Combo1 : 13,166,132
Combo2 : 165,18,186
Combo3 : 78,28,227

lovhin456 wrote:

Hi! Random mod ~

General;
- Hard and Insane have different preview time fixed
- Try these colors ?

Combo1 : 13,166,132
Combo2 : 165,18,186
Combo3 : 78,28,227

^much better
- You have 2 osb files, delete one done
- I keep hiting 10~20 ms early, check the offset ? Checked, found the same

Skin;
- The hit circle set is kinda forcing it. At least for me the circles look with too much stuff ;/ I think it's okay
- You need something that spins on the spinner-circle fixed
- To reduce space, make the cursortail a 1x1 transparent png image ^
- Eh, lighting is actually nothing that's a bit weird ... ^
- Add a fail-background ?
- Maybe try this comboburst, section fail and resized BG ?

Normal;
- 00:03:656 >> Make more symmetric ?
- 00:49:090 >> Add a note ? naah >3<
- 00:49:783 >> ^ ^
- 01:31:922 >> ^ oki <3 much better
- 01:32:442 >> ^ ^
- 02:52:210 (1,2,3,4) >> Stacking these may be confusing okok .. better this way ?
- 03:00:187 >> Curve better and stack (7) better under (6)'s end ^
- 04:04:349 (3,4,5,6) >> Stacking these may not be a good idea ^
- 04:14:927 >> Add a note ? sounds much better, thanks <3

Hard;
- Good

Insane;
- 04:14:754 >> The reverse arrow gets covered

* Star ~

lovhin456 wrote:

Insane;
- 04:14:754 >> The reverse arrow gets covered yeah that was on purpose back then, fixed

jericho2442 wrote:

Astom
03:51:777 (2) - maybe remove this note so it follows the song better uhm no

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

try this
00:06:423 change to soft audio (60%)
00:06:596 to 00:07:030 whistle
00:07:116 finish
00:07:290 to 00:07:723 normal
00:07:810 whistle
00:08:504 whistle
00:09:197 change to normal audio
i think it sounds more funny ^_^

poisonchan wrote:

@Shiirn
Fixed :3

1. Tags: Perhaps, add "MarioBros777"?
2. Some of the "Names" in the SB should be cropped to reduce the SB-Load, not sure if it's necessary tho. The difference would be minimum so it's up to you~
3. I think this map would benefit more from the "default" approach-circle than the "custom" one.
4. I don't like how the Slider-followcircle makes some approach-circles a bit hard to see. If it's possible, consider using another one.
5. Kinda "nazi" but the "Spinner-circle" should be 666x666.
6. Yeah, the [Normal] diff is exceeding the "3 stars" rule, the diff is easy enough tho. I'll ask around to be sure~

1. poisonchan<3.-
   1. 00:47:001 (1) - Things should be clear and easy to read for the easiest diffs. More than half of this circle is being covered by the previous slider-path, try to move the circle away please. If you can't come up with anything, here is a suggestion.
   2. 00:59:139 (1) - This spinner is way too short to be used in the easiest diff imo. Try replacing it with a slider.
   3. 01:47:694 (1) - Why the repeat has lower volume? It's a bit disorienting while playing, I'd suggest to keep using the same volume through the slider.
   4. 02:52:210 (1,2) - Is this "compressed-spacing" intentional? I think you should simply stack the circles~
   5. 03:49:089 (1) -You should to improve the "hear-shape" by moving the current ticks around. Here's a suggestion:
      

      296,232,229089,6,0,B|216:176|204:104|244:48|312:64|336:96|336:96|368:72|448:80|456:176|380:208,1,480,4|0

   6. 04:15:274 (1) - Using "0%" is no longer acceptable, "5%" should be fine but it sounds too low imo. Try with "10~15%" (copypaste)

1. Krisom.-
   
   1. 01:06:423 (1,2) - Kinda nazi but I think these sliders were intended to be placed in the center.
2. Natteke.-
   
   1. 01:47:694 (1) - Using "0%" is no longer acceptable, "5%" should be fine but it sounds too low imo. Try with "10~15%" (copypaste from Insane)
3. Wiinter.-
   1. 03:10:245 (9) - Perhaps NC for the sake of consistency?
   2. 03:21:343 (11) - ^ and then remove this one: 03:22:384 (1) -
4. ykcarrot.-
   1. Breaks are not meant to be used in that way. Those breaks are way too short and unnecessary, the warning-arrows appear right when the break starts. Remove them, please. (There shouldn't be any problem with the HP Drain)
   2. 03:52:730 - ^
   3. 03:55:505 - ^
   4. 03:58:280 - ^
   5. 04:03:829 - ^
   6. 04:15:361 (1) - Using "0%" is no longer acceptable, "5%" should be fine but it sounds too low imo. Try with "10~15%

1. MafiaMaster.-
   
   1. 01:26:712 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Oh my god, this spacing doesn't make any sense at all. I find it quite unintuitive and confusing, still playable tho... . Perhaps, try a star-formation or something else?
   2. 01:49:082 - Using "0%" is no longer acceptable, "5%" should be fine but it sounds too low imo. Try with "10~15%"
2. orioncomet.-
   
   1. 02:00:361 (1,2) - The current combo placement doesn't make much sense, placing the NC on (2) would be way better and it would help reading the jump, try it. (Remove the NC here: 02:00:361 (1) and here: 02:00:707 (1) afterwards)
   2. 02:14:754 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Quite tricky, I guess it's alright tho~
3. poisonchan.-
   
   1. 03:12:326 (6,7,8,9) - This pattern looks a bit messy thus it's kinda hard to read. Perhaps, tweak it a bit? as you can see it's basically the same pattern.
   2. 03:30:881 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (2) seems to be the slider, while it's not. This pattern is a bit hard to read, I strongly suggest to tweak the pattern a bit and remove some of those stacks which are making this too confusing. Here's a suggestion, it keeps the essence of the pattern so you might like it.
4. Astom.-
   1. 04:15:361 (1) - I can barely hear the spinner-end. I think that "10~15%" should be enough, consider increasing the volume~

Gonzvlo wrote:

[*]Astom.-

1. 04:15:361 (1) - I can barely hear the spinner-end. I think that "10~15%" should be enough, consider increasing the volume~I don't see problems with that, so no changes~

Gonzvlo wrote:

Wiinter.-

1. 03:10:245 (9) - Perhaps NC for the sake of consistency? ook
2. 03:21:343 (11) - ^ and then remove this one: 03:22:384 (1) - ^

Gonzvlo wrote:

[Insane]

1. orioncomet.-
   
   1. 02:00:361 (1,2) - The current combo placement doesn't make much sense, placing the NC on (2) would be way better and it would help reading the jump, try it. (Remove the NC here: 02:00:361 (1) and here: 02:00:707 (1) afterwards) - it look like random combo to me, so nah.
   2. 02:14:754 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Quite tricky, I guess it's alright tho~

orioncomet wrote:

Gonzvlo wrote:

[Insane]

1. orioncomet.-
   
   1. 02:00:361 (1,2) - The current combo placement doesn't make much sense, placing the NC on (2) would be way better and it would help reading the jump, try it. (Remove the NC here: 02:00:361 (1) and here: 02:00:707 (1) afterwards) - it look like random combo to me, so nah.
   2. 02:14:754 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Quite tricky, I guess it's alright tho~

Gonzvlo wrote:

[Insane]

1. MafiaMaster.-
   
   1. 01:26:712 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Oh my god, this spacing doesn't make any sense at all. I find it quite unintuitive and confusing, still playable tho... . Perhaps, try a star-formation or something else? (Don't agree)
   2. 01:49:082 - Using "0%" is no longer acceptable, "5%" should be fine but it sounds too low imo. Try with "10~15%" (I guess so)

jericho2442 wrote:

Lilac
01:04:523 (5) - new combo here to be consistent with the pattern you use at 01:15:621 - Hold up... If that's the case, then 01:17:001 - should be a new combo as well...
02:09:204 (7) - could really do with a new combo here as well i think, it just helps to split up the vocals better and flow more easy - Fair enough.
02:12:673 (3,1) - im not that keen on how the spacing here changed to red tick, it seems rather hard for the player to notice, i would advise adding a note on 02:13:019 yes it will create a 1/2, but the 1/2 is easier to play then the tricky timing change I...will sadly have to disagree. Doing that not only makes it sound bad, it plays terribly as well. Like I said, Normals have to sometimes have a challenge.
03:21:343 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - the spacing between these 3 combos are the same, yet the final 2 have a totally different timing, this is confusing and i would advise to make the 3rd combo further away so it follows the songs spacing more Seems to be done already.