Rizen wrote:

@Shiratoi, don't forget to open the "General (Issues present!)" box, there are metadata and hitsound issues listed there

ninfia wrote:

hey there! i'm relatively new to modding, so i'm trying to take the liberty on myself by giving out free to mods to further improve my mapping abilities. you can take the suggestions i make with either a grain of salt or take 'em to heart; i don't care! but i hope at least one of my suggestions eventually help you carry out ranking this mapset.

00:13:555 (2,1,2) - i'd say work on the aesthetics a little bit more here. i can see you're attempting to go for a blanket, but there are some visible imperfections with what you're attempting. that's only an aesthetic flaw though, everything in terms of technicality is fine!

00:22:930 (1) - very pretty!

00:37:930 (1) - i'd say to distance this note a little bit further away from the previous note. pay careful attention to the music, there's a pretty large spectrum of emphasis on this red tick without any notable formations of spacing to back it up. maybe you can add something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9812037
to emphasize piano note here. mm i think the little flow change is fine especially for such a calm part

00:39:805 (3) - the same here! ~

00:40:930 (1) - and same here? i guess there's a theme here. i'll stop linking these particular issues in spacing since it's totally up to your discrepancy how you want to interpolate the rhythm. ~

00:46:930 (4,1) - blanket issues

00:49:180 (1,2,3) - some spacing issues - the third slider should be further away than the distance between note 1 and 2.

01:18:805 (1) - rotate this slider 1 or 2 degrees either direction.

02:16:930 (1) - this note should be a little further away to emphasize the music. same reason

with the logic that there's a triple here: 02:36:617 (4,5,1), then there should also be triples here: 02:40:742 (4,1), 02:43:742 (4,1), 02:45:430 (5,1), 02:48:617 (7,1), 02:51:617 (7,1), 02:54:617 (6,1), 02:57:430 (6,1), 02:58:555 (3,1). it'd take a bit of work, but triples can add an almost exponential amount of much needed emphasis on a vital piece of the music. it's up to you though! kinda want to differentiate between kiais but ill see for more opinions~

03:06:805 (1) - add clap hitsound

03:24:805 (1,2) - work on blankets here

03:36:805 (1) - this is just a suggestion but if you want this note to stand out more, (given it's a different combo color), try changing up the flow just a little bit here and adding something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9812169. up to you though! adjusted

04:03:055 (4,5,6,7) - this feels a little weird since this is the only instance of a pattern like this in the map. eh i think its better like this for vocals

04:20:305 (1,2) - this should just be one slider drum beat

i see no issues with the ending segment.

overall, the map is pretty good! good luck getting it ranked~

1. 00:30:805 (1,1) - It would be more representative of the song, if you place the slider head of this slider: 00:31:367 (1) - on this circle 00:30:805 (1) - cause the piano sound and the voice are both strong, and match well together.
   
   
2. 00:40:367 (4,5) - Try to CTRL+G those two objects, since the sound here: 00:40:742 - is pretty strong and really deserve to be clickable. Also, by making this, you'll change the gameplay of this part to make it more smooth, and less dense in terms of click for the player.
   
   
3. 00:54:805 (4) - This slider should be changed into something different, cause that's not a good idea to make this sound 00:55:180 - unclickable. Why? Cause there is a strong vocal here (that is why you mostly focus for your rhythm choice), and also a string sound. That's quite unfortunate to let this beat unclickable in my opinion. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
4. 01:12:055 (1,2) - Considering that those two beats are pretty strong, and that they're starting the new kiai, why not making them more spaced? The same things apply to this 02:36:055 (1,2) - since they're both covering the same sound.
   
   
5. 01:35:117 (1) - Ending a spinner like you did here sounds not really good in my opinion. You based your spinner on the voice of the singer, so you should end it when the voice is ending, and it ends here 01:36:430 - // It will also allow you to make this beat 01:36:805 - clickable, things that will improve the gameplay of this part.
   
