because its preference only
10:40 Aloda: I'm happy to change them
10:42 Chocola_2287: 02:17:783 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82) - I prefer these 7plets having first 2 notes as kk
10:42 Chocola_2287: I would go for kkddkkd kkdkkkd
10:43 Chocola_2287: 02:19:497 (83) - k to be consistent with the 7plets
10:44 Aloda: Hm okay
10:44 Aloda: Changed to some slightly different patterns
10:45 Chocola_2287: 02:34:712 (24) - this SV change is too significant
10:45 Chocola_2287: I prefer SV flow here
10:46 Aloda: I kind of like the sudden sv increase with the start of the Kiai
10:46 Aloda: Feels fine to me, and it's no challenge to read
10:46 Chocola_2287: 02:38:355 (25) - k
10:47 Chocola_2287: 02:45:212 (25) - ^
10:47 Chocola_2287: consistency
10:47 Aloda: Sure
10:47 Aloda: I'll do the same in the second Kiai
10:47 Chocola_2287: kk
10:48 Chocola_2287: 03:11:247 (64) - k ?
10:48 Aloda: For consistency with 03:09:426 - ?
10:49 Aloda: I guess I change the quad too
10:49 Chocola_2287: ye
10:49 Aloda: Done
10:53 Chocola_2287: 03:40:176 (70) - similar reason with the kkxxxxx pattern
10:53 Chocola_2287: but to d
10:54 Aloda: Sure
10:56 Chocola_2287: 04:24:855 (1) - I prefer nerfing this part
10:57 Chocola_2287: the song mood here does not fit 1/4 imo
10:59 Aloda: Hm, kind of similar to the intro here
10:59 Aloda: I'll consider nerfing it
Good luck getting this approved.
Aisha
1st IRC
2017-09-16 21:55 Aloda: The thing I wanted to ask about was the long stream at 03:12:855 -
2017-09-16 21:55 Aloda: Since every other similar stream in the map has 2 7-plets leading up to it
2017-09-16 21:55 Aloda: While this one doesn't
2017-09-16 21:56 Aloda: And I wasn't sure whether that inconsistency would be a problem
2017-09-16 21:56 xfraczynho: 03:12:747 - about adding a note on here you mean?
2017-09-16 21:56 xfraczynho: 02:19:497 (83) - like this one?
2017-09-16 21:57 Aloda: Yeah and removing a couple of notes too
2017-09-16 21:57 xfraczynho: I would like to see something like 02:05:783 -
2017-09-16 21:57 Aloda: 03:13:391 (80) - and 03:14:247 (88) -
2017-09-16 21:57 xfraczynho: but if you add some notes
2017-09-16 21:57 xfraczynho: is pretty good, as I said I like ascendant difficulty marathon maps
2017-09-16 21:58 Aloda: Alright
2017-09-16 21:58 xfraczynho: when I modded I compared stream length
2017-09-16 21:58 Aloda: I guess I'll just add that one note then
2017-09-16 21:58 xfraczynho: and I felt it fine
2017-09-16 21:59 Aloda: Alright, cool
2017-09-16 21:59 xfraczynho: but about making ascendant difficulty map is most about mapstyle than something like RC or something
2017-09-16 21:59 Aloda: Yeah I guess so
2017-09-16 22:00 Aloda: But anyway, thanks for the help!
2017-09-16 22:00 xfraczynho: you're welcome

