Yahuri wrote:

m4m return mod from my queue~

General
-get some custom combo colors. suggestions: pink, purple, blue, peach (this set matches up with the background picture, if theres something else you like better then thats cool too).

Star
00:04:348 (3,4) - fix blanket it was intentional
00:12:919 (4) - curve is very slight, define it more it was intentional
00:12:919 (4,5) - match DS with 00:09:277 (4,5)? why would I? it looks fine as it is and it is pretty continuons in its movement
00:14:634 (2,4) - move 4 to the left to increase spacing between the tail of 4 and tail of 2. you could make the flow from 2,3,4 straight as well why??? it doesn't overlap nor look ugly imo?
00:19:777 (1,1) - increase DS to match DS of 00:20:634 (1,2,3) Nah, i kept that spacing and switched afterwards because of the piano actually
00:27:705 (1,1) - i dunno about you, but this timing gap seems pretty short. It is absolutely fine !
00:36:949 (2,3,5) - make perfect triangle what do you call a perfect triangle? it looks like a triangle rn lol
00:41:087 (1,2) - not a fan of this overlap keeping this tho ^^ feels a bit lesjuh-esque and i like it
00:58:952 (9,1) - i think you can make the flow angle down more for more emphasis on the slider indeed it would emphasize the following slider but it wouldn't make the movement i wanted to make the player feel during that single notes part.
01:06:489 (1,2,1,2) - its ok as it is now, but i think just using circles might be a more accurate way to represent those notes. you could increase the jump DS as well. nah, imo it works perfectly fine right there =)
01:11:514 (7,1) - decrease curve of 1 to blanket 7 this is super nazi but ok..
01:10:923 (5) - could make jump, there are drums, piano, and lyrics here slow part nontheless so consistent spacing
01:13:287 (5) - ^ ^
01:17:277 (7,8,9,1) - make parallelogram, or square wanted to emphasize the drums on the 3 first beats so that's why i choose a reverse slider
01:22:745 (6,7,3) - stack 3,7, then fix blanket ill leave it up to you to get the rest of blankets lol no, it was intended.
01:29:395 (7,8) - flow looks weird imo, but im not sure how to explain it XD emphasis on the end of the phrase she sings
01:32:203 (1) - i like how you use these sliders throughout the map, good work Thanks
01:36:341 (1) - i think you can increase the jump DS here, its the start of the new phrase and has just as much musical intensity as 01:36:489 (2), if not more imo you shouldn't force people to jump because the phrase is about to be intense, it hasn't even started yet that you have to move your cursor p fast already? that doesn't make sense to me, i prefer leaving this as it is
01:38:115 (1) - jump for lyrics not mapping lyrics
01:40:479 (1,2,3,4,5) - fix star this pattern was intended as it is
01:41:218 (6,7,8) - looks kinda messy in relation to the star section, fix spacing? meant to be increased because all the notes had their DS increasing over the pattern
01:42:253 (3) - definitely want jump like this pattern a lot rythmically
01:45:947 (1,2,1) - personally i would want jumps here, more fitting especially because its leading into the kiai section by removing 1/4 ? nah sorry i can't do that
01:47:573 (1,2,3,4,5) - star? intended (also its not a star)
01:53:927 (2,1) - stack? intended too
02:28:952 (1,2,3,4,5) - fix star? intended
02:35:898 (6,1) - jump for more emphasis would make no sense to change the spacing there
03:12:105 (5) - jump? nah i don't want to change spacing here
03:36:637 (5) - i think you should split this up, the lyrics in the middle sound pretty important to me (or just ctrl+g this rhythm) 03:36:637 (5,6) not following lyrics
04:04:420 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - clean up hexagon pattern clean up? its fine
04:14:765 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - flow looks ok i think, but this kinda looks like stuff randomly strewn about the map tbh it's not random, it's imo the most intense part of the song rythmically.
04:20:085 (2,3) - stack? meh :-(
04:40:627 (5,1) - increase jump nah i want regular spacing here.
04:44:765 (1,2,1) - spacing awkwardly close imo erm, because the following note is 1/4th afterwards?
05:06:785 (7) - jump why??

needs some work, but fun map nonetheless. good luck!