   
6. 02:06:055 (4) - Don't you think that it would be better to add an NC out there? Cause the voice is changing a lot here, so it's not really appropriate to keep it in the same combo with the previous part.
   
   
7. 02:59:867 (2) - I don't understand why you gave such spacing on a circle that is placed on a sound that is barely audible. It's better to give more attention on a beat that is strong like this 03:00:055 (3) - instead of a beat placed on a blue tick that is almost inaudible. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
8. 03:05:305 (1) - Map this slider with two circles instead, like those previous patterns, since they're all based on the same sound.
   
   
9. 03:23:305 (1,2,3) - It particularly disturbed me while playing it, cause since they all use the same combo color, it's difficult to notice if the 03:23:867 (3) - is before 03:23:680 (2) - or after. So I think you should start the NC here 03:23:680 (1) - instead, to avoid misleading problems.
   
   
10. 03:24:805 (1) - I really enjoy this sparkle sound, and it's a nice hitsound selection, but would you like to reduce a bit the sound of the hitsound? My only issue here is that it's still pretty loud, and it can be pretty distabilizing if this cover others hitsounds. I tried to put it at 35% and it's pretty nice. It goes same for this hitsound 04:08:305 - !
    
    
11. 03:56:680 - Since there is another instruments that play in the background, you can't map it the same way as this 03:42:805 (1) -, otherwise it would "harm" the emphasis of the song in terms of density. That's why you can't leave this 03:56:680 - empty while there is quite a string sound here that deserves to be mapped.
    
    
12. 04:30:430 (1,2) - The velocity of those sliders out there are strongly different, so to avoid bothering the player, I highly suggest you to use two different NC here, and starting the combo here 04:31:930 - instead of here 04:32:305 - since the vocals come back on the first 1/4 slider, so that would be weird to keep it teamed with a slider that has a different sound.

Pachiru wrote:

Here is my mod, I'll do my best to help you!

Sounds like you're having two hitsounds with a +5ms delay. Those hitsounds are "soft-hitfinish7.wav" & "soft-hitwhistle9.wav". To be sure, please recheck those hitsounds, it's important! took a look at it in audacity and it seemed fine but ill double check it with someone to make sure https://puu.sh/yNSqD/2fc2f4860e.png

1. 00:30:805 (1,1) - It would be more representative of the song, if you place the slider head of this slider: 00:31:367 (1) - on this circle 00:30:805 (1) - cause the piano sound and the voice are both strong, and match well together. flipped this slider as well 00:28:930 (5) -
   
   
2. 00:40:367 (4,5) - Try to CTRL+G those two objects, since the sound here: 00:40:742 - is pretty strong and really deserve to be clickable. Also, by making this, you'll change the gameplay of this part to make it more smooth, and less dense in terms of click for the player. 00:40:555 - mm i want to prioritize this beat more making claps clickable
   
   
3. 00:54:805 (4) - This slider should be changed into something different, cause that's not a good idea to make this sound 00:55:180 - unclickable. Why? Cause there is a strong vocal here (that is why you mostly focus for your rhythm choice), and also a string sound. That's quite unfortunate to let this beat unclickable in my opinion. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
4. 01:12:055 (1,2) - Considering that those two beats are pretty strong, and that they're starting the new kiai, why not making them more spaced? The same things apply to this 02:36:055 (1,2) - since they're both covering the same sound. i want the players to build momentum by going into small spacing to emphasize the kiai even more
   
   
5. 01:35:117 (1) - Ending a spinner like you did here sounds not really good in my opinion. You based your spinner on the voice of the singer, so you should end it when the voice is ending, and it ends here 01:36:430 - // It will also allow you to make this beat 01:36:805 - clickable, things that will improve the gameplay of this part.
   
   
6. 02:06:055 (4) - Don't you think that it would be better to add an NC out there? Cause the voice is changing a lot here, so it's not really appropriate to keep it in the same combo with the previous part.
   
