This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Thank you a lot for your mod!
bank78952 wrote:hi o/
Uncheck Widescreen support
Please use Normal Simpleset for better playing // I swear to God, I keep making these little mistakes smh
00:32:709 (41) - d
00:44:875 (95) - K is better?
00:49:709 (121,122) - ctrl+g
01:59:542 (49) - D
02:10:875 - add K ? // applied all of that
00:42:209 (84) - K ? // I don't really think a K fits too great in here
01:58:542 (300) - k
02:10:875 (317) - add K
02:10:875 (317) - add K // applied basically everything else though
i wanna do gd but im afraid it's bad, Orz
good map good luck for rank
You can copy&paste the content of the .osu file into a spoilerbox and I add it as a new difficulty (depending on how it is tho)
xelticrival wrote:I've created a new difficulty, but I don't really know how to upload it. Is there a way to attach the file through commenting? Or is there any other ways @@
Thank you a lot for your mod! No need to apologise, as it was very solid
Pardon my weak modding as I'm still new in taiko modding
00:22:876 (2) - changing it to d and 00:23:210 (5) - to k to follow previous rhythm? // applied the second change only, because I personally don't really like the sound of having 00:22:876 (2) a d
00:37:875 (63) - how about D? // There is a change in pitch I want to emphasise, so not having a K seems not plausible for me
00:50:209 (124) - k? // applied
01:02:875 (192) - change to k , remove 01:03:209 (194) - and move 01:03:042 (193) - to 01:03:125 (193) - instead and add d at 01:03:375 (194) - ? // This creates some sort of choppy sound I don't really deem fitting
01:20:042 (265) - add d?
01:22:709 (274) - add d? // applied this and the one above
the emptiness at 00:15:542 , 00:18:209 , 00:20:876 , and so on is kinda off (for me). How about adding notes on them? // I partly agree, but adding notes to that section will increase the density to a weird level
00:27:542 (24) - change to k? // The sound at this spot sounds too dull to make sense as a k to me
02:10:875 (189) - change to k instead of K? // While I think both k and K can be used, I prefer having it a K because of it being a rather strong sound
That's all for my suggestion.
Nice song and map. Hope it will be ranked someday~
Really, thank you a lot for your mod! Especially the Futsuu looks a lot better now, jesus
(suggestion) SV 1.4 -> 1.2
00:44:875 (58) - add Finish
00:58:209 (82) - kat
01:25:542 (122,123,124) - (suggestion) delete
01:27:542 (125) - add Finish
01:38:209 (144) - add Finish
01:44:209 (155,156,157,158) - k k d k k
01:46:541 (160) - delete
01:48:875 (164) - add Finish
01:51:209 (167) - move to 01:50:875
02:03:542 - add a kat
02:10:209 (188) - delete // I basically applied everything. I am kinda annoyed by how I forgot the finishs in here despite having set them in the other diffs, meh.
Make sure the pattern fits at piano/drum. Current pattern don't fit neither. // To be honest, I am not too satisfied with the Futsuu either. I am honestly glad you even made the effort instead of suggesting me to redo it, though that might be simpler
00:14:709 (6,7,8) - dd k
00:17:375 (13,14,15) - dd k
00:20:042 (20,21,22) - dd k
00:22:709 (27,28,29) - dd k
00:23:542 - add a kat
00:35:875 (66,67,68,69) - kdd k
00:38:542 (73,74,75,76) - kkk k
00:41:209 (80,81,82,83) - dkk k
00:42:209 (84,85,86) - remove Finish // I have no idea how that even happened
00:44:875 (90) - add Finish
00:45:875 (92) - kat
00:49:709 (106,107,108) - dd k
00:54:875 (124,125,126,127) - kdk K
00:57:542 (134,135,136) - d k d
00:59:875 (143,144) - k k d k
01:00:875 (145,146,147,148,149) - d ddk k
01:03:542 (155,156,157) - k d d k
01:27:042 (210) - move to 01:27:209
01:28:542 - add a kat
01:32:875 (229,230,231,232) - d k k d
01:38:209 (246) - add Finish
01:39:209 - add a kat
01:43:541 (264,265,266,267) - d k k d
01:52:875 (289,290,291,292) - d k k d k
01:59:042 (301) - move to 01:58:875
02:10:209 (316) - remove // Again, applied everything.
00:14:876 - add a don
00:17:542 - add a don
00:20:209 - add a don
00:22:709 (1,2,3,4,5) - d ddd k
00:25:542 - add a don
00:28:209 - add a don
00:30:875 - add a don
00:54:209 (146,147,148,149) - d _ k d k
01:02:375 (188,189,190) - kkk
01:27:042 (289,290,291) - d k _ D
01:30:042 - add a note
02:10:209 (66) - remove // Once more, applied everything.
Thank you a lot for your mod!
Arrival wrote:Hello, M4M request here.