Beomsan wrote:

Hey there!
from my queue
sorry for terrible english... I'm happy if you can understand my english. lol

[General]

1. set combo colour?
2. uncheck Enable countdown

[Star]

1. 00:38:426 (1,2,3,4) - Not here! delete 00:38:722 (3) - 00:38:870 (4) - and add a note 00:38:279 - here doesn't play good at all though
2. 01:07:376 (3,1) - It's too close. stack or ctrl+g? nah, if you read correctly this shouldn't be a problem at all in all honesty
3. 01:12:400 (2) - Is there a special reason to prev 2.55x next 1.41x? Let's see the distance of the others. 01:08:558 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - almost used 1.2x distance. and There is no reason at all to emphasize IMO. If you are broadened the distance, I think must be 01:13:287 (5) - here! changed a few things around here
4. 01:08:558 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 1.2x 01:12:400 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - 1.4x? we have no reason to do so! yeah it was because of the first (1) and (2)
5. 02:27:179 (3,4) - why did you stack it! It interferes with a sense of excitement! because there's no need to rush things out !
6. 03:36:341 (3,4) - ^ ^
7. 02:49:051 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - It's personal recommendation...(?) dahdyawgdhywagdyad I don't know how to copy the code so... 02:49:051 (6) - x404 y68 02:49:198 (7) - x376 y256 02:49:346 (1) - x504 y76 02:49:494 (2) - x312 y100 02:49:642 (3) - x508 y232 02:49:790 (4) - x388 y24 02:49:937 (5) - x296 y272 if you don't mind of course, try it! tried but i don't really like how 6 and 4 overlaps so i'll keep what i already have, thanks for putting time into this tho!
8. 04:42:548 (1,1,2) - ummm.... Is this not strange? yeah indeed this is the only time i used this kind of pattern in the map. However it fits good, but if it gets mentionned in mods too much i'll simply remove it or change the pattern a bit

that's all from me!
overall is good. I love this map.
GL with this!

Kalibe wrote:

nice song

General*

* Found unused .wav files:
- normal-hitclap.wav Thanks, forgot about them
* Wave hitsounds with possible delay > 5ms:
normal-hitclap.wav
soft-hitclap.wav not taking any decisions yet
* 03:36:046 (2) - Unsnapped slider fixed stuff
[Star]

- 00:07:378 (1,2) - 00:10:807 (1,2) - 00:14:235 (1,2) - 00:21:521 (3,1) - Swap NCs why? mapping the sentences here doesn't let me do that why would i put a nc on the 2nd syllab
- 00:18:092 (6) - 00:24:949 (4) - NC // also idk for what reason you nc'ed 00:18:949 (1,1) - 00:20:664 (1) - :S fixed stuff
- 00:43:747 (4) - Finish sounds really noisy duh.. how about just using whistle instead? right
- 00:49:568 (8,1) - You should space them like u did with 00:49:494 (7,8) - Now looks really weird imo. dont really get it, ill leave it as it is
- 01:03:238 (5,1) - Fix stack it is already fixed?
- How about nc'ing those sliders 01:05:750 (3,5) - ? Visually will looks better as a 1/4s pattern tho. changed NCs but not the way you told me to though, well not exactly!
- 01:08:558 (1) - Replace Whistle with a Finish, i hear more finish sounds. yep
- 01:10:331 (2) - Ctrl G to emphasis snare sound? looks cool
- 01:16:834 (5) - 01:19:198 (5) - 01:22:745 (6) - Add NCs?
- 01:23:632 (1,3) - Swap NC. yes
* 01:29:543 (8) - Slider with curves like this feels reallly strange to play, cuz transision between 01:29:395 (7,8) - is just awkward, also im not fan of really curved sliders. Preferable to change~ no because i feel like the end of the phrase sounds the way the slider is designed.
- 01:32:203 (1) - How about changing slider points to like this? http://puu.sh/qpzhD/98d574f95c.jpg wow no, i don't really like it :/
- 01:36:341 (1) - Like before, i hear more crashes sounds, so replace whistle with finish. yes
- 01:38:115 (1,2) - Prefer to Ctrl G those circles cuz (1) fit well with vocal, so it will be nice to emphasis with bigger spacing than (2) it already looks good enough to me
- 01:43:435 (1) - Remove NC cause u didn't add it 01:42:253 (3) - here. yes
- 01:49:568 (5) - Overmapped a bit, i dunno why u did this, for vocal it's a weird option and i really don't hear any tick on that blue one. i honestly think it is working absolutely fine because i wanted to make the "aaa" lasting through a note stream
- 01:54:519 (5,1) - 02:00:282 (1,2) - Swap NCs. yes
- 02:14:026 (1) - Unnessesary NC, delete that please. yes
- 02:14:765 (1) - Also like before -> 01:32:203 (1) - i want to get something similar. no, same reason as above
* 02:49:051 (6,7) - Why this spacing is bigger than 02:49:198 (7,1) - when 02:49:198 (7,1) - is much louder than 02:49:051 (6,7) - ? Kinda bug me spacing emphasis here :S not really, the actual notes starts at the (1) which is why the spacing is about to change there
* 02:53:927 (1,2) - I think this will be makes confusion on players, feels unclimatic a bit... how about this instead? http://puu.sh/qpA23/39250f7ee8.jpg looks nice
- 02:55:996 (6) - Add also Finish on that circle. yes
- 03:07:376 (1) - Like in 01:08:558 (1) - yes
- 03:12:992 (1) - Really minor, but flows better if you move that slider a bit to down :3 why? i dont really feel like its the case
- 03:23:632 (3,5) - Rip blanket structure. lol
- 03:39:001 (9,10) - The flow with transison are just lack itself, prefer to change slider direction. why? it sounds absolutely the way it should be here imo
- 03:52:597 (1) - For what reason NC? It's just a continuation previous 1/4s repeater 03:52:302 (1) - so nc isn't nessesary tho. ok
- Ok, i will stop here. Overall it's not bad, but needs many improvments to go. Good luck!