   
7. 02:59:867 (2) - I don't understand why you gave such spacing on a circle that is placed on a sound that is barely audible. It's better to give more attention on a beat that is strong like this 03:00:055 (3) - instead of a beat placed on a blue tick that is almost inaudible. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
8. 03:05:305 (1) - Map this slider with two circles instead, like those previous patterns, since they're all based on the same sound.
   
   
9. 03:23:305 (1,2,3) - It particularly disturbed me while playing it, cause since they all use the same combo color, it's difficult to notice if the 03:23:867 (3) - is before 03:23:680 (2) - or after. So I think you should start the NC here 03:23:680 (1) - instead, to avoid misleading problems.
   
   
10. 03:56:680 - Since there is another instruments that play in the background, you can't map it the same way as this 03:42:805 (1) -, otherwise it would "harm" the emphasis of the song in terms of density. That's why you can't leave this 03:56:680 - empty while there is quite a string sound here that deserves to be mapped.
    
    
11. 04:30:430 (1,2) - The velocity of those sliders out there are strongly different, so to avoid bothering the player, I highly suggest you to use two different NC here, and starting the combo here 04:31:930 - instead of here 04:32:305 - since the vocals come back on the first 1/4 slider, so that would be weird to keep it teamed with a slider that has a different sound.

Okay so I'm done with the mod, now let me tell you that the map is very nice, the way how you played with the sliders and stacks is very nice. You really did good with your ideas on this rework! I'm glad to see how it improved! Don't give up!

1. 03:24:805 (1) - I really enjoy this sparkle sound, and it's a nice hitsound selection, but would you like to reduce a bit the sound of the hitsound? My only issue here is that it's still pretty loud, and it can be pretty distabilizing if this cover others hitsounds. I tried to put it at 35% and it's pretty nice. It goes same for this hitsound 04:08:305 - !

Bibbity Bill wrote:

here's the mod you asked for

[Connection]
01:29:492 (2) - personally, i feel the spacing is a bit too big and i would make it 1.5x, if you don't want to change it you could atleast make it a bit more even on the spacing
01:48:430 (5,1) - why no triple here or a 1/6th repeat slider dont want to complex the rhythm
02:12:805 (1) - same as earlier, why ignore the guitar and not emphasize it atleast in some way ~
03:00:055 (3) - why not rotate this at a bit sharper angle or line up with 4
03:36:617 (6,1) - could make this a triple
03:36:992 (1) - why the whistle? for the piano im assuming but idk
03:50:680 - why not a note or slider or something to emphasize this sound? i want the rhythm to be simple in this calm section
03:55:555 (3) - also why not make this into a 1/6 repeat or a triple ~
04:00:430 (4) - why not rotate this a bit so you can make a triangle out of 03:59:680 (2,3) - blanket & overlaps
04:01:555 (3) - same as earlier, could 1/6 slider or triple ~

hopefully it was helpful and not too nitpicky and opinionated, good luck on ranking

Time Capsule wrote:

want me to check?

Chekito wrote:

sorry but I wont use formating
m4m

00:00:430 - At the very beginning you are forced (by the editor) to put NC on the first slider, maybe you could add it on the next similar sliders (As 00:03:430 (4) - 00:06:430 (4) - 00:09:430 (4) - ) to keep the consistency
00:12:430 (2,3) - Have you tried doing Ctrl+G on this? It'd play better imo 1/2 would be harder to read imo
00:16:930 (1) - Please your blankets make me feel like i'm watching at Mir's mapsets kya
00:22:930 (1) - yeah i love u too thanks mr.mirai
00:36:055 (2) - Stack with 00:34:367 (2) - ? (or stack the slider to the circle better)
01:01:930 (4) - This would play better as a slider imo, it feels like the space between this and the next note doesn't really fit the feeling of "The song is becoming intense!"
01:09:805 - For this small part you could do something like this http://puu.sh/yPsbu/37b91c7ade.osu (sorry i had to do it like this because i can't really explain it). Don't mind the placements, but I wanted to show you that you could do a jump at the first two circles then stack the third circle at the end of the first jump and repeat the process. It would really fit the feeling of the song in that moment and I think you will also agree that
01:13:742 (4) - You could move this behind the followpoint, because right now, the placement of that circle reflects the position of the next note (whose is suposed to be below 01:13:555 (3) - ) So you're not really reflecting it correctly imo, so you could just move it to x444 y:130 ... at least give it a try yea i get what youre saying but i kind of want the quieter parts to play horizontally while the louder drums play vertically plus i like the stacks with the sliders and such..
01:34:555 (3) - you could make this straight lol it feels kinda weird while playing since its going to nowhere nope want to keep it parallel to 01:12:805 (1) -
01:42:055 (4) - I know this is stacked with a previous circle, but the spacing is way bigger than the previous similar one 01:38:680 (3,4) - (this is 2,85x spacing and the previous is 2,65x) i think its fine since its not really that noticeable in game
01:43:555 (3) - Yes, after a lot of thinking and testing, I concluded that doing Ctrl+J on this slider would fit a lot better than the current one, because it will fit both flows (01:43:930 (1) - as a flow break and 01:43:367 (2) - as a fluid flow) no i want to break the flow here to emphasize the drum like i did here 01:44:680 (3) -
01:45:805 (1,2) - I mean it's the slowest and calmest part that i've heard on the song, and you used way TOO MUCH MORE spacing than the other parts (even considering the difference of time between notes it's still too high)
It just doesn't make sense at all
01:52:367 (2,3) - Normal spacing vs 01:57:430 (5,6) - Big spacing on similar parts lol why... you also used a way lower spacing on the same similar part 02:03:430 (5,6) -
02:33:805 - same than before nah variety
02:48:055 (4) - NC for vocals and emphasis? unexpected big jump lol
02:55:555 (3) - woahh try doing Ctrl+G on this, I mean you lose a bit of spacing but it plays hella good LOL gotta keep da emphasis
02:58:930 (1) - pls add a curve at the end of this slider, I assure you that It will be a lot better b-but 02:57:805 (1) -
03:03:430 - Undermapped lol why only focusing on violin here
03:06:430 (2) - This feels like a single circle more than a slider yea
03:09:430 - BabyRage noo
03:36:055 (3,4,5,6) - Why did you map it 1/4? That's clearly 1/3 lol u caught me
03:39:805 - Tell me im not the only hearing a non-hitsounded whistle here piano ig
04:03:242 (5) - NC for emphasis would difference both patterns a lot and that would look better
last kiai is weird to play but it looks ok
04:38:680 - You should add small kiais (like 1 sec kiais) on specific parts of this whole section since it has the feeling and intensity of a kiai, but you can't put a whole kiai on this cuz that would be a lot. Then you could just use 1 sec kiais, to represent the most intense parts of this section (just in case you don't know but you can give it the brightness and stars effect from a kiai just with 1 second) dont wanaaaaa
05:09:430 (1,2,3) - I don't really think these three are from the same rhythm, I mean, they doesn't really seem to be fitting being all in the same pattern and position vocals


done, sorry for the wall, but most of them are shitty suggestions

1. I think 'Bond' would be a more impactful name lol
2. 00:10:930 (1) - Tbh this looks kinda ugly, maybe make a less snaky curve
3. For these kind of sliders that end on nothing, it'd be better if you silence their ends off with 5% vol.
4. 01:06:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The build-up is pretty weak here, try to use succesively increased spacing or slider velocity here for a much better effect.
   The same goes for 02:30:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 04:03:805 (1,2,3) -
5. 01:46:555 (2) - Delete the finisher on the first note.
6. 01:48:430 (2) - Actually 1/4 slider would be better here for the bass.
7. 03:03:430 - Would be better to put a 1/4 slider in here too to bring some variety into this section. Then do the same at 03:09:430 - for consistency.
8. 03:21:617 (5,1) - That's a pretty weak jump, would increase it.
9. 03:36:055 (3) - NC for 1/6 rhythms.
10. 03:42:055 (1,2) - 03:45:055 (4,5) - 03:48:055 (4,5) - 03:51:055 (4,5) - Instead of 1/4 sliders that unnecessarily increase note density here and are overmapped due to sliderends, it'd be better if you switch these off with 1/2 sliders.
11. 03:54:430 (5) - Delete finisher on this start.
12. 04:20:305 (1,2) - This antijump feels pretty out of place because a) it can be easily misread as 1/4 and b) it doesn't occur anywhere else in the map, making it a strange single case. Something like this works well:
    https://puu.sh/yX5n4/d7f8c14615.jpg
13. 04:36:430 (3) - That finisher is a bit premature, better delete it and put it on the next spinner instead.
14. 05:13:554 (4,5,6) - First off, there are no 1/8 beats that the 5-slider is following. Second, you could easily make this more special with 1/6 beats that are present in the background.
15. Consider making your combos longer by setting your NCs after each measure (4 white ticks) instead of how you do it right now - it's kinda spammy.

Pho wrote:

Yo, M4M from my queue.

[Connection]

1. I think 'Bond' would be a more impactful name lol nah i like it uwu
2. 00:10:930 (1) - Tbh this looks kinda ugly, maybe make a less snaky curve
3. 01:06:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The build-up is pretty weak here, try to use succesively increased spacing or slider velocity here for a much better effect.
   The same goes for 02:30:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 04:03:805 (1,2,3) -
4. 01:48:430 (2) - Actually 1/4 slider would be better here for the bass.
5. 03:03:430 - Would be better to put a 1/4 slider in here too to bring some variety into this section. Then do the same at 03:09:430 - for consistency. i think its better like this to emphasize the violin more
6. 03:21:617 (5,1) - That's a pretty weak jump, would increase it.
7. 03:36:055 (3) - NC for 1/6 rhythms.
8. 03:42:055 (1,2) - 03:45:055 (4,5) - 03:48:055 (4,5) - 03:51:055 (4,5) - Instead of 1/4 sliders that unnecessarily increase note density here and are overmapped due to sliderends, it'd be better if you switch these off with 1/2 sliders. i want to keep it like this to differentiate between sliders like this 03:42:805 (1,2) - cuz of different vocals
9. 04:20:305 (1,2) - This antijump feels pretty out of place because a) it can be easily misread as 1/4 and b) it doesn't occur anywhere else in the map, making it a strange single case. Something like this works well:
   https://puu.sh/yX5n4/d7f8c14615.jpg
10. 05:13:554 (4,5,6) - First off, there are no 1/8 beats that the 5-slider is following. Second, you could easily make this more special with 1/6 beats that are present in the background.
11. Consider making your combos longer by setting your NCs after each measure (4 white ticks) instead of how you do it right now - it's kinda spammy. maybe i just dont like seeing large numbers haha but ill see!

Not much to say, the map is pretty simple. Highlighting the more special parts of the song better would be cool, right now you seem to be reserved in that regard. need to def improve on this
It also looks a bit chaotic at times, but this should be ready for rank. GL

Time Capsule wrote:

beyond the boundaries for diffname? /slapped
Sry for the delay,ill drop the mod here within today
But sure broken mod af lol