The spread of your 4 first can be reworked. 188 > 324 > 494 > 695 isn't the best of all spread. Try making look like 200 > 350 > 500 > 750 as much as you can. // what
My mod will take this in count too.
Add agu and Zetera in the tags // added
I really suggest decreasing the volume early in the map and during the calm parts to something about 60%, then increasing it during the main parts to 80%.
You need to have your sv to 1.4 // There is no rule forcing SV 1.4. While it is advised to stay at 1.4, I think it's more sensible to have a lower SV on a 180bpm Kantan
00:12:876 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - For this part I'd suggest alternating between d k k as you put it and d d k to avoid repetition. d d k fits very well too. // I honestly prefer having it repetitive on an easier difficulty. Forcing variation into a repeating part of a song doesn't make me feel comfortable in this case
01:00:542 - add a note here // done
01:04:875 (94,95,96,97,98) - What about, instead of k d d d d 1/2, which is pretty boring to play, this ? It's better to play, and fits well. // First of all, I like that idea a lot, but I am not sure if I feel comfortable placing avoidable red tick stuff in this diff. I reworked that part though
01:10:875 - add a note here // done
01:25:542 - add a k here, not putting a note here sounds weird since you put a k right after though it's the same sound // The k after that sound is for a build-up to the kiai. Imo putting another note down would be too heavy on that light section of the song
01:36:875 (140) - What about this ? // Basically the same as the suggestion on 01:04:875 . Reworked the part again
01:44:209 (154,155,156,157,158,159) - Same thing here // ^
01:47:541 (161,162,163,164) - And here this http://puu.sh/qj9PD/e52a501e60.jpg
02:00:209 - add a note here to avoid repetition // ?
00:15:542 - You need to put a note here since you started the map with a note on the exact same sound, plus it's a big sound.
And of course continue for the other sounds after // This would dense the beginning part up way too much. It's just a Futsuu after all
The first part is quite repetitive, so what about chaning these 00:17:375 (13,27) - to k ? Maybe the sound would need a d but a k goes well in your overall pattern and -as i said- avoid repetition // While it sounds reasonable to change it to k from a variation pov, I don't think it's a necessary thing to do as the sounds on 00:17:376 (13,14) - are the same and having one of them be a k while the other one is a d doesn't feel reasonable to me. Also, they are too dull to make both a k.
Same for the part right afer, having no note on this particular sound makes it feel really weird.
00:46:875 (95) - Put this on the red tick just before, it makes the rhythm change a bit and is beter to play. // done
00:57:542 (135,136,137,138) - What about this // moved the k to the red tick on the left
00:59:875 (144,145,146,147) - I understand that you want to map the melody here, but do this instead // done
01:04:709 - add a note here to keep the same structure // done
01:16:875 (189) - D ? // imo the sound is too weak to justify a D
01:26:875 - add a k here, feels weird without it // The sound on this tick is barely audible.
01:29:709 (220) - delete this or put it on the following white tick // Why though? Having nothing on that tick or having something on the white tick next to it would feel way too off, since there's a very present snare on that red tick and imo having it doesn't disrupt anything
01:31:375 (225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232) - I'd suggest [img]this%20http://puu.sh/qjaHr/f46838c388.jpg[/img] fits way better imo // It sounds plausible, but I still kinda prefer it as it is
01:40:375 (257) - ditto // ^
01:37:375 - and 01:48:042 - put a d here, better to hear imo // I don't know, having a d there sounds as good as having none. I honestly prefer the latter to keep it simple
02:04:875 - Why this hole ? // Honestly no idea where the d went. Fixed
00:35:542 (55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63) - A bit too dense, just keep one of the triplets here. // It's reasonably dense imo, considering the parts around it are less heavy
Do it for the others too
00:55:125 (153,154,155) - I would have done a k k D here // Compared to the crash at 00:54:875 (152) -, the part 00:55:125 (153,154) - has a lower pitch, thus I chose d d K
00:56:542 (160) - Put this note on the following red tick ? If you do so remove the next two notes. // Changed that part a little bit
// The timing you copied below got a little bit messed up, so I am roughly guessing what you mean.
00:56:709 (160) - k here ? // Added one in the previous changes
00:56:709 (160) - ^ // Can't really figure that one out because the section with a similar sound to the previous one sounds well enough to me
01:54:542 (25,26,27) - no kkd in muzus unless it is well spaced, change it. // As far as I know, there is no rule against that one either
01:54:542 (25,26,27) - add a k when you hear the little metronome sound // I won't exclusively highlight "little sounds". That would end up being one dense piece
Nothing more to say actually.
Good luck !
Arrival wrote:Hello, M4M request here.
Avoid big notes in the end of streams, quintuplets and most of all TRIPLETS, they are prohibited and really bad to play overall. They are no longer prohibited, but I see your point as correct, since some of the finishers are not nice at all. I need to make an exception at 01:16:709 (393,394,395) - though. For me, it is important to stress all higher pitched beats (I think they are snare sounds) with Ks. This is because I am using ks in this part that have a different function, so the Ks are distinctive and definitely fitting.
00:14:876 (7,8,9,29,30,31) - You should change them to d so it stays consistant with the other ddddk. Check
00:28:709 (77) - Maybe remove this note to add a slight break Does this deserve a break though? The artists adds an instrument here, making this more dense in terms of complexity. This is why I see this circle as fitting, since I didn't stress that in any prior pattern. Well, there was one, not anymore.
00:48:959 - You should add a note here, the stream actually starts at the white tick I don't think it does, or at least the piano sounds dominant as soon as I started the stream. I listened over this part again and couldn't agree with your point.
00:52:875 (237) - 00:54:209 (249) - They are the same sound, this isn't logical to use different notes here Assuming that you asked me to stress 00:54:209 - the same way I stressed 00:52:875 - , I fixed this problem.
00:55:709 (262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275) - This doesn't really fit, imo you should stick with triplets and quintuplets. Yeah, you're right. Changed this to D dk dk k dk dk d kdd.
Good luck !
Thank you a lot for your mod! Considering you never modded Taiko before, it was pretty nice (I'm just ultra picky, I guess)
pwhk wrote:For M4M
hmm.. never modded taiko before, lets hope it isn't ultrabad
00:42:209 (52) - make it D for strong sound? // Imo the sound is not strong enough to warrant a D
00:54:209 (74) - make it k for higher pitch? // I find the d to be more fitting in the entire context
01:00:875 (87) - D for cymbal // Not much of a fan of that, to be honest. It kinda feels out of place to me, but it's a good suggestion nonetheless
01:00:875 (87) - K for cymbal // ^
01:06:875 (98) - remove this? The entire section is 1110 1/1s and this is extraneous // I kinda want to have a note support this section, so I rather leave it as it is
01:20:875 (115) - d seems more fit to pattern and song // done
01:28:209 - this section is too empty. Add a d here? // I generally agree, but I added a k instead, because it sounds more appropriate to me
00:38:875 (76) - probably not all k here for this section (like others), change it to d? // I decided to have it a full k 1/2 because of the higher pitch suggested by 00:37:875 (73) -
00:51:209 (112) - piano absent. remove? // done
00:54:209 (123) - k for higher pitch // imo both d and k work equally well and I kinda prefer being it a d
01:00:875 (146) - D for cymbal // same as Kantan
01:04:875 (161) - K for cymbal // ^
01:05:542 (163) - k for pitch? // The pitch is lower compared to the part with the k prior to this. I don't think changing it to a k is necessary
01:05:959 (213) - piano isn't 1/4 here. Remove? // While the piano isn't present on this note, I chose to put one there to have the part less stuttery and have a better contrast to the next part of the song, which is a lot calmer
01:15:542 (252) - k for SE? // I wanted to emphasise the deep drum on this one, so it's a d
Thank you a lot for your mod! As we agreed on, just drop me a message when you got something for me to mod
Nishizumi wrote:hi guro o/ m4m as our deal
the hitsound volume is tooooooooooooooooooooooooo loudness
i strongly recommend to change these :
decrease volume on red line to 70%
add green line at 00:23:542 - with 75% volume
add green line at 00:44:875 - with 80-85% volume and give a kiai from here until 01:06:209 - seems better
add green line at 01:06:209 - with 70% volume
add green line at 01:24:875 - with 60% volume
decrease 01:27:542 - volume to 80-85 % since it's kinda loudness @_@
and the last one 01:48:875 - decrease volume to 70% // I probably should stop seeing the volume stuff as secondary as I do
don't forget to add preview point // woops
00:22:876 - why is this only one had a triplet ? make it consistent by adding a don at 00:20:292 - or change the triplet to 1/2 snap // It's to kind of finish the section. I pretty much did the same at 00:33:875 (49) - . I will consider removing it if more people mention it
01:06:209 - add finish here ? // o. Done
01:31:459 - delete this to make easier to hit i guess, since the next note is on blue tick // done
01:42:125 - same as above // done
delete all triplets after kiai, since it looks hard as kiai time // You're right tbh. The part after the kiai has more triplets than the kiai itself, wop.
the spread between muzu and futsuu looks big enough, you should consider it
increase hp to 7 to differentiate with muzukashii ? // I guess I will leave it as it is. 7 seems to steep for me
00:15:876 - why are this and the others kat while 00:13:209 - this a don. they're same pitch // 00:13:209 (2) - is a kat now
01:39:542 - change to don here ? to avoid kat continuously // actually makes sense even from a pitch pov
01:44:709 - delete ? this seems more fit // Aye
increase hp to 8 ? // Seems ok
no find any issue here (i'm bad at low diff ;w;) //
that's all, hope it helps you. good luck~