2nd IRC
2017-09-17 00:42 Aloda: Hey, I got your message
2017-09-17 00:42 Aloda: Just to clarify, the kk patters you mentioned are just the ones in the intro?
2017-09-17 00:43 Aloda: And which section exactly are you talking about when you say the 'section of quarters'?
2017-09-17 00:47 xfraczynho: sec sec
2017-09-17 00:47 xfraczynho: I tried talking you by here
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: 00:22:283 (46,47) -
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: 00:23:140 (51,52) -
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: 00:24:854 (61,62) -
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: 00:25:711 (66,67) -
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: 00:26:569 (71,72) -
2017-09-17 00:49 xfraczynho: these are which I felt a little repetitive and could be followed better
2017-09-17 00:50 xfraczynho: 00:30:426 - also this section of quarters
2017-09-17 00:50 Aloda: Alright
2017-09-17 00:50 Aloda: Do you want me to just make all the sets of quads there the same?
2017-09-17 00:50 Aloda: kddd dkkd or something
2017-09-17 00:50 xfraczynho: wait wait
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: not same
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: it's about this sec
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: 00:36:426 (43,44) -
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: for example on your mod reply you said Okay, changed all to d k.
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: to be honest
2017-09-17 00:51 xfraczynho: I'd like to see k k instead d k at timestamps like 00:31:283 -
2017-09-17 00:52 Aloda: Oh okay
2017-09-17 00:52 Aloda: I'll do that
2017-09-17 00:52 xfraczynho: but I don't want to screw up your mapstyle at all, that's why I told you to find someone else to comment it
2017-09-17 00:52 xfraczynho: I mean... if other one points something like it it could be great
2017-09-17 00:53 Aloda: Yeah I see haha
2017-09-17 00:53 xfraczynho: also a little suggestion about playability
2017-09-17 00:53 xfraczynho: 00:43:426 (93) - k, 00:43:569 (95) - d?
2017-09-17 00:54 xfraczynho: it's most personal cause I don't like odd patterns but I think it could be nicer :')
2017-09-17 00:54 Aloda: Sure, it sounds fine
2017-09-17 00:55 Aloda: Going back to the kk doublets in the intro
2017-09-17 00:55 Aloda: Is it okay if I leave the last one but change the rest
2017-09-17 00:55 Aloda: I think that one sounds fine
2017-09-17 00:55 xfraczynho: yeah I agree
2017-09-17 00:55 xfraczynho: 01:12:855 - also
2017-09-17 00:55 xfraczynho: with 'empty' I mean not to overmap it
2017-09-17 00:55 xfraczynho: but when you come from a hard section and it becomes calm for a long perior
2017-09-17 00:56 period * it seems... strange to play
2017-09-17 00:56 Aloda: Okay
2017-09-17 00:56 Aloda: I guess I could add some 1/2 in there
2017-09-17 00:56 xfraczynho: 01:13:926 - like here a don
2017-09-17 00:56 Aloda: Some more 1/2 I mean
2017-09-17 00:56 xfraczynho: 01:16:926 - also
2017-09-17 00:56 xfraczynho: yeah
2017-09-17 00:56 Aloda: Yeah
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: also could be great if you 01:21:640 (25) - move to 01:21:640 (25) - and make it kat
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: idk, seems nice :')
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: to be honest I think that's most of things I wanted to point
2017-09-17 00:57 Aloda: Move to where?
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: next sections looks great
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: 01:21:212 -
2017-09-17 00:57 xfraczynho: lol wrong ts
2017-09-17 00:58 Aloda: Haha
2017-09-17 00:59 Aloda: Okay, I've done that
2017-09-17 00:59 Aloda: Updating now
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: wait wait
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: last one sec xD
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: 03:40:283 - this stream follow seems better than 05:04:283 - imo
2017-09-17 00:59 Aloda: Alright ahaha
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: I mean
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: Kiai is easier than that one
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: and they're pretty similar
2017-09-17 00:59 xfraczynho: so it doesn't make sense at all for me D:
2017-09-17 01:00 xfraczynho: I'd like to see something like xxxxx x xxxxxxx x xxxxxxxxxxx(longstream)
2017-09-17 01:00 Aloda: Oh you're right
2017-09-17 01:00 xfraczynho: or xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx
2017-09-17 01:00 xfraczynho: seems better
2017-09-17 01:00 xfraczynho: (applies for every Kiai sections xD)
2017-09-17 01:00 xfraczynho: don't be afraid of making long streams anyways, it's a high SR song :')
2017-09-17 01:00 Aloda: I think what I'll do is add notes at like 05:04:176 - and 05:04:390 -
2017-09-17 01:01 Aloda: So that it's consistent with the similar patterns throughout the map
2017-09-17 01:01 xfraczynho: yeah that look even nicer
2017-09-17 01:01 xfraczynho: remember to do on similar sections :p
2017-09-17 01:01 Aloda: Yeah I will
2017-09-17 01:02 xfraczynho: also maybe nerfing a little on non-kiai similar sections
2017-09-17 01:02 xfraczynho: just by deleting a note could be enough, it's to make a difference and better density difference :')
2017-09-17 01:03 Aloda: Yeah I get it
2017-09-17 01:03 xfraczynho: will be back on 10 ~
2017-09-17 01:03 Aloda: Okay
2017-09-17 01:06 Aloda: Removed a note from all the others except 02:17:783 - and 03:40:069 -
2017-09-17 01:12 xfraczynho: kay just back
2017-09-17 01:12 xfraczynho: did you update?
2017-09-17 01:13 Aloda: I did
2017-09-17 01:13 xfraczynho: okok gotta testplay
2017-09-17 01:16 xfraczynho: 00:52:712 (39) -
2017-09-17 01:16 xfraczynho: I think a kat on here is neccesary, you should restructure the quintuplet
2017-09-17 01:16 xfraczynho: 00:52:283 (35) - pretty same pitch as that one
2017-09-17 01:16 Aloda: Alright
2017-09-17 01:16 Aloda: kdddk good?
2017-09-17 01:17 xfraczynho: yeah I thought the same
2017-09-17 01:18 xfraczynho: 01:12:426 - since you're using finish notes after streams
2017-09-17 01:18 xfraczynho: considering bpm is nice
2017-09-17 01:18 xfraczynho: http://puu.sh/xBEcG/b9f2513a24.jpg
2017-09-17 01:18 xfraczynho: so try that maybe :')
2017-09-17 01:18 xfraczynho: ok that should be enough, tell me when update :D
2017-09-17 01:19 Aloda: Alright updating now
2017-09-17 01:20 Aloda: And done
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: ok the last thing
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: xDD
2017-09-17 01:27 Aloda: xd
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: 03:17:997 - 03:18:855 -
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: what about adding notes here? I got your point on follow the drum instead voice
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: but 8/1 break is huuuge imo
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: 03:21:426 - same
2017-09-17 01:27 xfraczynho: should be all for me :')
2017-09-17 01:28 Aloda: Hm
2017-09-17 01:28 Aloda: tbh I prefer to have the break there
2017-09-17 01:28 xfraczynho: great
2017-09-17 01:28 xfraczynho: still nice
2017-09-17 01:29 Aloda: It just lets the strong sounds I've mapped to stand out more I guess haha
2017-09-17 01:29 xfraczynho: yeah I can get you :p
No kds!
Map seems nice for me, good luck for ranked ~
Raiden
cool structures and 1/6