Don't really need much reason so ill just make it short tyvm
00:40:367 (2,3) - ctr+g repetation of flow make 00:40:930 (1) - get slight bigger impact to vocal emph i want to follow drums ><
00:48:055 - this point actually worth an angle https://puu.sh/yXx7X/9636e5e2a4.png (ye ugly slider there for ex) naah
02:03:055 (4) - due gap isnt it better to stak at 02:03:617 (6) - instead?
02:11:680 - wow undermapping shiras, if it was me i would make 02:12:055 - clickable want there to be a pause here hehe
03:28:554 (3) - x357 y178 i like my flow better
03:30:805 - love this personally
04:03:430 (2,3) - ctr+g for varitynope emphasizing each vocals here & there isnt really a change in it so dont want to increase spacing
04:09:242 (4) - quite weird tbh how you manage to make the kiai section solidly consistant pattern, make it more "free" to aim by use 02:48:242 (2,3,4) - kind of pattern could be an alternate tho. like simply move 04:09:242 (4) - to x113 y344 or so
04:15:242 (4) - with (2) instead nah its been consistent with the rest of my kiais (04:19:555 - )
04:20:305 (1,2) - meh for me
04:35:305 (1,2,3) - makr this as tringular for aesthic https://puu.sh/yXxnN/44cf85368e.png adjusted
04:54:055 (3) - upcureve instead? ctr+j
05:05:117 (6) - stack at slider tail if me slider tail 2 smoll
05:13:555 - if you want undermap it use 1/3 https://puu.sh/yXxtw/2e285d7b23.png check ^^

thats from me, kds not neccesarily needed, still solid after year tho

1. For these kind of sliders that end on nothing, it'd be better if you silence their ends off with 5% vol.
2. 01:46:555 (2) - Delete the finisher on the first note.
3. 03:54:430 (5) - Delete finisher on this start.
4. 04:36:430 (3) - That finisher is a bit premature, better delete it and put it on the next spinner instead.

Yamicchi wrote:

Another mod because I want this ranked asap
[Overall]
There are some sections where you overused the NC while the song doesn't support that much NC, for example the beginning sections, which 00:01:930 (1) - 00:04:930 (1) - 00:07:930 (1) - NC can be removed. Having too much NC makes the section incoherent.
On second thought I think you should check NC throughout the whole map tho xd
[Composing]
00:09:805 (1,1) - Idk bout you but the flow here is really uncomfy, as it creates a back and forth flow while imo it should better be something roundabout. I'd ctrl+g the second slider, it flows smoother I think.
00:12:805 - it's not something too hard but the 1/4 and 1/2 spacing in this section (until the heart shape slider) is really confusing. I see you used larger spacing for 1/4 to emphasize strong beats, but that way the spacing is pretty much similar to 1/2 spacing already. I would suggest increasing 1/2 spacings such as 00:12:805 (1,2,1) - 00:15:805 (1,2,1) - 00:18:805 (1,2) - more, or stacking them, your choice. iunno man i dont think its that hard to read but we'll see
00:54:805 (1,2,3) - visually confused spacing. Either move (2) closer to (1) or further from (3) would work.
01:09:805 (1,2) - 01:10:930 (1,2) - a bit lack of spacing emphasis if you wanna show the difference between these with 01:10:367 (1,2) - 01:11:492 (1,2) - . How about you increase the spacing a bit? i like the stacks tho
01:12:055 (1,2,3) - I'd be sad if you're not making these harder, as they're buildup for the kiai incoming, it should be a jump or something like that, I mean much bigger spacing. Also the overlap between 1,3 is really weird although you used it throughout the whole map xd nah i want to really contrast the kiai between this
01:33:805 (1,2,3,4) - not sure if this matches your mapping style but I think your current flow is quite harsh so I changed it a bit. Depends on you to fix or keep it. nah i use this flow a lot ;c
02:03:055 (4,5) - ok this is the first time I see this spacing for 1/2 gap xd why did you make this?
02:35:117 (2,2) - why are these tilt so much to the right compare to 02:34:930 (1,1) - lmao
03:00:805 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this is so comfortable to play aaaaaaaa noooooooo
04:30:430 (1) - blanket ewww
04:32:867 (4,1) - wish these were parallel instead of just ctrl+j tho nop

Welp I thought I found more than just this.

As a remap, feel free to give me kudos or not :p

R a n k t h i s f a s t

Naotoshi wrote:

[c]
00:01:930 (1) - tilted already

00:16:930 (1,2) - very tilted wo ai blankets

00:34:367 (2) - some way of acknowledging that the piano is sharper / shorter would be nice ctrl+g dunno if that helped

01:16:367 (2,3,4) - idk.. these are weird. to me the most obvious emphasis is in the vocals where the white tick is not there. i think mapping the white tick really takes away from the "feel" of the vocals by switching to a drum in the middle of it. maybe 1/4 slider on those blue ticks would be better? meh dont really get it since they play fine to me but lemmeee ask around

01:25:367 (2,3) - especially here like the vocal has a strong emotional peak at the blue tick i guess but it is not that important in gameplay cuz theres just a slider right after it...

01:24:242 (5,6,7,1) - other thing is like, after these, the rest of the kiai feels really underspaced. cuz these are so intense.. you could just space out the kiai patterns a bit more imo, it'd feel better iunno i think its already quite different from the non kiais

01:59:305 (2,3,4,5) - lame not lame

03:00:055 (3) - very lame


04:18:805 (1,2,3) - come on theres like 2 interesting drum rhythms in the entire song and you simplify them dont really want to use too much 1/6 when the song is mostly 1/4

05:13:555 (4,5) - a

anyway i think the core issue is that you have these giant filler jumps on basically nothing and then the super loud emotional vocals have really tiny spacing so the map doesnt feel like it represents the song that well to me... if you emphasized the vocals a bit more it would be a lot better i guess

[]
other stuff
01:31:555 (3,1) - this one feels especially lame cuz theres a strong downward movement from 3, since there isnt a direction change to get to 1 or anything it feels pretty unemphasized in gameplay

01:42:430 (5,6,1) - u should totally map the background violin 1/3 i <3 simplifying rhythm

02:06:055 (1,2,3) - i feel like this should definitely be 2 sliders, it matches the vocal really well but i like it like this

02:11:305 (1,2) - i think this rhythm works better: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10023848 in order to show the 1/4 plucking instrument

03:18:805 (1,2) - this one is kind of misleading cuz there is a pretty obvious sound on the blue tick, i recomment filling it in

03:24:055 (3,4) - maybe make the claps stand out somehow? plain back and forths is kind of lame i think this is the best way to show the crescendo

03:30:617 (5) - fill in a triple here? nah

03:42:055 (1,2) - personally i think circles would work better, the overmapped slider ends kind of stick out since theres no supporting back line at all

05:22:180 (3,4,5) - i dont really get this rhythm variation, slider on 3 and then circles where 6 is fits quite a bit better instead theres like that guitar thing in the bg im trying to emphasize

Nevo wrote:

owo what's this?

00:31:367 (2) - stack
00:49:930 (1) - you could prob reduce spacing to this so its consistent with 00:52:930 (1) - and 00:55:930 (1) - since the vocals are pretty similar
01:11:492 (1) - you could position this in-between 01:10:930 (1,2) - so its like the same thing you did with 01:09:805 (1,2,1,2,1) - its all stacked on slider heads so i dont rlly get it ;
01:46:930 (1) - maybe adjust this so it doesnt go back on itself idk maybe jsut put the white node ahead of the red anchor so maybe like https://puu.sh/zdUru/7a520e1880.png
03:03:805 (1,2,1,2) - maybe make this kinda how you did 03:00:805 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - since its like the same thing
03:25:930 (1) - maybe stack with 03:25:555 (3) - so its kinda like 03:23:305 (5,1) -
03:36:055 (1,2,3,4) - you could prob stack the circles to the sliderheads since thats kinda how you did the other 1/8th triple thingies before like at 02:36:617 (4,5,1) -
04:19:930 (5) - could prob use more spacing here the spacing of these circles doesnt really feel like it reflects the change in intensity of her voice patternzzz
04:20:305 (1) - could also be a slider as i think it would reflect the vocal a little better also you like never started a slider on blue ticks before this xd nah drum beat here 04:20:492 - is def more prominent than vocals

Nevo wrote:

the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell

Nevo wrote:

the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell

after some stuffs we good to go!

