Zero__wind wrote:

发愁;w;

Red: unrankable issues
Purple: highly recommend to fix

General
没什么问题

Horologium
01:12:511 (5) - 不觉得把一个基本什么都听不到的音放这么大的跳是个很好的选择，或许可以放在01:12:673 (1,2,3,4) - 中间的那一片位置 fixed
01:24:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - 这个地方如果是我的话我不会这样给节奏分组，我会像这样（不要看note摆放那是随便摆的 注意看加NC的位置）给这部分的鼓点分组以顾及背景里面啊~啊~啊~啊~的音，也就是这里摆梗的时候我不会四个四个一组地去摆而是更推荐三个三个一组来摆因为和音乐契合度更高 這裡只是單純地放1/2的節奏
01:26:943 (1) - 这里开始的一串1/4和上面是同样道理的 我会倾向于像这样六个音六个音一组地去组织节奏和排列 如果觉得单双不友好也可以尝试这样或者别的什么不切指的 重点是六个音六个音一组 ^
01:26:619 (1) - 去掉NC吧 01:25:970 (3) - 这里都没加 01:26:294 (1,1) - 重疊+12跳所以加了
01:30:349 (4) - 可能只是个人喜好 不过我觉得把这一拍删掉空着 把后面01:30:511 (5) - 和3叠起来的感觉挺合曲的，当然如果要这样改的话肯定要调整一下note的位置~ 不是很習慣突然空拍

02:29:213 (1,2) - 总感觉这里角度太小了点 2如果往右边挪一些会打起来舒服一些吧 這個我覺得還好
02:36:592 (4) - 我觉得这里的三连是很有问题的 和前面的01:13:321 (5,6,7) - 01:23:700 (5,6,7) - 不太一样 我认为这里1/4的蓝线上是没有音的如果要放连打的话就只能放1/6 不像举例的前面两个地方1/4蓝线上有鼓那是没问题的 done
02:38:619 (3) - 不是很清楚为什么要在这里放1/4 我觉得从02:38:781 (4) - 这里起个三连感觉跟轨跟得比较自然比较好理解 02:38:619 (3,4) - 有另一種鼓聲
02:43:646 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 怎么说呢 感觉最可惜或者说最失望的地方吧 这么好的节奏 做一千张图都不一定能碰到一次的 居然浪费/.\ sad 始於跟鼓還是比較易打
02:46:240 (2) - 这里应该是1/8五个音 还有02:53:538 (4) - 好
04:11:213 (6,7,8,9,10) - 这又是不能接受的节奏;w; 04:11:294 (7) - 这里的1/4蓝线我认为是没有音的 这里只能跟1/6 为了避免这个问题最好就还是像前面03:53:213 (7) - 这里一样从白线上起五连 fixed
04:52:727 (7,8,9,10,11) - 同04:11:213 (6,7,8,9,10) - ，要避免在04:52:808 (8) - 这里放1/4 fixed
05:07:970 (2,3,4) - 这里节奏感觉有点奇怪吧 我本来以为会在05:08:294 - 这里起三连来跟着旋律走结果却在跟了满地都是的hit-hat把这里给漏掉了/.\ 不是很理解 不覺得有問題
05:12:349 (5,1) - 这个地方 总感觉5的音要比1强太多啊…为什么不从5起个1/1呢 然后05:12:673 - 这里的这一拍完全不需要加finish 成为滑条尾巴 感觉合理一些 因為我很少在downbeat放滑條尾

1. 01:05:457 (3) - 音乐里面这一拍我听起来更像是军鼓，更倾向于用soft clap。后面类似的01:08:051 (5) - 01:10:646 (4) - 这种都一样 有很多个
2. 01:29:213 (1) - 这里同01:02:294 (1) - ，建议头上用soft clap 感觉更合曲 同样的还有03:32:457 (1) - 04:32:132 (1) -
3. 02:28:565 (5) - 漏了drum sample
4. 02:38:051 (5) - 加个clap？不然总觉得这个白线三连摆得意味不明
5. 05:21:754 (1,4) - 我感觉根据音乐来判断1的尾巴和4还是应该和前面一样用clap呀0.0

Narcissu wrote:

01:12:349 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - 這種越過長白線的單點梗我比較建議突出重音，而不是把最大的距離分配到01:12:511 (5) - 。同樣理由05:33:431 (1) - 之類建議不堆疊，05:33:105 (2,3) - 這兩個一組的人聲疊一起 ok

1. 其实是不是可以把中间混进去的两首也加到tag里?

• 
  Sharlo

1. 00:33:105 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这个五连overmap在开头这段很突兀啊， 00:33:349 - 这里有个比较轻的音所以大概可以这样下->this，跟前面某处一样
2. 01:02:619 (2,3,4,1) - 不知道是不是错觉看上去没 00:52:565 (4,5,6,1) - 摆得整洁，中间ds需要稍微调整一下，现在是这样
3. 01:57:754 (6,1) - 这个好远啊，试试看 01:58:078 (1) - 01:58:727 (4) - 分别ctrl-g，打起来的flow也不错
4. 02:12:997 (5,6) - 不要overlap? 和前面 01:54:835 (5,6) - 一样比较有整体感
5. 03:27:267 (5) - 这个减速可以上个nc
6. 03:48:024 (5) - 04:47:700 (5,6) - 其实可以搞一样的
7. 05:36:025 (1) - 挡了不少血条，ctrlg一下会发现上面的锚点在界外
   
   
   Chaoslitz
8. 01:12:349 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - 这里可以随人声音高逐渐加间距，大概这样，个人认为比较有感觉
9. 01:26:619 (1) - 感觉没有必要nc，一个方向的跳给一组nc像 01:25:646 (1,2,3,4) - 一样
10. 02:44:781 (1,2,3) - 这里做个圆润的blanket可能更好看些
11. 04:03:105 (3,4,5,6,7) - 建议从人声 04:03:267 - 这里起五连，或者考虑这个 04:03:349 - 蓝线没音，把 04:03:267 (5,6,7) - 换成滑条?
12. 04:11:213 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^

Zero__wind wrote:

发愁;w;

Red: unrankable issues
Purple: highly recommend to fix

General
没什么问题

Horologium
diff名谁想的 好有文化 一看就知道不是我
00:33:105 (2,3,4,5,6) - 不太明白这个五连跟的什么 并不能听到什么音 戴一下我的耳机阿
00:52:240 (2,4) - 感觉这也可以soft whistle的呀0.0 这种调比较高的音我都想加 书得没错但是我想区分一下乐器 这里对我来说可能会是哨子之类区别于whistle的东西
00:59:700 (1,2) - 这里节奏CTRL+G一下 先circle再slider 可以比较好地延续前面00:58:403 (1,3,5) - 的跟轨方式 然后再往后就circle跳了就无所谓了 对我来说这个小节应该是跟前面一小节一样的节奏才对
01:02:294 (1) - 听音乐来讲我更倾向于这里用soft clap 而且个人比较倾向于在长串的最后一拍用和前面不一样的音效这样可以更好地提供反馈 就是听到这个音就停了 的感觉 可能会觉得有点吵 可以给这拍降点音量比如到80 不改
01:05:457 (3) - 音乐里面这一拍我听起来更像是军鼓，更倾向于用soft clap。后面类似的01:08:051 (5) - 01:10:646 (4) - 这种都一样 有很多个 蓝线上的都要区分所以用跟soft-clap不一样的
01:29:213 (1) - 这里同01:02:294 (1) - ，建议头上用soft clap 感觉更合曲 同样的还有03:32:457 (1) - 04:32:132 (1) - 可是我听起来觉得不是我用在其他地方的clap的声音
01:57:754 (6,1) - 跟前面两处3/4相比 这个好容易掉啊;w; 居然跳这么远 wocao看了一下7.00x吓哭了还是Ctrl+G好了
02:07:970 - 同01:49:808 (7) - 可能是因为一开始就在往善良的方向做所以并没打算跟太多的1/6
02:09:105 (4) - 漏了drum sample fixed
02:28:565 (5) - ^ 这里并不是那个音
03:15:916 (1) - 这里音效放反了0.0 头上clap尾巴drum会比较合曲 好像是0.0
03:24:267 (4) - 感觉这里是不是应该加个音效 不管是按现在用的drum finish也好还是按我提议的soft clap也好 总之加个音效？ 好就决定是drum-finish了（
03:27:592 (1) - 这里同第一段01:24:349 (1) - 建议三个二分拍一拆 还有后面的串子也是 我觉得玩家打图时到这里受鼓的影响更重何况音效也是这样的
04:33:268 (4) - 漏了drum sample fixed
04:37:159 (4,5,6,1) - 我的妈这flow把我打哭了OAQ 好憋屈啊一点也不像finish 能不能把1反过来呀T^T 我把5和6反一下你应该可以接受
05:21:754 (1,4) - 我感觉根据音乐来判断1的尾巴和4还是应该和前面一样用clap呀0.0 不一样的 还是那句话 戴我的耳机（够
05:36:025 (1) - 我不太确定这是不是rankable 现在反过来是出界的 最好不要放那么高 没出界
美丽
好困

good luck

Narcissu wrote:

hi, m4m here 谁和你m4m啦

開頭的drum-hit2 應該是計畫全程白線的，這個鐘錶的聲音比較建議用故事版音效補全，才有鐘錶的感覺……快捷鍵是ctrl+shift+i 不会诶

存在感和使用頻率最高的soft-hitclap1，drum-hitnormal1屬於廣場舞音效……我覺得不適合用在這種較為空靈的歌裏面增強打擊感和節奏感 一起来跳迪斯科

某圖片1025*768……好像還有一張是我的，文件名都沒換 嗯？？是你的吗

02:24:024 - 這裡開始左右的噴泉效果可以在重音的時候增加噴射距離和量……沒有變化比較單調 不会

04:32:457 - 這邊的鐘錶和第一次重複了，考慮前兩次分別是左右，最後一次這裡可以左右一起？ 两个钟表那不是hin奇怪吗

kiai 被吸入球體的光點……用 M，1 比M，0 好一點，也就是勻加速代替勻速 好懒

對比太強烈感覺沒有故事版的部分有點挫……

開著故事版看不清物件……

Tag 裏面的dnB 大小寫果然是有問題吧…… 啥问题啊

------

02:12:997 (5,6) - 這個有點難讀，可能因為我皮膚沒有數字……總之這種特殊的排列用在沒什麼特別的地方而且只有一次我是覺得不好的……

03:00:349 - 這裡可以加個圈 让人好好的break不好嘛

03:30:835 (1,2,1,2) - 1/4折返粘一起有點難讀

03:47:862 (4) - 也就編輯器裏面能看見這塞進一圈連打的樣子吧……

05:45:105 - 鐘或者noraml-finish 更有結束的感覺

sahuang wrote:

Add to tags "drum and bass"?

Garden wrote:

from 水仙req
[General]

1. 其实是不是可以把中间混进去的两首也加到tag里? 混进去了什么啊

[Horologium]

• 
  Sharlo

1. 00:33:105 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这个五连overmap在开头这段很突兀啊， 00:33:349 - 这里有个比较轻的音所以大概可以这样下->this，跟前面某处一样 That puush could not be found.
2. 01:02:619 (2,3,4,1) - 不知道是不是错觉看上去没 00:52:565 (4,5,6,1) - 摆得整洁，中间ds需要稍微调整一下，现在是这样 应该是我开GS的问题
3. 01:57:754 (6,1) - 这个好远啊，试试看 01:58:078 (1) - 01:58:727 (4) - 分别ctrl-g，打起来的flow也不错 第一个可以，第二个保留，不是很喜欢反手flow
4. 02:12:997 (5,6) - 不要overlap? 和前面 01:54:835 (5,6) - 一样比较有整体感 O
5. 03:27:267 (5) - 这个减速可以上个nc 凡是有关nc的都不要让我改 我不听我不听
6. 03:48:024 (5) - 04:47:700 (5,6) - 其实可以搞一样的 不是啊 两个地方不一样 后者是真的多了一个音
7. 05:36:025 (1) - 挡了不少血条，ctrlg一下会发现上面的锚点在界外 那我改一下

Trynna wrote:

is it gonna happen at some point?

Garden wrote:

• Chaoslitz

1. 01:12:349 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - 这里可以随人声音高逐渐加间距，大概这样，个人认为比较有感觉 改了
2. 01:26:619 (1) - 感觉没有必要nc，一个方向的跳给一组nc像 01:25:646 (1,2,3,4) - 一样 刪了
3. 02:44:781 (1,2,3) - 这里做个圆润的blanket可能更好看些 還好吧這個
4. 04:03:105 (3,4,5,6,7) - 建议从人声 04:03:267 - 这里起五连，或者考虑这个 04:03:349 - 蓝线没音，把 04:03:267 (5,6,7) - 换成滑条? 04:03:511 - 這邊沒聲音感覺現在就好了
5. 04:11:213 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^ ^

Garden wrote:

normal-hitfinish2.wav
确认一下没用到的话就删掉

1. 00:40:889 (5,6,7) - this jump feels a bit overdone for such a calm section in comparison to the others, i don't think it's really suitable since people can get frustrated in such a chill part, introdutory jumps are fine but such spikes are a bit sad
2. 01:43:808 (1,2) - while the song has a little pause effect that was represented pretty well on 03:47:051 (1) - and 04:46:726 (1) - respectivelly, you tried to represent it with a kick and a circle, representing something way denser and active than the song provides. i know it's not completely bad but maybe it's cool to consider
3. 02:02:619 (1) - 04:05:862 (3) - inconsistent NCs, i'd rather remove 02:02:619 (1) - actually
4. 02:36:349 (3,4,5) - that should be 1/6, compare with 02:33:754 (1,2,3,4) - were you followed this background accurately, also 02:36:592 (4) - seems like covering nothing in special. This also happens on 02:43:646 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) -, where you clearly followed 02:43:376 (4) - with 1/6s and randomly switched to 1/4 while the basis is still the same. 02:43:727 (2) - 02:44:051 (5) - 02:44:376 - etc seems like having no specific beat, just a constant sound (except for 02:44:376 -)
5. 02:46:240 (2) - that's definitely not 1/6 it's 1/8 but you can also simplify with 1/4 if you want aswell prob
6. 04:04:889 (4,5,6,1) - in my opinion this kick (04:05:051 (6) -) has nearly no effect since it's super close to the next object that also basically starts a new section with stream sounds. doing something else or giving the transition more impact with more spacing or something would be great
7. 04:52:808 (8) - i'd remove this beat as done on 03:53:132 - and 01:49:889 - cuz seems pure overmap and a bit random as there are 1/6 beats on the background. try adding something on 04:53:132 - as there is a drum there

Trynna wrote:

checking snaps on this song is so tiring
hi btw, came cuz you, chaoslitz and garden pm'd me, but i was going to do it anyway

1. 00:40:889 (5,6,7) - this jump feels a bit overdone for such a calm section in comparison to the others, i don't think it's really suitable since people can get frustrated in such a chill part, introdutory jumps are fine but such spikes are a bit sad ok
2. 01:43:808 (1,2) - while the song has a little pause effect that was represented pretty well on 03:47:051 (1) - and 04:46:726 (1) - respectivelly, you tried to represent it with a kick and a circle, representing something way denser and active than the song provides. i know it's not completely bad but maybe it's cool to consider should be fine represent the kick with a 1/4 slider, and imo leaving a gap between doesn't sounds good so i placed a note before entering the kiai
3. 02:02:619 (1) - 04:05:862 (3) - inconsistent NCs, i'd rather remove 02:02:619 (1) - actually i prefer adding the nc xD anyway fixed
   * need to fix sb
4. 02:36:349 (3,4,5) - that should be 1/6, compare with 02:33:754 (1,2,3,4) - were you followed this background accurately, also 02:36:592 (4) - seems like covering nothing in special. This also happens on 02:43:646 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) -, where you clearly followed 02:43:376 (4) - with 1/6s and randomly switched to 1/4 while the basis is still the same. 02:43:727 (2) - 02:44:051 (5) - 02:44:376 - etc seems like having no specific beat, just a constant sound (except for 02:44:376 -) yup, fixed 02:43:646 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - oo
   * need to fix sb
5. 02:46:240 (2) - that's definitely not 1/6 it's 1/8 but you can also simplify with 1/4 if you want aswell prob ok
6. 04:04:889 (4,5,6,1) - in my opinion this kick (04:05:051 (6) -) has nearly no effect since it's super close to the next object that also basically starts a new section with stream sounds. doing something else or giving the transition more impact with more spacing or something would be great fixed
7. 04:52:808 (8) - i'd remove this beat as done on 03:53:132 - and 01:49:889 - cuz seems pure overmap and a bit random as there are 1/6 beats on the background. try adding something on 04:53:132 - as there is a drum there okay

call me or garden back, but i prefer giving you my heart

Trynna wrote:

02:43:808 (2) - seems like missing drum sample added clap
02:46:240 (2) - whistle on 02:46:362 - should be moved to the upbeat moved it to 02:46:403 -

Karen wrote:

加群二维码.jpg

Lasse wrote:

05:10:889 (9) - shouldn't this be a 1/6 repeat?