minor complaints:

general:

can i have a reliable metadata source?

raise volume!!!! i can barely hear the tapping on sections like 00:29:997 - 00:45:426 - etc. give them at least a +15 boost

smooth sv changes, not abrupt!!!!
parts like 01:12:855 - , do like you did in 00:44:997 -

difficulty itself:
minor rhythm complaints in the kiais: namely notes like 02:38:997 (4) - which are supposed to be kats to keep the upbeat rhythm of the snares and high pitched vocals in every 2nd beat; to fix this simply ctrl+g with the previous note or do a kkk
02:42:426 (4) - see? happens some times. also on the last kiai, keep a look out on it


yeah that's all!!
Topic Starter
Aloda

Raiden wrote:

cool structures and 1/6

minor complaints:

general:

can i have a reliable metadata source?
Karent is the official music label for this song, so assuming this is up to date, the site I linked in the beatmap description should be fine for a metadata source. Let me know if you need more, and I'll try to find something.

raise volume!!!! i can barely hear the tapping on sections like 00:29:997 - 00:45:426 - etc. give them at least a +15 boost
Okay, done.

smooth sv changes, not abrupt!!!!
parts like 01:12:855 - , do like you did in 00:44:997 -
Done.

difficulty itself:
minor rhythm complaints in the kiais: namely notes like 02:38:997 (4) - which are supposed to be kats to keep the upbeat rhythm of the snares and high pitched vocals in every 2nd beat; to fix this simply ctrl+g with the previous note or do a kkk
02:42:426 (4) - see? happens some times. also on the last kiai, keep a look out on it
Done.


yeah that's all!!
Applied all. Thanks a lot for checking this for me <3
Raiden
no kd

05:25:282 (32) - kat
05:28:712 (60) -
05:38:997 (32) -
05:42:426 (60) -

06:02:569 - smooth sv

metadata should be fine, poke me back
Topic Starter
Aloda
@Raiden Applied all! :)
Raiden
let's go
Surono
gratz cool map~
Aisha
Gratz boy!
Topic Starter
Aloda

Surono wrote:

gratz cool map~

xfraczynho wrote:

Gratz boy!
Thank you and thank you! :)
gaston_2199
Lool, a long time I modded this. Congrats finally first qualified~
Topic Starter
Aloda

gaston_2199 wrote:

Lool, a long time I modded this. Congrats finally first qualified~
Yes it took a while, but we got there in the end haha. Thank you for helping get this qualified :)
raii
congrats on rank w
BeenzinoXd
COOL
Please sign in to reply.

New reply