Xenok wrote:

Petit mod des familles:

00:10:807 (1) - Pourquoi pas placer la note à la fin de 00:09:949 (5) - , comme ça, ça fait un petit break dans la musique, et tu stop le curseur en même temps, ça à l'air plus naturel (il faudra surement changer la pos/l'angle de 00:11:235 (2) - si t'es d'accord avec ce point) j'ai changé un peu c'est swag
00:46:702 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - le spacing entre ces objets ne fait que de changer en mode un peu random, essaie de garder un spacing semblable ou qui augmente graduellement le spacing entre les sliderstart est plutôt consistent et c'est sur ça que je veux insister évidemment le spacing des sliderends varie bcp ^^
00:49:051 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - je pense que le 5 ne devrait déjà plus être en ligne droite, comme ça, ça fait bien 4-4 et pas 5-3 (si tu vois ce que je veux dire) oui bonne remarque j'ai changé
00:59:100 (1) - ce slider suit pas le flow du jump avant, ou on doit tourner dans le sens horaire et là on doit faire une ligne droite chelou pour toucher ce slider, genre on peut particulièrement flow le jump avant et on doit snap la fin de ce jump, c'est perturbant je vois pas ce qui est frustrant dans ce jump, en vérité, c'est justement pour casser cette fluidité dans le jump pour bien indiquer qu'on repart sur qqchose de nouveau
faire commencer 01:07:671 (1) - à 01:07:376 (3) - ? (le même argument que le premier)
01:29:100 (4,5,6) - je sais pas si l'overlap est voulu ou il serait mieux de le stack sur 01:28:361 (4) - c'est voulu
01:36:785 (4) - la note est super bien placée pour le flow mais elle overlap chelou entre le 1 et le 3, mais si tu le stack le flow est moins bien, donc je sais pas trop je préfère garder comme ça
01:50:676 (6) - placer la note en x:85 y:179 pour qu'elle soit au centre de 01:51:120 (1) - ? oui mci
02:05:159 (6) - est pas exactement stackée sur 02:04:125 (1) - merci
02:05:307 - peut-être mettre 70% volume à cette section pour faire le transit entre le refrain et le couplet (je trouve que ça sonne pas assez puissant à 60%) oui c'est pertinent, je garde
02:11:218 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ce jump est un peu overspaced bon t'as raison, mais pour le moment j'aime bien, si on me le mentionne encore plusieurs fois je changerais xD
02:24:223 (1) - new combo pour marquer la fin de la mesure et le break
02:44:913 (5,6) - pourquoi pas enlever les claps ici, et 02:45:208 (7,8) - enlever les claps ici, puis mettre en hitsound drums? ça marque bien la dessente des toms en batterie (le truc chelou que fait le batteur en fond) oui ça sonne mieux en effet
02:45:504 (1) - hitsound finish au début du slider? on l'entends dans la musique et ça marque le début de la mesure yes
02:49:346 (1,2,3,4,5) - un peu overspaced je trouve j'ai nerf
03:35:750 - le premier refrain était à 80% volume et lui à 60% y
03:39:149 (10) - je ferais rotater le slider pour qu'il suive le flow du jump, comme ça: http://puu.sh/qPeho/4bff4c5cb7.jpg yes
03:46:686 (8) - ce slider est trop collé à 03:46:391 (7) - surtout dans un moment intense comme ça, ça break un peu le flow j'ai boosté
04:20:528 (1,2,3,4,5) - j'aurais vu ce passage beaucoup plus spaced j'ai buff
04:28:952 - 80% volume idem y
04:47:868 (3) - new combo car début de mesure et changement de pattern dans la musique? oui
04:47:868 - j'aurais d'ailleur essayé de follow la voix en même temps que les drums dans cette part, 04:49:937 - ici par exemple, y'a un son important de la voix mais c'est pas mappé :c oui mais en vrai c'était pas le but, j'ai cependant rajouté la note à l'emplacement ou tu as mis un exemple

Voilà, la map est bien alors j'ai cherché un moment pour bien trouver les trucs c: