1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Graveyard
posted
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
posted
INTERWEBS

[Easy]
00:02:846 (2) - Move down 1 pixel and right 1 pixel to blanket BG o/
00:03:620 (1) - End at random spot try at 00:05:556 -
00:33:814 (1,2) - Spacing is rekt here
01:02:459 - Pls slider slider here cuz strongest sound on the slider xD
01:27:233 (3) - Ugli

[INTERNANE]
00:01:201 - missed 1/4 right away but maps 00:02:653 (2,3,4) - this triple SO WEIRD
00:22:201 (6,1) - FUK DIZ
posted

Arphimigon wrote:

INTERWEBS

[Easy]
00:02:846 (2) - Move down 1 pixel and right 1 pixel to blanket BG o/ya
00:03:620 (1) - End at random spot try at 00:05:556 - no! iz noob spinnner
00:33:814 (1,2) - Spacing is rekt here oke fixd
01:02:459 - Pls slider slider here cuz strongest sound on the slider xD ok slidr end cuz ez
01:27:233 (3) - Ugli oke less ugl

[INTERNANE]
00:01:201 - missed 1/4 right away but maps 00:02:653 (2,3,4) - this triple SO WEIRD no
00:22:201 (6,1) - FUK DIZ arphi hl
posted
00:00:911 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - This section is not very aesthetically pleasing because the notes are bunched together unevenly. Spreading this pattern out would make it look better.

00:03:233 (6) - How important is this 6? Moving it closer to the group would improve the visual flow of the section.

00:10:394 (1) - This is an odd jump as the angle of movement doesn't change at all. It feels like an acceleration rather than a jump, which doesn't suit the "ping" note you're emphasising. For example, flipping 00:09:814 (2) - would cause your flow to break causing more of a "ping" feeling. (Don't do this though, RIP ds if you do)

00:13:685 (2) - Similar to above, compare this with 00:14:265 (2) - . Maybe increase the angle change on this note?

00:14:459 (1,1,2) - Uneven spacing makes it look ugly

00:22:685 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - all the way to the end of the streamy section: Could be mapping the melody here! Wasted potential!

00:26:459 (4) - I expected you to emphasise this one but it's not. The other strong beats are all emphasised by placing them at the end of the triplets/quints, but this one is just there.

00:32:653 (2) - slider end what happened to the ping?

00:34:588 (1) - Same comments as above regarding ping emphasis

00:38:459 (3) - ON THE OTHER HAND, this one is such a large downward jump I'm inclined to put this back in the "jump" category. So this ping is well done imo.

00:40:394 (1) - Emphasise this! Especially coming off a large jump, placing such a small distance actually DEEMPHASISES the note, so I'd argue this note is weaker than 2!

00:40:782 (3,5) - ping

00:44:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Again, stream city. I question the choice of using stream city in this song again

00:48:911 (8,9) - I don't understand why you broke the stream here of all places. Why not break it at 00:48:717 (6) - then map the dotted notes here before going back to stream at 00:50:072 (6) - ?

00:56:943 - and 00:57:136 - are pings but are not mapped. I say this is a good place to put a circle and start a slider respectively.

00:58:201 (3) - Not sure why offset this, I'd just stack it as it'll still be emphasised well.

01:00:040 - and 01:00:233 - ^

01:03:136 - and 01:03:330 - ^

01:04:588 - ^

01:04:975 - ?

01:06:233 - ???

(yeah you completely borked the ending. Might as well remap the entire ending lol)
posted

gracefu wrote:

00:00:911 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - This section is not very aesthetically pleasing because the notes are bunched together unevenly. Spreading this pattern out would make it look better.applied

00:03:233 (6) - How important is this 6? Moving it closer to the group would improve the visual flow of the section.applied

00:10:394 (1) - This is an odd jump as the angle of movement doesn't change at all. It feels like an acceleration rather than a jump, which doesn't suit the "ping" note you're emphasising. For example, flipping 00:09:814 (2) - would cause your flow to break causing more of a "ping" feeling. (Don't do this though, RIP ds if you do)applied

00:13:685 (2) - Similar to above, compare this with 00:14:265 (2) - . Maybe increase the angle change on this note?applied

00:14:459 (1,1,2) - Uneven spacing makes it look ugly minor change

00:22:685 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - all the way to the end of the streamy section: Could be mapping the melody here! Wasted potential! variation

00:26:459 (4) - I expected you to emphasise this one but it's not. The other strong beats are all emphasised by placing them at the end of the triplets/quints, but this one is just there. shuffled around

00:32:653 (2) - slider end what happened to the ping? shuffled

00:34:588 (1) - Same comments as above regarding ping emphasis applied

00:38:459 (3) - ON THE OTHER HAND, this one is such a large downward jump I'm inclined to put this back in the "jump" category. So this ping is well done imo.yes!

00:40:394 (1) - Emphasise this! Especially coming off a large jump, placing such a small distance actually DEEMPHASISES the note, so I'd argue this note is weaker than 2! applied

00:40:782 (3,5) - ping applied

00:44:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Again, stream city. I question the choice of using stream city in this song again k

00:48:911 (8,9) - I don't understand why you broke the stream here of all places. Why not break it at 00:48:717 (6) - then map the dotted notes here before going back to stream at 00:50:072 (6) - ? irc and the rest

00:56:943 - and 00:57:136 - are pings but are not mapped. I say this is a good place to put a circle and start a slider respectively.

00:58:201 (3) - Not sure why offset this, I'd just stack it as it'll still be emphasised well.

01:00:040 - and 01:00:233 - ^

01:03:136 - and 01:03:330 - ^

01:04:588 - ^

01:04:975 - ?

01:06:233 - ??? All other stuff IRC :P

](yeah you completely borked the ending. Might as well remap the entire ending lol) pls gracefu
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
posted
up again we'll see..

edit:all diffs wiped
Expcet ez
posted
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.