00:25:056 (1,2) - why is spacing from 4 to 1 so low? you know it's a powerful sound so you increased sv but you should increase spacing at the same time. Same goes for slider (2), move it down and left for better flow.
00:40:656 (4) - blanket? xd
00:42:113 (2) - not perfectly round-shaped triple to slider
00:46:999 (1,2) - i would extend (1) to blue tick and replace (2) with a slider + sv multipler x1.5
00:51:799 (1) - why this slider? slider tail expresses nothing? just put a single note, you're not emphasizing vocals in this section anyway.
00:56:599 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - can look better. Use a slider as reference and place note on the slider.
https://puu.sh/zv84t/0093910aa2.jpg make a good-looking slider first. If spacing doesn't change, just ctrl+shift+f the slider.
01:02:085 (3,4,5,6) - isn't spacing kinda low compared to 01:00:370 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ?
01:02:770 (1,1,1) - this kind of slider shape change is too much compared to your other sliders, also you could do some slider velocity changes here hmmm? from slow to fast to even faster, but then you have to extend the last slider to blue tick.
01:05:170 (3,4) - increase spacing, sounds are getting louder on very note 01:04:828 (1,2,3,4) -
01:05:513 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - why is this different from 01:16:485 (1,2,3,4,5) - they sound the same? last one is obiviously better when looking at emphasis.
01:06:199 (4) - yeah, these should be 2 seperate notes since they're loud
01:11:170 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - inconsistent pattern, why changing from this movement 01:11:342 (2,1,2) - to this movement 01:11:685 (2,1,2) - sound is the same?
01:13:742 (1,1,1) - can try the same as 01:02:770 (1,1,1) -
01:15:628 (7,1) - spacing to loud sound
01:23:342 (1,3,4,5) - overlap, pattern doesn't look organised
01:33:285 (2,2) - same
01:33:628 (3,3) - yeh same
01:35:685 (3,2) - ^
01:35:685 (3,4,5,2,3,4) - everything overlapping each other. I don't think that there's an intention to these overlapses, there may be tons of others so i'm not going to look for more i guess. You should organise your patterns better so your map look more beautiful.
01:42:713 (3,4,5) - should be a stream
01:44:942 (5,5) - minor blanket issue
01:51:113 (3,4) - spacing
01:52:142 (1,1) - too much difference in movement 01:50:770 (1,4) - choose one
02:25:056 (5,6) - ctrl+h (6), wouldn't it make more sense if it turned the same direction because of the same sound as (5)? gives better flow as well.
02:51:285 (2,3,4) - this should also be a stream?
02:53:513 (5,1,2) - spacing, your sv change becomes useless without the spacing. You have to pause to hit 02:53:856 (1,2) - :/
003:17:513 (2,4) - yeah some people stack like this, but you only use it just 1 time and other people do it constantly in the map.
03:41:170 (4) - you're starting to ignore sounds from this point on, pay attention to the blue ticks.
03:48:370 (5,1,2,3,4) - sudden slow down in movement. also missing sounds here 03:48:370 (5) - try a 1/4 slider repeater and change 03:48:713 (1) - to a slider to map the guitar sound.
04:09:970 (1,2) - you may want to focus on the vocals here so just delete (2) and move slider to 04:10:313 and end on 04:10:570 - also add new note on 04:09:970 -
05:13:742 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the song is building up intensity here 05:10:999 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - and suddenly your stream goes very slow
There still a lot to improve in aesthetics and organising your map. If you want to look for overlapses you can select your pattern and check the overlapped parts of the next or previous pattern, for example
https://puu.sh/zv7MK/f059168f79.jpg. In this screenshot you can see that (2), (4), and (5) overlap with the selected pattern. I'm not saying that all overlapses are incorrect but there tend to be a system for it. You can try look at other maps and find out how they overlap things with their own system, these overlapses tend to repeat themselves in a map.
PM me is there's something you don't understand. Wish you best of luck!