Bubbled!

Pachiru wrote:

holy shit nevo, you're doing the right thing!!!

Nevo wrote:

:3c: anime
Rebubbled

1. the end of these specific sliders 00:10:930 (1) and 01:46:930 (1) and 04:30:430 (1)
2. the ends of these sliders these sections 01:06:805 and 04:03:805
3. this spinner ends 03:39:898 (1) and 05:26:398 (1)

Kisses wrote:

soft-sliderslide26.wav is unused

Kisses wrote:

soft-sliderslide26.wav is unused

The times you use S:C26 sampleset are

1. the end of these specific sliders 00:10:930 (1) and 01:46:930 (1) and 04:30:430 (1)
2. the ends of these sliders these sections 01:06:805 and 04:03:805
3. this spinner ends 03:39:898 (1) and 05:26:398 (1)

Because none of these timing points actually use pass through slider bodies the sliderslide hitsound isn't needed.

Also something to point out is that the end of 04:30:430 (1) is the only object that doesn't have 5% volume with the S:C26 sampleset. It has 55% volume instead, so I assume this was a mistake where you added an extra 5..?

FoxyGrandpa wrote:

Nevo wrote:

the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell

Nevo wrote:

It's your local pp mapper.

Pretty sure I can rebubble now C:

Rebubbled

Battle wrote:

00:13:930 (1,2,3) - 2 has more emphasis than 3 since the movement to 2 is much more sharp than for 3 + the 1/2 delay for 3, u can just ctrl + g (2,3) tbh to fix this (remember to fix hs if u do)
00:21:430 (4,5,1,2,3) - tbh this bugs me just because the spacing for 00:20:680 (2,3,4) - was fairly large so it kinda just feels outta place, sure the music is transitioning to the less intense part, but i don't rly feel like using smaller spacing for these is appropriate for w/ the music idk i think i have been spacing 1/4 like this in the beginning :/
02:48:055 (1,2,3,4) - having these both be the same length jump-wise doesn't rly go w/ the music since the vocals increase intensity, so having the first set of jumps be smaller than the next makes more sense
03:21:430 (4,5,1) - and 03:22:180 (2,3,4) - both feel out of place considering that you never really use any concept similar to this, and you're kinda just throwing them in the middle of the map, for the first stuff you never really do linear jumps so they feel out of place and the second stuff you never really do antijumps so they feel out of place as well
05:13:554 (4,5) - spacing here isn't rly intuitive since even in the solo you didn't space the 1/6 out like this and can lead to misreads

could do more things like 03:36:055 (1,2) - in parts where there's 1/6 and it's intense since you kinda just stick to 1/6 repeat sliders for the most part which kinda feel lame to play

aside from that, i don't rly like the whole back and forth patterns like 02:46:367 (2,3,4,1) - since they don't really make sense for the most part since there isn't really something super strong in the music to support the pattern (especially with the amount it's used) so ye remapped all kiais
gl

Kisses wrote:

I think slider shapes like 04:10:555 (4,5) and 01:00:805 (1) and 01:12:805 (1) (mostly the former two) don't really fit the song and that you would be much better off sticking with straight or curved sliders. I also don't think it's too good to use such an extensive arsenal of sliders when the song is of this nature, fairly calm and repetitive throughout. meh i think its fine

03:55:930 (4) - I was really expecting this held vocal to be a slider, like you have it at 03:54:805 (1) . Perhaps a 1/2 or 1/1?

04:02:680 (3,4) - turning these into 1 slider would hl and emphasis the vocals more. atm circle strays away from your vocal rhythm mapping a bit mm i think the drum sound there is too prominent to be a slider end
[]subjective but a mod

- Frontier - wrote:

1366x768 resolution aaaa
i think i can find better resolution of bg

_Meep_ wrote:

:eyes:

_Meep_ wrote:

:eyes: